More

Cenk Uygur

Cenk Uygur

Posted: December 14, 2007 08:02 PM

Where Are Our Leaders When We Need Them?


First, there was the abysmal, pathetic, inexcusable and cravenly collapse on Iraq War funding. The Democrats gave into ALL of the demands of the most unpopular president of all time. And where were our so-called Democratic leaders?

I understand there are a number of people on the campaign stump claiming they are going to be wonderful leaders. Really? What have they led on? When have they ever defeated Bush? Did I mention their opponent is the most unpopular president in American history?

This is not ancient history. It's happening right now. So, the Democratic presidential hopefuls were MIA on the Iraq War funding fight, or lack thereof. They went right along with yet another Democratic cave-in. No fight, no leadership, no nothing.

Then there was the energy bill, where the Democrats tried to take back $13.5 billion in outrageous subsidies that the Republicans had given the oil companies in the middle of their record breaking profits. And what happened? Another loss. That provision was stripped out when the Republicans mustered up 40 votes, including Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA), to pull of yet another successful filibuster.

And we got the familiar refrain of losers -- what could we do? Oh, you poor schmucks, did you get outmaneuvered and outvoted again? How about you put a world of pressure on your own senator to not betray your whole party and the American people by giving the oil companies $13.5 billion of our hard-earned money? Does this party have any leaders? Do they have any idea what leaders do?

If Senator Clinton, or Obama or Biden had an ounce of leadership in them, they would have found a way to win by one vote rather than lose by one vote for the billionth time. Please don't tell me they were too busy worrying about their own careers on the campaign trail to actually do their job. You know what would be a convincing argument on the campaign stump -- I actually got something done! I actually beat George Bush for once! But right now, none of them can make that claim.

But at least one of them has been trying, and that's why I left his name off the above list of senators. Chris Dodd is fighting one of the most important fights -- not allowing the telecoms to get immunity for their law-breaking on FISA. If they get this, the entire Bush administration would be shielded from any accountability for their brazen violations of federal law.

So, who is fighting to make sure this victory goes to the Republicans -- Harry Reid, naturally. Glenn Greenwald has an excellent explanation of how Sen. Reid helped the Republicans tremendously with a legislative maneuver today. I don't know if he knows this, but he's supposed to be on the other side of the aisle. And this is our leader?

Let me not mince words, Harry Reid is a terrible majority leader. In fact, it's an insult to the word "leader" to use it in the same sentence as Harry Reid. Why would you help George Bush and the Republicans break the law?!

Actually, I know why. It's because so many of the Democrats are also in the pockets of the telecommunication lobby and some of the Democrats, like Jay Rockefeller, have been complicit in allowing the worst abuses of this administration. So, they're looking to cover their own ass. Just like when they gave into Bush on the Iraq War and on federal spending, but kept the one thing they care most about -- pork-barrel spending. Greedy politicians have to make sure their asses are covered first.

I don't know if Harry Reid is part and parcel of these complicit Democrats, and I don't care. It's possible that he's just too weak to stand up to them. What a ringing defense, "I am not a greedy, law-breaker; I'm just too weak to stop them." What I do know is that results matter and his results have been hideous.

To top all of this off, Reid had to help the Republicans by burying a hatchet in the back of Chris Dodd, who has been trying to fight this immunity provision tooth and nail. Sen. Reid respects Republican Tom Coburn's holds on bills because to do otherwise would be to challenge the bullies, God forbid. But he won't respect his own colleagues hold on this bill. I'm trying to see if there is any other way Reid can hurt us. If it can be imagined, believe me, he'll find it and do it.

But this fight is not yet over. The other Democratic contenders promised that they would help Dodd filibuster if it came down to that. Then they prayed all night that their bluff wouldn't be called. Well, it has. It's now put up or shut up time. Will the other Democratic senators in the presidential field, come to the defense of their fellow Democrat and help to lead this filibuster fight?

God, this is so easy. The first one to jump on the bandwagon would gain so much credibility with primary voters. And they would lose nothing. Do you have any idea how many Democratic votes (or independent votes, for that matter) you would lose if you stood up to Bush? None, zero, not one.

This should be a no-brainer for Obama or Clinton. They should be tripping over themselves to jump to Dodd's side on Monday. Let's get real, as much as I respect Senator Dodd (who I have absolutely no affiliation with), he is not likely to win the nomination. So, the person who works with him can soak up all the credit for this fight.

This is the time to show us if you are truly leaders or not. This is not theoretical; it's real and it's now. On Monday, will you do as you promised and help to lead a fight against Bush's law-breaking or will you show that you're no leader at all?

As frustrated as I am that none of these folks has done a damn thing to stand up to Bush all this time, I am willing to look past all that if we could just get one of them to stand up just one time. And that time is now. Will any of them do it? Is there a leader among them?

The Young Turks

Follow Cenk Uygur on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheYoungTurks

 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:13 PM on 12/17/2007
cant these sorry losers stand up to this idiot in chief once? just once. one fucking time. thats all i ask once. i got my ass kicked by bullies as a kid. and you know what? i fought the same kid, day in day out til i won and he left me alone. the collective testicles of the democratic congress are missing, perhaps they are with the 9 billion missing in iraq. which means they are gone for good. so what now?
01:11 PM on 12/17/2007
John Edwards, are you listening? If you don't speak up LOUDLY in support of Dodd, you are wasting the biggest opportunity that has ever been thrown in your lap.

Clinton and Obama will go on vacation til it blows over, mark my words.
11:45 AM on 12/17/2007
Dodd twice was nearly elected Senate Leader. He lost by one vote to Tom Daschle and Harry Reid.

He would surely make a better leader.

It's time for the Legislative Branch to be a legislative branch again and that should mean looking at the President and simply saying if he wants to veto a bill to allow the US to effectively intercept foreign terrorist communications over protecting corporate behemoths, we'll take that fight and see you in November of 2008. Then keep sending him the same bill as many times as we can. Seriously, every day pass it again to make him keep vetoing it if he's that dumb.. Our Presidential candidate promises to sign the bill as his first act in office and if Bush doesn't cave, we don't look a gift horse in the mouth and spend everyday about how he hasn't learned the lessons of 9-11. After all, Congress will have fixed the issue of foreign surveillance and Bush is trying to stop that because he insists on a profit protection scam over the security of nation.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MAX1
... What's a micro-bio?.
07:44 AM on 12/17/2007
.

Cenk,

WHY CRY FOR LEADERSHIP?

KUCINICH ALREADY IS PROVING THAT LEADERSHIP YOU SEEK. YOU JUST HAVE TO BE WILLING TO SEE I.

H.Res. 333 sound familiar?
I guess he's just not electable enough?

Never voted for the AUMF of 2002...
Not good enough?

Never voted for the antiPatriot Act...
Not good enough?

Never voted for the MCA...
Not good enough?

The only candidate to propose NOT FOR PROFIT health care...
Not good enough?

The Candidate WITH a comprehensive plan to bring the troops home while putting in place (get this) actual PEACE KEEPING TROOPS to... (gasp) to establish PEACE...
Not good enough?

The ONLY candidate to enter articles of Impeachment...
Still Not good enough?

I beg to ponder what people do consider what IS good enough.

He's lead the way. It's not his fault other people don't want to listen when it matters.

You can even Google him.

.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MAX1
... What's a micro-bio?.
07:31 AM on 12/17/2007
.

Cenk,

Good rhetorical question you ask:

Where are our leaders when we need them.

The definitive answer is:

Busy off defining how High Crimes and Misdemeanors aren't applicable to many of themselves.

That's where.
03:20 AM on 12/17/2007
Harry Reid, the so called "give em hell Harry", soft spoken, gentle mannered, is just as he appears. A damned weenie who has been bought and paid for by big corporate interests. The Dems , and I am a lifelong Dem myself, couldnt have chosen a weaker leader than Harry Reid. Reid was installed by the big corporate interests, same with "off the table" Nancy. We have the best government that money can buy. They all suck at the teet of K street.
02:51 AM on 12/17/2007
Nailed it as usual, Cenk! This continual, repeated sell-out and cave-in by the craven, feckless, spineless, gutless, worthless, weak and whiny Democrats in the Senate and House is the OPPOSITE of leadership.

We've got to get rid of these Vichy Democrats. This stand by Dodd ought to be the acid test for Iowa and New Hampshire Democrats. If the other Senators in the race don't rally around, then to hell with them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
02:13 AM on 12/17/2007
We all decry the lack of a leader. I wonder if the real problem is that we don't have anyone willing to follow. Kucinich is right on all the issues, but most of us talk about how it's inevitable that he won't get the nomination.

Why? What it comes down to is that not enough of us are giving him the support he would need. We all have our own ideas. We all argue our own points of view. Nobody changes their mind. We simply don't possess the necessary skills to come to a consensus.

We broadly agree about what's wrong. That seems to be the place to start. We need to prioritize the problems, and deal with the most serious ones first. To me, it looks like the takeover of government by the corporations is the gravest threat to the continuance of our democracy. The net neutrality issue is a kind of paradigm of this problem. Maybe it will also provide a watershed for us by revealing who can and who cannot stand up, fight, and win.
12:42 AM on 12/16/2007
This blog should be featured front and center on HuffPo! I had to find it by searching. If I hadn't watched Keith Olbermann Friday, I wouldn't have known that Harry Reid was selling out again. Another Friday afternoon news poop, how Republican of Harry. Sigh! Thanks again Cenk, I think you're great.
06:34 AM on 12/15/2007
Clinton has a great opportunity here. She can camp out in the senate and let Bill go out to speak at rallies to explain that Hillery has to stay in DC to fight against the Republican machine. It's a win/win since Bill is a better speaker and most people would rather see him any way. Hell they would rather vote for him so it sends the message that, "A vote for Hillery is really a vote for Bill."
Comeon Hillery. Why don't you try doing the right thing and give yourself a chance to win the election. Hey it might even feel good enough to become a habit.
03:43 AM on 12/15/2007
cenk

you seem to be completely overlooking what is, to me at least, the most obvious explanation as to why the dems continue to roll over every time bushco tells them to -

do you think, for one minute, that the bushco cartel HASN'T wiretapped every single political opponent, as well as their families and friends? and who among us doesn't have secrets we would prefer to keep quiet? who among us doesn't have loved ones we would want to protect from politically motivated blackmail?

as we now know, jaye hoover used the fbi to illegally spy on every person she ever met that she didn't like or agree with - and she was not shy about using the information to her own political advantage whenever and wherever necessary - that's how she kept her job through five different administrations

the corruption and complicity of the democrats in the rape of america is very, very plain for anyone with eyes to see and the american people will never get their country back until they DEMAND an accurate pencil & paper, hand-counted, free and fair voting process

why are democrats not demanding this?

now you know...

the entire american political process has sadly become a meaningless kabuki puppet theater of distraction designed to look like a democratic process and prevent the american people from discovering that their democracy and freedom no longer exist
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirReal1
02:52 AM on 12/15/2007
No doubt about it Cenk, this isn't what a lot of us expected after voting in 2006, but I think we were a bit over optomistic.

The "culture of corruption" that a largely appathetic populace allowed to develop in Washington is going to take a lot more "careful gardening" to get the rest of the "weeds" out. This isn't the time to give in to frustration and "throw them all out". It's time to take up the mantle of "citizen activist" and all do our part to take our government back!

Get informed, do the research, compare the options, and vote for change!

It may take a few attempts, but if we stay committed we could have a government that we can all be proud of by 2012, and that beats the hell out of sitting and watching the nation crumble because we got frustrated when it took more than 1 election to change what took 50 or more years for the "power brokers" to build.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
milo9
01:44 AM on 12/15/2007
To me the telecom issue is a defining one. It's so blatently wrong. If they can't do the right thing on this then it's time to admit it's hopeless and time to move on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
milo9
01:40 AM on 12/15/2007
You're on point with the telecom issue, if the Dems go down without a fight it's time to go on to the next question. How can a Senate Majority Leader be ousted? What's the procedure? Just to get Reid out of the way, where he can't do so much damage. Same for Diane Feinstein. She sits on both the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. And she's backed every bit of bad legislation that's came out of them. It's time, I can't visualize another year of this bulls***. If we accept it we're just as gutless as they are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
01:32 AM on 12/15/2007
Self-protection is not leadership.