Last week, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice withdrew as Rutgers University's commencement speaker.
Citing months of protest by faculty and students in stepping aside, Rice wrote: "Commencement should be a time of joyous celebration for the graduates and their families. Rutgers' invitation to me to speak has become a distraction for the university community at this very special time."
On the surface, it could appear that an institution of higher learning through narrow-mindedness successfully silenced, who at one time was, this country's most powerful woman of color, politically speaking. Would this have occurred if Rice's politics were left of center?
Should Rice's achievements as an African American female trump the egregious policies that she participated?
Whether these actions qualify as examples of embedded liberal racism and sexism, I will leave for those more qualified to identify that type of psychological misconduct.
Beyond melanin, gender and political philosophy, Iraq remains a dark cloud hovering over the Rice legacy. Without some understanding that goes beyond suppositions about her role in the Iraq war, protests like that at Rutgers are understandable.
Rice definitely warrants praise, growing up in Birmingham at the height of Jim Crow segregation, ascending to secretary of state. If one includes Rice's predecessor, General Colin Powell, former President George W. Bush also deserves praise for being the first commander in chief to appoint only African Americans as secretary of state.
But Iraq looms large in the Bush foreign policy narrative.
Was Iraq not an effort Americans supported by nearly 75 percent in the beginning? Was there not a number of Americans who believed that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11?
Was there not an intermingling of the amorphous term "weapons of mass destruction" with nuclear capabilities that prompted then-National Security Advisor Rice to state: "The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly Saddam can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"?
Iraq, along with Afghanistan, had the dubious distinction of being promoted as pain-free military exercises that when one factors physical, mental, and economic costs, will be one of, if not the, most painful in US history. Was Rice not present at the genesis of both exercises, serving as National Security Advisor?
The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq will cost taxpayers $4 trillion to $6 trillion, taking into account the medical care of wounded veterans and expensive repairs, according to a study by issued by the Kennedy School of Government.
Is it racist and sexist to ignore this painful side of the American adventure? Does being the first African American woman to serve as secretary of state mean that Iraq and Afghanistan be relegated to footnotes in the Rice biography?
Part of the dilemma in viewing the Rice legacy lies in the cowardliness of the government to find out how Iraq in particular was implemented. How could the certainty of Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, Rice, et al, in the run up be so dreadfully wrong in actuality?
Being the first black woman selected as secretary of state is laudable, but at what point should one factor an individual's record? Or does Rice being an African American woman suffice?
Iraq, in my view, was America's worst foreign policy decision because it was preemptive. That decision led to the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqis, 4,486 US soldiers. Moreover, the psychological damage sustained by returning veterans will not be known for decades, along with the impact Iraq and Afghanistan continues to have on the nation's economy.
It is uncertain if the protests that led to Rice forgoing her commencement speech are examples of liberal sexism and racism. But as long as Iraq continues to be the unanswered failed policy such protests should be expected.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.