Mitt Romney's Ironic Speech on Religious Tolerance

Posted December 7, 2007 | 02:03 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Mitt Romney's Ironic Speech on Religious Tolerance   digg: Mitt Romney's Ironic Speech on Religious Tolerance   reddit: Mitt Romney's Ironic Speech on Religious Tolerance   del.icio.us: Mitt Romney's Ironic Speech on Religious Tolerance

Let me paraphrase Mitt Romney: Don't hate me for my religion, hate atheists and agnostics for theirs!

This is his JFK speech on religious tolerance? This must be a joke. How is anyone taking this seriously?

Here is the exact quote from Romney's speech:

"It is as if they're intent on establishing a new religion in America - the religion of secularism. They're wrong."

How about if I said this:

"It is as if Romney is intent on establishing a new religion in America -- the religion of Mormonism. He is wrong."

Well, actually there would be nothing wrong with that since Mormonism is wrong. Their prophet looked into a magic hat to read magic tablets with his magic glasses. Magic hat? Really?

I'm agnostic. I don't believe in any of the major, organized religions. So, I'm not singling out Mormonism. There are patently absurd parts of all of the religious texts (in fact, most of the texts). I'm always amused by Christians -- who believe the magic man Jesus is going to suck them up into heaven while the rest of us die fiery deaths -- making fun of Mormons for their quizzical beliefs.

But this isn't about legitimate criticism of each other's beliefs. It's one thing to criticize a person's religious beliefs and it's another to do it while pretending to give a speech about religious tolerance.

I don't think there's anything wrong with Romney criticizing atheists or agnostics. I also don't think there's anything wrong with him criticizing the people who set up the "religion" of secularism in this country, namely George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, etc.

He's not going to get my vote, but thanks to the people he criticizes, it's a free country. He can believe and say anything he likes. Just don't pretend to be tolerant while you're doing it.

Watch The Young Turks

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
27
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Zanti,

I am a high priest of the religion of the Early Morning Saints of the "No Stamps Collectors" (EMSNSC), and we really had a hostile debate, which almost got into beating each other up, with some priests of the Late Evening Saints of the "No Coins Collectors" (LESNCC) denomination. I finally convinced the damn non-believer guy, who does not believe in the holy EMSNSC religion, that if he would not give up his faith and follow mine, he will doubtlessly wind up in hell, where the devil, a stamp collector, will roast him through all eternity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 12/14/2007

Obviously, Mr. Romney cannot please everybody, he was directing his speech to all believers out there and I am happy about his speech. I am also proud to be called a Mormon, this is the only religion that helped me turn away from the sin and misery to happiness. Mr Romney treats women and children the way that they should be treated, I respect him and his family's wonderful relationship. I hope the best for him. FOR THE HATERS OUT THERE PLEASE UNLOAD THAT HATE AND YOU'LL BE HAPPIER. PEACE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 12/09/2007

"I'm always amused by Christians -- who believe the magic man Jesus is going to suck them up into heaven while the rest of us die fiery deaths -- making fun of Mormons for their quizzical beliefs."

Because of your choice of punctuation, your assertion applies to all Christians, as opposed to all to whom it might apply. Are you referring specifically to Christians who believe such a thing, or did you mean to suggest that all of us C.'s think alike (and on such a primitive, literal-minded level)? Just wondering.

No, the founders did not create a secular nation. Simple logic tells us as much. To wit, our nation's founders very carefully avoided establishing any religious requirement (which would involve a state church, etc.). A concept of freedom that wouldn't work (or make much sense as a notion) if they had not also carefully avoided the opposite--i.e., the establishment any SECULAR requirement. Their stance on the issue of religion or lack thereof is a NEUTRAL one. Neither for nor against.

Secular, please keep in mind, does NOT mean neutral. It denotes an irreligious system--i.e., the opposite of religious. I think a lot of folks are trying to sneak the concept through the gates by equating it with ideological tolerance/neutrality. Rather, it IS an ideology, even as vigorously as richard dawkins and others lie about that point.

Our founders wanted freedom to choose. Obviously, to the extent that our system is religious OR secular (irreligious), choice is curtailed.

A neutral stance best facilitates free choice. Obviously. A secular system is one that would discriminate against the faithful. This isn't Advanced Civics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 12/08/2007

Dear Brother Cenk,

You have hit the nail square on the head. Tolerance is a one-way street with these religious zealots. Agape.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 12/08/2007

The hat wasn't magic. Neither were the tablets. There were magic glasses, but he didn't use them in conjunction with the hat. Instead he used a magic stone. Get it right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 12/08/2007

Hi Cenk, I'm a big fan and also Agnostic.
I believe what should be the common thread in all religions including Atheism and Agnostics is Faith. Not the belief in a God.

And yes I know Atheists and Agnostics are not part of any religion, that is if your thinking of religion as being an organized worship of a deity and not just a fervant belief in something.

It's your faith that brings such things as Peace, Love, Tolerance, Understanding, Humanity and Humility into your life.

Faith can be a very strong thing. If people have faith that there is a deity out there looking over them, then there is. It's what they believe. It's their faith.
But people can also have faith without it being in a deity.


    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 12/07/2007

So much tolerance going on here!

Romney laid out the best defense for agnostics and atheists when he noted that religious tolerance is meaningless when we only tolerate those we agree with.

Just because de didn't directly mention everybody in every type of belief system or none, doesn't make him intolerant. Just means he didn't want to take 12 hours to make the speech.

Tolerance means we respect even those we don't agree with.

You all need to show what it is you are asking others for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 12/07/2007

This is how you energize the Repo base, of course.

Since there are said to be more Repos than us non-
believers, this could work for him.

Except, the same rule applies to various other minorities
pissed off by & at Repos, so *collectively* it could just
be his & their downfall.

The *certainty* of the True Believer is wondrous
to behold, no?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 12/07/2007

The history of this country is one of an in ethnic group (originally british) looking down on an out ethnic group (originally german). But as the country diversifies, the in group has to expand (welcome fellow protestants) in order to stay ahead of the out group (dirty catholics). With blacks gaining some political power in the 20th century, even Catholics and jews became ins (except where they were few enough in number not to be needed).

Romney's speech should be understood as the religious equivalent of this. He does not want to change the system of ins and outs. He just wants to move the mormons from the out group to the in group. This is historically common enough. It is obviously not praiseworthy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 12/07/2007

Please, magic hat? Get your info on Mormonism somewhere besides South Park-- you're better than that.

Besides that, good post and good point. I utterly hated Romney's speech, and as a practicing Mormon myself, I felt he dealt with my faith dismissively by not answering what people really care about.

"I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. [Governor Romney], you're no Jack Kennedy."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 12/07/2007
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Cenk Uygur›
 

 Site  Web ask.com