iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill McKibben

Bill McKibben

Posted: September 7, 2010 11:40 AM

2010-09-07-solar_truck.jpg

As I write this piece, we're in the midst of a (biodiesel) road trip to Washington, D.C., towing behind us an unwieldy piece of history: a solar panel off the roof of the Carter White House. It's decades old, though it still makes hot water just fine. In a sense, we're traveling backward -- which in another sense is what I think we're going to have to do for a while in the U.S. climate movement.


The bad news everyone knows. The strongest attempt ever to pass climate legislation through the U.S. Congress came up short earlier this summer. The inside-the-Beltway green groups took what seemed to be the route of least resistance: a very tame piece of climate legislation larded with special prizes for special interests. They worked it as hard as it could have been worked -- and in the end it didn't even come close. The fossil fuel industry and their allies in D.C. barely had to break a sweat shooting it down.

So -- barring some unforeseen development -- we're not going to see significant action on the federal level about climate for at least the next two years.

And that means we're far less likely to see significant international action on climate, since it's hard for other governments to muster the political will to make tough choices when the U.S. is punting.

So what do we do with those two years? I think we use them to build a movement, which explains the solar panel we're hauling south from Maine.

The story is painful even to consider. This panel went up on the White House roof in 1979, with then-president Jimmy Carter (in a wide tie, and with a bushy haircut) promising that it would still be there in the year 2000, producing hot water from the sun for whoever was then president. In fact, it didn't make it through the next decade -- it came down in the Reagan years, a symbol of our decision to turn away from the idea of limits and veer sharply down the path we've trod ever since.

But not everyone went along. Frugal folks at Unity College in Maine salvaged the panels, and put them up on the cafeteria, where they continued to produce hot water for the next three decades. Meanwhile, around the world other nations took the technology and went to work. Germany and Japan took over the lead in photovoltaic panels, but solar thermal technology like this became the special province of the Chinese.

I sat not long ago with Huang Ming, China's leading solar entrepreneur, in his space-age Sun Moon Mansion in Shandong Province looking over the stats: his HiMin Solar Energy Group has put up 60 million such systems across China--he estimated that when 250 million Chinese take a shower, the hot water is coming off their roofs. In a biting symbol of that passed torch, he keeps one of the Carter panels in his private museum.

There's no question what we should have spent the last few decades doing. But there's no point now in crying about why we didn't: the only job is to try to get back in the game, to start catching up.

Some of that means spending the money so that we can make the next technological discoveries. Many, including the Breakthrough Institute and Bill Gates, are calling for big increases in R and D funding, which might help us somehow claw our way back toward the front of the parade.

But catching up also means making use of the technology we already have, in ways both practical and symbolic. We're headed for the White House with this old panel, and with a promise from the U.S. company Sungevity that it will supply all the brand-new panels the president could ever want -- as long as he puts them up on his roof where everyone can see them. George W. Bush, amazingly enough, actually put some solar back in the White House grounds -- on the roof of a maintenance shed, and on, who knew, the Presidental Spa and Cabana. But since he didn't tell anyone, they didn't do much good. We want them up there on the roof, as visible as the White House garden, which helped boost seed sales 30 percent across the nation the year Michelle planted it.

So far, we haven't heard a word from the White House about whether they'll accept the gift and make the promise or not -- which, frankly, surprises me. I can't think of a clearer win for the president, a better reminder to the legions of young people who worked on his campaign that he is still focused on the future. He owes environmentalists more than he's given them -- by all accounts he decided not to push for the Senate legislation. He's up against tough odds in Congress, of course, given the obstructionist GOP. But they can't filibuster his roof.

What's especially poignant is that we have gotten promises from other, much less likely, world leaders -- Mohammed Nasheed, for instance, president of the entirely Muslim and quite poor Maldive Islands, the low-lying Indian Ocean nation that faces inundation from rising seas. He took the Sungevity offer, and he'll be putting solar panels on his roof on October 10 (10-10-10), the same day that thousands of groups around the world will be participating in a massive Global Work Party, putting up wind turbines and laying out bike paths. The same day we want Barack Obama, sleeves rolled up, out on his roof with a wrench.

The point of all these panels, of course, is not that we're going to solve climate change one roof at a time. (Obama is doing lots of good practical things already -- his "greening the government" effort is retrofitting federal buildings across the country with insulation, for instance). The point is that they help build the movement that we allowed to wither away.

Environmentalists lost sight of just how big a movement that would need to be. Too many groups convinced themselves that they could slide some legislation through Congress, make deals with industry, get things going without a fight. It was worth a try, but it didn't work--the fossil fuel industry, the most profitable enterprise known to man, beat us. And they will beat us again and again until there's a real, broad-based, popular, noisy movement underway in this country, a movement that can provide a currency (bodies, passion) equal to the currency the billionaire Koch Brothers can pony up to defeat climate legislation.

Some of that movement will go on at the local level, as we transform cities and towns and show what can be done. Some will be done on college campuses like Unity College, or Middlebury where I teach, which are showing the way forward. Some of it will be done in jails--I'd be very surprised if civil disobedience doesn't become a bigger part of this battle in the years ahead, if only because it's the tool we use to show our society how urgent, morally and practically, this crisis really is.

But some of it must be done symbolically. And there's no more symbolic piece of real estate on this continent than the White House. Let's hope that on the 10th of October it, at least, is transformed. It's been a long, hot summer, in the capitol as in much of the northern hemisphere. Let's make sure that next year that heat is put to some purpose -- heating the Obamas' bathtub, and helping power up a movement.

Originally posted on Yale Environment 360.

 

Follow Bill McKibben on Twitter: www.twitter.com/billmckibben

As I write this piece, we're in the midst of a (biodiesel) road trip to Washington, D.C., towing behind us an unwieldy piece of history: a solar panel off the roof of the Carter White House. It's de...
As I write this piece, we're in the midst of a (biodiesel) road trip to Washington, D.C., towing behind us an unwieldy piece of history: a solar panel off the roof of the Carter White House. It's de...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 124
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Waterphoneman
artist, musician, inventor & mouth from the south
09:17 PM on 09/09/2010
Yes, it is time for our president to walk his talk and put solar in all government buildings including the White House. Talk about job creations that would not only improve our energy consumption but it would also begin to clean our air which we desperately need. Solar on government buildings would send such a strong message that we all need right now.
09:58 PM on 09/09/2010
True, but that should have been done on day one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
10:27 PM on 09/09/2010
oh boy, i cannot wait for the mid term elections to come. if for no other reason than for people like myself to send a strong and powerful message to democrats.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
09:07 PM on 09/09/2010
obstructionist commentary to keep you for moving forward?? when you are talking about spending of millions of tax dollars on putting solar panels on the roofs of public buildings in "sunny areas" i, whether you like it or not, have every right to object. and trust me, i do object. the money belongs elsewhere; paying for more teachers in our schools, paying for heath care premiums for those who cannot afford it, helping people who have lost their jobs stay in their homes, getting people back to work, etc. etc. when we've dealt with the serious social problems in this country, then and only then, will i consider paying for these solar panels.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
04:54 PM on 09/09/2010
sure i'm all for putting up solar panels on every government building on one condition. not one tax dollar goes to the project unless it is agreed on by all the citizens of the united states. which means it goes to the vote. if the majority agree that this is what our tax dollars should be spent on then fine. however, if the majority do not agree with this then the subject is closed.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
07:43 PM on 09/09/2010
Did we get to vote on the present systems installed in the WH or any other government building for heating, cooling, hot water, etc.?

This is just more obstructionist commentary to keep us from moving forward.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Turnaround
06:28 PM on 09/10/2010
Exactly, mothergrace!

There is nothing to vote on anyway:

"Americans, do you want government buildings to cost less money to operate?

Do you want to invest in and promote efficient energy as one way of reducing our addiction to foreign oil and all the trouble it brings?"

Mark your choice below:

__ Well, duh!
__ No, I'm insane.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russ Klettke
Business and fitness writer
06:39 AM on 09/09/2010
This is so important and such common sense. I live in an working-class neighborhood in Chicago, where we have far fewer sunny days than in much of the rest of the country. A neighbor down the street installed a hot water solar heating system – with a 10' x 10' panel – on the roof of his 3-unit building 25 years ago. The only service call in those years was because some squirrels chewed through a component. Otherwise, he's gotten 25 years of free hot water for three families where the back-up gas-fired system is almost never used. With 1985 technology.

We've been idiots.
01:46 PM on 09/08/2010
The solar panel may get "on" the White House. Just learned the author is talking to the White House!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:33 PM on 09/08/2010
Back in the day - no one believed in the automobile - the future is just that - and new sources of energy will emerge. Had a girlfriend in 79 who was attending college in Golden, Co. - she told me someday the technology would be used to heat and cool our housing and provide energy - smart girl.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patman77
01:32 PM on 09/08/2010
go d help we take any $ outta the saudi or te xass billionaires middlemens pockets that have lea d the charge fueled by gr eed to ruin our green gem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patman77
01:29 PM on 09/08/2010
and every other gov. roof in the sunny areas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
almakesling
01:28 PM on 09/08/2010
When they revamped the oval office, they could have budgeted to put the panels back up.
photo
Morena
¡Diga toda la verdad. Siempre!
01:21 AM on 09/10/2010
Do you have ANY clue what you're talking about? That's a rhetorical question by the way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:33 PM on 09/08/2010
324 - - happy to give you more info - twitter me at The Culture Yard
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 PM on 09/08/2010
324 - - be happy to tell you about it - twitter me at The Culture Yard.
or
cypnegril@aol.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
12:11 PM on 09/08/2010
You've got to be joking. Linking himself symbolically to Carter? Putting 30-year-old technology on the White House roof, when there are jobs involved in making new solar panels for electricity? Neither part of it is a winner.
01:39 PM on 09/08/2010
It's symbolic, the administration has been offered free solar panels for the White House. Plus the new technology uses a better system etc. As a result of the symbolic "gesture" more people would attempt solar and buy solar, thus creating jobs, lowering homes energy bills etc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
02:10 PM on 09/08/2010
I'm in favor of some such gesture, just not wading into a quixotic attempt to rehabilitate the reputation of Carter's presidency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russ Klettke
Business and fitness writer
06:45 AM on 09/09/2010
Check my other comment posting. My neighbor put solar on his 3-unit building in Chicago in 1985 and has gotten free hot water for three apartments for 25 years. In Chicago. The newer technologies are more efficient, to be sure, but the facts are this technology was already working in the 1970s.

There's a message in that. Of course the right-wing punditocracy would completely miss the point, but they do on everything. Maybe the deeper message is about how trillions of dollars have been wasted because of the influence of the fossil fuel industry and the consequent poor decisions of lawmakers and presidents over the past 30 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
08:51 AM on 09/08/2010
People are homeless, hungry, unemployed, without health-care, in danger of being arrested, etc. You have a solar problem.

Solar energy will never fill the energy requirements of a modern nation. It is subject to the whims of nature, is not cost efficient or energy efficient. I ask that you drop the matter in the interest of the nation and the population.

Meanwhile the monetary financial system is in disintegration threatening the population as all out war. Please take the time to investigate and use your talents to bring attention and elicit solutions to this financial/economic offensive directed against the population.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benover de Viros
10:16 AM on 09/08/2010
Ding Ding. We all have special interests. The Author's is solar. Yours is obviously other pressing issues. Are you suggesting the Author put his interest on hold until your issues are addressed. If so, sorry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
10:26 AM on 09/08/2010
Special Interests? There is a crisis here, It's not solar panels. Millions of people will die as the financial system disintegrates gobbling up the means of production. I implore your sense of priorities. Humanity is truly depending on its' most educated and dedicated to implement economic measures that will counterattack deadly market forces.
11:31 AM on 09/08/2010
"Solar energy will never fill the energy requirements of a modern nation." -- How pessimistically unrealistic must you be to think we will never be able to power our nation with solar energy? Despite the obstacles raised by the fossil fuel industry, solar energy technology is improving all the time. Even with current technology, we could supply a substantial amount of our energy from solar if we funneled some of that coal subsidy its way. Regardless, you are seriously short-changing our ability to innovate if you think we will *never* be able to rely primarily on solar energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
12:38 PM on 09/08/2010
Solar energy may have its' small place in energy options. Creating Solar absorption devices will actually heat up the planet; trees and other vegetation utilize solar energy much more efficiently and man should support that process. The Nuclear fueled energy economy is being short changed, not even mentioned, as the paramount economy driver of this century.
There is a lot of work to do in an economy that tolerates unemployment in the millions. The United States must dedicate itself to the redevelopment of the North American continent. Start the Nuclear Fueled Energy Economy, Construct the continental water distribution system described in the NAWAPA plan, as this project will literally turn deserts green. Construct the interstate maglev rail system. Expand NASA space programs as the most rewarding and beneficial programs to the population.
Humanity is being forced to contract; birth rates are dropping, people do not have access to health-care, unemployment continues to be unrelenting because of the demands of market forces. A "Manhattan Project" must be directed to focus on the survival of the population, counterattacking market forces and elevating the population's standard of living. Soft or passive energy generation models will surfeit.
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
06:59 AM on 09/08/2010
Give it up. At the point you think solar panels are more important than the economy, lost mortgages and banking corruption you've lost the path, and the authority to lead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:10 PM on 09/09/2010
Solar panels could be a huge part of the economy, especially if they are democratically-owned. You are so far off base! See my comment to the other guy above who also cannot chew gum and walk at the same time. Solar is a total win for the economy, the planet and democracy as long as it is done right (at a local level, democratically-owned and supported by feed in tariffs). get informed!
photo
Morena
¡Diga toda la verdad. Siempre!
01:25 AM on 09/10/2010
Same thing was said 35 years ago...shouldn't have listened to the regressive then. Shouldn't listen to you all now!