iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brendan DeMelle

Brendan DeMelle

GET UPDATES FROM Brendan DeMelle

Why We Need a Nationwide Moratorium on Fracking

Posted: 05/ 6/11 01:58 PM ET

Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced his appointments to a fracking safety panel late yesterday. While this panel might seem a step in the right direction to hold the gas industry accountable for fracking threats, it falls short of what is truly needed right now: a nationwide moratorium on fracking until thorough scientific studies are conducted to assess the risks posed by fracking to drinking water, public health and the global climate.

From a brief look at the makeup of this new DOE panel, I see several red flags already. If this is truly about determining the "safety" of fracking, where are the hydrologists, air pollution experts, ecologists and climate scientists? The composition of this panel does not live up to the commitment to science-based decision-making that Secretary Chu and President Obama repeatedly tout.

DeSmogBlog released an extensive report today, "Fracking The Future," documenting the fracking threats we know about (so far) and urging a nationwide moratorium on fracking. The risks are simply too great to allow fracking to continue right now. Just in the past few months, fracking has been linked with earthquakes in Arkansas, horrid air pollution in rural gas patches, a gas well blowout in Pennsylvania, drinking water contamination and health problems among homeowners living near fracking operations. Many of these impacted families are choosing to leave their homes out of fear of further disasters and health effects. These are unacceptable risks that must be studied further immediately.

Truly independent scientists from all relevant disciplines must examine the gas industry's fracking practices thoroughly to determine if the benefits outweigh the risks to our future.

Our report also reveals Big Oil's recent takeover of the unconventional gas industry, which is no longer comprised of the "mom and pop" small independent companies that the industry's front groups claim to represent. Instead, the gas fracking boom is largely dominated by some of the largest polluters on the planet, including BP, Shell, ConocoPhillips, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Halliburton, and others. It turns out the so-called "clean" gas industry is really just the dirty oil industry in disguise.

The same corporations responsible for the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster, the Exxon Valdez spill, the destruction of Ecuador's Amazonian rainforest and countless other pollution catastrophes, now want the public to blindly trust them, with zero federal oversight, as they pursue drilling for much riskier unconventional gas throughout the country.

While the oil and gas industry is hard at work trying to portray unconventional gas as "clean energy," in reality it is asking the public to commit to decades more reliance on a dwindling fossil fuel enterprise that, in turn, is virtually guaranteed to pollute our water, air and land, and further provoke a mounting global climate crisis.

It's time for a national moratorium. It's time to stop fracking the future.

 

Follow Brendan DeMelle on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bdemelle

Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced his appointments to a fracking safety panel late yesterday. While this panel might seem a step in the right direction to hold the gas industry accountable for fr...
Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced his appointments to a fracking safety panel late yesterday. While this panel might seem a step in the right direction to hold the gas industry accountable for fr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 163
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:40 PM on 05/10/2011
Green energy = JOBS
Let's fix this country, make it safer, create jobs, save the middle class and mitigate terrorism all in one initiative.... WE NEED A GREEN TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
g-moi
Let's GoGreen. We Can Do It.
04:50 PM on 05/10/2011
NO FRACKING!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mxytsplyk
De gustibus non est disputandum
04:48 PM on 05/10/2011
Before fracking: No gas from water spigot. After fracking: gas from water spigot.

www.gaslandthemovie.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erik Brown
Out here in the middle
02:14 PM on 05/10/2011
The Energy Companys say it does nothing. The Enviros say it causes freckles farts and the fever. We all know its somewhere inbetween, and the game is being played as to not admit liability. Create a baseline wherever this process is to be used. Require full disclosure of chemicals and process. Make Energy Co's buy insurnace. There is an actuary somewhere who can evaluate risk. Someone wearing there Big Boy Pants needs to step in and set down some rules.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
02:32 AM on 05/11/2011
The "enviros" say it poisons our aquifers. The truth is not somewhere in between; it's pretty much right there.

Your suggestions would be a step in the right direction, though. You'd need to get past the free market purists first, of course. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erik Brown
Out here in the middle
12:17 PM on 05/11/2011
I belive that part of the problem is the 'mom and pop' drillers cutting costs. Selectively casing thier wells to save money. Chevron cases they entire well here in Western Colorado and has had no complaints. Another problem (I believe) is the use of water for fracking. Water is attracted to water, and will migrate great distances. There is a fracking technology that uses Petrolium byproducts as the fracking fluid. It is then pumped back out of the well to be used again with the other NGL's (non gas liquids).
photo
librainstars
even the smallest things in life make a difference
07:52 AM on 05/10/2011
Some how , some way if we are going to keep doing this to ourselves we have to find a way its safe
from cnn yesterday in NY and pa
http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/09/news/economy/natural_gas_fracking_duke/index.htm

Ive read before in CO where the water coming out of the tap started on fire.
I may not be smart. But I do know fire water is not good for you. No pun intended
quoted
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A new study from Duke University found potentially explosive levels of methane in drinking water supplies located close to natural gas wells.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
07:16 PM on 05/09/2011
http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/methane-contamination-of-drinking-water-accompanying-gas-well-drilling

This is the latest peer review article on fracking.

The article says fracking shale gas is a valuable tool in getting a relatively clean fuel. However before drilling and fracking takes place a base line of contaminates in the ground water needs to be established. Because in the PA & NY area's there are already thousands of old wells already drilled and closed that can cause contamination of the local water. Also due to the numerous faults in the region fracking may cause water contamination and a base line is needed to tell the difference between natural contamination or contamination from old wells and fracking contamination. Last they said the fracking operations should regulated and give all the chemicals used to track contamination sources if they occur!

THIS IS BEST REPORT ON FRACKING I'VE SEEN.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Netflyer
Tree Hugger in firm support of President Obama!
04:27 PM on 05/09/2011
Here's a peer reviewed study:

http://www.propublica.org/article/scientific-study-links-flammable-drinking-water-to-fracking

I'm sure the pro-frackers will say something like the study wasn't large enough or it was done by non-qualified people, blah blah... Don't worry, there will be more studies - remember these are the same guys that said Love Canal was a safe place in the 70's... Lake Erie also... same guys...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Netflyer
Tree Hugger in firm support of President Obama!
04:20 PM on 05/09/2011
More than most topics this one is littered with the Natural Gas industries lobbiests. You can spot them a mile a way... few posts, few fans and PRO fracking... Don't mention the documentary Gasland or they will tell you that you shouldn't base your ideas about fracking on a silly movie (which by the way if you can prove any of the points in the movie wrong, fire away, and don't send us to a debunking Gasland site that the NG industry has lamed up, paleeze...)
Fracking is bad for myriad reasons but some of the more obvious ones are the fact that fracking fluid is a proprietary formula meaning the public will never get to see what chemicals are in it. The NG industry beat the Clean Water Drinking Act by way of our last VP, Mr. Cheney and received a pass on having to fully disclose their fracking fluid makeup. So basically we don't know what they are filling the ground with. Stop right there if you want. Don't pay any attention to the reports of contaminated drinking water, ruined property, the ability to light your running water on fire. Oh yeah, some NG lobbiest on here said that setting your water on fire proves nothing, that it is just methane... ahem... if I can light my water of fire it proves something dude... it proves my water is not fit to drink at the very least.
Stop Fracking!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:55 PM on 05/13/2011
Actually, I always assumed that the anti-fracking crowd was on the payroll of the coal companies.
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
02:12 AM on 05/09/2011
"... fracking has been linked with earthquakes in Arkansas, horrid air pollution in rural gas patches, a gas well blowout in Pennsylvania, drinking water contamination and health problems among homeowners living near fracking operations. Many of these impacted families are choosing to leave their homes out of fear of further disasters and health effects...Truly independent scientists from all relevant disciplines must examine the gas industry's fracking practices thoroughly to determine if the benefits outweigh the risks to our future."

I'm no "independent scientist" but it appears that the risks outweigh the benefits. What's being done to the people trying to live near these areas is outrageously harmful. Fracking should be illegal not just suspended.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:11 PM on 05/08/2011
Imagine if every home were able to generate the power it needed to operate via solar panels, windmills, electromagnetic perpetual motion generators, etc, the end result would not only be a decentralized electrical power grid but also a decentralized political power grid as well. It would completely change our economy and social structure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:24 PM on 05/08/2011
Micro-nukes gen-set might do exactly what you are talking about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pita143
Virtue mine honour
07:39 AM on 05/09/2011
You are the ONLY other person I have ever seen who talk about Micro-nukes. The University of Michigan is working on a MiniNuke that uses the fuel rods from larger nukes. The fuel rods still have plenty of use in them, but they can not be used on the big nukes but could easily be used on much smaller regional nuke plants. The smaller plants are much, much safer and you don't lose as much energy transmitting over long distances.
11:15 PM on 05/08/2011
the problem is big oil, gas, ect., is paying off the politicians.
01:19 PM on 05/09/2011
I know, they're all it - what with Gore et als' snouts so deep in the carbon trading scam and subsidised renewables troughs that all you can see are their legs sticking out.
avanteguard
Truth, Justice, and the American way
05:33 PM on 05/08/2011
Fracking is an important technology in the recovery potential of billions of energy units of oil and gas, so we must lift all restrictions on fracking type recovery, as our energy thirsty populace and our economy needs these important and abundant reserves that fracking can provide esily provide.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
02:35 AM on 05/11/2011
Not if it threatens aquifers. Water is infinitely more valuable than natural gas.
avanteguard
Truth, Justice, and the American way
11:52 PM on 05/11/2011
It does not...the aquifer is thousands of feet higher and sheathed by impenetrable rock
05:25 PM on 05/08/2011
My brother and I just drove past our grandfather's old farm. Our family still has the mineral rights to the farm. We noticed that two ponds have been set up on the property. Looks like they are ready to start drilling at any time. While my brother and I are collecting royality checks, the rest of you yahoo's can go frac yourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
01:29 AM on 05/09/2011
If you let them start drilling, you'll never be able to sell that land. You will diie there, sick, poisoned and regretting your short-sighted decision.

The water you drink, the air that you breathe will poison you and your loved ones.
10:30 PM on 05/09/2011
Neither I or anyone in my family own the land. When grandpa sold the farm, he kept the mineral rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pita143
Virtue mine honour
07:41 AM on 05/09/2011
Have fun....because that drilling head will be on your property FOREVER. Once they are done they DO NOT remove the big metal drilling structure because it is too expense to remove. I hope you enjoy your money, but realize that once you destroy the water table, you can not eat that money to stay alive and all the money in the world will not bring back the water quality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
10:40 AM on 05/09/2011
Why is it 99% of geologist that have looked at this disagree?

They are more Climatologist that don't believe in man made climate change than their are geologist that believe proper fracking causes damage to water tables.

Do also believe man made climate change is a hoax?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:15 PM on 05/09/2011
That's not true. After a well is no longer profitable or stopped producing a crew comes in with equipment they go in fill the old pay zone first with special cement then they pull production tubing out fill the "bore" hole with cement do some test and such. Then with a special tool they cut the well casing off at a certain depth pull it and then cement that section. Then remove the well tree if they hadn't all ready done it, then do a general cleanup then the state comes out and approves the site. The term for it is P&A, plug and abandon. In certain case though the will leave the tubing in place if they detect a certain level of radon then they just cement around it, then all the same. In most states now these old well are periodically checked and of course the land owner also watches after it.
That is basically the way the way they do it now a days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjt218
07:08 AM on 05/08/2011
Just to clear up a misconception . . . The wells in Arkansas causing related to earthquakes weren't fracking wells. They were wells where the nasty water is disposed of.

Just want to make sure it's clear that the process for fracturing shale to get gas out, is not the culprit there.
04:00 PM on 05/08/2011
the waste water wells are part of the process. what else are you going to do with all those millions of gallons of water?
avanteguard
Truth, Justice, and the American way
05:40 PM on 05/08/2011
I propose we filter it and use it over!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oneman689
hard to see the picture from inside the frame
04:21 PM on 05/08/2011
Thank you
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:18 PM on 05/07/2011
If fracking were carried out in the neighborhoods where the richest people live, instead of where the other 98% live, it would be illegal overnight.
avanteguard
Truth, Justice, and the American way
05:42 PM on 05/08/2011
That is why we should do it in the green river basin as not many live there, and it could provide all the energy that America needs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:06 PM on 05/08/2011
I think it is making a lot of framers rich as they frack right ubder their feet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pita143
Virtue mine honour
09:08 PM on 05/07/2011
Only after the last tree has been cut down,
Only after the last fish has been caught,
Only after the last river has been poisoned,
Only THEN will you realize that money can not be eaten.

Fracking has been proven, REPEATEDLY to cause permanent damage to the water table. We have multiple alternatives to heat our homes, we have NO alternatives to fresh, clean water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:10 AM on 05/08/2011
Climate Change Deniers have more proof that Climate Change is a hoax!

I think both Climate Change Deniers and Anti-Frackers are both wrong. But Climate Change Deniers have more evidence to support their case than a movie and a weak report out of Cornell University by a marine biologist and ab aerospace engineer!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pita143
Virtue mine honour
07:31 AM on 05/08/2011
climate change deniers HAVE NO PROOF. there are tons of data that proves them wrong. PERIOD.The Climate Change Deniers publish anticlimate change papers so they can get a $10,000 fee from American Enterprise Institute which is run by and paid for by Exxon Mobile.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:24 PM on 05/11/2011
Natural gas is turned into fertilizer, which is turned into food.

So, yeah, we can eat natural gas, and a heck of a lot of people will starve if we don't have it.