iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Caroline Henderson

Caroline Henderson

Posted: December 14, 2010 06:45 PM

Outside of the Cancún Messe at the international climate talks, runners Kevin Osborne from the U.S and Yingao Chen from China take their mark at the starting line. A sports commentator calls out: "It's a beautiful day! The sun is shining, the wind is blowing and our two competitors are ready to begin this epic race for a brighter and more prosperous world." At the sound of a whistle, the runners take off, racing toward the clean energy future.

What is the story behind this race? The U.S and China are major emitters and major economies with a complex relationship and huge opportunities to lead the clean energy economy.

At this moment in time, the U.S. is falling behind during a time that we most need economic revitalization and a competitive new job sector. While China has taken huge strides in building their renewable energy sector, much of their turbines and solar systems are exported while more new coal plants are constructed to meet growing energy demands.

U.S leadership has come empty-handed to the negotiations and continues to accuse China of holding up progress. Relations between U.S and China remain tenuous and marked with antagonism and mistrust.

Can the two countries overcome their differences and rise to the challenge? Who will emerge victorious in the clean energy economy?

***

As athletes representing U.S and China race in slow-motion along the red carpet track, youth on the side-lines cheer on the runners, holding up signs of historical moments in the U.S China clean energy history. Sports commentators from both countries narrate the race:

2010-12-14-starting.jpg

2000: "U.S has started off in the lead, it looks like they're making progress but can they keep it up?" "Will China be able to catch up?"

At first the U.S is by all indications equipped to outrun China in the race toward abundant clean energy.

2005: "China passes landmark Renewable Energy Law, she's gotten a jumpstart and is closing in on the gap."

The race becomes closer as both U.S and China take greater strides and vie for the lead...

2009: "Amazing comeback as China surges ahead, doubling its wind capacity in record time! She's really devoting herself to the race -- and it looks her investments are paying off!"

Now it is China that has taken the lead, with the U.S falling behind and looking winded.

2011: "Oh what's this -- it seems that a major obstacle is blocking the path to a clean energy future -- how will the runners handle this challenge?"

Two youth from the crowd crouch down on the track, creating a roadblock. The runners pause, looking frustrated and perplexed. They push the obstacle but it won't budge.

"It looks like they're struggling one their own and refusing to cooperate. Can the U.S. and China cooperate, to develop the next generation of clean energy?"

At this moment, youth from the crowd begin to chant "To-geth-er!" The runners continue to push, but to no avail. Finally, as the cheering become stronger, the runners take hands and push through the roadblock together...

"Wow, in a surprise turn of events, US and China work together to overcome the obstacle!"

The athletes resume the race, surging toward the finish line.

"An unbelievable comeback from the U.S and both athletes seem to be performing excessively well, blowing old records out of the water!"

2010-12-14-finishline.jpg

Sprinting now, U.S and China take hands and cross the finish line victoriously!

***

U.S and Chinese youth have come together to urge President Obama and Congress and to spur on new job-creating economic drivers at home by rapidly growing U.S green economy between now and COP17 in South Africa and encourage the Chinese government to implement more clean energy projects at home, bringing the clean energy transformation to the Chinese people, matching major strides in wind and solar manufacturing with increased domestic installations.

This race illustrates the need for ambition in advancing toward the clean energy economy -- to provide new sources of employment and improve air quality, to enable true progress toward international climate solutions, and to secure a viable future for our generation.

But jobs, solutions, and the security of our planet won't be ensured by competition alone. In the lead-up to this race, Chinese and U.S youth became acquainted with the importance of building trust and mutual leadership. We need both China and the U.S rising to the occasion, racing toward the clean energy future.

According to U.S runner Kevin Osborne of the Cascade Climate Network, "If we don't learn to lead together, then we won't lead at all. We need to be leaders and demonstrate far-reaching cooperation to achieve effective clean energy solutions."

As part of the U.S China Youth Climate Exchange, over the past two weeks, American and Chinese youth are demonstrating the sort of cooperation and leadership that we are asking of our governments. Learn more about this initiative and the impressive string of media it has garnered here.

***

It's already clear that we have a long way to go in order to make real progress on the international front. The first step to saving the negotiations and saving the planet is for the U.S to seriously step up its clean energy game.

This week, President Obama announced a framework tax deal that would scrap the Renewable Energy Grant Program, the only major national program incentivizing renewable electricity; such a decision would kill nearly 100,000 jobs, and further cripple our country in the clean energy race.

President Obama must show real leadership on this issue: no more fumbles, giveaways and cop-outs. We need Obama to get into the game and stand up to Big Oil bullies and climate deniers; he must demonstrate how the clean energy economy can revitalize America and employ millions.

Meanwhile, the current 2011 fiscal budget proposes to repeal tax breaks for major industries like Exxon Mobil, freeing up $20 billion and saving an estimated $45 billion over the next 10 years, funds that could be re-funneled to green jobs training programs, energy efficiency, and clean energy development.

Ironically, these wasteful dirty energy subsidies are likely to be protected by industry-entrenched members of congress simultaneously calling for fiscal restraint and job creation.

Congress must approve a budget that reflects American priorities: investing in clean energy technology and removing wasteful subsidies to fossil fuel industries.

 

Follow Caroline Henderson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/carohend

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:06 AM on 12/23/2010
China practices free trade like Great Britain did in the 1800's - you trade with us freely but we will protect our industries because it is our right!

When the EPA puts a restriction on an emission from a manufacturer in the U.S. and does not impose the same restrictions on imports the EPA has just advance a Racist policy!

Has the EPA hurt that large Corporation with its restriction when that Corporation can simply close its U.S. Manufacturing plant and move to Asia like Intel did?

Did it hurt that young minority a year or two out of high school getting a paycheck and not hanging out with some gang members?

When nations subsidize making steel for wind turbines and our nation does nothing and a U.S. Corporation closes another factory that hurts minorities proportionally more is that not Racist?

Our government has shown a disregard for minorities at the lower end of the economic spectrum giving them no hope!

Talk about hidden cost! How much does it cost to imprison a young black man for life because there are no jobs for him!

The three strike law should be for our politicians and agencies like the EPA that make it easy for large corporations to move to other nations where they can pollute and still be abiding by the law! Not for our young minority non-college bond citizens!

WALL-STREET and WALL-MART win again!

The poor lose! And who's fault is that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
08:43 PM on 12/14/2010
China's economy is developing at full throttle and now emits about as much green house gases as the US. But China has 5 times as many people so her carbon footprint per capita is about 1/5 that of the US. If China can maintain its emission levels at their current levels it would be equivalent to the US reducing its emissions by 80%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
08:30 PM on 12/14/2010
There is a powerful lever that might gather strong support for bold government action.

See GREEN LIGHT, accelerating a new way forward on climate change at www.aesopi­­­­­­­­­­­­n­s­t­i­t­­u­­t­­e­­.­­­o­­­r­g

Potentiall­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­y destructiv­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­e solar storms occurred in April, September and November. The latter, a huge one, narrowly missed earth. Imagine the impact of widespread­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­, lengthy, blackouts!

Decentrali­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­z­­e­­d power production is a wise insurance policy - as well as a surprising way for disruptive green technologi­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­e­­s to start to supersede the costly need for imported oil!

Political opposition may be minimal, since such blackouts would clearly be national emergencie­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­s­­.

A solar storm can cause power system collapse. NASA estimates in the U.S., damage could cause 130 million people to suffer a long-term blackouts. The cost - $1-2 trillion the first year. Roughly the price tag of both the wars in Iraq and Afghanista­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­n­­!

China now has 200 cities with more than 1 million people.

Supersedin­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­g grid dependency is an insurance policy for our population and the entire planet. See the Aesop Institute website.

The potential for power outages can be used to stimulate rapid production of potentiall­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­y cost-compe­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­t­­i­­t­­i­­v­­­e­­­, renewable, energy conversion systems.

Supersedin­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­g oil and all fossil fuels can be accomplish­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­e­­d very much faster than convention­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­a­­l wisdom (and predictabl­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­e skepticism­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­) would suggest is possible.

Decentrali­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­z­e­­d­­, inexpensiv­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­e­, green energy can turn future cars and trucks into.power plants that can sell electricit­­­y to local utilities when parked.

The resulting activity can revive the fragile economy snd generate large numbers of jobs.
08:08 PM on 12/14/2010
Building it from scratch requires long term planning, deferred gratification and hard working. Why bother? We can always buy it when the fruits ripe. After all, we could print the greenbacks as many as we like, right?

It's not like we do not have enough solutions, rather strong wills and leadership, both are in short supply.

Don't want to be a pessimist. But with the next congress (112th) in office and the main goal of which is to "make Obama a one-term president", I'd be very happy as long as we do not go backward, let alone forward.