As President Obama makes his push for health care reform, one of his key selling points has been that if you're happy with your current insurance plan you can keep it. This message appeals to voters afraid of being forced into coverage from a government program. However, a close reading of the proposed legislation suggests this may not be true.
University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein has read the crucial sections of the draft bill and argues that rules about current private health plans are unrealistic and unfairly favor the public option. According to Epstein, the bill says that when members of plan exit from it, the plan is no longer the same plan. Thus, the plan's operators will have to comply with new regulations, something they won't be able to do and still maintain their existing pricing and services.
If Epstein is right, and I suspect he is, then Congress must reconcile these inconsistencies to make good on the President's sales pitch.
Watch the full program at FORA.tv.
Follow Blaise Zerega on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BeeZee
What else would we expect from the "corporati
Epstein -- another free market zealot with lifetime tenure, "opinions" funded by the government grants, and a comfy seat in the faculty club. The only people who doesn't see through the hypocrisy are his colleagues at the U. of Chicago.
This guy Epstein is THE WORST and has LONG ARGUED essentiall
There is no public option in the Baucus bill... there are health care exchanges that uninsured people can join... roughly about 5% will be able to.
You can only "exit the plan", if you're talking about the employer based plan if your premium exceeds ~12% of your gross pay... an unrealisti
This article makes no sense and is very misleading
If you buy your own insurance, you won't be able to afford it a few years from now and will have to cut your own benefits as I just had to do.
And if you have employer-p