More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Donius

Bill Donius

Posted: June 7, 2010 04:26 PM

How Will the Oil Spill, Politically? Who Is in Charge?

What's Your Reaction:

Combine tragedy, political opportunists and amnesia of past history; what do you get?... an oil spill that can be spun to tar the Obama Administration. Since we are a country that wants to blame the current presidential administration for all that is right and wrong with the country; it is easy to understand how this process works. This task is easier since we are also a country that is increasingly politically polarized.

Enter President Obama. Is the spill somehow the result of the failure of his administration after seventeen months on the job? It would make things vastly simpler if this was the case, as the country could then direct their anger on him and his administration. This may be psychologically purging, but it is not accurate.

As with many economic trends, legislative changes and priorities typically occur over time. If we want to identify the root cause of what allowed the oil spill to occur in the Gulf of Mexico, we must look to how the spill occurred and the regulatory environment governing conditions for operating oil wells.

It has been documented in the past weeks, BP ignored a number of cautionary signs in their quest to continue drilling, making up lost time and getting profits back on track. The primary cause of the tragedy was a string of poor management decisions at BP.

These decisions were made in a regulatory environment led by former oil industry executive turned U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. After Cheney and Bush were elected they sought input from oil company executives and made many changes to ensure big government would not get in the way of the opportunity for enhancing profits for the oil industry. Wholesale changes were made to defang the Minerals Management Service, the entity designed to regulate the drilling industry.

One of the changes made was eliminating the need for oil rigs to purchase an emergency shut-off cap. At $500,000 this was deemed to be an expensive and unnecessary luxury. The proposed rational was oil platform staff could perform this task, obviating the need for an emergency cap. Turns out, of course, the cap was not a luxury but a necessity for emergency situations. Saved: $500,000, Lost: $14 billion and counting. Lost: employee lives, major damage to the environment, including the precious wetlands ecosystems. Potentially lost: livelihoods of fishermen, other related job losses in the region, ability of fragile wetlands ecosystems to bounce back and god only knows what else.

Can Republicans take this trail of mucky oil floating in the Gulf and legitimately try to blame this crisis on the Obama administration? Can those favoring small government now legitimately claim we need bigger government in order to fix this problem? You can't have it both ways unless you expect the American public to have amnesia. We're not fooled this easily.

Now that the disaster has occurred, it does raise the more difficult problem of who should be in charge of fixing the problem? Since BP caused the problem is it their responsibility to fix it? Are they qualified to fix the problems and stop the flow of oil into the Gulf? If not, who is better qualified? And, whose job is it to decide who is best qualified to fix the problem?

This disaster is shaping up much differently than the financial disaster in which the Treasury Secretary and U.S. Federal Reserve was able to step in with swift, dramatic, decisive actions. Their actions blunted what would have been a far greater financial meltdown.

It appears the Obama administration is appropriately prioritizing the oil spill. In addition, the administration is taking steps to ensure financial remuneration occurs. Next up, action needed to ensure the Minerals Management Service is re-calibrated to properly do its job.

Let's get both political parties to focus on constructive steps to solve the problem and better protect the country from the next disaster.

 

Follow Bill Donius on Twitter: www.twitter.com/wdonius

 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bill Donius
Writer and Community Volunteer
11:22 AM on 06/09/2010
The oil spill is provoking healthy debate and discussion, but we need action to resolve the problem and guard against future problems. How do we get that done? We need a regulatory overhaul of the Minerals Management Service. However, how can that occur In the cuurent highly polarized political environment?

American voters need to become engaged to truly affect change. We must tune in, get educated and become part of the solution. If we spent as much time tuning into important issues as watching American Idol, it would be a start!
10:22 AM on 06/08/2010
We barely survived 8 years of government by the oil cartels and now these same people are attacking Obama for a disaster they encouraged by their undermining of the regulatory process favoring corruption over public safety. Obama appears incapable or unwilling to mobilize a federal corps of environmentalists for a massive effort to help clean up the mess. He is simply too wedded to business as usual as we have seen in the health care and financial reform debates that produced pro-industry and pro-wall street reforms. The republicans are total hypocrites and Obama is too conservative.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Orly Holmes
02:06 AM on 06/08/2010
Thats besides the point Mr.Banker.

Which is, how does your muttering over who wants ''big government'' or ''less government'' or any government going to address this mess? You are dissembling. Oil does not give a damn what party you are, hence Obamas cratering support among all Americans for his mishandling of this crisis even by his own party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
don52
12:09 AM on 06/08/2010
Regulatory agencies free from political pandering would be the ideal. In a matter of science and industry it should be the scientist and industrialist making decisions, not bureaucrats. Did anyone ask the question, what if? In an industry where billions of dollars are made every year and virtually no preparation for a disaster is astounding. I was listening to a talk radio show talk about how the Obama administration was slow to respond. I'm not sure that one man or administration can do. This is just the political dialog that is never ending that is meant to sway the loyal followers. What I am wondering is when a new fleet of oil skimmers are going to be built with 21st century technology. We needed them a month ago. There are millions of gallons out here and were picking up tar balls. A vast amount of that oil is going to have to be sucked out of the ocean one gallon at a time. Currently how many gallons does one skimmer pull out of the ocean in one day?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 PM on 06/07/2010
***Let's get both political parties to focus on constructive steps to solve the problem and better protect the country from the next disaster.***

This statement is the desire for the impossible. The Republicans made it clear, in plain English, that they were going to do everything in their power to make sure that Pres. Obama fails. To think that they have any intention of assisting with ideas or solutions is a pipe dream of the highest order. The Republicans are eating this up, and spitting it out as though they are the victims of this disaster and that Obama is the culprit. This might not be so bad, BUT THEIR FOLLOWERS BELIEVE EVERY LIE THEY CAN SPEW FROM THEIR SPLIT, HISSING TONGUES! The Republican party is despicable to the core. If our fellow Americans are stupid enough to vote Republican in November, then we as a country deserve our pitiful and predictable fate, which will be an utter certainty should they take back Congress.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ObamanextPresident
12:09 AM on 06/08/2010
steamboars that is the best paragraph I have read in a long time. It completely describes the 'flabbergastedness' I feel at the gop and the people who believe them. Thank you, A New Fan!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ObamanextPresident
12:14 AM on 06/08/2010
And yes... the annihilation of our beautiful country should they win majorities. He//, as the minority party they are doing a pretty good job of continuing their evi/ vision..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:21 AM on 06/08/2010
And, with the way they have continued to block departmental appointments in record numbers, is REALLY and TRULY starting to effect the way our government operates effectively. I feel nothing but disgust for Republicans. The losing party is still expected to help governing, even when they lose.

Stupidly, in their desire to see Pres. Obama fail, they don't understand that they fail also. This is not an "us against them" equation. This is truly only an "us" situation. When the POTUS fails, we ALL fail, whether that President is Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, W, or Pres. Obama.

Republicans are disgusting in their false displays of patriotism and righteousness, and I pray that the day comes when their paper thin facade comes crumbling to the ground in the form of massive electoral defeats for years to come.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ObamanextPresident
12:24 AM on 06/08/2010
I hope you are able to blog this over and over for a long time.
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
11:09 PM on 06/07/2010
Looks like Obama's off the hook. Dick Morris was on Hannity tonight and he was blaming the oil disaster on Bill Clinton in the mid nineties. Whew!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
09:15 PM on 06/07/2010
I don't think there is any end to the Republican's ability to blame others for things they've done. It is a remarkable capacity to sustain and nurture incredible moral inconsistencies and dissonance. When the sage said the sign of a great mind is the ability to deal with inconsistency (or something like that) that person meant "inconsistency" of empirical data. The scientist, the great mind, deals with reality as it is and tries to reconcile it by collecting more data, creating hypotheses and scientific theories --not the popular definition of theory as a collection of opinions-to explain all the data, while continuing to recognize the varying and inconsistent nature of it--the more inconsistent, the more difficult the study and the theory to explain it.

The republicans don't care about data. They just throw a plethora of moral arguments at situations, and it is completely situational ethics that they love. And then they blame situational ethics on everyone else. Pardon the grammar. But you know what Imean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spassmeister
to thine own self be true
08:38 PM on 06/07/2010
it is astounding that the "drill baby drill" crowd, who coincidentally promoted and elected two oilmen for the executive branch, have even a remote possibility of seizing the public opinion high ground on this issue. Why isn't the country aligned on this vis a vis 911? Comparing a natural disaster that had at least 48 hours of prep time be compared to a man-made disaster that had no warning - and no precedent. And all these folks yelling for Obama to go down there and "run things"? Seriously? They want govt. to do less, and also more? And is Obama supposed to climb into a submergible vehicle and go down and fix it himself? the rajun cajun sort of went over the top this time.

People don't have amnesia (and in case they develop it, we have the medium of the internet to remind them), but they will answer questions and form opinions that don't "roll up" to a single coherent policy. Want new taxes? nope. Want more service? yep.

On the cleanup/fix let's put Exxon in charge and have BP pay them to do it. carte blanche. but with zero profit margin - cost plus zero.
05:47 PM on 06/07/2010
I agree the former administration's policies helped create the climate for this disaster.

The true fault lies with all of us, for our continued reliance on oil-- our unwillingness to change our personal habits, and demand our government to develop clean energy alternatives.

This tragic event can be a a watershed for positive action, if we choose it to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mummblemouth
08:38 AM on 06/08/2010
We're more at fault for allowing cons to sell our American energy policy to big oil for the last 100 years. Being consumers is partially to blame, but the root of the evil is that poor policy led to no real choices in the energy market.
05:07 PM on 06/07/2010
Someone needs to author an accurate chronology of the unfortunate events that caused or attributed to this disaster. This chronology should be easy to understand, unbiased, accurate, and all-inclusive. Perhaps it should start with the invention of off-shore drilling and include a description of all technology, policy, regulatory decisions, etc, etc. Give the American people the facts and let them make an INFORMED decision. All this blame and finger pointing is very distracting and some of the jargon is downright embarassing to any reasonably intelligent American. It is causing a political divide and we need to be united!! We are all appalled by this catastrophe! No wonder BP takes us for such fools.