More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

NPR: The Saga Continues


There's no more scrupulous or versatile broadcast journalist than NPR's Daniel Zwerdling. He is one of those reporters who keeps his eye on the sparrow -- that is, on small details from individual lives that add up to significant issues of public policy. As he described in a special report this week how the United States Army is clarifying guidelines "that should make it easier for soldiers with traumatic brain injuries from explosions to receive the Purple Heart," it was mind-boggling to think that right-wingers in Congress were at that very moment voting to eliminate the modest federal funds that make such essential and authoritative reporting available to anyone in America who cares to tune in.

Zwerdling's collaborator on this report was ProPublica (the non-profit and equally independent newsroom that won the Pulitzer Prize last year for a harrowing account of deadly choices made by a New Orleans hospital during Hurricane Katrina). As a result of their reporting, the Army now intends to give special priority to reexamining the cases of soldiers who suffered battlefield concussions but who mistakenly may have been turned down for the Purple Heart, which historically has been awarded to soldiers injured by enemy action.

You may not think this such a big deal, but the symbolism of the announcement is potent. And it's part of a larger, ongoing investigation conducted by Zwerdling and ProPublica's T. Christian Miller into the military's widespread failure to diagnose and treat traumatic brain injuries, the "signature injury" among troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan as they fall to roadside bombs and other explosives.

It's also typical of the comprehensive and essential journalism that has been a hallmark of NPR since its creation in 1970. Once upon a time, in the early glory days of radio, corporate media took on the challenge of providing Americans with the kind of information critical to citizenship. No longer. Conglomerates long ago bought up the country's commercial radio stations, closed down the news departments, and auctioned off the airtime to partisan polemicists or pre-packaged content devoid of journalism. Serious news on radio -- "the news we need to keep our freedoms," as the historian and journalist Richard Reeves once put it -- has become the province of NPR (Full disclosure: We two have spent most of the last forty years toiling in the vineyards of public broadcasting, although never for NPR.)

Take Zwerdling's investigations as just one example: Over the years, he has sorted out the complexities and secrets of the 1986 Challenger space shuttle disaster and the warnings that preceded it, dangers posed to humans by the plant pesticide Chlordane (it eventually was banned by the Environmental Protection Agency) and the failures of the Corps of Engineers to maintain safely the dikes and dams around New Orleans -- among many other stories.

Multiply his efforts by those of all the modestly-paid but dedicated journalists at NPR and you have a forty year history that has given listeners a deeper and richer portrait of America and the world than any other broadcast news organization in the country -- with or without offense, as Byron said, to friend or foe.

In just the last few weeks, NPR has provided unique coverage of the job crisis in the United States, upheavals in the Middle East, and anxiety over the safety of nuclear power in the wake of the Japanese earthquake -- as a matter of fact, many of the issues the House of Representatives should have been debating instead of posturing and pandering to its rightward political base.

Hear Steve Benen of Washington Monthly on the House Judiciary Committee's vote the other day reaffirming "In God We Trust" as our national motto:

For months the new House Republican majority has wasted time on health care bills they know they can't pass, abortion bills they know they can't pass, climate bills they know they can't pass, and budget bills they know they can't pass. They've invested considerable time and energy on defending the Defense of Marriage Act, recklessly accusing Muslim Americans of disloyalty, going after NPR, and pushing culture-war bills related to vouchers, English as the 'official' language, and now 'In God We Trust.'

And yes, on Thursday, following a number of missteps by NPR executives, including what has now been indisputably exposed as a disingenuous and dishonestly-edited video by a disreputable right-wing smear artist of the network's chief fundraiser expressing some personal opinions, the House passed a bill cutting off government funding for NPR -- all of this part of the "vanity project," as Benen calls it, that House Republicans have been running in order to feed red meat to Fox News and the partisan talk radio hosts who have turned the public airwaves -- remember, the airwaves above our fair and bountiful land belong to you, Mr. and Mrs. and Ms. America -- into a right-wing romper room.

Opposing the bill to strip public radio of funding, Democratic Congressman Lloyd Doggett of Texas said, "My constituents turn to [public radio] because they want fact-based, not Fox-based coverage." The attacks, he continued, are "an ideological crusade against balanced news and educational programs."

And even Georgia Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss told an interviewer:

You know, an awful lot of conservatives listen to NPR. It provides a very valuable service. Should we maybe think about a reduction in that? Again, I think the sacrifice is going to have to be shared by NPR as well as others. But I think total elimination of funding is probably not the wisest thing to do.

Good for you, Senator. Because without public radio, the reactionaries among us will hold a monopoly on the airwaves.

And while we're on the subject of wise things, let's not forget NPR's other programming: the arts and entertainment coverage that plays its own distinctive role trying to keep our democracy spirited, diverse and imaginative. Think Garrison Keillor. Krista Tippett. Ira Glass. Think Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!, Car Talk (yes, many of us are would-be grease monkeys). On the Media (the single best analysis and critique of media anywhere). And -- well, consult your local listings.

We're talking here about something essential to American life. President Kennedy touched on it in a speech at Amherst College less than a month before his assassination in 1963. Speaking in honor of the poet Robert Frost, who had recently died, the President's words were directed to the role of artists but can also embrace the importance of a public media whose obligation is not to a political or corporate paymaster but to the integrity of the work and the trust of the listener.

"The artist, however faithful to his personal vision of reality, becomes the last champion of the individual mind and sensibility against an intrusive society and an officious state," Kennedy said. "... In serving his vision of the truth, the artist best serves his nation. And the nation which disdains the mission of art invites the fate of Robert Frost's hired man, the fate of having 'nothing to look backward to with pride, and nothing to look forward to with hope.'"


Bill Moyers is a veteran broadcast journalist and managing editor of Public Affairs Television. Michael Winship, former senior writer of Public Affairs Television, is president of the Writers Guild of America, East.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 875
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
05:32 PM on 03/24/2011
It's all about the ratings. The more people tuned in the more revenue they receive from advertisers. The more people are tuned into NPR the fewer can be tuned into Fox. Fox is heavily supported by industries that may not want the whole truth about their diabolical practices to be general public knowledge. The for profit Health Insurance industry is one that is easy to use as an example. Is it any surprise that a network known to not let the facts get in the way of a good story doesn't want to have the negative facts revealing information about the companies that are advertising on their network? So we are faced with media battle being created control the American citizens beliefs. Huge corporate PR campaigns need channels to bend the thoughts towards their clients point of view. They spend heavily an election campaigns for predominantly Republican and Tea party candidates. Their broadcast advertising dollars are sent to the most fertile market. Fox News cultivates a market applying generous amounts of manure so people actually believe or can't tell what's the truth. Fox knows that people who need to have unbiased information to form intelligent decisions listen to NPR. Corporations seeking to sensor facts making them look bad turn to Fox truth bending sensationalized news that has built a listener base not able to distinguish truth from fiction.. Outlaw corporate political campaign spending and the loss of advertising revenue will choke Fox. Stop US Government ad spending on Fox.
05:51 PM on 03/23/2011
NPR is relatively new. Since the seventies maybe.. I grew up with NationalEducationalTelevision (NET13 NYC, which morphed into PBS).Talk radio has drifted to the right over the years to the point of exclusivety almost. The public sentiment shifts . Hate talk has always been with us ( Father Coughlin), the public backlash eventually moved him out . This too shall pass
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jean Clelland-Morin
religion / the Golden Rule
04:34 AM on 03/23/2011
Bill and Michael.For me, you are preaching to the choir. Please keep speaking out. U.S. citizens will lose if the Special-Interest-Power-Propaganda continues to rule the air-waves. // Jean Clelland-Morin
nothing2fear
They only call it Class War when we fight back.
04:17 PM on 03/22/2011
To the people sitting in the dark:

Conservatives do not like any kind of competition (we can see this from the distortion of what they call “Free Markets), so unfortunately NPR becomes their enemy. The honest reporting (or at least as honest as it gets in the USA) that emerges from these public broadcasting stations attempts such neutrality that it at times seems mundane and ineffective, but this perception is misleading as this neutrality does give many information without the distortions of opinions. Of course this makes it the enemy of the all too distorted conservative radio and TV stations.


So in the battle of the budget and in this time of need (need of the people) all the conservatives can see to cut is that which thwarts their absolute control of the air ways. They speciously say that it is bias because it does not spew the distorted blather of the right out into the world.

When in control of the congress all that conservative could find to improve the nation was tax cuts for the rich (and the destruction of The Glass-Steagall Act) while they spent what we did not have like drunken sailors (after they had given the revenues away).

So we find nothing new here except a continued battle to keep the people in the dark.
02:29 PM on 03/22/2011
I love NPR. Everytime I listen I learn something new.
02:13 PM on 03/22/2011
NPR does try fairly hard to be non-partisian in its reporting; however, there's little debate their outgoing management viewed anyone right of center with extreme contempt.
nothing2fear
They only call it Class War when we fight back.
04:20 PM on 03/22/2011
Well earned contempt, I might add.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jaguar6cy
01:13 PM on 03/22/2011
Mr.Moyer believes the government should continue to subsidize his career choices and public opinions. But for that to continue "fairness" dictates that an equal subsidy should be paid to Fox News. Moyer would no doubt oppose that payment solely because he disagrees with them on most issues. Moyer wants big government and big subsidies but only for himself. That restriction on freedom of speech and equal protection tells us such subsidies must end and should never have begun.
nothing2fear
They only call it Class War when we fight back.
04:26 PM on 03/22/2011
Faux News is supported by such biased opinion and great wealth that any subsidy for it would be as heinous as the subsidies for Big Pharmaceutical companies, Big oil, and Big agriculture as well as the continued spending on a military industrial complex left over from the long dead cold war. It would be more advantageous for us to stop subsidizing two-bit dictators than to damage this source of information.
01:46 AM on 03/22/2011
In my not so humble opinion, NPR is no longer necessary and no longer serves the purpose it was originally intended to serve. If the concern is public access, then why wouldn't the government have made satellite radio a publicly funded program so that everyone could have access to all of the satellite radio stations?
02:44 PM on 03/22/2011
Has something come along to replace the NPR news and programming that I depend on? Possibly on the web, but I sure don't see any sign of comprehensive news or cultural programming on other radio or tv stations.
11:17 PM on 03/21/2011
If NPR was extremely right wing, I would have trouble with it being supported with my tax dollars. I makes no sense for any radio or TV station to be paid for with public money.
02:30 PM on 03/22/2011
dkonton49, you may be right, but WHY does it make no sense for any radio or tv station to be paid for with public money? Do you have actualy reasons?
10:09 PM on 03/21/2011
Why we all need Public Radio
09:27 PM on 03/21/2011
Ahhhhh Bill Moyers, host of a "news show" where he talks for fifteen minutes about his views on a particular topic. This is followed by guests who feel the same way he does and back his opinion. So in a half hour, you have heard one side of an issue. Only on PBS.
09:43 PM on 03/21/2011
I'm assuming that "Only on PBS" a joke? Fox is nothing but a stream of opinions from their "anchors", and a stream of "news" that verifiably false with the most cursory investigation. Presenting the news actually refers to presenting factual information. NPR doesn't present opinion, it provides facts, with very little embellishment. Most consumers of cable news of any stripe would hardly recognize it. In fact, it's boring, which is why so few people listen, tuning instead to the infotainment of Fox, MSNBC, CNN, etc, and the reinforcement of their narrow-minded and idiotic prejudices. We began our decline as a nation years ago with our choice of sensationalism and spectacle over facts with the advent of 60 Minutes, and our moronic population will see it through to its sad conclusion. Moyers is right. An uninformed democracy cannot function, and with the so many people getting their facts from biased charletans with a vested interest in deceit, and a population too stupid to notice, we're doomed as a functioning democracy.
12:30 AM on 03/22/2011
You're statement "In fact, it's boring, which is why so few people listen..." is factually inaccurate. NPR's Morning Edition and All Things Considered are in the top 5 most listened to radio programs.

Also, why are you comparing radio statinos to television stations? Shouldn't apples be compared to apples?
jjayes
repub noses keep growing
05:22 PM on 03/21/2011
What do republicans call news based on facts? Mainstream media bias.
04:54 PM on 03/21/2011
I miss BIll Moyers. I stream NPR/VPR in my office all day; just about everyday. I also am a sustaining member.
So people commenting on behalf of PBS/NPR should also contact their senators/representatives and, if able, make their own contributions. Support NPR by more than just commenting on websites. Get to work to save the best thing on the airwaves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anonymous67
02:17 PM on 03/21/2011
Republicans -- the party of hate.
02:16 PM on 03/21/2011
There are numerous private news sources espousing progressive-liberal view points. The Huffington Post is just one of many. Why should any (Left, Right, or the middle) be supported by tax dollars?
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
02:42 PM on 03/21/2011
NPR is not liberal/progressive. That's old news. Try to keep up. The country needs and independent news source to counteract the effects of the for profit propaganda media in dominance today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kyle10
those who sharpen perception tend to be antisocial
02:51 PM on 03/21/2011
Agreed.
05:43 PM on 03/21/2011
Let's play a game. I'll name a NPR liberal progressive commentator/contributor and then you name a conservative one. I'll go first. Bill Moyers. Your turn. BTW: nice Reagan pic.
12:17 PM on 03/23/2011
My definition of "contributor" includes supporter (either editorially or financially). Let's see you throw Bill Moyers out of that category. While I consider Juan Williams to be "progressive light" I suppose he is a rabid conservative to hard core liberal progressives. I am a middle of the road libertarian and registered Democrat.