As you can see in today's Progressive Breakfast, interpretations of the President's speech ranged widely. Carbon cap is dead. Or alive. Serious push for other clean energy standards and investments. Or desire to take anything they can get. Pragmatic. Or cop-out.
The fact that the speech can be interpreted so many different ways is part of the problem. There was no clear rallying cry for the public to use to press the Senate into action.
And environmental issues are especially vulnerable to counterproductive in-fighting over which super-special idea is the only true silver bullet solution. Not having a clear focal point makes exercising grassroots pressure much harder.
But what was clear is that the President does want to pass some sort of energy reform this year. And if we want to make it as strong as possible, throwing up our hands over the mixed messages from White House doesn't accomplish anything.
It would not be wise to allow the Senate to work its will without grassroots pressure.
The President understandably gave a nod to GOP Sen. Lugar's energy-efficiency proposals in his speech, because he's the only Republican with any kind of compromise proposal on the table, a few Senate Republicans will be needed to get to 60 votes, and 60 votes will be needed.
But letting Lugar dictate the final terms would be terrible. His energy-efficiency proposal appears good, but according to The New Republic's Brad Plumer, Lugar's overall effort to cut carbon emissions is undermined by other loopholes regarding renewable energy standards and coal plants. Plumer argues the Lugar bill could actually lead to less renewable energy production than if we did nothing.
Thankfully, the President did not cite Lugar by name or embrace his entire bill, so Lugar does not yet hold all the cards. But without strong grassroots pressure, 60 votes will coalesce around the least amount of reform possible, precisely where Lugar stands today.
But where should grassroots pressure go? Carbon cap? Renewable energy standards? R&D investment? Energy-efficiency?
All are important. But as far as what to tell your Senator when you pick up the phone or write a letter, at this stage, it doesn't matter.
All that matters for now is that Obama's speech is followed by a strong grassroots response for bold action on clean energy. If we can make it known inside the Senate that the public is demanding real change on energy, we will start the legislative process on a positive note.
Sure, there will be weak proposals and sneaky loopholes to stamp out down the line. Worry about that later.
Originally posted at OurFuture.org
Follow Bill Scher on Twitter: www.twitter.com/billscher
Ari Melber: Where Maddow and Krauthammer Meet on Obama's BP Response
Maddow and Krauthammer diverge on the policies Obama should enact. But unlike much of the commentariat, they both want less dreaming, less posturing, and more details.
Brian D. McLaren: Initial Response to the President's Oval Office Speech
If political, economic, social, and faith community leaders start articulating a bold vision for a new economy, and start demonstrating determined leadership in achieving it, I think they'll find growing numbers of us are fired up and ready to go.
Why does the president have to motivate you to do something that you should be able to do for yourself?
If the tea party can get out there and do it, you should be able to do it to without having to have your hand held. Grow up.
Sorry, but no. That sounds like the same crappy logic that got us that god awful Health "care" bill. The corporations get their cut off the top and we get the scraps. ''
I agree with litesleeper...if you want pple to use less oil then tax it....gov't building electric cars is a recipe for disaster...in fact govt encourages energy use, so they could stop that
If he was working for the good of all of us, his actions would be quite different. I have no sympathy for his short term benefit focus with no hope for long term results. This is not what we need - especially now.
no, please do move to Canada and let us get back to being the USA..
ps. take the bad haircut with you
thanks,
USA
i think that all hell would break loose if the president told us the 100% unvarnished truth. he, like so many before him, is discovering the depths of the miasma at the top of the political heap. mixaphorically speaking. unlike his immediate predecessor, this president is actually attempting to do the job he took on at one of our lowest points. if that means he has to coddle a few here, ignore this, play that up, learn to fudge the facts, well, deal with it. for some reason abraham lincoln leapt into my mind. hmm.
anyway, i wouldn't put that last nail in just yet. there's no precedence for this gulf oil disaster. not really. all of the many other spills that went before were life's little lessons that we swept under the rug. so to speak. the dog ate our homework. we didn't learn. there are still those who still insist that we don't need to change, just do more of it. what could go wrong? well.
i can still hope. so far.
Sorry, but no. That sounds like the same crappy logic that got us that god awful Health "care" bill. The corporations get their cut off the top and we get the scraps.