iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chase Harrison

GET UPDATES FROM Chase Harrison
 

Kony 2012 Video: Money for Nothing

Posted: 03/09/2012 8:48 am

The United States believes that it is the ultimate provider of democracy and morality for the third world. This week, in accordance with America's self-righteousness, a documentary entitled 'Kony 2012' went viral, captivating the minds and hearts of Facebookers. The video focuses on conditions in Uganda pertaining to dictator Joseph Kony and his army of child soldiers. Average Americans, most of who had never heard of the issue, sprang into action in order to revitalize that usually dormant sense of world awareness. However, the video perpetuates the same mentality as the U.S. policy towards Africa. If the United States wants to truly be a deliverer of democracy and help the impoverished masses, we must stop the techniques employed in Kony 2012 and the concept of giving aid rather than providing more economic structure and self-sustenance.

The main point of the video is that the United States should use military intervention to work with the Ugandan army to overthrow Joseph Kony. The leaders of the Invisible Children organization clearly did not pay attention in history class. The very basis of this argument is flawed. Military intervention, especially against an army of child soldiers, is incredible risky. Furthermore, military intervention, in general, is a complicated venture -- rarely does it go swiftly or as planned. In addition, the United States is not good at fighting in the jungle or on rough terrain, as proved in Vietnam and Afghanistan. The last thing the United States needs is another prolonged war and the loss of more innocent Americans.
           
However, the largest problem with the concept of military intervention is that it does not really solve the problem. Sure, taking down Joseph Kony would be beneficial, but it would only go so far. Within Uganda, the problem goes deeper than one man and his policy. The Kony regime is a complex organization that is integrated into the country's politics. By removing Kony and his regime, we would leave Uganda leaderless and in chaos. Uganda's problems extend beyond a military regime; in fact, the entire country is in disarray. Economic underdevelopment is the main blockage of progress in Uganda. Simply removing Kony from power in Uganda may have short-term implications, however, in the long run, it is a foolishly placed effort.
             
So how can we help Africa? To start, we must stop our current policy of aid. Aid has bolstered government corruption and been detrimental to the welfare of the people. When the United States gives aid to governments, it is given to the leadership to manage. This often results in government officials, like Joseph Kony and cronies, usurping money for themselves and controlling the flow of cash for their own special interests. Sometimes, the dictators will channel the money into the very organizations that we are trying to fight. By placing the money into the hands of dictators, the Unites States is giving control of the situation to an untrustworthy partner, who does not share our vision and goals for the good of the nation.
           
For the average African, aid has had a debilitating effect. While Bono and his fellow celebrities may feel like crusaders of the African cause, this type of direct monetary assistance, which has defined the United States policy towards Africa, has squelched progress toward economic self-sustainability. Africa's main problem is the underdevelopment of its economy. Citizens are left helpless due to a lack of developed industries and opportunity. The constant provision of aid simply provides for Africans without encouraging them to provide for themselves. It also shuts down small-scale industries and destroys the spirit of entrepreneurship. Our current policy of aid creates a system of eternal dependency of which we are an integral part.
           
Between the policies of aid and intervention, the United States needs to drastically alter its strategy towards Africa. Helping Africa is possible through improving African economic infrastructure. Dictators like Kony are able to capitalize on the fragile state of their respective economies by manipulating the desperate people and reigning through economic dominance.  This can by combated through creating economic opportunities in Africa. To start, on a governmental level, countries should be encouraged to allow the United States to provide more a comprehensive transparency index in each country, so that the action of governments will be visible and politicians can be held accountable by the U.S. and their own people. The United States should work with existing efforts to establish stable bond markets in Africa. These markets, in essence, would promote the flow of capital into Africa that would develop their economies. Additionally, investors would be tied financially to the well-being of their respective countries causing greater international concern for the financial stability of Africa as a whole.  
           
The United States should also focus on infrastructure. In the Kony 2012 video, Invisible Children touches upon this by promoting the construction of schools. Infrastructure will help to industrialize Africa's economy allowing for further development of resources. This will create better opportunities for citizens and businesses while also developing other infrastructure projects, like roads and railroads. Furthermore, the United States should focus on building schools in Africa to try to break cyclical poverty and promote income mobility. Lastly, in the case of the war-ridden regions of Africa, exemplified through Kony's Uganda, the United States should focus on empowerment through giving arms, monetary support, and Internet communication rather than using our own hard power.
    
Although brought to our attention by a viral video, the dire situation in Africa is not new and shows no signs of improving. If the United States truly wants to embody its self-proclaimed role of global development crusader, it needs to stop practicing antiquated, ineffective policies like direct monetary aid or support of  Invisible Children's ridiculous policy of U.S. military intervention. We must utilize new long-term policies that empower Africans to be self-sustaining. While the Kony 2012 video may have highlighted the problems in Uganda and throughout Africa, the video just showcases the perpetual ignorance that exists not only within our populace but also with our policymakers who cannot seem to break the cycle of aid and intervention.  

 
FOLLOW TEEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:45 PM on 03/10/2012
Kony is not in power. Kony is the leader of a terrorist organization known as the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA). The leader of Uganda, who, I may add, is a very autocratic and strong-willed ruler who borders on dictator, is president Yoweri Museveni. Not Kony. Killing Kony WOULD NOT send Uganda into a leaderless chaos. Please do some more research. This is pathetic.
08:41 PM on 03/09/2012
"For the average African, aid has had a debilitating effect. While Bono and his fellow celebrities may feel like crusaders of the African cause, this type of direct monetary assistance, which has defined the United States policy towards Africa, has squelched progress toward economic self-sustainability. Africa's main problem is the underdevelopment of its economy. Citizens are left helpless due to a lack of developed industries and opportunity. The constant provision of aid simply provides for Africans without encouraging them to provide for themselves. It also shuts down small-scale industries and destroys the spirit of entrepreneurship. Our current policy of aid creates a system of eternal dependency of which we are an integral part."

Substitute "American" for African and "liberals" for we or our. Enlightening that liberals can see this for others but not their own country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sb1285n
12:26 PM on 03/10/2012
These are two completely different situation, and the fact that you are trying to compare the two shows just how uninformed you are. One is an established complex economic power, the other a third world country.

There are times when you need to let capitalism run its course, but no intervention whatsoever will hurt the economic self-sustainability already in place. This is part of the problem we have now. Reagan era economic policies have weakened the middle class and caused an increase in the income gap between rich and poor. A country cannot thrive without a strong middle class, small businesses can no longer compete. If we continue to let things run their course we will end up enslaved to big box retailers and corporations and the "spirit of entrepreneurship" will be snuffed out for good.
04:22 PM on 03/10/2012
I know they are different and I wasn't commenting on Kony 2012 or I would have. I was commenting on the liberal stance of Obama needing to do everything for everybody. The very fact that a liberal writer can see be an enabler, creating dependance on government, in this situation foreign aid, but cannot see it in his own culture is ironic.

I typically don't read HP, not because of politics, but because I just don't. I only got on to find out more about the Kony story off of a google search. When I read the article, that paragraph stood out to me. The fact that you cannot understand my point shows you are not as informed as you want others to believe.

There are plenty of small businesses that are doing well in my part of the country. It is up to you to support those small businesses and make sure that they don't fail.
06:12 PM on 03/09/2012
I never would have guessed that it is possible to write an eight paragraph article while clueless about one of the central facts of the issue. Kony is a rebel leader, not a dictator. He is not a "government official". He does not "reign through economic dominance." His Lord's Resistance Army is believed to number only in the hundreds, and is currently not in Uganda. While some of the points here on military intervention and other issues may be valid in other circumstances, it is pretty clear that the author of this article has a significantly worse understanding of the facts of the conflict than those whom he criticizes. A word of advice: If you're going to write an article where you wish to present yourself as a source of authority, at the very least just read a Wikipedia summary of the recent history of Uganda, as this will go great lengths to preventing such embarrassing situations.
06:11 PM on 03/09/2012
I think the HP should tell us who is funding Kony's war and who is profiting from any business activities in Uganda---The HP has that ability---c'mon HP do it for all of us!
03:24 PM on 03/09/2012
As Yale's Chris Blattman masterfully put it, "It hints uncomfortably of the White Man’s Burden. Worse, sometimes it does more than hint". I feel like that is the main folly with IC and the entire Kony campaign. Actually, the rest of Blattman's words on Invisible Children are worth reading as well: http://goo.gl/g5zZm
03:03 PM on 03/09/2012
is this an up by the bootstraps essay? I agree, economic infrastructure in Africa is imperative, but its not African dependency on the US that is ruining African economies. Most of Africa was destroyed by colonization..which led to much of the political destabilization that we see today. Of course its easy to say, "What Africa needs to do is..." without taking the history of this continent into account. Fair trade, education (within Africa, *no brain drain) and better partnerships with developing nations is essential...this "Western protectionism" that we are seeing...is not.
photo
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
01:44 PM on 03/09/2012
OTOH, I am pleased to see that today's 16 year olds, unlike those of my generation, can understand the need for infrastructure. But OTOH, I am disappointed to see that Harrison seems oblivious to the "chicken and the egg" problem here: nobody is going to "build infrastructure" in an area where they could be attacked at any moment by the LRA. Kony must be killed or captured, the LRA disbanded. Only then can anyone build infrastructure out there in Acholi country.
10:30 AM on 03/09/2012
Correction. kony is not in power. He's not a dictator. He's a brigand fighting against government forces. Get that right. Typical insular american.