More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brook S. Mason

GET UPDATES FROM Brook S. Mason
 

New Eco-Art's Short Shelf Life

Posted: 06/17/10 11:00 AM ET

Garden sculpture in marble, limestone and bronze lasts for thousands of years but the latest eco-art barely survives a single decade.

Case in point: a scant four years ago, the North Carolina Museum of Art in Raleigh commissioned Hudson Valley artist Steven Siegel to come up with an environmentally correct sculpture for their extensive 160 acre park. In response, he created "To see Jennie smile," 2006, 24 feet high and ten feet across constructed of newspapers donated by the local Raleigh News and Observer. With today's emphasis on inclusivity, the artist worked with NCMA volunteers to complete the work from several tons of discarded newspaper built around two trees forming a natural internal armature.

Well last week, that environmentally sound sculpture was listing precariously and after consultation with the artist, it was dismantled, reports a museum spokesperson.

"Steve thinks of his work as being temporal, ephemeral, so it wasn't unexpected," says Linda Dougherty, NCMA chief curator and curator of contemporary art, of the recent deconstruction. In the past decade, an increasing number of artists like Andy Goldsworthy have focused on creating work out of natural materials, which typically endures the brunt of nature from hurricanes to wind storms.

"After exposure to the elements, the sculpture weathers and changes, eventually decaying and deteriorating, mimicking the cycles of the natural world," says Dougherty.

"Because they are ephemeral, they go away," says Siegel, who is based in Rhinebeck, New York, of such work. He began making site-specific sculpture out of paper in 1990 and to date has created more than two dozen such installations as far afield as Italy. "About seven or eight are still standing," he says. The DeCordova Sculpture Park outside of Boston in Lincoln, Massachusetts boasts one of the largest and is 35 feet long and ten feet deep. "It's got plants on top," says Siegel.

"Paper is a material that never fails to capture the imagination," says Siegel. These days, Siegel is working on a large studio piece, "Biographies," that consists of far more materials than just paper.

But sculpture like Siegel's that doesn't endure is no stranger to the museum in the South.

"We've had other similar examples like a Patrick Dougherty work made of woven saplings disintegrate," says the NCMA curator. That artist's particular work only lasted through two years.

Dougherty is not totally missing on the museum scene. Last year, the NCMA commissioned him to create a work for within their hallowed halls. The artist's new work "Out of the Box," 2009, is practically trailer sized and stretches over 75 feet across and just over 15 feet high.

Unlike marble and bronze works, which can cost in the millions, "natural" garden sculpture prices range from only a few thousand dollars to the $20,000 range and beyond, reports the North Carolina museum curator.

"Siegel brings the newspaper back to its point of origin, the forest, returning it to the landscape," according to a museum spokesperson. "After exposure to the elements, the sculpture weathers and changes, eventually decaying and deteriorating, mimicking the cycles of the natural world."

What will go in the place of Siegel's sculpture? "I haven't decided yet," says Dougherty.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:06 PM on 06/28/2010
I keep wondering how the sculpture looked before it was removed. Like a bunch of wet newspapers?
itolduso
lateral thinker
11:01 AM on 06/21/2010
When is a work of Art done? Is it when the paint dries?.... when the bronze is polished? when it's hung on the wall or set on it's base? When the piece crumbles or fades or the last note is played.... does it's memory then just disappear? Do those that were moved or excited or changed somehow revert to how they were before? Can it no longer influence what comes next? Who determines it's value? The artist? The market? the audience? Time? How foolish we are to believe that there is an end.... there is only change.
12:11 PM on 06/18/2010
Interesting perspective on landscape sculpture relative to the envirment.
09:46 AM on 06/18/2010
it's a fascinating new twist on landscape art
04:41 AM on 06/18/2010
In my view, the ecological concern is not necessarily the materials used, but the life span of an art work and its impact upon the landscape, which is always a concern if it is public. Maybe this is one step towards the eradication of public art works that blight landscapes. The public landscape shouldn't be a playground for the large-scale display of anyone's ideas. Very few have the sensitivity of Goldsworthy, for example.
12:48 PM on 06/18/2010
Should we do away with architecture then? A building is after all one more form of "large-scale display" of someone's idea in a public space. Just about anything done by humans is an expression of someone's idea actually, including parks, landscaped areas, and areas deliberately left "wild" (the idea being that "untouched" is better and/or more aesthetically pleasing). I'm afraid it's unavoidable, and not everyone will like everything. That's not a reason to force people not to express themselves in certain ways, including by making and/or displaying large-scale art. If it's going to be displayed in a public place, of course the community should have input, but not every single person has to like it.
12:00 AM on 06/19/2010
Well, first off, architecture is obviously not art. Certainly there are important differences between the two. Part of the problem that I'm stating is that public art has succeeded in claiming some of the same space as architecture. This indeed has littered the landscape with merely over-sized art works plunked down in public. Art's roles should not be confused with those of architecture. Though lines between the two have importantly blurred, those lines shouldn't be randomly exploited. Often, this occurs because of a need to satisfy shallow demands of the market. Of course, this happens with architecture, too.

Any good art is a well-considered dialog, not merely whimsical taste or expression. Art should have appropriate settings and integration with the environment. The market easily overrides this at times. Art is not sacred because it's the product of someone's expression. Art that has short-term value and/or value in a particular context may become aesthetically burdensome as it is exposed over time, and especially if it is permanently installed. The ecology that I'm describing recognizes that the permanent nature of public art is sometimes an unfortunate assumption.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Brook S. Mason
05:26 PM on 06/17/2010
Great article, I'll definitely check out the North Carolina Museum of Art in Raleigh next time I'm in town.