iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carol Muske-Dukes

Carol Muske-Dukes

Posted: March 10, 2011 04:26 PM

The Rules According to a Fraternity "Cocksman"


Read and weep or laugh, shake your head -- but be warned. If you dismiss this frat email as a joke or more of the "acceptable" "just being guys" open season on women -- you are missing that drone in the sky. We remain so inured to this kind of jollied-up predator mentality that we stop seeing and hearing it. Whether the sound of loathing emanates from a club, fraternity, the washrooms of senates or courtrooms or corporate boardrooms or belief systems or in the media -- the rhetoric leads to one dark place, one dangerous zone: the denial of the dignity and rights of women, and the sanctioning of that denial. We've been talking about the War Against Women being waged by the Republican Party and the Tea Blogs and Right to Lifers here in the U.S. -- and by the shock troops of misogyny worldwide -- yet here in our backyard, or rather, on fraternity row at USC, my school, (as on other campuses) -- the war escalates in language designed to puff up a (obviously limp) "cocksman" and to shoot the "target" on sight.

This email was obviously meant only for the eyes of frat fellows, but was inadvertently leaked to other readers. The campus newspaper has run a rather lame accounting of the e-letter and its effect -- generating online boilerplate -- with some defending the letter, some isolating the writer as an aberration, others registering shock.
Jezebel has run the text of the letter -- and brave students and young women on campus have authenticated the source of the email -- name, rank and frat "number."

Young women, the self-styled cocksman says, are "targets," they are not "people." They are body parts. This deflated rubber-swordsman with his sniggering small-time imitation of a currently popular blabbing seducer is in the "delusions of power" business, not the sex advice business. Misogyny is about the desire to destroy and devalue what is most feared. If women are targets or "pie" or "gullet" -- this writer is a wad of wankery, tacky ejaculate, unwittingly revealing what makes him screech and wee wee. He's scared of the sisterhood, he's scared of Mommy, he's scared of the power of women and he just can't stop trying to pull himself up on nanny's knee making farting noises. Look at me, girls, I wet the bed again!

Too bad this pathetic rant is so sadly familiar that we look away, embarrassed. Because what should finally set off the alarms is this: There are young women on campuses everywhere, headed to frat parties where the difference between "sexual assault" and "consensual sex" is being parsed for "brothers" by clubroom minds as festering and obsessed as this one. Harm to these young women is being calculated -- how much dehumanizing damage can be inflicted and gotten away with -- cheered on by fellow "cocksmen"?

I love teaching at USC -- I teach young writers, students who are sensitive and enlightened, talented, wildly gifted. They seem the antidote to this creep chatter. Their writing, their insights are light years away from this chummy scum. Yet the big majority, the caring and decent students on campus would not be surprised by this letter -- because this is a sick missive sent round the world daily in all of its hate-mail forms. It is sanctioned by the offensive against women everywhere the war is being fought. Step beyond fraternity row, folks -- make that Planet Earth.

Read the email here.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
01:10 PM on 03/13/2011
My original comment was scrubbed; not sure why so I'll try again.

My concern is that many young women on college campuses are not dealing with the misogyny head on, but instead willingly playing along with the fraternity shenanigans much to their peril. The Karen Owen story is truly frightening to me; but admittedly I don't know how prevalent the behavior is. (Anecdotally, I've heard from daughters of friends who are currently in college that it's fairly typical.) She goes one step further by one-upping the boys in her detailed accounts of her conquests, most of them drunken and dehumanizing. And yet, some women are touting this as her being in full control of her sexuality, doing to men what men have done to women for years.

Pardon me for disagreeing, but if you're too drunk to stand, you are not in control of your sexuality. Period. It's dangerous for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which is the transmission of STD's.

So, I'm in total agreement with the author of this post, but I think we need some additional introspection as women about why so many girls are attracted to this boorish behavior and worse, why they seem to want to be both sexual objects and the objectifiers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcwtts1
Elections have consequences
11:12 AM on 03/13/2011
This is a particularly scummy piece of frat behavior. Seriously, dehumanizing, quips about rape, and mildly racist on its face. But it is also typical frat boy bs. It hasn't changed in half a century. Every year you see kids in black face on Halloween, crazy statistics of sexual assault, awful behavior. It isn't ok but it is impossible to fix. You have to deal with individuals, educate them, make them see that this stuff isn't ok. But again, it is tough if not impossible. Frats are a microcosm of larger culture.
03:47 PM on 03/12/2011
i created an account just to comment on this.... please re-read this paragraph very carefully: "Note: If you are so lucky to encounter a perfect piece of pie. I mean the grip is out of this world, it doesn't look like hair ever existed in the region, and it tastes like strawberry shortcake, then you are allowed to refer to the pie as crème brulee. It must hit the tri-fecta to be considered for this great and honorable distinction." i sincerely hope the author of this e-mail is found quickly and investigated because this smacks of child sexual abuse.

and the idea that "tighter is better" is actually indicative of 1-she doesn't want him; 2-he isn't doing his job; and 3-this isn't consensual. when a woman is relaxed and enjoying herself her muscles become relaxed as well. if she's tighter that's an indication he's not doing it right.

and rape vs. non-consensual? give me a break. no means no. period. in a situation where "fight or flight" are not possible, a freeze response happens as well. doesn't mean she wants it. what a pig this guy is and anyone else who thinks this kind of degradation is okay.
02:46 PM on 03/12/2011
This letter should be required reading for every young woman upon entering college.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mabinog
My micro-bio is a desolate wasteland
07:27 PM on 03/11/2011
ah the greek system, where young men and women go to do pointless, insulting, and sometimes dangerous acts in order to be accepted by people they don't know and have only enough respect for them to insist that they do pointless, insulting and dangerous things.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kansas ham on wry
Red stater petitioning for asylum elsewhere
01:01 PM on 03/11/2011
Just when you think the species is making small tentative baby steps towards perfection, along comes something like this that makes you realize we're not that far removed from swinging in the trees. I especially liked the distinction between non-consent and rape. Funny, but where I come from, they're basically the same thing. Maybe some enterprising women's group can create a male Kappa Sigma rating system to turn the tables. Yes, I know it's better not to lower yourself to their level. But shame isn't something that would work on folks so congenitally callow. Now humiliation on the other hand..................
03:03 PM on 03/11/2011
please see Duke University's Karen Owen
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:36 PM on 03/11/2011
This is a hoot. Anybody recall Animal House? Brilliant satire, no? Let's just for a moment invoke Camille Paglia with gratitude for her sex-positive feminism while paying our respect to just how differently men and women are wired for procreation.
GraceNotes
We live for books.
02:47 PM on 03/11/2011
There is absolutely nothing sex positive about that e-mail. And those boys are not remotely interested in procreation.
11:29 AM on 03/11/2011
Oh my god, this actually made me feel sick. I went to college and I know exactly who this guy is. He is incredibly insecure. The only way he can have any effect on people is to be shocking. He has no ability to have a real relationship with anyone because he doesn't even know who he is let alone have the guts to share it with someone. He will marry, no doubt, some girl who is also insecure and loves to be bullied and will bear him children in hopes that it will make this world class fella change his ways and fall madly in love with her. She will never know that he is not capable, even after he leaves. In college I would have dismissed this fella in about 30 seconds after he started talking. But he knows that, which is why he is trying to build this force amongst his "brothers" to back him up. Poor kid. I wish he could feel the security that comes with being loved for who you are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Venicelady
Ignorance is NOT bliss.
04:13 PM on 03/13/2011
"I wish that he could feel the security that comes with being loved for who you are".

Won't happen until this boy growns older, and becomes seasoned by life and experience, if ever.
10:17 AM on 03/11/2011
The Frat Bro mentality has been treated as more of a laughing point than a serious matter. Which makes sense because Bros are hilarious: they wear promotional tank tops, rip-off Wayfarers, love competitive drinking games, fantasy football, being a business major. And of course, most of this activity is harmless and stupid college fun. Then again, lunatics and psychos do exist within any space-- bro-space or not -- and the e-mail purports this but doesn't say anything we didn't already know.

Given this whole situation I'm more interested in how this the email has come as such a shock to everyone. Both Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy were serial killers -- the only difference was one of them was good looking and the other was fat and dressed like a clown. Either way, a lot of people were murdered. I feel the same way about the Frat system. This email comes as an ugly punch to the gut. However, the Frat (and none-Frat) get-her-drunk-first mentality has been around as long as I can remember. Go to Food 4 Less on any Thursday night and see how many bottles of plastic Prestige Vodka get purchased by mass quantities of guys for a couple of less than honorable reasons. See how many "Bros only tonight" parties exist on Frat Row. It's not like this email proves anything new. It's just made it bloated, dressed it up in a clown suit for everyone to go Ewwww.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ds2vet
The central bank is our enemy
11:43 AM on 03/11/2011
So let me ask this stupid question. We all know what went on in college, why do these young women participate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mabinog
My micro-bio is a desolate wasteland
07:24 PM on 03/11/2011
Why isn't that beside the point?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Venicelady
Ignorance is NOT bliss.
04:10 PM on 03/13/2011
For a number of reasons:

1). The young women want to be in the "popular" group. Hanging around with these frat boys ascribes a certain cache to them.

2). They have low esteem, or a misguided sense of themselves as emerging young women.

3). Hero worship- these boys are the "big men" on campus.

Oversimplifications to be sure, but these reasons touch on why these young women participate in these activities.