More

Of Stanwyck and Show Horses


The mathematics of who's elite and who's "just folks" in presidential politics is somewhat mysterious. It doesn't correlate with class or income.

FDR, with his long, elegant cigarette holder, his little dog Fala and his aristocratic voice, should have been almost a caricature of upper-classness. But he used that voice in his Fireside Chats to speak directly to people's hearts, and they loved him. Harvard and money didn't seem to hurt JFK, and no politician could work a crowd better than Nelson Rockefeller, whose name was nearly synonymous with money (He probably would have been president if he hadn't dumped his wife and chased after a married woman with five kids -- whom he did later marry.) Ronald Reagan communicated with blue-collar folks so well he has a whole class of them named after him -- the Reagan democrats.

But Adlai Stevenson, darling of upper crust Democrats, never could shake his egghead image and resonate with the lunch-bucket crowd. Tom Dewey was a tough prosecutor, but you couldn't imagine him slugging back a Bud. When Alice Roosevelt Longworth called the ever-dapper Dewey "The little man on the wedding cake," the image stuck. Mike Dukakis, a working class Greek-American who took the subway to the state house, was transformed by right-wing attack squads into an effete liberal who munched on Belgian endives and was soft on crime.

Which brings us to Barack Obama; today, people are asking if he's a show horse who's elegant and thrilling to watch in full stride, but one who's going to wobble in the stretch. Is the little filly chasing him the mudder, the one who will keep going in the wind and the rain and the muck and never take her eye off the finish line?

It seems bizarre that the guy who lived for a time on food stamps, the son of a sometimes struggling single mom, is now being labeled "elite." But his-ill phrased "bitter" comment opened him up to the charge that he can't relate to ordinary blue-collar voters.

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has turned herself into Barbara Stanwyck in all those old forties movies, the tough, sassy working-class gal who's got a heart of gold and knows her way around a gat.

You expect Hillary to drill a duck any second. And unlike Dick Cheney, she won't shoot another hunter instead.

This is why the primary race can't be shut down before the competitors round the final turn. Hillary Clinton has had a lot to prove, and she's demonstrated her staying power. Now it's Barack's turn. The magic is gone, but magic always goes, and now it's slog time, and time as well for Barack himself to complete the colors on his portrait. Because he's so new on the political scene, others have been projecting onto him their hopes, dreams and fears. He can't coast on his early lead, because as Red Sox fans know, early leads are worth bupkes in the fall.

It's going to be hard for some Democrats to move away from the dream of Obama to the reality of Obama... The magic was indeed wonderful, while it lasted. That's why, I think, we saw the extraordinary hostility against Hillary when she did what you are supposed to do in a campaign -- throw some punches. Would that same fury have erupted if John Edwards had been her opponent? I doubt it. To some, she became the evil witch trying to destroy the dream child. But you can't win with just a dream. You have to take a punch, and throw it. You have to prove you can go the distance.

Barack Obama has to win this primary race in the homestretch; calling it off too early tarnishes him, it doesn't help him. It hasn't been negative campaigning that's hurt him the most, but his own stumbles. The elite tag came from his own gaffe. But those things happen during campaigns, and candidates recover.

Or maybe they don't.

New York Times columnist Bob Herbert says he's puzzled by Obama's "strange reluctance to fight harder for the nomination in public."

In any event, we need to find out if Obama can pull it off. And not worry about John McCain's good poll numbers. Does anyone remember that, seven months ago, Rudy Giuliani looked like the top dog in the republican race?

So let the games continue. And may the best man -- or woman -- triumph.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:34 AM on 04/28/2008
The reason people are so excited about Barack is because he doesn't buy this reductive notion that what you are "supposed to do" in campaigns is "throw punches". We're fighting to overturn your kind of politics, so of course you don't like it, or understand it. But that just makes the stakes even higher and the battle even more important. For you, a Clinton supporter, to define Barack's success by how much he decides to change course and run a Clintonesque campaign, well, that totally misses the point. To the extent that Obama succeeds in your eyes, he fails in the eyes of the people who have supported him all along. And you might notice that he's winning without following your advice or measuring up (down) to your standards.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gulopartisan
My micro-bio is empty.
08:15 AM on 04/28/2008
Thank you. It can't be said enough. We are done with picking Presidents by how well they can beat up the opposition, and all the other "necessities" our arrested teen thug mentality has chanted at us. Obama may lose by playing fair, but the next time will be easier.

And Hillary hasn't "thrown a few punches," she's lied, insinuated, promoted false information, and attacked Obama for things he didn't do. Shame on you, Hillary. And welcome to the end. I won't vote for you, even if Cheney is McCain's "Vice President."
03:55 AM on 04/28/2008
This post has a point. Obama does have to slog it out. I do think that there is good news for Obama anyway. Has anybody noticed that win or lose if you look at his poll numbers from at least a month away, he always goes up in the polls? He would have to trend down in Indiana and that would be unprecedented. So, hopefully, he can close this down in a week from Tuesday.
11:14 PM on 04/27/2008
"In any event, we need to find out if Obama can pull it off. And not worry about John McCain's good poll numbers. Does anyone remember that, seven months ago, Rudy Giuliani looked like the top dog in the republican race?"

Does anyone remember seven months ago when Hillary did. Please don't get stars in your eyes about Hillary. She went from inevitable winner to inevitable loser, even if a some of her supporters are still in denial. To fail that badly with so much head start just makes her suspect as a leader of anything, let alone the America
09:59 PM on 04/27/2008
""Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has turned herself into Barbara Stanwyck "

O, come on, Ms. Rivers. Hillary is more like Jane Fonda in "Mother-in-Law"

Barack Obama belongs on the cover of "Gentleman's Quarterly", and inside under "style"__something Adlai Stevenson, Tom Dewey and Mike Dukakis lacked. Hillary lacks it, too.
09:49 PM on 04/27/2008
What is an elite? I'm starting to think that it is by definition whoever the Republicans (or the Clintons, take your pick) are running against. But seriously, I have a hard time imagining either Clinton or McCain using the "elite" charage for a sustained period of time, given how filthy rich they both are, and how much they both reek of Washington. It worked for Clinton in Pennsylvania for the time being, but if she continues to try to use this line of attack, sooner or later it backfires on her when folks ask "how is it that the millionaire 109-times over is calling the guy who just payed off his college loans an 'elite'?" It will eventually go back to her chronic phoniness; an adjective she'd do well to rid herself of.