More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Cathy Renna

GET UPDATES FROM Cathy Renna
 

You're Fired: Work It Doesn't Work

Posted: 12/19/11 04:51 PM ET

After watching the pilot of ABC's soon-to-air sitcom Work It, I think the first thing they should do is re-title this piece of crap. A better title, with all due deference to another very gay-friendly ABC franchise, may be Desperate Network.

The fact that the production companies behind this show, Bonanza Productions and Summer School Productions, are best known for The Vampire Diaries and science fiction shows, respectively, makes it clear they are not the best fit for this show. These folks should stick with vampires and aliens, which are more believable than any of the idiotic stereotypes and tired, sexist, racist, and transphobic caricatures in this program.

So what the hell was ABC thinking? After seeing the show for myself, the petitions by GLAAD, HRC, and others to get this program pulled make a lot of sense to me. What rubs salt in the wound is that this is ABC, which airs Modern Family and Desperate Housewives and recently included Chaz Bono on the wildly popular Dancing with the Stars, thus boosting the visibility of real transgender people more than we have ever seen on primetime television.

But here's the issue: as usual, LGBT people (and yes, this show should offend the entire acronym) are only part of a long list of potentially allied minority groups that should be offended by this show. In fact, I would say that we have to get in line to be offended. Women, single parents, people out of work in this time of economic crisis, people of color, and more should all be cringing right now. As my dad used to say, these folks aren't prejudiced; they make fun of everyone.

Here are some of my thoughts and some food for thought. I'd love to be a fly on the wall when HRC and GLAAD -- and hopefully others -- meet with ABC, partly because I would love to hear their defense of this, and also because you just know some of the folks involved in this, from creators to actors, are members of the populations who are rightly up in arms.

When you get right down to it, this is really about sexism, which, as I am fond of saying, merely provides the roots from which the flower of homophobia blooms. From that comes the following questions, and my answers. I'd love to hear more from you about your thoughts regarding these questions, which I asked myself as I watched.

Is this a transgender issue?

Yes. Sadly, we have very far to go to educate the public on trans issues. Far too many people still see transgender women as simply "men in dresses," particularly those who transition later in life and do not "pass." For them this show is downright dangerous. The recent promo ad depicting the two main characters hiking up their skirts while at urinals plays on the most base fear of the "bathroom issue" that we face constantly in the media, in court, and at the ballot box. ABC is better than this kind of inflammatory and degrading representation of a part of our community that is the target of so much discrimination and violence. Never mind the near-complete lack of protections for trans people in the workplace, a point that we as a community need to focus a lot more energy on, both nationally and locally.

Is this something gay people should care about?

The main character's wife chastises her husband for comparing a prostate exam to the pinball machine scene in The Accused, in which a woman is gang-raped. All you gay men who think this is funny or that it isn't something we should care about, take note: we are still all one big "gay" to a lot of people; this is not about "those transgender people," nor is it "not a gay issue" just because these are straight men in dresses.

A few other choice lines in the pilot:

One character opines about "women taking over the workplace" and eventually reducing men to "sex slaves" forced to "kiss, cuddle, and talk." Right. All I could think was, "Hey, 1970 called, and they want their sitcom back."

Even the female characters get into the game. While interviewing dressed as a woman, the main character's potential boss, a woman, is so impressed with his knowledge of drug trials for one of their products that she quips, "Usually our girls think a clinical trial is something Lindsay Lohan goes through." Laughing yet?

Want another lovely line? Here's the female drug rep explaining why their company is only hiring women: "We find the doctors prefer to 'nail' the drug reps more when they are girls." Someone might want to look at the percentages of female and gay, for starters.

And let's not forget people of color, another easy mark. When Angel, the best friend of our main character, says he wants in on the charade, he says, "I'm Puerto Rican. I would be great at seeing drugs."

And let's not start counting the jokes involving tits, tucking, ace bandages falling out of skirts at the "worst possible moment" on the dance floor, and other "shooting fish in a barrel" jokes that make for easy punching-bag moments. People are getting paid to write these jokes, folks, when they should be the ones looking for work. That is the travesty here.

So when our organizations get that meeting, I hope they go armed for bear and with some transgender people to tell their stories about their live, which are no laughing matter. Taking along some allies, particularly women's organizations, would be a smart move, as well.

And I hope we go to the folks who advertise on ABC and let them know what they'll be supporting. In my experience all the attention, education, and activism in the world doesn't get a network exec's attention as much as a phone call from a major advertiser asking what the hell is going on and threatening to pull their support.

One final question: is it just me or does it annoy you that RuPaul's song "Supermodel" is used in the promos, and the Black Eyed Peas, progressive supporters of LGBT equality, are singing about "lovely lady lumps" during the tedious and trite scene where the boys are trying their best to wear women's clothes? If they have not given permission, they should be making a fuss, and if they did, they should pull out now. How dare they take one of the LGBT community's favorite phrases of encouragement and use it for this show? We need to "work it" ourselves here and make our voices heard. Kudos to GLAAD, HRC, and others for making their concerns known.

My predictions is that this show may well never air, but let's take it as an opportunity to form some coalitions and do some education. Let's "work it" ourselves, for everyone who should be offended by this throwback of a show that is truly cringeworthy.

 

Follow Cathy Renna on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cathyrenna

After watching the pilot of ABC's soon-to-air sitcom Work It, I think the first thing they should do is re-title this piece of crap. A better title, with all due deference to another very gay-friendly...
After watching the pilot of ABC's soon-to-air sitcom Work It, I think the first thing they should do is re-title this piece of crap. A better title, with all due deference to another very gay-friendly...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:42 PM on 01/14/2012
I'm a bit confused, I thought the premise of the show is about two straight men dressing as women. From my knowledge, and I admit, I'm not transgendered, being transgendered means that you are a person trapped in the wrong gender's body. I have a friend who was born a woman, but later became a man. He dates women, he takes testosterone and lives as a male. This show is about two heterosexual men, who like women, who dress up like women to get jobs, I don't see that as an issue for the transgendered community because the show isn't showing up. It's showing two idiots dress up like women. Now true, the premise sounds absolutely stupid, and not funny, but this is more like a bad comedy about men and women, rather than the transgendered community.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marla Louise
Artist and philosopher
09:19 AM on 12/21/2011
Two separate editorials in HP about what is probably a badly written comedy seems a bit overkill to me.

Let me say first I am transgendered. But a comedy about two men being force to have their noses rubbed into the gender dichotomy, and yes even gender hypocrisy, strikes me as a lovely basis for comedy and satire. I certainty find my own life, discovery and understandings to be hilarious at times.

And in the past, this premise has created great comedy like in "Some Like it Hot", "Victor/Victoria", "Monty Python" and even the Bard himself.

Now it does sound like this show is 'bad' comedy in that the writing is incompetent and stereotyped, but that just makes it a bad show, not an insult to someone like me. I wasn't insulted by Bosom Buddies, which was pretty bad, and I doubt I would be insulted here either.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tallulah Morehead
Award-Eligible Film Legend
09:10 PM on 12/20/2011
So was BOSOM BUDDIES harmful to transgendered people?
Is CHARLEY'S AUNT harmful to transgendered people?
Is SOME LIKE IT HOT harmful to transgendered people?
Is Shakespeare's TWELFTH NIGHT harmful to transgendered people?
Is Dame Edna harmful to transgendered people?
Is MONTY PYTHON'S FLYING CIRCUS harmful to transgendered people?
Is THE KIDS IN THE HALL harmful to transgendered people?

Transvestite farce has a long and honorable tradition in comedy. Maybe WORK IT will be dreadful, maybe it will be merely poor, maybe it will be good. (This writer hated the pilot. That doesn't mean the show is bad; it means she has an axe to grind, and even if the pilot is bad, the show can improve if given a shot.)

But whatever it is is IRRELEVANT to the transgendered, because it is not about them. I have an older transgendered sibling, and neither of us are offended by transvestite farce.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jaxstl
I may disagree with you but I will defend your rig
06:42 PM on 12/20/2011
I am sure the show is vapid and will be pretty lame, but do the main characters learn anything about the plight of women during the course of the show, or is it just one punch line after another. By placing men in situations where they would be treated as woman I think would be highly educational to your average male and if the show offers those kind of perspectives I think it could have something to offer. I don't think the trans community has much to worry about, while many people don't totally understand transgender issues, it's hard to confuse a comedic devise which has been used since the dawn of the comedy(Greeks and the like) with the real issue of gender identity. Reacting with such vitriol does a disservice to the real problems that transgender people face.
photo
FronzelNeekburm
Ah, research. The enemy of too many.
04:38 PM on 12/20/2011
Question: Are we supposed to be more offended as people who support gay rights or by fans of comedy? Because both seem pretty valid...
04:28 PM on 12/20/2011
Everyone needs to calm down. I don't think you can rush to judgement that quickly based on the pilot episode. I say let the show air and see what the entire scope of the show is and if it is indeed that offensive then pull the plug. Why aren't people attacking Two Broke Girls or other shows that include rape jokes in every episode and that also features more offensive racial stock characters than any other show out there? This article was a waste of time. ABC was also behind Dirty Sexy Money which featured a transgendered character that was portrayed with respect and given the same story time as other featured characters. I'm not saying this show is going to be funny or even watchable but give it it's due before drawing discussion.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
04:02 PM on 12/20/2011
Not only is this show offensive, but it's a clear (and inferior) copycat of "Bosom Buddies." Hanks and Scolari these guys are not.
04:59 PM on 12/20/2011
That's the first thing I thought when I saw a promo for this show.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Stevenson
Shh, I'm talking now.
08:30 PM on 12/20/2011
I loved Bosom Buddies as a kid, but this show just looks like garbage.
03:41 PM on 12/20/2011
Let's not also forget that this is a re-hashed horrible idea from the (pre-politically correct 80's) that should never have seen the light of day. I am more offended that ABC thinks this was a good idea, then is on the fence of cancelling one of the smartest, funniest, and silliest shows on TV: Cougartown. C'mon ABC, your audience isn't stupid, stop treating us like we are.
03:10 PM on 12/20/2011
I hope everyone here has taken the time to sign the free online petition to support the Obama Administration's current attempt to end DOMA ? This could well be our last chance to end this evilness for TEN YEARS !

Please sign the petition and forward it to your friends/family/co-workers. Thank you.

Petition is here --> https://secure3.convio.net/hrc/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=1285
03:09 PM on 12/20/2011
Wasn't this show canceled in the early 80's staring Tom Hanks?
12:20 PM on 12/20/2011
I've seen the promos and I've been offended since they started airing them. This show won't last more than 3 weeks.
09:56 AM on 12/20/2011
Desperate Network! ha that's funny...this new show seems just outrageous!
photo
ramal
One's only real life is the life one never leads.
09:08 AM on 12/20/2011
It's an "American sitcom", surely those two words alone are synonyms for vapidness, bad taste and boredom.
chesscub
Mind of a computer, body of a walrus
03:36 PM on 12/20/2011
"Modern Family" disagrees with you, but "Work It" is low brow and insipid.
photo
Valksy
civis mundi sum
07:49 AM on 12/20/2011
Absolutely agree, Cathy.

What we see in the US at the moment is a nurtured culture of anti-LGBT behaviour. From the political stump to the pulpit, from stage, screen and the sports field, people with an influential voices are granting approval (and even encouragement) for some of the most appalling and catastrophic behaviour. Trying to ignore that this behaviour has very real and very dangerous consequences is intellectually dishonest at best, grotesquely ignorant at worst.

The simple truth is this - when a minority group is labelled as a less-human, less-worthy "other", that minority group is placed at risk. Failure to realise this is why history keeps bloody repeating itself and it needs to be stopped.
06:10 AM on 12/20/2011
While I agree on all your points and I think it was well-said, there is only one inherent problem with this show: It's basic premise is the that men in dresses are a joke and should be laughed at. Esp when they' don't pass.

That's the main problem with this show. It's the center point. The main laugh track. The be and all of the comedy.

And frankly, I"m not laughing.