More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Charles Gasparino

GET UPDATES FROM Charles Gasparino
 

Who Is The Best Person To Run Bank Of America?

Posted: 08/30/11 06:11 PM ET

If the saga of Bank of America, the country's largest and most troubled bank, were to be made into a movie, its title would have to be "The Dumbest Men in the Room," with a starring cast that features its half-witted chief executive officer Brian Moynihan and his equally half-witted board of directors.

All of which wouldn't be so bad if Moynihan and his brain-dead board
weren't running a bank with more than $2 trillion in assets and $1 trillion in
customer deposits that the federal government (meaning taxpayers)
might have to cover some day if Bank of America hits the skids just as
it did during the financial crisis of 2008, and as it almost did in
the last couple weeks.

Just to recap: BofA's share price was heading to zero as investors
came to believe that all the bailout money, the billions upon billions
of guarantees and zero-percent borrowing rates the government handed
the bank over the past two years wasn't working. That's because on top
of everything else, the big bank was facing a new potentially, more
devastating liability: untold billions of dollars in losses tied to
the sale of faulty mortgages by its Countrywide Financial unit, and
Moynihan's inability to come up with a plan to deal with the problem.

The run on the stock appears to have ended last Friday when Warren
Buffett pumped $5 billion into BofA in one of the most one-sided deals
the market has ever seen (I don't even need to say who got the short
end of this stick), and the company began unloading prime assets like
a piece of its stake in the China Construction Bank, raising billions
of dollars more. Investors seem to be getting comfortable that the
worse is over for BofA and that Moynihan is starting to get his act
together. The bank's stock price is no longer heading toward
penny-stock territory (shares are now trading at around $8 today), and
market talk about another round of government bailouts has ceased, at
least for the moment.

Will it last? Buffett says he thinks so and he's been saying a lot of
nice things about the bank and Moynihan since he announced his big
investment. But Buffett's show support should be seen for what it is:
a bribe. Under the terms of the deal, he has already made more than
$500 million, with many more hundreds of millions to come. His
investment isn't even a week old.

For that reason, investors should remain wary that the biggest bank in
the country won't at some point become the nation's biggest banking
catastrophe. While BofA may be in a better financial position than it
was before the 2008 financial crisis (it would be difficult to be any
worse), or before Buffett came to the rescue, it's far from a healthy
situation.

And one more thing: the bank is being led by possibly the most
unqualified CEO in all of corporate America.

I say this not because I dislike Moynihan; I've met him and he's seems
like a nice enough guy. Some smart people on Wall Street hold him in
high regard for basically the same thing; if there is a CEO in
financial business who wants to do the right thing, they say it's
probably Brian Moynihan.

But desire aside, Moynihan has been nothing short of a klutz as a
leader. Part of his problem is that he's a lawyer by training and
lawyers make lousy CEOs (remember Chuck Prince's messy tenure at
Citigroup). But at least Prince proved to be a decent lawyer who fought
his way up the corporate ladder to replace Sandy Weill as Citi's chief
executive.

The best you can say about Moynihan is that he got the job by default.
Before he became CEO, Moynihan was a regarded as B-player at best by
his colleagues. He held a variety of jobs inside Bank of America's
vast bureaucracy and failed to stand out at any of them. He was
mediocrity personified.

Moynihan he did have one thing going for him: he was part of a group
of executives who remained at BofA after it purchased Fleet Financial
in 2004 where he served as general counsel. And his Fleet lineage
helped him when it mattered most. Ken Lewis, under investigation for
his financial-crisis purchase of the troubled Merrill Lynch brokerage
firm, had resigned. A boardroom showdown over Lewis's successor ensued
with some members wanting an outside candidate and others looking to
promote one of Lewis's cronies.

At the time, Moynihan's name was barely on the long list of
candidates. But several former Fleet board members remained on the
BofA board, and capitalized on the general dysfunction to promote one
of their own. With that, a man least likely to succeed as a CEO became
the head of the nation's largest bank.

Moynihan took over in January 2010 and began screwing up from the
start. He assured investors that the feds gave BofA the green light to
raise its dividend when no green light had been given because the
bank's post-crisis finances weren't strong enough. Despite mounting
evidence that BofA faces a crisis of large magnitude stemming from
Countrywide, Moynihan has inexplicably downplayed the bank's exposure
right up to the moment the bank was about to announce its intention to
shell out its first multi-billion settlement to investors holding
soured mortgages.

In fact, Moynihan has had nearly two years to prepare for the
onslaught of Countrywide related claims -- one even came from his
business partner, Larry Fink, the CEO of Blackrock, the money management firm that BofA had held
a huge stake in. Yet when the trouble began earlier in the year,
Moynihan didn't have a clue about how to proceed.

"He seemed lost," one investor who met with Moynihan about the
liabilities told the Fox Business Network.

What's even worse, he seems to have learned almost nothing from recent
history of financial firms and their top executives assuring everything
of OK when it really isn't. Though people who know Moynihan swear he's
honest, he's been coming across as a CEO in the mold of Dick Fuld and
Alan Schwartz -- the guys who ran Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns into
the ground but not before assuring the markets that their firms were
fine before they imploded.

Moynihan's BofA isn't quite the house of cards of either Bear or
Lehman, but he seems to be relying on the Fuld/Schwartz handbook of
dissembling when he should be telling the truth. During the recent run
on the stock, Moynihan and his PR staff were absurdly spinning that
BofA was in absolutely no need of additional capital, downplaying
reports, including an early one by the Fox Business Network on August
4, that the bank was looking to cash out of at least part of its stake
in the China Construction bank.

But between Buffett and the sale of the China Construction stake BofA
has raised close to $13 billion in additional capital. The BofA flacks
are saying that the moves won't "dilute" shareholders and place more
downward pressure of BofA shares since the bank isn't selling new
stock to come up with the money. But one of the reasons why the
Buffett deal is so one-sided is because BofA basically handed the
Oracle of Omaha the right to purchase some 700 million shares anytime
over the next 10 years -- or 7% of all outstanding BofA stock -- in what
will be the mother of all dilutions once that nice old man from Omaha
decides to cash in his chips.

Despite all of this, Moynihan's in-house defenders will tell you that
their man is working day and night to fix the bank and repair
something he had very little to do with, namely Countrywide. That's a
bit closer to reality since it was his predecessor Lewis on a pre-crisis buying spree to make BofA the world's largest bank, who snapped
up Countrywide in early 2008.

But Moynihan wasn't exactly an innocent bystander in terms of
Countrywide. In all those Countrywide-related meetings when he worked
as part of Lewis's management team, did Moynihan even once raise his
hand and object to the purchase?

The answer from what I understand is no.

For all of this experience, of course, Moynihan might be the best person to
run BofA for some of the more brain-dead members of the bank's board,
but investors should be demanding something better. So should
taxpayers, because if Moynihan fails to fix the problems at Bank of
America, they will be paying the ultimate price in the form of another
massive government bailout.

And all because Brian Moynihan used to work at Fleet.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
02:32 AM on 09/01/2011
It is already in the name - Bank of America. The government naturally. On behalf of the American people for a change instead of on behalf of Amrica's big corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
02:20 AM on 09/01/2011
Do they still give away toasters?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
astuartgirl
Um, no, not really.
06:40 AM on 09/01/2011
no but now they are giving away houses!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
02:30 PM on 09/02/2011
LMAO
12:52 PM on 08/31/2011
If you're going to write an article calling people half-witted, Charlie, at least make it grammatically correct.
08:49 AM on 08/31/2011
all because he worked at fleet ------

-it all goes to show you that half the battle to winning is just showing up .
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
08:16 AM on 08/31/2011
The "Countrywide Financial unit" was acquired by BofA after it went under. BofA didn't originate those bad loans, after crash it bought Countrywide for nothing thinking it was a great deal. But BofA also bought the liability, is being sued for the loans Countrywide wrote.

Bank Of America bought Countrywide and "bought the farm". Dumbest acquisition ever.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kye154
03:18 AM on 08/31/2011
BoA should be shut down entirely, all of its assets nationalized, and the entire executive staff should be sent to the seaside resort of the Guantanamo detention facility for terrorizing this nation!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:52 AM on 08/31/2011
OK, I understand your frustration with BofA, but, please do not confuse the total lack of competence at the top with the thousands of employees who are just trying to do their jobs. This problem is at the top, not from middle management down.
03:16 AM on 08/31/2011
Over and over we see the results of fear preventing regulators from making banks controllable. This flailing monster should have been broken into its many parts instead of being allowed to metastasize. Gov. Perry and other repuplican pols cry aboit regulation but the effect of the last 20 years of unregulating is upon us and it is pretty ugly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
02:18 AM on 08/31/2011
Eventually, B of A will be bought out by some foreign bank or something. Then, their computer server will take over the global banking system. And then the ATM machines will stop working, when it decides to keep all the money.
12:03 AM on 08/31/2011
Broke of America is hopelssly bankrupt and just like Lehman Bros. Exposed the INSOLVENCY of Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, so will these same banksters be exposed again as INSOLVENT.

No amount of QE bailout money printing will save them, in fact, there's a small town in Italy, already coining their own currency because people in the future will no longer peg or accept dollars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 PM on 08/30/2011
Fox and BoA should have a bid RICO party.
ThePeacemakers
Concerned Citizen
11:12 PM on 08/30/2011
They're seeking a usual suspect - one with ties to the easily corrupted government officials.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Pdubya
10:45 PM on 08/30/2011
Jon Dillinger
10:43 PM on 08/30/2011
break up the banks. too big to fail my foot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bg66astoria
Research Helps
10:24 PM on 08/30/2011
Time to start vetting a bankruptcy receiver?
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is empty
09:20 PM on 08/30/2011
Some things don't really stink that bad till you wedge your toe under it and flip it over.. Countrywide really was/is a stinking pile but what would have happened if it had not been bought out and instead.. collapsed. Think that one over..

Who could have taken it on but Bofa and who would have? Hindsight is 20/20 and Bofa knew it was a mess but they wanted the Countrywide machine.. the systems.. the structure. Take out the crooks and it really is a powerhouse in the industry. bofa wanted that and It really did make sense at the time.. in a twilight zone kinda way. No one knew at the time just how bad the de-regulation of all things mortgage was going to pan out.. or how really nasty and crooked Countrywide was.

Bofa took the mother of all rip off schemes and swallowed it whole.. it isn't going to kill them but they certainly are gagging on it now. It will make them stronger down the road.

This article is ill informed.