More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Quigley

Bill Quigley

 

Two Grandmothers, Two Priests and a Nun go to Prison for Peace

Posted: 03/28/11 04:50 PM ET

Two grandmothers, two priests and a nun were sentenced in federal court in Tacoma, WA Monday March 28, 2011, for confronting hundreds of US nuclear weapons stockpiled for use by the deadly Trident submarines.

Sentenced were: Sr. Anne Montgomery, 83, a Sacred Heart sister from New York, who was ordered to serve 2 months in federal prison and 4 months electronic home confinement; Fr. Bill Bischel, 81, a Jesuit priest from Tacoma Washington, ordered to serve 3 months in prison and 6 months electronic home confinement; Susan Crane, 67, a member of the Jonah House community in Baltimore, Maryland, ordered to serve 15 months in federal prison; Lynne Greenwald, 60, a nurse from Bremerton Washington, ordered to serve 6 months in federal prison; and Fr. Steve Kelly, 60, a Jesuit priest from Oakland California, ordered to serve 15 months in federal prison. They were also ordered to pay $5300 each and serve an additional year in supervised probation. Bischel and Greenwald are active members of the Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, a community resisting Trident nuclear weapons since 1977.

What did they do?

In the darkness of All Souls night, November 2, 2009, the five quietly cut through a chain link perimeter fence topped with barbed wire.

Carefully stepping through the hole in the fence, they entered into the Kitsap-Bangor Navy Base outside of Tacoma Washington - home to hundreds of nuclear warheads used in the eight Trident submarines based there.

Walking undetected through the heavily guarded base for hours, they covered nearly four miles before they came to where the nuclear missiles are stored.

The storage area was lit up by floodlights. Dozens of small gray bunkers -- about the size of double car garages -- were ringed by two more chain link fences topped with taut barbed wire.

USE OF DEADLY FORCE AUTHORIZED, one sign boldly proclaimed. Another said WARNING RESTRICTED AREA, and was decorated with skull and crossbones.

This was it -- the heart of the US Trident Pacific nuclear weapon program. Nuclear weapons were stored in the bunkers inside the double fence line.

Wire cutters cut through these fences as well. There they unfurled hand painted banners which said "Disarm Now Plowshares: Trident Illegal and Immoral", knelt to pray and waited to be arrested as dawn broke.

What were they protesting against?

Each of the eight Trident submarines has 24 nuclear missiles on it. The Ground Zero community explains that each of the 24 missiles on one submarine have multiple warheads in it and each warhead has thirty times the destructive power of the weapon used on Hiroshima. One fully loaded Trident submarine carries 192 warheads, each designed to explode with the power of 475 kilotons of TNT force. If detonated at ground level each would blow out a crater nearly half a mile wide and several hundred feet deep.

The bunker area where they were arrested is where the extra missiles are stored.

In December 2010, the five went on trial before a jury in federal court in Tacoma charged with felony damage to government property, conspiracy and trespass.

But before the trial began the court told the defendants what they could and could not do in court. Evidence of the medical consequences of nuclear weapons? Not allowed. Evidence that first strike nuclear weapons are illegal under US and international law? Not allowed. Evidence that there were massive international nonviolent action campaigns against Trident missiles where juries acquitted protestors? Not allowed. The defense of necessity where violating a small law, like breaking down a door, is allowed where the actions are taken to prevent a greater harm, like saving a child trapped in a burning building? Not allowed.

Most of the jurors appeared baffled when defendants admitted what they did in their opening statements. They remained baffled when questions about nuclear weapons were objected to by the prosecutor and excluded by the court. The court and the prosecutor repeatedly focused the jury on their position that this was a trial about a fence. Defendants tried valiantly to point to the elephant in the room -- the hundreds of nuclear weapons.

Each defendant gave an opening and closing statement explaining, as much as they were allowed, why they risked deadly force to expose the US nuclear arsenal.

Sojourner Truth was discussed as were Rosa Parks, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King.

The resistance of the defendants was in the spirit of the civil rights movement, the labor movement, the suffragist movement, the abolition of slavery movement.

Crowds packed the courtroom each of the five days of trial. Each night there was a potluck and a discussion of nuclear weapons by medical, legal and international experts who came for the trial but who were largely muted by the prosecution and the court.

While the jury held out over the weekend, ultimately, the activists were convicted.

Hundreds packed the courthouse today supporting the defendants. The judge acknowledged the good work of each defendant, admitted that prison was unlikely to deter them from further actions, but said he was bound to uphold the law otherwise anarchy would break out and take down society.

The prosecutors asked the judge to send all the defendants to federal prison plus three years supervised probation plus pay over five thousand dollars. The specific jail time asked for ranged from 3 years for Fr. Kelly, 30 months for Susan Crane, Lynne Greenwald, 7 months in jail plus 7 months home confinement, Sr. Anne Montgomery and Fr. Bill Bichsel, 6 months jail plus 6 months home confinement.

Each of the defendants went right into prison from the courtroom as the spectators sang to them. Outside the courthouse, other activists pledged to confront the Trident in whatever way is necessary to stop the illegal and immoral weapons of mass destruction.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
10:45 AM on 03/29/2011
The defendents seem to have forgotten the Governemnt wasn't on trial...they were, for tresspassing into a Nuclear Weapons facility...

The lack of real security there is a bit astounding, however the fact remains they did it with the full understanding and desire to be arrested to make their point. They did, and now they have been tried and convicted for the obvious crime they knowingly and willfully commited.

The sentance was very light, had then gone in and done damage, they would have gotten life sentances.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mike dougles
07:36 AM on 03/29/2011
They did the crime they do the time.
photo
Carbon 60
Science can take us to the stars
04:53 AM on 03/29/2011
Only double chain-link fences? I had more security at my high school? The military could at least put in a moat or something. They are hundreds of nukes after all.
11:46 PM on 03/28/2011
There is nothing unusual about the defendants not being permitted to introduce evidence to challenge the validity of the law which they are charged with violating. While there is some evidence that suggests, early in our Nations history, that jury nullification was explicitly or tacitly permissible, and there is still nothing a Court can do if a jury does nullify the law through an acquittal, the fact is that our law has long held that defendants cannot challenge laws on moral or similar grounds.
10:29 PM on 03/28/2011
Thanks for this report, Bill. The dedication of everyone involved in this resistance is truly inspirational. There is a better way.

"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoSandwiches
10:19 PM on 03/28/2011
Are you kidding me? The people who were supposed to be keeping those nukes safe from terrorists but can't keep out a band of senior citizens should be spending the jail time, and these 5 should be given medals and allowed to test the security of some of our other potential targets.

14 year old hackers get off jail time for helping to crack into systems and teaching how, why not these 5?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
09:39 PM on 03/28/2011
"Walking undetected through the heavily guarded base for hours,"  This needs repeating.
 
Beyond that, this is like history repeating itself, one word- Vietnam.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
09:33 PM on 03/28/2011
This is the proper way of things.  Old people in the movement can stand the confinement.  It's the least we can do.  Young people should run to fight another day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
s0uthparkc0nservative
Rhyme and Reason, living together
07:29 PM on 03/28/2011
I can't believe it–protests against nuclear weaponry WITHOUT needless name-calling, finger-pointing, or accusations of hypocrisy (and from the Church, no less).
And just think...somewhere there might be more.
07:01 PM on 03/28/2011
Would've been nice to see this on the MSM. It would make a great 60min story. Turn it into a movie. These defendants and this cause appear to be lacking in publicity.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
09:40 PM on 03/28/2011
Wonder if any  manufacturers own any of the media outlets?
05:49 PM on 03/28/2011
Please let the courageous Disarm Now! Plowshares know how grateful I am for their action, for their willingness to speak truth to power, time after time, as a witness to the death-dealing weapons that we create, build, store, and use on other creatures. And thank you, Bill Quigley for being their steadfast attorney, trying to explain a defense of justification to those who do not have ears to hear.
lletaa
end war/healthcare for everyone
11:03 AM on 03/29/2011
Yes Alice. These weapons are dangerous and stupid and will destroy us. I can't understand why we consider humans intelligent as we seem to want to become extinict on this planet in the short time we've been here.