iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carl Pope

GET UPDATES FROM Carl Pope
 

Will the Post-Oil World Also Be the Post-American World?

Posted: 01/19/2012 11:36 am

Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates -- That question just shouts itself from the stage of the World Future Energy Summit here. The opening plenary features UN Secretary-General Ban ki-Moon, and Abu Dhabi's Sultan Ahmed al Jaber, but also Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao and Korean President Kim Hwang-sik. The U.S. is not even mentioned by any of the speakers. And U.S. presence here is thin -- almost absent -- in terms of government engagement, even as just to the north the sabers rattle around the Straits of Hormuz and Iran's nuclear program.

It was Al Jaber who framed the world's challenge as one of shifting toward an agenda for growth through renewable energy, even while governments are having to cut budgets:

"We must be agile. We must deploy and demonstrate." He pointed out that the United Arab Emirates is now exporting renewables -- having built the world's first 24-hour thermal solar project in Spain -- even though his country has the world's ninth-largest oil reserves.

Ban ki-Moon explained the source of his passion for climate change and energy access for the poor:

"A single light bulb opened a whole new world for me as a young man in post-conflict Korea -- it enabled me to study -- to grow -- to develop my mind. I want to give this opportunity to everyone else."

"Energy poverty must end. It is neither just nor sustainable that one in five lacks access to modern energy."

That was the impetus for the Secretary General's launch of the UN's Sustainable Energy Access for All initiative, with its three goals:

  1. Universal access to modern energy by 2030. (Almost half of the world lacks either electricity or technology for clean cooking.)
  2. Doubling the rate of energy-efficiency improvements.
  3. Doubling the share of renewable energy in the global economy.

The Secretary General also strongly signaled that he won't let the seemingly endlessly bogged down formal UNFCC negotiations on climate prevent world action against the threat of climate disruption. He framed Rio + 20 as the moment for opening a new chapter, one focused on bottom-up, solutions-oriented climate action. "Rio is our generational opportunity to shape the world we want -- but it is not the end, but the beginning."

It was the Korean president who declared that we are moving into a "Post-Oil World."

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao provided the real news, and dominated the stage. He buried his lead in class Chinese fashion, beginning with a routine description of the outlines and dimensions of China's energy situation and policy.

Then he closed with four points: the first two quite conventional. Energy efficiency, he says, is the key to everything. Renewables are important but (in a hedge against criticism of Chinese reliance on coal) not ready to take over yet.

Then he made his move as the largest importer of Persian Gulf oil and the new focus of attention in this region. He deplored the lack of stability in global oil markets, said that prices have departed from levels justified by the supply-demand situation, said that speculation and volatility need to end, and called for a global, and binding set of rules to govern world oil trade. It was a direct challenge to OPEC and the control that oil producers have exercised over markets since the 1970s. It was said gently, though, in a non-threatening tone.

Wen Jiabao closed with his fourth point, a soothing bromide about the great desire of China to be a neighbor and friend to everyone in the region, softening still further the challenge posed by the idea of a globally regulated oil market.

While the Chinese premier buried his lead, it did not go unnoticed by his hosts. The National wrote "Beyond energy security, in turn, Mr Wen's Gulf visit offered an intriguing glimpse of a broad realignment that may link this region more closely with the big economies of Asia ... Mr Wen went so far as to suggest 'a global governance mechanism for energy, under the G20 framework, to stabilise oil and natural gas markets'. Producing countries will have little interest in surrendering influence over oil prices, but buyers are not alone in wanting a calm, predictable market...."

But there is more to the question of America's role than China's new centrality. The theme of this conference, driven home time and again, was innovation. A special plenary was led by Bertrand Piccard, who led the team that flew the Solar Impulse, the first solar aircraft to fly for a diurnal cycle, nighttime as well as day. He made it clear that the Impulse was not an effort to remake aviation but rather to "create a revolution in human consciousness. We have today all the solutions in our hands. " Piccard went on to say that the technologies demonstrated in the Solar Impulse would save half the world's energy use if deployed everywhere, and that we could already get the rest from renewables. "I'm very depressed when I go to conferences and hear that protecting the environment and protecting the climate is extremely expensive." As a doctor, he points out that CO2 emissions are not the disease, they are the symptom, that the disease is the wasteful burning of excessive fossil fuels, and that the therapy is clean technology.

Piccard was followed by the only American on the plenary stage,  13-year-old Aiden Dwyer, who has proposed that by using the Fibonacci series you could squeeze more power out of arrays of solar cells. Subsequent tests have suggested that Dwyer's original measuring techniques were incorrect, and that he has not in fact made a major breakthrough. But the point of his appearance was to underscore the need for creativity and a wiliness to challenge orthodoxy that is required by a clean energy future.

It's fascinating that this drive for innovation is welling up inside the Arab world, in a region best known in the West for its resistance to modernity and innovation. Oil alone does not break this pattern -- last year in Saudi Arabia I could feel the heavy hand of the past. And Abu Dhabi faces serious problems. Only 20 percent of its population are citizens, the other 80 percent are guest workers. But the country is not trying to hide this fact -- the opening video showcases the broad diversity of the population as it is, not as it once was -- and the themes of diversity and tolerance are driven home everywhere. And it is making way rapidly for its youth generation. The moderator of the plenary session, Aida Al Busaidy, was a 38-year-old Emirati journalist educated at Arkansas State.

How many nations would let someone that young introduce the Premier of China at the country's biggest showcase to the world?

So does the U.S. still matter here? Yes, it turns out, because we still provide a particular kind of leadership in clean energy, sustainability, and environmental protection -- we just don't provide it at the government level. The Zaid Energy Future prize, hosted at the Emirates Palace (by far the most-over-the-top hotel I have ever entered), shows where the U.S. still shines. The lifetime achievement winner is my Bay area neighbor, Ashok Gadgil, who won $500,000 for work including his Darfur stove project, a fuel-efficient cooking stove that has prompted a 55 percent drop in Darfur's use of firewood. General Electric was one of the three finalists for the most innovative major corporation. The second place NGO winner was a distributed solar company -- Orb Energy, India's biggest -- led by an American, Damian Miller, in a reversal of Gadgil's diaspora biography, while the Environmental Defense Fund came in third.

So Americans are still doing their part, even though as a nation state there is no longer American leadership of the kind that is needed. That's bad news for America, but perhaps worse news for the climate. Our broken politics are now becoming everyone's business -- but we're the ones who have to fix them.

 
 
 

Follow Carl Pope on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CarlPope

 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
10:34 AM on 01/23/2012
Any environmental change which does not take into account the prevailing culture of any given community is doomed to failure. A good example would be the continued popularity of suburban living.

Two things most family units look for in a dwelling are privacy and space. Room for kids to play without the intrusion of strangers, a yard big enough for a dog or two and a garage where Dad can set up a workshop. Mom doesn't want neighbors looking in her windows or listening through the walls.

Susie Smith needs to get to dance lessons Tuesdays at 3PM and junior theater on Fridays and is only 10--no public transportation for her. Sonny has soccer practice after school,and there is no school bus available. Dad works in the city and has frequent overtime requirements. Mom works part time odd hours at the local hospital. Public transportation is not an option, and two cars are a necessity.

This is normal American life. That vast red area of the US on maps of elections results is populated by families like the Smiths. They are not moving to the city, they are not getting rid of their dogs, and unless public transportation comes directly to their door and directly to where they need to go exactly when they need to get there--along with an adult supervisor for their kids--they aren't going to take a bus.

Back to the drawing board, guys. Until you make the Smiths happy, ain't no one happy.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
09:39 PM on 01/22/2012
Germany, Europe's economic powerhouse, is moving away from fossil fuels and nuclear faster and more systematically than any other nation. I have heard Jeremy Rifkin who advises Germany, talk about their program as related to his book "The Third Industrial Revolution."
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
08:15 PM on 01/22/2012
Any energy source that required the transformation of fresh drinking water to toxic waste water for its production is not economical cuz it takes 8000 BTU of solar heat energy to produce one gallon of fresh drinking water. In the future, all of the fresh water used to extract fossil fuels would need to be distilled from ocean water. It's much more economical to use solar energy directly instead of fossil fuels that produce waste water from fresh water. We must end our dependence on fossil fuels in order to save our planet's fresh drinking water resource. Global Droughting must be prevented.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:48 PM on 01/21/2012
Rooftop solar is cheaper than nukes, about 16 cents.

Offshore wind and waste bio char bio fuels, is half that again,

efficiency s cheaper than ANY energy source.

That combination can supply all the worlds energy needs, cheaper, 24/7, forever, clean and safe. Ready to replace fossils and nukes in a decade or less.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power#Cost_trends wind 6 cents.

100% on Renewable Energies
http://130.226.56.153/rispubl/reports/ris-r-1608_186-195.pdf
http://www.iset.uni-kassel.de/abt/w3-w/projekte/LowCostEuropElSup_revised_for_AKE_2006.pdf

http://www.gizmag.com/sahara-solar-breeder-project/17054/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/05/991621/-Solar-Photovoltaic-Generating-Capacity-Averaging-65-Compound-Annual-Growth-Rate-for-Last-5-Years

http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/biochar-alone-could-offset-12-of-all-human-greenhouse-gas-emissions-study.html When we cut out fossil use by 90% or more, that's a carbon negative system.

Use plug in commuter hybrids to cut vehicle oil use by 90%, so waste bio fuels can supply the need.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LLNL_US_Energy_Flow_2009.png
05:45 PM on 01/21/2012
It would be a great boon to the promotion of green energy if organizations like the Sierre Club would contract a detailed national energy plan from a reliable scientific source. Such a plan should define exactly which green sources we would use, how much of each type, where they would be located, how much and what type backup generation would be required, how their power would be distributed, how long it would take to implement, what would it cost and what would be the overall impact on our economy. An alternative would be to lobby thue DOE to produce such a plan. Until something of this magnitude is done, we will continue to call for more "green energy" without a clue as to what we are asking for.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:25 PM on 01/22/2012
Interesting thoughts. You are right that the environmental groups should work to create a unified plan for the future.

The DOE is the the department of nukes, so don't hold your breath.

I propose: eff, offshore wind and waste bio char, and rooftop solar. Add commuter plug in hybrids and we can replace all our fossil and nukes use with green clean, forever, 24/7 energy.
08:59 AM on 01/20/2012
“Subsequent tests have suggested that Dwyer's original measuring techniques were incorrect, and that he has not in fact made a major breakthrough. But the point of his appearance was to underscore the need for creativity and a wiliness to challenge orthodoxy that is required by a clean energy future.”...That’s an excellent example of the status of green energy in a nutshell. Hey, it doesn’t work yet but it makes us feel better to pretend it does.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:50 PM on 01/21/2012
Oh, you forgot nukes get 500M$ per year per reactor in breaks, and that's why they can sell it cheap. rooftop pv solar is cheaper than nukes. Rooftop solar is still the cheapest electricity for million of Americans and billions of people around the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
05:02 PM on 01/19/2012
Any energy initiative which raises the price of energy is a major hit to our economy at this time. You want to send America into an economic tailspin just whisper $5 gas is a possibility.

You want people to buy the new light bulbs, figure out a way to convince those living on food stamps, TANF subsidies and Medicaid that an EFL bulb at 5 times the cost of an incandescent is a good deal.

Tell the part time carpet layer who lives in a rural community, can't afford a new vehicle, has no access to public transportation and couldn't use it anyway unless he could load his supplies, tools and carpet on the bus and be insured of getting a ride back home after 2AM when he finishes the job that $5 gas for his truck is a wonderful thing.

At some point reality must be considered and the air dreaming of environmental academics who never have to deal with the gritty actuality of real life as lived by real people be subjected to a vote.

It is fine to put up wind turbines, solar arrays and innovative wave technology. But right here, right now we need to drill, refine, dam, and build nuclear. Unless, of course, environmentalists really want America to devolve into a third world nation powered by horse and burned logs.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:46 PM on 01/19/2012
The hard reality is that we're gonna run out of fossil fuels eventually. The CO2 balance must be kept in our atmosphere. For one trillion dollars, the amount of money that we just spent on the last war, we could have put enough solar panels in place to supply all of our electric energy needs, one trillion watts. Liquid fuels can be made from plant materials. And yes, we could have built 1000 safe Westinghouse nuclear power plants with that trillion dollars. Our biggest problem is war. In the next ten years, we'll be spending at least five trillion dollars on our military + another trillion dollar war perhaps. We're a nation of militant dodo birds!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
niumarmion
a temporary being
01:38 AM on 01/20/2012
The academics and environmentlaists have no say about any of this. The ruling elite could not care less about "real" people. The national institutions, such as, MIC and the prison industrial complex, serve the ruling elite. Our rulers now have the power to deliver a nuclear war head to any point on the globe with pinpoint accuracy with stealth technology before a country can detect the penetration of their air space. Their drones can assassinate any of their enemies with the same precision. The wealth and sacrifice of the "real" people go towards the military glory of our rulers.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
03:46 PM on 01/19/2012
The world started on the path to the post-American world when the government started waging unfunded wars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
09:11 PM on 01/19/2012
American decline started with 3-mile island when we turned away from nuclear power. Had we built the 1000 Nuclear plants Nixon wanted, we could be coal free, using natural gas as fuel and well on our way to synthesizing fuel from air and water (zero carbon). The Persian Gulf would not be a vital interest.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
09:18 PM on 01/19/2012
It would have been even better to set up solar panels everywhere.
photo
Aladdin Sane1
"Are you the police?""No, ma'am, we're musicians."
11:27 PM on 01/19/2012
Nixon wanted nuclear; Carter wanted solar. Ford wanted his hair back, but Reagan was too selfish to give up any of his.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
10:30 PM on 01/19/2012
Going into debt to pay for something is fine if you get a return on your investment. War shows no return on investment. Building renewable energy infrastructure shows return on investment cuz you can sell the energy to pay off the debt.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
03:37 PM on 01/19/2012
Because the United States is the policeman of the world it must spend five to six trillion dollars every ten years or so keeping the peace instead of using its money to build a renewable energy infrastructure. For six trillion dollars we could have built enough thin-film solar panels to supply enough electricity for 1,620,000,000 homes. This would represent the home energy needs of India, China, and the United States combined. Instead all of this resource is now blowing across the cratered landscapes of long forgotten wars. World peace brings prosperity, but there is no peace.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:21 AM on 01/20/2012
I would change your dialogue from 'keeping the peace' to 'spreading empire'. That would be much more accurate. We are not creating peace.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
12:05 PM on 01/20/2012
If an Empire is being built and maintained by a hidden diabolical hand, it isn't America's Empire. It would be an Empire belonging to a small group of multinational puppeteers. As a subservient Provence of this Empire, we'd be the most exploited of all cuz our children die fighting its wars, our natural treasure is wasted, and our survival infrastructure is sacrificed. We should have renewable energy independence by now, a vibrant ecology, and full employment with health care and housing for all, but all this has been sacrificed. Don't blame us ordinary Americans for the woes of the world. We suffer that same as everyone else if not moreso.
12:31 PM on 01/19/2012
I'm looking forward to the World World. As for the Post-World World, THAT, scares the heck out of me!
photo
M33TBallz
IMHO, SYPH
08:42 AM on 01/20/2012
Bizarre.
08:59 AM on 01/20/2012
Indeed it is, from the point of view of an American Oil World.