An Open Letter To Joe Lieberman
Dear Senator Lieberman,
Congratulations! You got away with it! So despite having supported and endorsed the Republican candidate for president -- and going so far as to question the patriotism of the Democratic nominee -- you've managed to keep your chairmanship. By rights, you should've been summarily ejector-seated from your committees, bonked on the head with your gavels -- cartoon-style -- and hauled from the Democratic caucus naked and on a rail whilst being pelted with wadded-up copies of your RNC address.
The aforementioned reasons for this still-lenient serving of justice fails to include the syllabus of other trespasses against you, including, first and foremost, your unwavering support for the Bush administration's unforgivable foreign policy -- a policy which has all but bankrupted our treasury and besmirched America's reputation abroad. Heckuva job, Senator!
One might be inclined to consider your conduct to date as somehow principled -- even mavericky, had it not been so transparently self-serving. Your behavior has been that of a man guided by nothing more than petty vengeance and retribution -- attention-starved opportunism not unlike grade-school instigators and gossip-mongers whose only path to relevance is to play two friends against each other. Worming your way from side to side depending on which kid or clique likes you more.
Now, I completely understand the political reasons for why President-elect Obama and the caucus ultimately chose to keep you around. Unfortunately, the Democrats need your stinky vote -- such as it is -- in order to theoretically break any future Republican filibusters. And there will be many of those to be sure. However, the closer we get to 60 votes in the caucus the better our chances of reversing the craptastical policies and legislation of your favorite Bush administration and the formerly Republican Congress.
Sure, there's no guarantee that you'll vote with the caucus, but you made it clear that you would have pitched a spasmodic, petulant fit and changed your affiliation to the Republican Party from the "Lieberman Loves Lieberman" party or whatever the hell it's called, had you been stripped of your chairmanship. Consequently, the Democratic caucus would've definitely lost your vote. It's an unenviable "possibly" versus "definitely" proposition. And with the caucus being this close to 60 against what will surely be an obstructionist Republican caucus, we have no other choice but to roll the dice with "possibly."
That is until 2010 when the Democrats will hopefully attain enough members, and thus votes, that they won't need your support anymore. Then you can storm off and mind-screw the Republicans for a couple of years until -- and it's probably not good strategy to tip our hand like this, but you know it's coming -- until you lose in 2012.
Nevertheless, you got what you wanted yesterday. Circumstances allowed you to keep your chairmanship irrespective of your weasely and contemptible maneuvering. And more than a few of us on the left actually agree with you for once: you managed to abscond off without adequate punishment.
You got away with it, despite those meddling kids, right?
Not so fast.
I submit to you, Senator Lieberman, that you were punished yesterday more than you realize. Stick with me on this. I'll explain.
I've been a supporter of the president-elect for the better part of a year now, and while I've always recognized a deep intellectualism and multilayered thoughtfulness in the man, it never fully occurred to me how he would use these strengths in a position of leadership. Until this week.
In sharp contrast to your behavior, President-elect Obama hasn't shown any predilection for pettiness or disloyalty, nor has he undermined his allies for the sake of political expedience. He's proved himself to be a man of great character. Of values. I don't need to remind anyone how he stood by Jeremiah Wright, for example, and at his own political peril when most would've tossed him overboard like political chum.
You, on the other hand, have shown an unapologetic contempt for the party that once nominated you for the vice presidency -- the party that welcomed you back to the fold even though you slipped through the system and defeated the fairly elected Democratic nominee, Ned Lamont, in 2006. You've betrayed your fellow liberals to settle a political score, Senator -- in order to exact some kind of ignoble payback against your former party, against your caucus and against the netroots for merely calling you out on your literal and figurative smooching of the president.
This is behavior President-elect Obama doesn't appear to be capable of. Because he's clearly better than you. In fact, it's not difficult to hypothesize that had you possessed a fraction of his political instincts or any small measure of his morality, you would absolutely not be in this position, Senator.
See, by allowing you to keep your precious chairmanship -- by letting you off the hook -- President-elect Obama, through his political bigness, punished you without punishing you. He beat you yesterday, Senator. He beat you because he let you be you, and underscored it with his demonstrably better angels and strength of character.
In the final analysis, the hard reality is that by not choosing retribution, he made you look...
...small.
And that, Senator, is good enough for me.
Cheers!
Bob Cesca
The Huffington Post
BobCesca.com
Order my new book: One Nation Under Fear, with a foreword by Arianna Huffington. Also available in stores.
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Bob Cesca: I am in awe of your writing. I would go down on my knees to be on a par with you. Unfortunately when I am critical of something, or someone, my letters always get dismissed, whited out in fact. Of course, I am but an amateur.
Many congratulations, please keep up your own fantastic standard.
Multiple cheers,
Venise
Your open letter to Mr. Lieberman resonated particularly strong after seeing Lieberman say somewhat proudly on TV that the president-elect wants him kept in the democratic fold with his ego and chairmanship power intact . Like many who responded to your open letter, I was LMAO. Your words rang true and it was so hilarious, I had tears on my eyes. If I was an editor, I would change nothing. I am recent political junkie, a republican obama voter living in the South with now nascent democratic leanings thanks to the ilks of hannity, oreilly, and limbaugh who are still popular here but it doesn't take rocket science intelligence to figure them all out. Steve Kroft of 60 minutes said recently that he was impressed with the president-elect in his exclusive interview because Obama was the only politician he knows whose answer to a follow up question was more impressive than the answer to the prior question. Like Steve Kroft, if you are impressed with the president-elect's reaction to Lieberman's treachery, you ain't seen nothin' yet. Like Chris Mathews of MSNBC, I will do everything I can in my own small way to help his presidency a success.
What is all the hullabaloo about a 60 vote Senate majority? The democrats talk as if this will be a panacea that will provide an opposition-free chamber. This is nonsense. Realize there are senators with a mind of their own that thankfully don't always vote a party line. This includes independent thinking republicans that could vote with democrats on issues. This banter by democrats about the urgency of having Lieberman in their caucus is baloney. They want Lieberman because Lieberman has access to wealthy political donors. Ask Ned Lamont (remember him?)
Yes, Obama let Lieberman bare his shame alone. In ancient Japan such people would slash their stomachs and die rather than live in shame.......
Lieberman is no doubt the smallest of the small.
He is so without character that he cannot even bring himself to fully and openly just admit he behaved badly. Instead he couches his actions in all kinds of innuendo suggesting he just wishes he could have said some things more tactfully. What a CROCK. What a phoney.
Small among men is Joe Lieberman.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer!
Craptastical, my new favorite word!!! LMAO
Dear Bob Cesca,
BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO.
Perfect. From your lips to voters ears. I can wait in peace for 2012. And it may be the finest punishment of all that Senator Lieberman also wait and wait and wait for the inevitable punishment.
I feel better now. Thank you.
Nice Rant Bob. Nice Rant. Lieberman couldn't even move the Jewish vote in Florida for McCain. I wouldn't be so sure if his chairmanship gets yanked...all in due time...all in due time.
The Democrats should have ridden Lieberman out of town on a rail.
Yeah, yeah....Obama was big...and Bob is right...Joe is small. But, you know, I still want the j@#!#a$$ thrown out of the caucus.
my sentiments exactly
"small"...what a great word! Thanks, Bob!
Bob, great conclusion. The senator is small. Good thing he never was in line to be president. Sarah at least was good looking, can't say the same for the good senator from Connecticut. He will pass in history as some inconsequential figure. He will probably loose his senate seat shortly, it will be the voters who will eject him. I'm pretty sure Obama knows or at least expects this!
diggin that bob.
Well done, Cesca. Very well done, and that's enough for me.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
