iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bob Cesca

GET UPDATES FROM Bob Cesca

Rick Perry's Epic Lying Could Make Him the Next President

Posted: 09/21/11 11:57 PM ET

The scariest thing about Rick Perry's campaign isn't just that he's the likely Republican nominee, it's that he's displayed an unapologetic exuberance for telling supercolossal lies, most recently in the form of a pulse-pounding, face-melting, cinematic commercial. The efficacy of these kinds of lies could catapult him to the White House.

Most politicians equip their mendacity with convenient escape pods with which they can conveniently jettison their weaselly words by way of a few artful dodges. Not Rick Perry. His lie machine is a red, white and blue phallic rocket ship fueled by post-apocalyptic imagery and a musical score that Michael Bay would reject for being too over-the-top.

Perry's latest commercial, titled "Proven Leadership" is a perfect example of what Perry is capable of. And it's something the Democrats and the president's reelection campaign staff ought to take very seriously.

The story begins with hyperspeed edits of the aforementioned post-apocalyptic hellscape, each one reminiscent of I Am Legend or the nuclear bomb sequence from Terminator 2. Empty streets, empty houses, empty playground swings swaying as though the children formerly in them were, seconds earlier, vaporized by President Obama's army of Internal Revenue Gaydroids.

The audio, and especially the music, is a fantastic way to test the dynamic range of your home theater subwoofer, and it builds to such a crescendo that it makes the old THX "Digitally Enhanced" movie bumper sound like the Mr. Roger's Neighborhood theme.

There's even an air-raid siren in there. An air-raid siren! Even if it were true that President Obama ruined the economy all by himself (it's not even close to true), there's nothing in the history of the last three years indicating that we're in danger of an aerial attack. At least not in our commonly known dimension -- the epistemically closed fantasyland playing out in the twisted imaginations of tea party Republicans is another story.

Throughout this Armageddon sequence, we hear the voice of President Obama describing how the economy has improved since he took office, which is true. Contradicting the president's words are the voices of, I assume, various Fox News anchors telling us that the president has created "zero jobs." More about this lie presently.

Another air-raid siren leads up to a full stop cut-to-black transition and the triumphant entrance of Rick Perry who angelically materializes with majestic, patriotic B-roll that includes fighter jets soaring in formation, Perry riding in a helicopter, archival Perry in a flight suit and aviator glasses, cheering throngs of supporters, spotwelding sparks, the Iwo Jima memorial, churches, farmers, a gazillion American flags and, inexplicably, several horses running on a beach (appropriately, they're running to the right). This second half of the video is clearly designed to make Sean Hannity's entire audience have a simultaneous orgasm.

And, you know, I'm seriously understating the ridiculousness of the thing.

This is how Rick Perry delivers a lie. With thunderous gusto.

The video tells us in no uncertain terms and with steroid-pumped jingoism that the president created "zero jobs." This is the big lie being delivered by this garish extravaganza and it's repeated throughout the first half of the video. Perry also spoke this lie to everyone watching the most recent CNN debate.

Rick Perry on CNN last week: "[President Obama] had $800 billion worth of stimulus in the first round of stimulus. It created zero jobs, $400-plus billion dollars in this package. And I can do the math on that one. Half of zero jobs is going to be zero jobs."

The nonpartisan website Politifact gave Rick Perry a "Pants on Fire" rating for this one -- as in, liar, liar, pants on fire. Not even remotely true. Rick Perry made this up. It's fiction. The entire premise of his latest video, with all of its amplified puffery, is a fabrication. Not like it really matters to Republican voters who exist inside an ideological bubble the size of Mark Levin's adenoids, but here's the truth from Politifact. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported that the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA, also known as "the stimulus") saved or created 1.3 million to 3.6 million jobs. IHS/Global Insight reported 2.45 million jobs were saved or created. The Macroeconomic Advisers reported 2.3 million jobs were saved or created. And Moody's Economy reported 2.5 million jobs were saved or created.

Even if only one job was "created" and the rest were simply "saved," that's still not "zero jobs," as Rick Perry claimed.

Politifact also wrote that during the second quarter of this year alone the ARRA created "555,029 full-time equivalent jobs."

Let's recap. Where were we when President Obama took office? The economy was hemorrhaging up to 820,000 jobs a month during the deepest recession since the Great Depression -- and we've learned recently that the economy was even worse than was observed at the time. This was before the president took office in late January, 2009. Before the president was inaugurated, the economy lost 3.1 million jobs during the recession under President Bush, and another 2 million jobs in the first three months of the Obama administration before any of the president's economic policies were in place.

I don't care who you are or what party you represent but no one on this planet is capable of restoring that many jobs in this economy within three years. Impossible. Especially considering that corporations have discovered during the recession that profits are higher if they pay fewer people to do more work, or if they simply ship the jobs overseas. That's one reason why corporate profits are skyrocketing even though unemployment remains high. Workers, especially those with mortgages on the brink, are terrified of losing their jobs, so they're agreeing to do more work for less pay and reduced, if not eliminated, benefits. No amount of tax cuts for corporations or the super rich will roll back this corporate strategy. It works.

Nevertheless, upon the signing of the ARRA, every economic indicator shows that the economy turned around almost instantly. In January of 2009, the economy lost 820,000 jobs. By June, that number was cut in half. In November on 2009, the economy was creating 50,000 jobs. Meanwhile, the Dow rose from 6,000 at the beginning of 2009 to over 10,000 by the end of the year. First quarter GDP rose from -6.4 percent to +5.7 percent by the fourth quarter.

The only problem with the ARRA was that it simply wasn't large enough to match the utter magnitude of the catastrophe. In subsequent months, the recovery leveled off, and the Republican efforts to sabotage the economy by stonewalling support for anything that could turboboost the recovery have been shockingly successful.

Despite congressional Republican obstruction and the need for more stimulus, we're still in a recovery albeit a slow one (hence the need for the president's new American Jobs Act), and none of these factors alter the reality that the ARRA worked. It created or saved millions of jobs and rescued the economy from a decline into what could have been an insurmountable disaster, and no amount of anthemic bumper sticker marketeering can change this objective reality.

The Republican marketing machine is strikingly powerful. Rick Perry's new video is a fantastic example of the Republican capacity to obfuscate the truth and win supporters in spite of flagrantly lying to them. They're able to get away with whopper lies so massive, they're almost hilariously off the rails. Mitt Romney, for example, released a chart recently that blamed President Obama for the job losses that occurred in 2007 and 2008 -- before the president was even elected.

Their ability to shape their own reality -- to blame the president for the entire recession while simultaneously rigging the game against the recovery is unprecedented in American political history. It's evidence that the modern Republican Party has ceased to be driven by policy and ideas, and, instead, has become nothing more than a marketing and advertising firm selling candidates like packs of cigarettes. You'll look cool and it'll feel so good. They fish you in, get you hooked and you wind up voting against your own best interests while lamenting, "Why-oh-why does the nation have cancer? Must be the black guy." It's infomercial fiction pitched and sold using Fox News propaganda, AM talk radio fury, cinematic production values, easy-to-remember Frank Luntz zingers and all varieties of star-spangled cheerleading. They've been able to so effectively whitewash their guilt in this economic mess that the current Republican frontrunner is a top-down J.J. Abrams reboot of George W. Bush (who actually was the president when the economy collapsed).

And voters are buying it like pie.

The consequences include the results of the latest CNN poll showing that independent voters are supporting the Republicans -- lies and all -- by a margin of 53 to 28 over President Obama.

That's scary. So maybe the air-raid siren was appropriate after all.

Listen to the Bubble Genius Bob & Chez Show on iTunes, with Bob Cesca and Chez Pazienza.
Bob Cesca's Awesome Blog! Go!

 
 
 

Follow Bob Cesca on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bobcesca_go

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,296
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Iamthx1138
11:44 AM on 09/28/2011
The shear scope of the mess left behind by Bush and the subprime mortgage crisis was- and still is- unfixeable. By anyone. I think Obama essentially took over the helm of the Titanic after the bow was already under water.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Iamthx1138
11:37 AM on 09/28/2011
It amazes me that no one on the right seems to have even the faintest memory of the economic smoking crater that Dubya left behind for Obama. No one on the right seems to remember the bomb that produced this economic nightmare was the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008, and credit for that goes squarely to Team Bush and, among others, his fed chairman Alan Greenspan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Quitcherbichin
If you are posting here, thank a veteran.
06:44 PM on 09/27/2011
Rick Perry's Epic Lying Could Make Him the Next President"

Why not? It worked for Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christian Howell
The STEM. The Whole STEM. Nothing but the STEM.
06:00 PM on 09/27/2011
Just watched the video. At the end he sounded like the candidate from the Chris Rock movie.
03:32 AM on 09/27/2011
'They fish you in, get you hooked and you wind up voting against your own best interests while lamenting, "Why-oh-why does the nation have cancer? Must be the black guy."'

And the tea party ignoranti eat it up.
01:29 AM on 09/27/2011
Don't worry. Neither Perry nor Obama will be president.
05:07 PM on 09/25/2011
I am an independent voter, so I will choose who I vote for as the time to vote arrives. But I find the GOP strategy amazing. They will take a lie and then beat it to death by repeating it over and over again. What is absolutely astonishing is that the Republican base then start believing this to be true. The debt ceiling was raised 7 out of 8 times during the Bush administration by the Republican Congress, and it became such a huge issue in 2011 for Obama. The Rebublicans keep repeating this mantra about rich individuals must get a tax cut (extension of BUsh cuts) and must not pay higher taxes because the rich create jobs. Well, if that is true, then where did all these created jobs go when Bush gave the rich the tax cuts in the first place? I am not happy with Obama, but as yet I do not see a better alternative. I see Rick Perry, who will tell any lie. His theory is just make a strong statement and damn the facts. JUst promise to do this or that without showing how. Has our country ever been led by a weaker group of leaders? And finally, We always deserve the leaders we get because after all we are the ones electing them. Can't we look past the TV ads and look behing the sound bites? If we would, we would vote intelligently and our nation would have a better group of leaders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Loubro2
Cool Lou
10:49 PM on 09/25/2011
Preach!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loveis22984
ah wah wrong wi yah
03:56 PM on 09/25/2011
This is exactly why republicans love to underfund education.
photo
The Corporate Champion
Conservative, because someone's got to do the work
02:43 PM on 09/25/2011
Rick Perry 2012.
02:32 PM on 09/25/2011
President Obama clearly said in his campaign that it wouldn't be easy to fix America, and it could take 3-4 or more years. He knew this, and he told us up front, exhorting, "Together we can do it." From the moment he's taken office, the media has done nothing to support him, hammering away with early, frequent opinion polls, which created a diversion of premature judgment 3 months or 6 months, etc. in, "reporting" about the economy, without reminding voters with amnesia WHY and HOW we got into this situation.
We would be far better off right now, if the Republicans in the House would stop their elementary games of obstructionism at any cost, and get down to the real work of helping the rest of the country--not just the billion dollar corporations.
01:31 PM on 09/27/2011
Fan #2
01:35 PM on 09/25/2011
I'm an Independent and I just finished reading Suskind's new book, and I sent Obama a check. Here's why--in 2008, I thought everything was too much of a mess to elect someone who had less experience than I. I wanted Hillary cause she'd been through the fire and is intelligent. Bout all you need.
I would have voted for McCain because he had years of connections and while not the brightest light--he could get things done without understanding them. Then Palin and the religion stuff. Religion is fine, but like a really good single malt whiskey should never be mixed with anything else.
So, I went with Obama, but not for that emotional feel good we elected a black guy which Liberals did with the same enthusiam as the hopeful who like Perry cause people like to feel good, Obama was just the lesser of two wrong ways to go like most elections are if you're Independent and don't get off on some emotional play for your vote.
After the book, which I found to be excellent at explaining every problem I had with Obama--I see what a waste it would be to not give him the four years that he can now do cause he lived with the three years that he just did. As I thought, inexperience was his big problem, but he's lived through the fire and finally realizes that intelligence is great, but knowing how to use it as President is hard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueagle8u
12:33 PM on 09/25/2011
Great article!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sock Monkey
Deceive. Inveigle. Obfuscate. The DC mantra.
08:51 PM on 09/24/2011
I highly dislike Rick Perry but what about being told there'd be SHOVEL READY jobs in the stimulus bill only to have our President come out 2 years later and LAUGHINGLY tell us that there weren't any ?

Neither side gives a rats ass about us. The sooner we all realize it, the better.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lifeofthemind
12:47 AM on 09/25/2011
I feel for you, but you're falling for a sloganeering soundbite. Please reread the article (or read it for the first time) and pay attention to the actual, factual numbers and think.
12:42 PM on 09/25/2011
if i am not mistaken, the vast majority of stimulis went to tax cuts
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Loubro2
Cool Lou
12:04 AM on 09/26/2011
ridiculous
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christian Howell
The STEM. The Whole STEM. Nothing but the STEM.
05:40 PM on 09/27/2011
It ended up being around 40%. That's right 40%.
photo
SpinDizzy
This Space for Rent
09:14 PM on 09/23/2011
I guess one could panic at the sight of Perry and his overproduced whoopers. Or you could smile and nod at the sight of his current meltdown, where just about every right wing pundit is dumping on his feeble debate performances. Perry is just another GOP flavor of the month, up there with the Trumpster and Mama Grizzly. He'll be gone before the snow flies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Republicrat1776
Conservative liberal, not a liberal conservative
12:38 PM on 09/25/2011
Whoever eventually wins is going to use the same lies. Our job is to not let anyone forget that jobs were being lost every month until Obama, when jobs started being created
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Loubro2
Cool Lou
12:08 AM on 09/26/2011
thank you for the truth
10:48 AM on 09/23/2011
This article/post is proof that the Dems really are getting nervous about Perry beating Obama. The usual approach is to support or at least go easy on the Repub candidate who is *least* likely to beat the Pres. The fact that Perry is not only lying but is already characterized with "*EPIC* lying" means the libs are really and truly scared.
12:19 PM on 09/25/2011
Or it could be the libs are just telling the truth. You know, being more reality-based and all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
01:34 PM on 09/25/2011
I'm a Texan and we know all about Perry. Perry is a master Texas politician. He's never lost an election because he tells whoever he is speaking to exactly what they want to hear. He's done this his whole career and he's successful because of it. His problem is with the internet and the ability to record what he said to this group when he says the opposite next week to another group. When you've lied that many times and told every group whatever they want to hear after a while you forget who you told what to. His problem is the internet remembers when he doesn't.
Perry will tell you what you want to hear. Absolutely anything you want to hear. He'll tell the next group what they want to hear too. Remember that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plantwomyn
Fighting for full citizenship
02:07 PM on 09/25/2011
Then the question has to be why does Perry and his campaign believe that we want to hear a LIE? Either Perry has no respect for us as informed citizens or we citizens have failed to prove that lying to us guarantees that we will NOT vote for you. The only other answer is that Perry believes that voters don't care what the truth is, they just follow like sheep.
If any one of these is true, we have an illness in this country and no one person will ever be able to "lead" us to the remedy.
If we disagree it should be because we base our opinion on the FACTS. For those of you that blindly believe and echo the lies, shame on you. Take your citizenship seriously or IMHO you are unworthy to vote.