Corporate Manslaughter -- There Oughta Be a Law

Posted September 11, 2007 | 04:51 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Corporate Manslaughter -- There Oughta Be a Law   digg: Corporate Manslaughter -- There Oughta Be a Law   reddit: Corporate Manslaughter -- There Oughta Be a Law   del.icio.us: Corporate Manslaughter -- There Oughta Be a Law

This just came across the transom:

In late July the British government agreed to introduce a new law called the "Corporate Manslaughter Statute," which will make companies criminally responsible for deaths caused by a firm's gross negligence.

Penalties for violating the act potentially include unlimited fines, a "publicity order" (requiring the company to publicize its crime) and even remedial steps to correct the source of the lawbreaking activity.

Wouldn't it be nice if we had a law like that in the U.S. to protect workers and consumers. How many examples can you think of where serious injuries or death might have been prevented? I can think of a few, like the 2005 BP refinery explosion in Houston, the Ford-Firestone tire fiasco, the McWane pipe company deaths (covered an excellent NYTimes series by David Barstow and Lowell Bergman), and the 5,000 other "deaths on the job" that the AFL estimates result from the flouting of work safety regulations .

With a law like that, prosecutors might also be able to go after companies that regularly violate mine safety regulations and then claim an "act of nature" was responsible for their workers' deaths.

The UK is not the only country out ahead of US on this issue. To our shame, so are our neighbors to the north. A major mining accident in Westray, Ontario in 1992, led (after much organizing by the families of the victims -- with the help of the United Steelworkers) to support for and passage of Canada's new "Westray law" -- a law that similarly penalizes corporate crimes that contribute to serious injury or death.

Here in the U.S., it's very difficult to hold either corporations or corporate executives responsible for cases of gross negligence. Can you name any corporate executives who are likely to do as much time as Bernie Ebbers for causing an estimated 100,000 people to needlessly suffer heart attacks after taking Merck's Vioxx?

We all know that the fines that corporations receive for regulatory violations are routinely treated as the "cost of doing business," yet few of us are probably aware that the Supreme Court has been continuously cutting back on the availability of punitive damages (a legal sanction they don't have at all in the UK) under state and federal laws.

The corporate criminals are getting away with murder. At a minimum, Congress should provide Americans with the same legal protections that citizens in other countries receive.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
Comments
3
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Republicans will never allow that. It's these very practices that allow companies to make billions of dollars on the backs of its workers and customers. And damn us all to hell if we try to interfere with rich people getting richer.

The GOP is all about the rich getting richer and anyone else getting poorer (as long as their money goes to the already filthy rich). Everything that has ever been done to protect us as a people (either workers or consumers) has been usurped by republicans everywhere (especially Bush - who is the worst of the worst).

I don't know about you, but I am not going into Surfdom willingly. It is going to be a kicking and screaming thing all the way down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 09/12/2007

What a great idea! Even better would be a law passed by our Congress repealing the fraudulent "personhood" of corporations that renders them immune from a whole class of sensible regulation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 09/12/2007

So true! Corporations want all the rights of a "person" when it comes to the advantages they get for themselves out of the deal.

But how much you wanna bet they will be, let's say, unwilling, to accept the responsibilities and penalties that a "person" must face if they harm someone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 09/11/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect