More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brent Budowsky

GET UPDATES FROM Brent Budowsky
 

Now Obama Must Lead Democrats and the Nation

Posted: 08/18/11 02:47 PM ET

President Obama should reflect on what has gone wrong with his presidency. Then his economic speech after Labor Day, which should have been given long ago, and should be given before Labor Day, must be far bolder and more aggressive than any words this president has ever spoken about jobs.

America is a nation without leaders in an economy without jobs. We are a nation of citizens who hunger for action in a political system that refuses to act. We yearn for a president who will speak for the people of the nation with conviction, clarity, courage and compassion.

The failure of the president and Congress to take major action to create jobs for some two years is a dereliction of duty unprecedented in post-war economic history. The dominance of cutting spending in the short term, at the expense of the U.S. and Europe stimulating the economy, is an epic policy blunder of historic magnitude with potentially catastrophic consequences for the American and world economies.

Today major corporations hoard some $2 trillion they refuse to spend. Leading lenders hoard some $1.5 trillion of lendable assets they refuse to lend. Financial markets remain a casino in which some 70 percent of public stocks are held for less than 11 seconds while speculators enrich themselves while they create no wealth for the nation, and reward companies that destroy American jobs and export American prosperity.

Yes: President Obama inherited a mess. But it is unacceptable that in the third year of his presidency he still blames his predecessor and does bus tours to promote jobs programs that do not exist. The president should not be touting free trade deals and a patent bill as his major jobs programs. This is not merely false. It is farce.

Americans want an honest 50-50 compromise. This does not mean the Republicans get 50 percent of what they want, then the president surrenders the 50 percent that Democrats want, and then Washington departs for a long vacation.

The president must understand that he is the president of the United States, not another angry American with a pitchfork attacking "those people in Washington."

The president is the leader of the Democratic Party, not some mythical post-partisan figure who answers Republican attacks by blaming Democrats in Congress alongside Republicans.

The president must always negotiate from strength, never from weakness. There will never be genuine bipartisan agreements if partisan Republicans believe he will always give in.

The president must articulate a clear and compelling narrative about why America faces an economic crisis, what Democrats stand for and how his presidency will make life better for Americans. Voters enduring pain do not want public-relations platitudes or bus-tour bromides.

Instead of blaming others, the best thing the president could do is loudly accept that he too has made mistakes. Obama would learn what Kennedy learned after the Bay of Pigs. His honestly would lift his popularity.

The president should belatedly and seriously consult with internationally respected economic thinkers such as Joe Stiglitz, Robert Reich, Simon Johnson, Jeffrey Sachs and Paul Krugman. It is natural they are held in contempt by conservatives. It is disgraceful they are treated with condescension and disdain by a Democratic president and his advisers, who urgently need creative ideas to lift the economy.

The president must understand that the base of his party should be respected as the heart of his support. Not demeaned as an imposition on his time. Not devalued as an impediment to his brilliance. Not disrespected with the insult that they will be forced to support him only because the GOP is worse.

I am proud of the heritage of Democratic presidents the nation has turned to when times were hard and jobs were scarce. President Obama should embrace this heritage, not fear it. The reason his poll numbers are down, while the jobless rate is high, is the hideous notion that a Democratic president should spend a third of his time acting like a Republican, a third of his time surrendering to Republicans and a third of his time distancing himself from Democrats.

I love this country. I love this country so much it makes my heart break and my blood boil when I see the suffering of the jobless and the misery of the poor, and I must ask a Democratic president to act like a Democrat.

Something has gone wrong with the Obama presidency. The way to set it right is for the president to come home to the great party he should lead. Then to seek the 50-50 compromise while negotiating from strength. Then to ask voters in 2012 for a true mandate worthy of a great president of a great nation.

This column was originally published at The Hill.

 
President Obama should reflect on what has gone wrong with his presidency. Then his economic speech after Labor Day, which should have been given long ago, and should be given before Labor Day, must b...
President Obama should reflect on what has gone wrong with his presidency. Then his economic speech after Labor Day, which should have been given long ago, and should be given before Labor Day, must b...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 1
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam of CA
Independent Information Hunter
04:21 PM on 08/20/2011
Too little, too late for Pres. Obama. He is so-ooo full of mere hot air.
Let's see if he'll keep his promise to go home if the jobs are not created.
Dream on, America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
12:19 PM on 08/19/2011
Now? Now? I can't excused three years wasted, and not that anything is going to happen in the fourth year to off-set the first three.
11:34 AM on 08/19/2011
The simple truth is that President Obama hopes for reason and sincerity from Congress and that Congress has the best intent regarding average Americans. What he did not factor is a group that rather see him tied to a tree than compromise. They view compromise as weakness and are hell bent to the point of fanaticism with bringing the President down. They have a campaign of delay, persist, filibuster, scream, yell, lie, falsely accuse, and make up anything to do so and it is working. Sometimes, you cannot be the reasonable man in the room when dealing with that. Sometimes, you have to be more vocal, more brutal, and more vicious than your opponent. Bill Clinton understood that. President Obama right now does not.
photo
errol44
Just in town for the GOP circus
11:14 AM on 08/19/2011
Thank you, Mr. Budowsky for articulating so well the frustration and anger felt by so many Democrats after watching our Democratic President, time and again, embrace failed Republican ideals and policies only to then go on and criticize his base for not supporting his constant lurches to the right.

I am bewildered by the fact that he learned nothing from the 2010 election whereby weeks before the election, he and his staff began mocking his own supporters as "the professional left" and presented us (his supporters) with the condescending warning that voting Democrat was our only option lest the Republicans gain control; which they did in the House, and for which Obama feels no responsibility.

The latest rumors from the Hill regarding his upcoming "Economic" speech, are that he is going to double-down on his calls for reduced Social Security and Medicare benefits; these, purely Republican ideals, represent more shameless attacks on the middle-class, and will be presented by a "Democratic" President? Unbelievable.

My frustration then is what to do in Novemebr 2012. If I vote for Obama, I am essentially voting for a Republican. If I vote for his Republican challenger, I am voting for a Republican. Either way, a Republican wins in 2012.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:31 AM on 08/19/2011
I fear the time for a "Jobs Program" is a window of opportunity that has been closed.

IMPO...........President Obama made a serious strategic mistake when he was elected by a landslide and had public opinion largely in his favor.

Instead of JOBS, the first order of business was health care reform. A program that has proved to be unpopular with just about everyone (some because it goes too far, some because it didn't go far enough) used up all of his political capital, and sadly may ultimately prove to be unworkable.

Had the president come out swinging on a JOBS program in the first 100 days (FDR did), millions could have been put to work improving our crumbling infrastructure. We might now be busy digging our way out of a recession, instead of falling deeper into one.

The time to close the barn door is before the animals get out, not after. My personal opinion is that the US is in for hard economic times for many years to come.

If Obama is re-elected, we can look forward to 4 more years of Republican obstructionism, and gridlock. If he's not, in my opinion, the bottom 95% of us, will be worse off then we are now.

"Laugh about it, shout about it, when you've got to choose.......... anyway you look at it we lose"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mistinguette Grandison
No. Corporations are NOT people
02:10 PM on 08/19/2011
You are right that health care reform in the first year right before the midterms was a political mistake, but he did have a jobs program through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (or the stimulus as it is known to be) that did create some jobs here in the US. Plus the auto bailout helped create jobs too. Of course, considering the severity of the crisis and job losses, it was not enough. But he did do SOME things.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Fraley
09:38 AM on 08/19/2011
He's going to do what he's always done... leave it to 'The American People' and Congress. He's going to tell us to call our Congressmen, because if we really believe and click our heels together hope and change will magically pour out of our Republican overlords heads.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
09:03 AM on 08/19/2011
The writer weeps for our country, as many of us do, but he seems a little confused and unable to deal with the reality that the public and their politicians acted to tie the hands of the President and his Democratic colleagues in dealing with a most horrid economic disaster. And I will keep mentioning the disaster and the Republican actions designed to make it worse as often as I have an opportunity, lest we forget.
08:38 AM on 08/19/2011
The progressives have NO chance of winning and neither do the far right reps. We need compromise across the board. We need to raise revenues and we need to reduce government spending simultaneously.

We can raise revenue with tax reform that eliminates writes offs and lowers corporate and public rates. We we need write offs is beyond me. We can lower spending on everything. No sacred cows.

Everyone must participate in this.
11:01 AM on 08/19/2011
More people working would create more revenue. Closing loop hole and dropping the rates is great idea. You will never get the Dems to vote to cutting taxes. They want more taxes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dinosaur David B
08:15 AM on 08/19/2011
In other words, we're screwed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mistinguette Grandison
No. Corporations are NOT people
02:11 PM on 08/19/2011
Give it time and relax.
07:37 AM on 08/19/2011
"President Obama should reflect on what has gone wrong with his presidency"

Does he think anything has gone wrong with his presidency?

Obama isn't going to follow any advice other than Geithner's or Daley's or any of the other corporate frontmen or big money donors who staff his administration. Be assured it will be more of the same lame bi-partisan posturing accompanied by half-measures or blatant advocacy for austerity and continuation of Bush-era policy.

"the hideous notion that a Democratic president should spend a third of his time acting like a Republican, a third of his time surrendering to Republicans and a third of his time distancing himself from Democrats."

Should be obama's political epitaph.

We need an alternative other than a DINO.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
01:18 AM on 08/19/2011
"Americans want an honest 50-50 compromise."

No we don't. Please be real. You are making the same mistake Obama is making if you accept that.

The republicans want a deal that favors the top 2% of Americans. Honesty is not even a factor in this and 50-50 does not even get close.

The rest of us are living breathing individuals and I do not think that there is much consensus at all beyond wanting to see everyone working and happy. We need to get rid of this absurd notion that a 50 -50 compomise is a reasonable goal because it just legitimizes injustice.

Currently 5% of Americans account for 74.8% of our nations wealth.

Meanwhile the bottom 50% of Americans account for less than a mere 3%.

By my way of thinking, those top 5% should be paying substantially more than 74.8% of the taxes just to keep things fair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Bunting
11:36 PM on 08/18/2011
Jobs programs that do not exist... Its the presidents job now to do congresses job.
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
11:32 PM on 08/18/2011
He hasn't shown any leadership in 3 years, what makes you think he's going to start now?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HenryS
11:30 PM on 08/18/2011
If you ever read Man in the High Castle by Phillip K Dick, he proposes - among other things - that we often ignore the crucial importance of great leaders in critical moments of history. He crafts an example that FDR was a strong leader who made tough choices to get us out of the Great Depression but it did not have to turn out that way. In his alternative history, we get a President Garner who is a weak leader and the Depression drags on and on and America declines... This example keeps recurring to me and I think it is clear that we needed an FDR but got ourselves a Garner in Obama.
07:50 AM on 08/19/2011
He could've surrounded himself with strong agents of change and reform but he didn't, because it was never about that. It was only about the campaign--never the presidency. He staffed his administration with those who fund his campaign because the campaigning aspect --the cultivated multicultural image from central casting, the arena performances with dramatic soaring rhetoric with full-throated delivery, the appeals to idealism, all turned out to be little more than performance with no substance. There is no second act when it has been exposed to be nothing more than a shallow pop idol with Wall St promoters calling the shots.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mistinguette Grandison
No. Corporations are NOT people
11:19 PM on 08/18/2011
Agree. This has been concerning for me why he acts like a republican.