iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carl Pope

Carl Pope

Posted: May 5, 2010 03:36 PM

What Should We Do Instead?

What's Your Reaction:

The Good Jobs, Green Jobs National Conference, sponsored by the Sierra Club and the BlueGreen Alliance of environmental groups and labor unions, has been chock-full of ideas for how we can simultaneously end our dependence on coal and oil and jump-start our economy. That message was driven home by a star-studded array of speakers, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi but also including Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, Colorado Governor Bill Ritter, Senators Jeff Merkley and John Kerry, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, and Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

One example: The BlueGreen Alliance used the conference to release the results of a new study on the opportunity to create green jobs, reduce our oil dependence, and slash emissions of carbon dioxide by shifting more of America's freight traffic from trucks to rail. Currently, bottlenecks and inadequate infrastructure force many shippers to use more-expensive (and polluting) trucks to get their goods to customers. A ton of rail freight can be carried more than 450 miles on a gallon of diesel fuel -- that's roughly equivalent to a 450-mpg car!

If we electrified our railroads, as Europe has done, we wouldn't need to use any oil for rail shipments. As it is, UPS regularly has the lowest carbon footprint among its competitors because it relies heavily on getting its containers onto railcars, using trucks only for the "last mile" from the nearest railhead.

Investing in our freight-rail infrastructure is obviously also key to developing a world-class passenger-rail system, since in most of the country outside of the Boston-Washington corridor freight and passenger trains would share the same railbed.

Right now, the debate is focused on a goal of shifting ten percent of America's truck traffic to rail. That's not ambitious enough. Given the evidence that's pouring into the Gulf of Mexico, we need to get America off of oil as quickly as we can.

 
 
 

Follow Carl Pope on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CarlPope

 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
02:59 PM on 05/06/2010
REVOLUTIONARY TECHNOLOGIES WILL SUPERSEDE FOSSIL FUELS!

To the surprise of almost everyone, inexpensive, clean alternatives could be available in a relatively short time.

See Moving Beyond Oil and Running on Water at; http://www.aesopinstitute.org to learn a bit about a couple of them.

There are more. And they are moving toward practical products in several countries.

The science is new and difficult for those trained to think inside the box to accept.

But, independent labs are increasingly involved and practical applications are en-route.

As we can see, fossil fuels threaten to sharply impact life on earth much more quickly than is generally realized.

An early hit will be oil prices, which could exceed $100 per barrel in a matter of months. That can abort economic recovery.

One barrel of ordinary water can replace 200 barrels of oil. A gallon or two might power a hybrid car 1,000 miles.

The coal mine disaster, the oil catastrophe in the Gulf, and climate change, are alarm clocks!

Time to accelerate the development of breakthrough alternatives as rapidly as is humanly possible!

A 24/7 development program is ready to be born. Accelerate the birth!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:05 PM on 05/05/2010
how about supporting PACE loans and feed in tariffs so that democratic, clean power production in the built environment can replace Big Energy destruction of all types in all our ecosystems, including Big Solar (owned by BP, Shell, Chevron, Goldman Sachs and other mercenaries) which is about to permanently destroy most of the Mojave?