iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Cecile Richards

Cecile Richards

Posted: January 18, 2011 03:27 PM

In the wake of the tragic shooting last week in Arizona, President Obama called on all Americans to speak to one another "in a way that heals, not a way that wounds." These words echo the physicians' credo -- "first do no harm." I welcome the president's call for healing and for softening the harsh tone of our politics. We have a great need for this in America today.

Unfortunately, even with the president's hopeful words still ringing in our ears, the House leadership is moving forward with an agenda that will harm American women. On Wednesday, they will bring up a vote to repeal the health care law that is already expanding health care coverage for the women of our country.

The politicians who took over the House of Representatives rode to power on a wave of discontent over joblessness and financial worries. But rather than focusing on the economy, they have made it their first order of business to take health care away from our mothers, daughters, sisters, and friends. And, sadly, the vote to repeal health care is just the beginning.

These leaders are about to make life much less humane for millions of Americans -- especially the women of this country. Yes, we want a new civil tone, but we also want policies that respect women and deliver the health care they and their families need and deserve.

Keep in mind that the new health care law represents the greatest single advance for women's health in 45 years. It promises to make health insurance available to millions of women, and it includes measures to make primary health care -- including annual exams, prevention, and reproductive care -- much more affordable. Most importantly, it will deliver peace of mind to women whose health needs are great but whose resources are few.

The new law will also deliver peace of mind to women who have been sick before. It will end discriminatory practices such as routinely charging women higher premiums than men, and denying coverage for so-called "pre-existing" conditions such as breast cancer and, yes, pregnancy.

Health care reform also holds the promise of giving women access to prescription birth control without co-pays or other out-of-pocket payments. Making this policy a reality would enable women to choose the method of contraception that works best for them, keep women and children healthy, and reduce the number of unintended pregnancies.

Many American women have already begun to benefit from the initial implementation of health care reform. And countless more stand to benefit in the years to come. Repealing this law will hurt women and families and make daily life less certain for them. In other words, it will do harm.

But repealing the new health care law is only the first step for the new leaders of the House. Soon after the repeal vote, they plan to move forward with the Smith bill, which could effectively eliminate private health insurance that includes abortion coverage, a benefit most women with private health insurance have now. Thirty-eight years after Roe, this would chip away at the ability of women to make the most private and personal medical decisions. As if that were not enough, conservative members of Congress, led by Representative Mike Pence, are working to strip critical family planning funding from community providers including Planned Parenthood. And they are threatening cuts to vital maternal and child health programs, as well as programs supporting health care in our farming and rural communities. Taken together, all of these changes will take away the full range of services from women -- from birth control to coverage for abortion.

Talk of civility and a new tone is welcome and deserves nothing but praise. But when the health and peace of mind of our mothers, daughters and sisters come up for a vote, let's remember that actions speak louder than words.

 

Follow Cecile Richards on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cecilerichards

 
 
  • Comments
  • 230
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:04 PM on 01/20/2011
Perhaps you should separate all public demands upon a civilized unity from the capitalist markets survival of the fittest method of screwing populations. If the civilized credentials of autonomous exchange do not match the civilized membership of the same morality, then Unity is a questionable term and concept in the meaning of identity.

People are sold all these common concepts of identity, like citizen’s right, human’s right, freedom, equality, peace, liberty and goodwill in a system that bases responsibility on how much wealth and how many lawyers you have in your pockets.

For those traveling through time with the financial legacies derived from past and present means of exploiting gains from the members of their own company, the company is not a legitimate company, but, a fabricated artificial parasite feeding on the flesh of status from the righteous notion of do good.

In the cause and effect of do good, the deficits of do good in the minds of those basking in their own status of hard work, equates to an overall deficiency in health, since, health and well beings are inseparable aspects of cause and effect in the socio economic institutions temporal viability to deliver the complimentary credentials of a healthy system.

Who owns the condition of unity in health in capitalist philosophy of winners and losers? Over time the wealthy get healthy in their self preservation slave systems managing the public perceptions of concepts through media control, educational control and financial control.
01:10 AM on 01/20/2011
HANDS OFF MY NEW HEALTH CARE!!!! That's what we need to SHOUT to the GOP.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
08:46 PM on 01/19/2011
This legislation will go nowhere because the American people elected Obama as President and he is still in office and if any of it comes to his desk he will veto it. Everyone needs health care coverage, but not everybody can afford it. The members of Congress who doubt this are at liberty to turn down their taxpayer funded health insurance coverage and use a portion of their generous salary to purchase health insurance for themselves and their families privately. They will then be able to learn first hand what millions of Americans who cannot afford health insurance or who are under-insured put up with every day. Members of Congress, accept the challenge of living on the edge, just like your constituents!
09:06 PM on 01/19/2011
We know that we'll have to wait to repeal until after 2012. But we'll take a bit here and there out of the budget to ensure there is no funding for this monstrosity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinyrainbows
10:25 PM on 01/19/2011
Republicans want it revised. The vote to repeal was the first step. This also shows what can happen in 2012 when we take over both houses of Congress and the WH. They might as well play ball now.
07:25 PM on 01/19/2011
The Republicans who voted to repeal the Health Care Law,are not willing to give up their own Congressional Health Care coverage. Now that they have repealed the law in the House because it mandates that everyone buy it by 2014, how about repealing the requirement to buy auto liability insurance that exists in most or all states? Both requirements are designed to prevent the taxpayers from picking up the tab, one in case someone goes to the ER and the other if you suffer damage and injury because of careless driving.
Logical thinking does not support doing without either one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinyrainbows
10:23 PM on 01/19/2011
It is your decision to own a car.
04:38 PM on 01/19/2011
This Country would not be going through this "Gag Reflex" over HCR if Democrats had not jamed it down our throats. The dogs will not eat the dog food.
04:15 PM on 01/19/2011
Biased against men? Biased against whoever pays for this?

Biased against math? Increased demand for medical services without increased supply means higher prices, higher costs.

Biased against the Constitution? It gives Congress power to regulate private warships--hardly a problem here these days--but not health care.

Biased against health, making healthy people pay sick people to be sick?

Biased against good choices by reducing the costs of bad ones to the people who make bad ones?
03:32 PM on 01/19/2011
Interestingly this opinion piece starts by citing that we should talk to each other in a way that heals rather than wounds and than only focuses on half the population for the rest of the piece. Another interesting note is that the author refers to the higher premiums than women have as discriminatory, when in reality they reflect the higher cost of health care for women, especially younger women than men. Of course we should obviously than end the discriminatory practice of charging men more money for auto insurance shouldn't we? The whole gender argument becomes very emotional very quickly. Any reality that results in women paying more for anything is discriminatory, despite that it may represent the disparity in cost of the services. It is very easy to point at a number and claim that is discriminatory, but it takes a more adult conversation to look for the reasons why. Another frequently heard discriminatory number is that women make 77 cent for every dollar a man makes. This again has proven to be a fallacy. Women with the same experience, education etc make the same amount as men in the same position, but that does not get the voting bloc out does it? Endless claims of suffering due to gender are both divisive and fruitless. They do not solve the root causes, some of which, by the way that our gender and societal roles defines them may never be "solved", but this is a poor route to that discussion.
03:47 PM on 01/19/2011
I'd like to see the stats that women cost more to insure - especially older women. If younger women cost more, the only reason would be maternity. How does that balance out with young men being more expensive than young women due to greater risk of accident, or male babies costing more since they're more likely to become seriously ill. It's nonsense. Women having babies is a biological function, and one, by the way, that the human race requires them to perform. Young males driving crazy and causing more accidents than young women is not a valid comparison.

I'd like to see if you're equally enraged by the fact that most insurance plans do cover the frivolous drug Viagra but fail to cover the vital drugs that women use for birth control. That's ok with you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HeadAches
I'm here, getting into your head giving you...
04:29 PM on 01/19/2011
[Citation needed]
02:45 PM on 01/19/2011
We may have to take all pregnant women and all kids out of this argument because they may not be able to wait to see who is correct.With the American Family,pregnant women and kids are the Family Jewels and these are the ones the Bags need to keep their treads off.
miloiki
sweet as can be
02:45 PM on 01/19/2011
Repeal NOW.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
02:40 PM on 01/19/2011
Kermit Gosnell
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daveythegimp
02:30 PM on 01/19/2011
Is the sky falling too?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rimser
01:59 PM on 01/19/2011
Women's health issues are non-issues to these neanderthals. They honestly couldn't care less. It galls me that as taxpayers we do not have access to the same health insurance as Congress and the other federal workers whose salaries we pay.
05:47 PM on 01/19/2011
If you actually are a Federal income taxpayer, then you most likely have health insurance as good or better than Congress. The problem is that about 50% of the population is not.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
iskra
Natural enemy of sharks and tro//s
01:03 PM on 01/19/2011
It's all well and fine to critique the health care bill but I have yet to see a proposal from the Economy Killing Republicans that would reduce our health care costs, remove the insurance company death panels and cover everyone in the nation.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
02:41 PM on 01/19/2011
The Pugs will have to pass it before you find out what's in it.
05:50 PM on 01/19/2011
ObamaCare increases the debt (according to CBO), kills jobs, decreases health care options (doctors and hospitals are stopping adding Medicare patients), increases the costs to seniors (remember all of those Medicare cuts), and doesn't cover everyone in the nation.

Oh, and it removes your freedom to say no.
12:36 PM on 01/19/2011
Do you have any idea how this plan will effect men ? Does it matter ?
05:51 PM on 01/19/2011
Soon Planned Parenthood will have all public funding removed. It won't matter then.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
06:53 PM on 01/19/2011
Link, please.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
12:03 PM on 01/19/2011
I would very much like to see what Republicans are offering up in place of what the Democrats "crammed down our throats" (Fox's term, not mine).

Two year olds say "NO" to everything. Adults engage in reasoned debate. What exactly is the Republican "Cure" for health care? If it's tort reform, they need remedial math.

Had health reform been based on the needs of the country, instead of those representing the special interests, it could have been so much better. Money has become the only thing we seem to value. Not a very pretty picture.