iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Bill Moyers
 
GET UPDATES FROM Michael Winship
 

The Rich Are Different From You and Me -- They Pay Lower Taxes

Posted: 04/16/2012 12:40 pm

Benjamin Franklin, who used his many talents to become a wealthy man, famously said that the only things certain in life are death and taxes. But if you're a corporate CEO in America today, even they can be put on the backburner -- death held at bay by the best medical care money can buy and the latest in surgical and life extension techniques, taxes conveniently shunted aside courtesy of loopholes, overseas investment and governments that conveniently look the other way.

In a story headlined, "For Big Companies, Life Is Good," the Wall Street Journal reports that big American companies have emerged from the deepest recession since World War II more profitable than ever: flush with cash, less burdened by debt, and with a greater share of the country's income. But, the paper notes, "Many of the 1.1 million jobs the big companies added since 2007 were outside the U.S. So, too, was much of the $1.2 trillion added to corporate treasuries."

To add to this embarrassment of riches, the consumer group Citizens for Tax Justice reports that more than two dozen major corporations -- including GE, Boeing, Mattel and Verizon -- paid no federal taxes between 2008 and 2011. They got a corporate tax break that was broadly supported by Republicans and Democrats alike.

Corporate taxes today are at a 40-year-low -- even as the executive suites at big corporations have become throne rooms where the crown jewels wind up in the personal vault of the CEO.

Then look at this report in the New York Times: Last year, among the 100 best-paid CEOs, the median income was more than $14 million, compared with the average annual American salary of $45,230. Combined, this happy hundred executives pulled down more than two billion dollars.

What's more, according to the Times "... these CEOs might seem like pikers. Top hedge fund managers collectively earned $14.4 billion last year." No wonder some of them are fighting to kill a provision in the recent Dodd-Frank reform law that would require disclosing the ratio of CEO pay to the median pay of their employees. One never wishes to upset the help, you know. It can lead to unrest.

That's Wall Street -- the metaphorical bestiary of the financial universe. But there's nothing metaphorical about the earnings of hedge fund tigers, private equity lions, and the top dogs at those big banks that were bailed out by tax dollars after they helped chase our economy off a cliff.

So what do these big moneyed nabobs have to complain about? Why are they whining about reform? And why are they funneling cash to super PACs aimed at bringing down Barack Obama, who many of them supported four years ago?

Because, writes Alec MacGillis in The New Republic -- the president wants to raise their taxes. That's right -- while ordinary Americans are taxed at a top rate of 35 percent on their income, Congress allows hedge fund and private equity tycoons to pay only pay 15 percent of their compensation. The president wants them to pay more; still at a rate below what you might pay, and for that he's being accused of - hold onto your combat helmets -- "class warfare." One Wall Street Midas, once an Obama fan, now his foe, told MacGillis that by making the rich a primary target, Obama is "[expletive deleted] on people who are successful."

And can you believe this? Two years ago, when President Obama first tried to close that gaping loophole in our tax code, Stephen Schwarzman, who runs the Blackstone Group, the world's largest private equity fund, compared the president's action to Hitler's invasion of Poland.

That's the same Stephen Schwarzman whose agents in 2006 launched a predatory raid on a travel company in Colorado. His fund bought it, laid off 841 employees, and recouped its entire investment in just seven months -- one of the quickest returns on capital ever for such a deal.

To celebrate his 60th birthday Mr. Schwarzman rented the Park Avenue Armory here in New York at a cost of $3 million, including a gospel choir led by Patti LaBelle that serenaded him with "He's Got the Whole World in His Hands." Does he ever -- his net worth is estimated at nearly $5 billion. Last year alone Schwarzman took home over $213 million in pay and dividends, a third more than 2010. Now he's fundraising for Mitt Romney, who, like him, made his bundle on leveraged buyouts that left many American workers up the creek.

To add insult to injury, average taxpayers even help subsidize the private jet travel of the rich. On the Times' DealBook blog, mergers and acquisitions expert Steven Davidoff writes, "If an outside security consultant determines that executives need a private jet and other services for their safety, the Internal Revenue Service cuts corporate chieftains a break. In such cases, the chief executive will pay a reduced tax bill or sometimes no tax at all."

Are the CEOs really in danger? No, says Davidoff, "It's a common corporate tax trick."

Talk about your friendly skies. No wonder the people with money and influence don't feel connected to the rest of the population. It's as if they live in a foreign country at the top of the world, like their own private Switzerland, at heights so rarefied they can't imagine life down below.


Moyers & Company airs weekly on public television (check local listings). See more features -- including our all-new TAKE ACTION page -- at BillMoyers.com

 
 
 

Follow Bill Moyers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BillMoyers

Benjamin Franklin, who used his many talents to become a wealthy man, famously said that the only things certain in life are death and taxes. But if you're a corporate CEO in America today, even they...
Benjamin Franklin, who used his many talents to become a wealthy man, famously said that the only things certain in life are death and taxes. But if you're a corporate CEO in America today, even they...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,068
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
10:08 AM on 04/23/2012
And so, the societal class war has begun...which is bound to lead to increasing social revolutions in the USA...
10:01 AM on 04/23/2012
What is the average annual (not median) of the 100 highest paid CEO's in 2011?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
gino618
10:21 PM on 04/22/2012
The USA now has the highest corporate tax rate in the world. Jobs and businesses have been moving overseas - and most other countries have attracted them to do so because, in part, they've been lowering their tax rates on corporations. Yet here in this country we have people clamoring to raise our tax rates even more. And in the midst of this sniping about American jobs going overseas, we have our government giving our tax dollars away to foreign countries to train their citizens to create English-speaking jobs in call centers. Ask the White House how they can complain about jobs going overseas and then give our tax dollars away to train people in those overseas jobs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chuckl8899
02:45 AM on 04/23/2012
Through loopholes and chicanery, the largest American companies pay little to nothing in taxes and shelter billions of dollars offshore, paying no taxes on that either. Meanwhile, they employ cheap labor abroad and lay off american workers. These companies are american in name only and contribute nothing to the country. They need to pay their fair share as well as the investment bankers like Romney, who contribute nothing to our economy. Ironically taxpayers are subsidizing this sham. Your companies are worthless leaches on the american taxpayer. You should be ashamed of yourself
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
07:39 AM on 04/23/2012
And by "highest corporate tax rate in the world" you mean to say that the average corporation pays between 5-10% taxes, and many of the largest pay NOTHING!

As to the reason they are sending jobs overseas, it's because we aren't charging them for bringing goods back into the USA, so they are able to make MASSIVE profits by not paying as much in wages and by not having to obey US regulations regarding the environment. The solution is not to gut their taxes FURTHER, but to create a sane trade policy!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
09:28 PM on 04/22/2012
"

"As we view the achievements of aggregated capital, we discover the existence of trusts, combinations, and monopolies, while the citizen is struggling far in the rear or is trampled to death beneath an iron heel. Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters."
- Grover Cleveland, 22nd and 24th President of the United States
07:35 PM on 04/22/2012
I would rather see a rich man pay $1,000,000 in taxes then a poor person paying $1000. What America needs is more millionaire to pay taxes, than taxing millionaire more.
12:49 AM on 04/23/2012
i think we need less poor people
everyone should be supporting themselves
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
07:40 AM on 04/23/2012
And the solution for that is a higher tax rate on the rich. But then again you aren't intelligent enough to figure out how that works, so I'll just say for you to go study the 50s, you'll see how that worked.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
07:30 PM on 04/22/2012
David Stockman, Reagan's first budget director in the 1980s and the godfather of the Gipper's supply-side tax cuts.

The Reagan admin. After the tax cut ballooned from $500 billion over five years to $1 trillion after lobbyists added special-interest tax breaks for various industries. And on the spending side, the Reagan admin. went hog-wild throwing money at the Pentagon. The inevitable happened: The deficit ballooned.

" Stockman recalls. In 1982, 1983, and 1984, Reagan signed a series of tax hikes that, according to Stockman, recovered 40 percent of the original 1981 tax cut. Meanwhile, unemployment fell from nearly 11% in 1982 to 7.4% by 1984, and inflation slowed.

For GOPers to argue, as they do nowadays, that only permanent tax cuts spark economic activity is "totally inconsistent with what we used to argue in the 1980s,

Nobody learned the lessons of the 1980's----History repeats itself in 2005

Stockman says, George W. Bush and his crew repeated "in much greater magnitude the errors we made in the early '80s. A massive increase in defense spending, a massive reduction in the revenue base [tax cuts- long-term ], and not even an effort at spending cuts. Then the economy finally collapsed as a result of the credit crisis."

"It's very dismaying, to see that 30-year descent into the kind of nihilism, know-nothingism that is represented by the GOP today." It's not the Gipper's GOP anymore.
07:04 PM on 04/22/2012
Hyperbole - The dems care only about the issue. They had the largest majority in Congress in over a generation plus the presidency and ignored this...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
07:42 AM on 04/23/2012
That's true. The Democrats SHOULD have used the time from 2009-2011 to be passing tax increases, but instead they bought into the idea that they can't win while talking about increasing taxes, even though the reality is that they would have done FAR better in the 2010 elections had they simply been willing to increase rates!
06:38 PM on 04/22/2012
This is all so dishonest. If you look at the rates people pay as opposed to where the rates start, the rich pay the highest percentage of their income in taxes. Almost half the country pays nothing or gets a net payment. That is not saying that rates should not be higher for the rich. We need to figure out as a nation what we are going to spend and then we need to raise the money. However, this nonsensical campaign claiming that Buffets admin pays a higher rate than she does which is extremely unlikely just turns people off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
06:57 PM on 04/22/2012
Yes, the rates people pay. My federal income tax is about 20% of my income, my state income tax is another 7% of my income, my federal, state, and local sales tax is about 10% of my income, my property taxes are about 5% of my income... Wow, that's already 42% of my income in taxes.... How many rich people pay that much in their various taxes?
09:51 PM on 04/22/2012
they pay more dollars with high income
30% of 2 million for example
any increase would fund goobermint for

11 HOURS not a big deal eh
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:51 AM on 04/23/2012
Over the last 10 years my salary has doubled and my federal tax rate has dropped about 7% from 22% to about 15%. Im not quite a 1%er, but certainly a 2-3%er. My state taxes are the same rate, but my property taxes have fallen by 20%. Being honest, I certainly appreciate the extra cash but I'm not creating jobs with it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMDAY44
06:32 PM on 04/22/2012
Why is it that why I see an article like this, everyone complains about the salaries of corporate CEO's, but no one is concerned about the salaries of athletes and movie stars? Don't get me wrong, I don't care was someone else earns, but at least the CEO of a corporation has a heavy responsibility. Why should someone be paid 10's of millions of dollars to run up and down a basketball court bouncing a ball when the person at the concession stand only makes minimum wage or close to it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chuckl8899
02:49 AM on 04/23/2012
If the stars performed as poorly as some millionaire CEOs, their movie offers would evaporate
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMDAY44
07:46 AM on 04/23/2012
I don't know about that - wasn't it Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez that made that bomb "Gigli" several years ago? They are still working.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
07:43 AM on 04/23/2012
You're right, athletes and movie stars SHOULD be paid less. And nobody is saying otherwise. But the reason that we aren't complaining about that at the same time is because of the fact that it's not athletes and movie stars who have destroyed the economy....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMDAY44
08:08 AM on 04/23/2012
I don't recall hearing anyone complain about it at all. But I don't accept that CEO's have destroyed the economy. They don't have that kind of power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rneigh9880
"They call me Mr. Friendly"
06:07 PM on 04/22/2012
This is such a distortion of the facts that its disgusting. !5% of $1,000,000 is $150,000 and 20% of $50,000 is $10,000. Now which income is paying the most in taxes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
06:57 PM on 04/22/2012
The one who's paying 20%, NOT the one paying 15%. It doesn't MATTER that they are paying a larger dollar amount if the PERCENTAGE is smaller!
09:51 PM on 04/22/2012
you dont understand math i guess
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damothedevo
07:43 PM on 04/22/2012
So if you get a million you should pay ten grand and if you make fifty grand you should pay ten grand?? Once everyone is a CEO taxs will be fair. Unfortunately someone still has to do the work.
09:58 PM on 04/22/2012
and then the politicians earmark $500,000 to study shrimp running on a treadmill

doesnt sound like anyone should be paying MORE TAXES
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FAIRTV
06:07 PM on 04/22/2012
An incredible article from multi-millionaire Bill Moyers.
05:53 PM on 04/22/2012
According to the IRS, the top 10% income brackets (the rich) pay 71% of all Federal Income taxes in the US. The lowest 47% income brackets (the poor) pay ZERO Federal income taxes. The remaining 53% of income brackets (the middle class) pay 29% of all Federal income taxes. The author of this article is BS ing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
06:58 PM on 04/22/2012
First, that's FEDERAL INCOME TAXES, not TAXES.

Second, yes, the top 10% pays 71%, but the top 5% has more wealth than the bottom 90% and the top 1% makes more income than the bottom 50%....... So they are UNDERpaying!
09:52 PM on 04/22/2012
no not really
you'd do better trying to get goobermint EFFICIENT when their spending of our money
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
07:03 PM on 04/22/2012
Statistics that ignore the role of payroll taxes and the fact that the rich pay far less than everyone else in those taxes is also BS but something you wish to gloss over.
09:53 PM on 04/22/2012
the potus campaigned on keeping payroll taxes low so we could short medicare and social security and give those EXTRA PENNIES to the gas stations

what a GUY
photo
tnkeating
Dyslexic agnostic insomniac
05:35 PM on 04/22/2012
I'm tired of being told that I have to "spread the wealth" to people who don't have my work ethic. I'm tired of being told the government will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to people too lazy to earn it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MoreDimensions
05:49 PM on 04/22/2012
Agreed, that's why we need to raise taxes on those lazy wealthy people who pay less tax than we middle class hard workers.  We need to cut corporate welfare too.
09:58 PM on 04/22/2012
www.fairtax.org
07:46 PM on 04/25/2012
IF YOU WANT FAIRNESS
go to N Korea-everyone IS EQUALLY poor
IF you want to exel here, DO IT
Who told you life would be FAIR? LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damothedevo
06:44 PM on 04/22/2012
Some simple math tells me I'd have to work 5 lifetimes of 70 hour weeks to make what mitt got in one years interest. And I'm the lazy one??
05:19 PM on 04/22/2012
Every time wealth inequality is brought up as a problem, someone starts whining about the deficit. The capitalist homeboys are destroying the middleclass. They get their tax cuts, the rest get austerity. And they have right wing extremist sympathizers attacking any attempt at economic recovery. Jobs get sent to China to increase their profit, then they want to cut unemployment.
05:16 PM on 04/22/2012
Raise corporate taxes and industry will move off shore, thousands unemployed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
06:59 PM on 04/22/2012
Sure they will sparky, that couldn't POSSIBLY be solved by a protectionist trade policy like the rest of the world has....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
09:02 PM on 04/22/2012
Sorry, they have already moved off shore-