More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bob Burnett

GET UPDATES FROM Bob Burnett
 

One, Two, Three, What Are Liberals Fighting For?

Posted: 08/12/11 10:08 AM ET

These are hard times. The weather's bad and the economy awful. Obama has lost his mojo and 14 million Americans are unemployed. Many Liberals are discouraged and fearful about the 2012 election. But there's plenty of time to re-energize, so long as Liberals remember who we are and what we are fighting for.

Liberals are the largest group of registered voters. The most recent Pew Research poll on political preference indicates that 16 percent of registered voters are "solid Liberals" who support "across-the-board Liberal positions." (This compares with 11 percent of registered voters who are "Staunch Conservatives" labeled as "Highly engaged Tea Party supporters.")

The Democratic Party has millions more potential voters than does the Republican Party. Pew Research reports that supporters of the Democratic Party are 40 percent of registered voters: solid Liberals -- 16 percent, "Hard-pressed Democrats" -- 15 percent, and "New Coalition Democrats" -- 9 percent. In contrast, Republicans are 25 percent of registered voters: the Tea Party radicals plus 14 percent who are "Main Street Republicans. The Pew poll sees the 2011 US political world as 40 percent Democratic, 35 percent Independent, and 25 percent Republican. Moreover, 14 percent of Independents are characterized as "Post Moderns," "Moderates, but Liberal on social issues." Liberals should be able to mobilize a majority of registered voters -- Democrats plus Postmodern Independents.

Liberals believe the US economy should work for everyone, not just millionaires and billionaires. Our challenge is to get this message across to American voters.

The 2012 election will feature two dramatically different narratives. The Republican message is: "Government is the problem. Reduce taxes and government and the economy will magically blossom." Liberals need a strong counter message, such as that of Van Jones' Rebuild the Dream movement. Rebuild the Dream proposes a new social contract with 10 elements: Invest in America's infrastructure. Create 21st-Century energy jobs. Invest in public education. Offer Medicare for all. Make work pay. Secure Social Security. Return to fairer tax rates. End the wars and invest at home. Tax Wall Street speculation. Strengthen democracy -- by ensuring fair elections.

Liberals care about the welfare of average Americans and staunch conservatives do not. Recently, activist Carl Pope compared Tea Party radicals to the Taliban, "... just as the Taliban, when they took over Afghanistan in 1994, had an agenda entirely disconnected from the welfare of the average Afghan, the dominant strand of conservative thinking in Washington today couldn't care less what happens to the average American."

Liberals believe America's strength is its diversity: E Pluribus Unum, "Out of many, one." We believe in justice and fair treatment for all Americans, regardless of race, ethnicity, sexual preference, or religious affiliation. That differentiates Liberals from staunch conservatives -- who are Christian and White -- and means that we can form alliances with many groups.

The Pew Research poll notes a fundamental difference between "solid Liberals" and the other two groups that lean Democratic -- "Hard-pressed Democrats" and "New coalition Democrats": "both of these last two groups are highly religious and socially conservative." To the extent that cultural issues -- such as abortion and homosexuality -- dominate political discourse, these groups can be peeled away from the Democratic bloc to vote Republican. In his classic, What's the Matter With Kansas? journalist Tom Frank detailed how Republicans redirect economic discontent to explosive cultural issues. In 2012, "moral purity" will be a major Republican theme -- particularly if messianic Texas Governor Rick Perry becomes the GOP candidate. The Liberal challenge is to ensure that jobs and economic fairness become the dominant political themes, not "How can we make the US a Christian nation?"

Liberals believe in holding politicians accountable, starting with President Obama. Recently labor organizer Amy Dean observed, "[In 2012] Our role cannot once again be to simply elect the lesser of two evils. It must instead be demanding -- as a condition of our enthusiasm, our financial donations and our ground forces in any campaign -- a massive investment in jobs." As the largest group of registered voters, it's time for Liberals to use our strength to get tough with President Obama and other Democratic politicians.

In summary, Liberals are the largest group of registered voters. In 2012 we should be able to mobilize a strong majority of voters. Liberals have a strong message: we believe the US economy should work for everyone; we care about the welfare of average Americans. We believe America's strength is its diversity; we believe in justice and fair treatment for all Americans. These are hard times, but there's too much at stake for Liberals to wallow in discontent.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 373
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fahrenheit 451 usedbooks
activist and progressive bookstore
09:40 PM on 08/14/2011
Was that a joke? your opinion, or did I miss something or are just saying the constitutional Democracy we did live in is now a republic beacuse last I checked it was a constitutional democracy at least on paper!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SShaw490
04:52 PM on 08/14/2011
When all the shouting is done, America will vote to decide whether America is to become a full-on plutocracy in which corporations run the country, or whether America is a country that values middle class, average Americans. I live in Texas, and Rick Perry offers a country of minimum wage, uninsured, uneducated labor. Mitt Romney offers a Bain Capital-esque threat of lower wages, lesser benefits or we'll ship your job to China. Michelle Bachman offers a "smaller government" that cares more about what goes on in your bedroom than what goes into the water you drink.

Complain all you want about Barack Obama, but he's a fundamentally decent man who values average Americans. Maybe he's made compromises that you don't like; maybe he's been beaten back by Republican supply-side religion zealots in some issues that he should have won. But you have a binary choice - one vision or the other. Whatever you do, go down and vote for every Democrat you can find and put your stamp on America's future. If you pout in your house, you give tacit approval to the Tea Party, because that's what runs the Republican party these days.
04:25 PM on 08/14/2011
We fight for the betterment of all people and nations. We fight for an end to carnage. We fight for everybody's rights. We fight for those who can't. So long as there is injustice and problems exist, we will continue to fight and fight and fight.
11:53 AM on 08/14/2011
As a liberal Democrat I can tell you that my problem, and that of many other liberals is that the Democratic candidates we have to select from are either weak-willed or just Republicans with a Democratic label. (I speak of our "Democratic" president).

Living in Maryland, I am fortunate, I have Barbara Mikulski who IMO is one of the few Dems out there that really gives a damn about the people of Maryland and the US. My rep is John Sarbanes, and again, a good caring person. Liberals in other states, even ones with Democratic Senators and Representatives are not as lucky.

I will go to the Democratic Primary and I will vote for any Democratic candidate besides Obama, but if Obama is the Democratic candidate for president, I will hold my nose and vote for him because a Bachmann, Perry or Romney would be exponentially worse for this country.
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
11:22 AM on 08/14/2011
Thinly veiled attempt to convince us that anyone who is not tea party is a closet democrat and will win the election if we would only "come out"? I somehow think not!

"Liberals believe the US economy should work for everyone, not just millionaires and billionaires." - Again not all republicans are billionaires so this position is not exclusive to the dems. I think there are more "Liberals" who have had enough of the BS that is being shoved down our throats by Obama and the Democrats than you would like to think about.

Keep breathing your exhaust Bob 2012 is coming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cal3b G
04:40 AM on 08/14/2011
Liberals need not focus all their efforts on corporate-bought elections. Those elected are rarely able to get many liberal policies enacted anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
11:04 PM on 08/13/2011
Liberals have a strong message: we believe the US economy should work for everyone; we care about the welfare of average Americans. We believe America's strength is its diversity; we believe in justice and fair treatment for all Americans. These are hard times, but there's too much at stake for Liberals to wallow in discontent.

=================================

And a vote for Obama is a vote for "austerity", for more caving to the right and to corporate dominance over our lives.

As are all votes for incumbent Democrats -- They dance to the tune of the head of the party and the party elites that control them: The DLC and its other groups like The Third Way and No Labels.
06:09 PM on 08/13/2011
Greetings Bob...

It is great to be a liberal and espouse policies that only work out in the mind of people like yourself and the intelligentsia. Please show me one policy of the past that has worked-and when you do please use facts instead of verbal virtuosity that has not meaning other than creating more misguided emotional divide and class warfare...

I leave you with this quote-"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill

Warm regards,

Michael Winters
07:11 PM on 08/13/2011
It seems that government has done a lot of good things. Reducing the poverty and severe illness of our elderly, cleaning up our air and water, keeping food safe, building highways. I wouldn't all these things socialism, but shared responsibility for our common life. I wonder where Michael draws the line? Highways, military, food stamps, air traffic safety...

see: http://governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=7&p=4
08:04 PM on 08/13/2011
Impressive high sounding rhetoric. England had Churchill, Sweden had socialism. I'll take Sweden any time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roxiehart
They both reached for the gun
05:16 PM on 08/13/2011
"Americans' political ideology at the midyear point of 2011 looks similar to 2009 and 2010, with 41% self-identifying as conservative, 36% as moderate, and 21% as liberal."

You libs are out numbered nearly 2 to 1. With an even split of "indies", you lose badly. Read it and weep.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/148745/Political-Ideology-Stable-Conservatives-Leading.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=All%20Gallup%20Headlines%20-%20Government%20-%20Political%20Parties%20-%20Politics
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:54 PM on 08/13/2011
i hate to break the news to ya but "moderate " is code word for liberal.. ANY CONSERVATIVE WILL TELL U THAT!!!
03:35 PM on 08/13/2011
Folks, you may not like Obama and might even hate him, but if everyone stays home just imagine a Perry presidency with an all GOP/TP controlled congress.
Fine, stay at home, but damned sure don't call yourselves patriots. You wont deserve that title.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dapits
Constitution is not just a piece of paper
08:35 PM on 08/13/2011
Yes I can imagine a GOP?TP controlled congress. Hooray, I can also imagine all the socialists being run out of the country on a rail w/some tar and feathers.
05:20 AM on 08/14/2011
Wouldn't it be grand
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
01:41 PM on 08/14/2011
That would like pretty much like what we have now. What difference does it make if Obama serves up destructive corporatist policies or a Republican does?
02:48 PM on 08/13/2011
From this blog: " As the largest group of registered voters, it's time for Liberals to use our strength to get tough with President Obama and other Democratic politicians."

Define "get tough". We have only one weapon to use in our get-tough arsenal: voting. And if Obama ends up being the Democratic (ha-ha) nominee, what's the point? We will get four more years of Republican policies, sappy speeches and unconditional surrender. I am weary of the rah-rahs telling we Progressives to get going or get tough or get out the vote or whatever. Tell me what good it will do and maybe I will fall in line. If Bernie Sanders will challenge Obama, I am all in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
columbusbuck
LGBT/Veteran
05:52 AM on 08/14/2011
A coordinated write-in campaign for a true liberal would send notice I think. Perhaps Senator Bernie Sanders?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
02:19 PM on 08/14/2011
Let's pretend Bernie Sanders was president right now, with the same Congress. How exactly could he get the Republican House to pass progressive legislation? I'm sure he'd give his standard fiery speeches, and rail about the injustice of it all. And the Republicans would yawn and once again vote no. Sound and fury, signifying nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
columbusbuck
LGBT/Veteran
03:11 PM on 08/14/2011
At least act like you give a damn.
03:41 PM on 08/14/2011
President Sanders would leverage his many years in Congress to tap into friendships that he has formed. He would propose specific ideas and plans (not make generic comments) and then task the Democrats who would ALL rally behind him to turn his ideas into legislation. Of course the Republicans will balk but deals can be made with REAL negotiations to turn a critical few against the minority. President Sanders would stand firm on his positions (not back-down or surrender) and use the media to communicate to and educate the voters. Many staunch Republicans ("Keep your government hands off my Medicare!") would apply pressure to their representatives if they only understood what the impact would be to them as the result of the Republican nay-sayers. President Sanders would diplomatically but forcefully make the Republicans look like bad guys in the eyes of the public. Unlike the current occupant who wants to be their friend.
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
02:22 PM on 08/13/2011
One, Two, Three, What Are Liberals Fighting For?

For the “right” to spend other people’s money, run other people’s lives, and engineer a society based on their own cravenly misbegotten ideology.

For the right to pay off political supporters with tax dollars in corrupt collusion between party and public employee unions.

Too gutless to be real socialists, “liberals’” are “fighting” to continue leeching off of the success of capitalism, while resenting and bemoaning their entire dependence upon it.

Moreover, “liberals” are so gutless that they feel compelled to adopt the very term that denotes liberty, while their very aims are to subjugate every aspect of freedom to the collectivism of social democracy, while bastardizing language itself to create new “freedoms’, “positive” ones to replace the actual freedom they really seek to destroy, which they choose to characterize as “negative” freedom, rendering the very medium of political discussion useless.

In other words, to expand the evil of government, itself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClintBMD
Now where did I leave that Micro-bio again?
04:00 PM on 08/13/2011
Your opinion is so pathetically skewed, I almost feel sorry for you.

Almost.

You should sue your school board. They failed you miserably.
05:25 PM on 08/13/2011
He's probably the chairman
11:51 AM on 08/16/2011
I wish I had your ability to be so frank and outspoken. It's nice to be nice, but sometimes a man's got to do what a man's got to do.
09:56 PM on 08/13/2011
How did you end up being so confused? Liberals and socialists have never been on the same side. Did you come to your conclusions by yourself or did somebody help you?
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
10:42 AM on 08/14/2011
See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_democracy

Unless you have been asleep since before the left disingenuously adopted the term, "Liberal" after destroying the term progressive early in the 20th century, you have no excuse for so asinine a statement.
01:54 PM on 08/13/2011
It's not the number of liberals, but the number of VOTING Liberals. We all know that Obama, being a quasi-Republican, has turned the stomach of many liberals who have had their fill of Washington D.C.

Many, many, many liberals will now just stay home...what's the point if their hard work just gets us more of the same.
indyclem
looking for logic
03:40 PM on 08/13/2011
according to a recent poll he still has an 83% approval rating among libs
05:37 PM on 08/13/2011
I question the definition of "approval rating" in that poll.

95% of Soviet citizens preferred Breznev to Stalin (or... at least, feared him less)

"approval" would be another thing altogether...in Russian OR English
tm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cathyjs
11:07 AM on 08/14/2011
We Republicans take offense at anyone linking obama to our party. obama is definitely NOT a Republican and we don't apreciate you smearing our party. We were smart enough to know that you cannot take a community organizer junior senator who spent over a million dollars having his records sealed and turn him into a president.

This experiment gone terribly wrong will end in January 2013. Not a second too soon.
Dealerdeb1
Conservative Libertarian truth
12:32 PM on 08/14/2011
11% are "LABELED? By whom? more of the same smear tactics. Ther reality is Independants make up the largest sector and they are 78% against Obama at this point in time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClintBMD
Now where did I leave that Micro-bio again?
01:42 PM on 08/13/2011
Mr. Burnett,

It would help if we had a liberal or even centrist President to motivate the troops. But he isn't, and we don't. I will vote because I know it's critical. But I also know human nature, and with no leadership there is rarely any way of rallying those troops.

I agree with you in a way, but translating it into reality is the nut we have to crack.
05:46 PM on 08/13/2011
Speaking of inspiration.....

The President's campaign has just about settled on the 2012 campaign slogan.

"Re-elect Obama: Often Not As Bad As Those Other Guys"

What d'ya think?

The President's advisors chose it overwhelmingly over their second chioce...which was

"Don't Blame Us...We Voted For Hillary Too"
tm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClintBMD
Now where did I leave that Micro-bio again?
06:11 PM on 08/13/2011
hehehe I do like the slogans. My personal favorite, but not in the running, was: "Obama. Because change was really overrated anyway."
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
11:34 AM on 08/14/2011
In the Lib's case, reality is simply an illusion created by a temporary lack of paranoia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
12:17 PM on 08/13/2011
This is all well and good, but where are our Liberal candidates who are campaigning on these ideals? It's not about mobilizing the voters, it's about having someone to vote FOR. Liberal voters know very well what they want; they just can't find it on the ballot. I would venture to say that's why so many of them stay home on election day.

Liberals thought they were buying the real thing when they voted for Obama. Now we know that was just a lot of rhetoric to win. So now what do we do? The chances of there being a legitimate Progressive/Liberal challenger to Obama and the Tea Party is slim to none. And that's really too bad. We need a dog in this fight and we don't have one.
01:16 PM on 08/13/2011
Well stated Inmy.
02:03 PM on 08/13/2011
The President can only do so much. His (or her) job is not to legislate or even offer legislation it is to manage the nations affairs under existing conditions. When half the democrats in Congress voice concern over single payer health care you have to go where the votes are. When the ridiculous rules of the Senate lead to a situation where a hardline minority can require a super majority vote just to get legislation to the floor you take what you can get.

Any outside "Progressive" candidate who goes into the Whitehouse with the idea of cleaning up Washington will quickly suffer the same fate as Jimmy Carter. He will have no support and no leverage to get anything through Congress and will be followed, after one term, by something much worse than we can currently imagine.

My suggestion is to change party affiliation for the primaries and insure that the Republicans nominate the most vile possible candidate then vote in a decent Congress in the general election.

Obama is not perfect but if you "Progressives" take your balls and go home, splitting the Liberal vote, try getting used to saying President Perry and Senate Majority Leader McConnell while you're pick out a privatized Social Security broker.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
02:11 PM on 08/13/2011
Oh, please. Not another lecture about party unity for the sake of making sure the other guys don't win. The reason we keep getting center right candidates posing as Democrats is because we keep voting them in.
04:35 PM on 08/16/2011
I would agree with you but not on your suggestion about the party switch for the primaries because it has all the elements of a trojan horse. It would be the end of the democratic party and I don't expect the Supreme Court would be inclined to uphold the results.