More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carlos A. Ball

Carlos A. Ball

Posted: June 17, 2010 01:05 PM

Obama and LGBT Rights

What's Your Reaction:

For supporters of LGBT rights, the election of President Obama represented an apparent historical turning point for sexual minorities in our country. As a presidential candidate, Obama had said all of the rights things: he criticized the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy (DADT); he called for the enactment of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would protect employees against sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination; and called for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

But now that almost a third of Obama's first term has gone by, there is growing despair among many of his LGBT supporters over how little the administration has accomplished on gay rights. We have been here before. Eighteen years ago many gay rights advocates celebrated the election of President Clinton, the first presidential candidate to reach out to the LGBT community, only to be disappointed by how clumsy and conflicted the new administration was in handling the gays in the military controversy.

The Obama administration seems less clumsy, but almost as conflicted as did the Clinton administration. Its support for the repeal of DADT strikes many as tepid. In his State of the Union address this past January, the President promised to work with Congress to end DADT. But the administration earlier this spring opposed efforts to add an amendment repealing that discriminatory law to a defense authorization bill. The most it has been willing to do is to accept a compromise -- which would repeal DADT at the end of the year if a Pentagon study group agrees -- that leaves the issue unsettled for now. Similarly, the administration has so far failed to push for the repeal of DOMA or for the enactment of ENDA.

This is not to say that the administration has not taken some steps to address issues that are important to the LGBT community. For example, just last week the Department of Justice announced that it would prosecute domestic violence in cases involving same-sex relationships under the Violence Against Women Act. And, for the last year, the administration has been working on implementing an extension of some benefits for the same-sex partners of federal employees.

Although these steps are welcomed, they are hardly the types of changes that LGBT rights supporters had in mind when they opened up their hearts (and their pocket books) to Obama during the presidential campaign. What many of them hoped instead was that Obama would take the lead in reminding the country that issues of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity raise some of the most important civil rights questions of our time and that it is imperative that the federal government take the lead in making sure that all Americans are afforded the opportunities of equal citizenship.

The administration's hesitancy on gay rights may be the result of a lack of commitment to the issues. Or, it may be the byproduct of political calculations regarding what is legislatively achievable given the current politically charged environment. But we have reached the point when what explains the administration's cautiousness no longer really matters. What is more important now is that we are unlikely to see real progress on gay rights during the coming months. And with the Democrats unlikely to hold their large majorities in Congress after this fall's elections, the odds of major gay rights reforms during the second half of the President's first term seem even worse.

So it is now time to throw caution to the wind. It is important that the President take the initiative to fight for what is right on gay rights. It is better to lose after fighting than to lose without a fight. Yes, it would be nice to get results by repealing DOMA and enacting ENDA. But at this point, the LGBT community would settle for simple leadership from the man who promised sexual minorities so much during the 2008 presidential campaign.

 
 
 
For supporters of LGBT rights, the election of President Obama represented an apparent historical turning point for sexual minorities in our country. As a presidential candidate, Obama had said all of...
For supporters of LGBT rights, the election of President Obama represented an apparent historical turning point for sexual minorities in our country. As a presidential candidate, Obama had said all of...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:49 PM on 06/22/2010
In honor of Pride Month - check out this Proud to be Gay video. Love it!
http://ourscenetv.com/posts/397/proud-to-be-gay
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Jdaddy1951
02:02 PM on 06/18/2010
I suspect what it's going to come down to is a decision by all gay people who have been donating money to the national Democratic to withold its support and just donate to specific candidates who have proven records of not only being gay-friendly, but active in trying to overturn and defeat homophobic laws. When the Dems send out form letters asking for money, we should send them back and say, "What have you ACCOMPLISHED (not "done") for us lately?"
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MatthewRobertson
I'm 26. I'm gay. I like film. I care about shit.
08:06 PM on 06/18/2010
Exactly!!! Its time to start seeing results...no more talk.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Jdaddy1951
11:56 PM on 06/20/2010
I know 59 is supposed to be the new 39 these days, but I would still like to see some progress on gay rights before I DIE or something ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
04:18 PM on 06/20/2010
Yep. I send those letters back with a note saying that until ENDA is enacted, and DOMA and DADT repealed, only the Dems with a PROVEN record for equal rights for gay Americans will get my support, and NOT the Party as a whole.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Jdaddy1951
11:56 PM on 06/20/2010
Good. That should get the procrastinators' attention ...
01:30 AM on 06/18/2010
Yes, disappointed is the best way to describe it. Obama has done nothing for us that has actually required any effort on his part. He has not advocated for us; he has not used the presidency as a bully pulpit. He has quietly congratulated himself at gay venues for being our fierce advocate, but has never advocated - fiercely or otherwise. Instead, he has defended both DOMA and DADT in court actions in the most insulting possible terms, and left us twisting, twisting in the wind. I will not vote for him again, something I tell the DNC each month when they call for money. Never again.
11:10 AM on 06/18/2010
Actually Obama has limited presidential powers to sign in new laws. The real powers for passing legislation is with the congress and senate. On June 02, President Obama signed an Executive Memorandum to extend as many benefits to same-sex domestic partners. Some federal agencies implement these changes at varying speeds. The Department of Defense is stalling these benefits hoping for a resolution in its favor over DADT. President Obama' Executive Order can be changed by the next president. If Congress passes a repeal of DOMA, then it becomes law and it would require a 2/3 vote from the senate and congress to repeal.
As a Dept of Defense employee living overseas with my married partner, I welcome the efforts the Obama administration is making within it's power. It is far more than any other president has made in history.
05:23 PM on 06/18/2010
He has done something for us, although not enough. Democrats are our only hopes, unfortunately. When did you see a republican standing on a pro-gay platform?
09:32 PM on 06/17/2010
I am waiting for a repulican to take over the whitehouse to help you. I think the republicans will be better help to you and the oil company.
09:37 PM on 06/17/2010
I are discontent with Obama. But we sure know that worst democrat is better the best republican in terms of LGBT rights. Besides, Obama is not the worst democrat in terms of LGBT right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carter2004
01:01 PM on 06/18/2010
Oh, please. Could you be more condescending?

These issues are not a a spectrum. You can't be "better" or "worse" at advocating for equality. You either want equality or you don't. Apparently nobody does. So why on earth should we care who's in office if the result is going to be the same?
08:33 PM on 06/17/2010
I feel very sorry for those who voted for Obama, he seems to be back pedaling on every issue he promised. I know you must be disappointed and really thought he would do what he promised.

This not a new phenomena though, politicians have done this for decades. What surprises me though is how everyone is so surprised now. Any politician that promises everything to everyone is setting himself up for a major fall.

He is not a lone politician in Washington, he has lots of people to answer to and cannot go willy nilly off and do what he wants when he wants. The Democrats sure knew what they were doing though, they set him and you up. They had everyone believing he was wonder boy and could heal absolutely everything that was wrong with this Country.

Next time why don't the people get a little smarter and really check these people out before everyone votes. I didn't vote for him but then again I don't vote a political party anyway, never have, never will and I sure as heck don't fall for campaign promises. That never works out the way the people think.
09:36 PM on 06/17/2010
Obama is not as good as we expected him to be. But he is 100% better than McCain. Look at what McCain is doing right now. He wants to filibuster DADT repeal. So pathetic !
09:52 PM on 06/17/2010
I can understand your frustration even though I am not gay (been married 32 years to same man) I believe some people feel threated by your lifestyle. I don't particularly feel it is any body's business but your own. Some might feel it is against the reason men and women were made differently, to procreate and keep the species going.

When a group of people feel threated they do some pretty ugly things. The blacks were hung if they even looked at a white woman, even though this is probably not a good analogy, but it is the same as when some people see an openly gay person they beat them up or do what they did to that poor boy Matthew Sheperd.

Maybe now is not the right time, the change will eventually come I have no doubt but all in due time. The rest of the country is simply not ready for all that you want. It may not be ready for another 10 or 20 years. Look how long it took for the Blacks to gain their Civil Rights. Look how much you have accomplished already.
07:33 PM on 06/17/2010
Human rights should not wait. I understand he has a lot on his plate. But we need some substantial progress in LGBT legislation, repeal DADT, DOMA, enact ENDA and Uniting American Families Act. The LGBT community need to push the congress and the president more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tekkdude
Battling Republican lies one post at a time.
06:37 PM on 06/17/2010
Really? Really? The President doesn't have enough to do with unemployment, oil spill, finance reform, and the myriad other priorities that he has to sit down and deal with LGBT priorities now? Being gay, I am increasingly disillusioned with those who claim to speak for our community. This President has done more for gay rights since becoming President than all of the Presidents before him combined. Hello, have you forgotten about the HHS directive stating the LGBT partners be allowed to visit their loved ones in the hospital? The amendment which while it is not perfect, is a lot closer to repealing DADT than anything since DADT was enacted. This President is expanding the benefits to LGBT partners of federal workers. That alone made Republican heads spin I am sure. As a group, we are getting mighty demanding and it is going to provoke a backlash against our interests. We should push for all we can get but we should also be a lot more grateful for the things Obama has done already. This administration has already shown more loyalty and commitment to LGBT issues than any in recent history. That alone deserves our respect and support.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:52 AM on 06/18/2010
"We should push for all we can get but we should also be a lot more grateful for the things Obama has done already. "

"This administration has already shown more loyalty and commitment to LGBT issues than any in recent history. That alone deserves our respect and support."

Wake up.
01:02 PM on 06/20/2010
This administration has repeatedly said that they can multitask.

The President is not working on this, or any other issue, alone. Delegate, demand a time table, follow up, and can anyone not performing. That's what any other good boss does.

And if the administration is really a supporter of LGBT rights, then tell the DOJ to back off. (And before you give me the line about he can't--he certainly can. As this administration did regarding cannibis.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tekkdude
Battling Republican lies one post at a time.
04:42 PM on 06/20/2010
Is the LGBT community really not going to be happy until we have every single thing that we want this year? Much has been done and much remains to do but the constant harping and whining is getting ridiculous. We have much to celebrate in Obama, definitely more than if McCain had been elected. Our community should appreciate and acknowledge the contributions that Obama has already made while continuing to fight for the additional issues that are important to us as a group without threatening to abandon him at every turn.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:56 PM on 06/17/2010
Its likely because gays make up a relatively small percentage of the population (and arnent' going to vote Republican, mostly) and the gay themed issues are contentions and he has a lot of contentious issues on his plate as it is, and given the numbers and voting demographic, nothing personally is served by taking the issues on.
photo
SouthJerseySteve
Progressive isn't a dirty word.
06:28 PM on 06/17/2010
DADT puts the entire country at risk. How can American Soldiers in the Gulf Region protect us against terrorists if there isn't anybody left to speak and translate Arabic?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romulus
10:04 PM on 06/17/2010
Only gay soldiers speak Arabic?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:20 AM on 06/18/2010
because only gay soldiers can speak arabic lol. Yes some gay arabic soldiers have been discharged, that's true. but let's not exaggerate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcabowers
People are more important than money
07:17 PM on 06/17/2010
Ending discrimination is sufficient reason in and of itself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:21 AM on 06/18/2010
Not really because he can't act alone. If doing X for the gay community, means he will lose what he wants to do for W, Y, and Z, it's not worth it to him.

If gays were double the population, it would be politically worth it perhaps. but even then, he knows they aren't going anywhere.

DADT is pretty easy because most people support its repeal. But the rest is much harder.
photo
wonketteRAWKS
Hypocrisy is prevalent in BOTH parties!
05:18 PM on 06/17/2010
"Growing despair"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcabowers
People are more important than money
05:06 PM on 06/17/2010
Obama needs to more aggressively pursue a left leaning agenda in all areas, especially LGBT issues. It is the Civil Rights cause of our lifetimes. There is no just or palatable cause in putting off action any longer. One more day without full and equal rights for the LGBT community is a day too long.
04:38 PM on 06/17/2010
Talk to the Senate. There are over 200 bills passed by the House waiting on the Senate. Those old men take forever--we still don't have financial reform. Last time I checked, the President can't vote in the Senate any longer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcabowers
People are more important than money
05:03 PM on 06/17/2010
The Senate is in need of reform, desperately so and immediately so. The Senate has literally ground to a halt and produces nothing because of its arcane rules. Rules are misused to deny the majority the right to enact legislation. It is rule by a contrarian minority, not what the Constitution envisioned for that body.
05:40 PM on 06/17/2010
The rules can be changed in January-- only if there are enough Dems to lower the vote threshold. So, this should be the strongest reason for Dems to vote in November.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:57 PM on 06/17/2010
The constitution envisioned the senate being slow and deliberate and not subject to the whims of the people. That was the point. It was meant to help protect minority political rights against mob rule, which they feared.
photo
wonketteRAWKS
Hypocrisy is prevalent in BOTH parties!
05:17 PM on 06/17/2010
If and when they do, as always Obama will swoop in and take credit.
04:15 PM on 06/17/2010
Settling for simple leadership.....I think we might settle for follow through and a real commitment.

Clinton threw us under a bus and Obama uses us as a speed bump.
04:11 PM on 06/17/2010
There are many far more important things for the president to deal with.
04:21 PM on 06/17/2010
Presidents and their administrations do a LOT of things at the same time. If there's time for a prayer breakfast, there's time for civil rights, too.
05:29 PM on 06/17/2010
"Civil rights." Ha!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:57 PM on 06/17/2010
Prayer breakfasts arent controversial lol not with most. this stuff is much harder.
photo
SouthJerseySteve
Progressive isn't a dirty word.
04:02 PM on 06/17/2010
I just want to say "Thank You President Obama." Because you have failed us LGBT Americans again and again, I have stopped donating money to the DNC. I have changed my Voter Registration to Independent, I have stopped volunteering for your causes, and I no longer wish to see you re-elected in 2012. Along with how you handled Civil Rights, your lack of action against BP and Wall Street, show me that I'm very disappointed with your "change is coming" promises, because I fail to see anything different than Bush or Clinton. There are many disillusioned voters, gay and straight, black or white, young and old who aren't Tea Baggers, just sad to see Washington play the same game over and over.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:52 PM on 06/17/2010
He's just NOT that into you--until he needs your campaign contributions.