We love a good stereotype; it does not require critical thinking.
Question: What's the difference between a lawyer and a catfish?
Answer: One is a slimly bottom dwelling scum sucker, and the other is a fish!
This joke reflects the verdict issued by the court of public opinion in the tragic case of 13-year-old Jahi McMath who was declared brain dead nearly a month ago.
This case, which has received worldwide attention, has placed Christopher Dolan, the attorney who represented the family of McMath, at the epicenter of guilt. It has been reported that Dolan has received death threats and accused of exploiting a family's grief, making him exhibit A for the negative stereotypes commonly held for those who practice jurisprudence.
The efficacy of threatening violence warrants no further commentary. But the court of public opinion always possesses the benefit of rendering emotional decisions based on what is often scant information with little consequence.
At the heart of this tragic story is what French philosopher Albert Camus defines as absurdity. In philosophy, absurdity refers to the conflict between the human tendency to seek inherent value and the meaning in life.
Camus considers absurdity as a confrontation, an opposition, a conflict between two ideals. He defines the human condition as absurd, as the confrontation between one's desire for significance, meaning and clarity on the one hand - and the silent, cold universe on the other.
Could one also surmise that Camus' description accurately addresses where the family of McMath have found themselves since December 12, when the 13-year-old was initially diagnosed as brain dead?
"When parents die," as the late Sloane Coffin opined when eulogizing his son Alex, "they take with them a large portion of the past. But when children die, they take away the future as well."
There has been a disruption in the circle of life for a family that was preparing for the holiday season, only to become a national story immersed in absurdity.
No one knows what it is like to walk in this family's shoes--not even those who have face similar can articulate with any authority how this particular situation should be handled. If one accepts that this situation falls squarely under the rubric of absurd, why would one seek to selectively locate the genesis of logic?
If indeed Dolan is guilty of the charges levied against him by the court of public opinion, he is certainly not alone.
From ministers who disgracefully eschewed science and reason to hold placards and press conferences, placing themselves on the vanguard of justice, to myriad inaccurate reports by some of the world's largest news organizations, spreading false hope would seem to be the preferred modus operandi for anyone with egregious ambition or a deadline.
To select Dolan as worthy of public outcry could also suggest that McMath's family did not deserve legal representation. Should he have told them to let it go; she's dead? Or should he simply not have taken the case?
If Dolan has conducted himself in a manner that warrants disbarment, then the matter should be taken up with the State Bar. But if it is a matter of disagreeing with how he represented his client, which he is duty bound, those are the yearnings of ignorance expressing what the law should be.
The court of public opinion has the luxury, armed largely with the knowledge forged by watching Perry Mason, Matlock, et al., to determine emotionally what is right.
These recent actions against Dolan only exacerbate the existing absurdity. It is to find a solution for which one does not exist, at least not one that brings comfort--to fall prey to the elusive nature of the absurd that fuels arrogance and disregards logic in the pointless pursuit that leads to nowhere.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.