Welcome to "Am I really a Conservative?" the game show where we find out if one is truly committed to American ideals or the divisive ideology emanating from a portion of the Republican Party.
Our first contestant is I.M. Wright. Mr. Wright, tell us how long have you been a conservative?
"Oh, for awhile. I used to be a Democrat, but ever since the Democrats screwed things up, I've been a conservative. I like the way the Republicans stand up for American ideals."
Ready to play "Am I really a Conservative?"
Mr. Wright, we know that the Republican gods won't allow this to happen, but imagine for a moment that the cyclical nature of American politics continued as it has since its inception and the Democrats controlled the White House, both branches of Congress, and made significant appointments to the federal courts, including three to the Supreme Court.
Can someone revive Mr. Wright; I am not finished with my question? Mr. Wright, are you okay? I assume you got the gist of where I was going before you passed out? Good!
Suppose a Democratic president went to war by making the case that the country in question had some connection to a recent terrorist attack, aided the people who committed the terrorist attack and had weapons of mass destruction to either use against us directly or sell to the highest bidder only to find out three years later, stuck in an ongoing battle, that none of it were true, would you: (pick any that apply)
A) Want Congress to investigate how we got into the war and who should be held accountable so that we can make the tough decisions going forward.
B) Be content to stay-the-course at 1 billion dollars per month along with the potential of unnecessary loss of life because it would make us look bad internationally to pullout.
C) Institute a draft so that we can have enough troops to indefinitely occupy the country.
Next question. If the Democratic president's secretary of defense were Ted Kennedy and our military committed Abu Ghraib-like torture, would you:
A) Be content with a "few bad apples" alibi
B) Allow the Pentagon to investigate itself (six times)
C) Demand a bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission to go wherever the truth leads them and insist that Congress be prepared to take constitutional action, if necessary, based on those findings.
Next question. If the New York Times sat for over a year on a story revealing that the Democratic administration had sanctioned a program of secret, illegal spying on US citizens by the National Security Agency, knowing that they had the information during a presidential election that could have made a difference to your candidate winning instead of losing a close election, would you:
A) Demand they receive a Pulitzer Prize for excellent journalism
B) Consider the Times to be the standard bearer for patriotism
C) Demand they be brought up on espionage charges
Final question. If the Supreme Court found that the Democratic administration violated both U.S. military law and the Geneva Convention, would you:
A) Come to the defense of those who counseled the president justifying said acts.
B) Believe that the president, along with high-ranking officials were potentially guilty and subject to prosecution under the federal War Crimes Act.
C) Stand on the principle: "It is better to fight them over there so that we don't have to fight them here!"
Mr. Wright, if your answers remained consistent whether it was the current administration of the mythical Democratic one, congratulations you are, at least, maintaining a consistent understanding of American ideals. If, however, your answers varied based on who occupied the White House then your core beliefs are based on a right-wing "if you're not for us you're against us" ideology.
If the thought of the hypothetical Democratic administration was too much to bear I suggest that you rethink your current positions. Ultimately, all you are doing is providing cover for the next administration to simply say: "Well, the Bush administration did it--why can't I?"
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.