More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chip Conley

Chip Conley

Posted: March 15, 2010 05:26 PM

One hundred twenty million of us received the same letter last week. It was a simple warning from the U.S. Census that we would be receiving our mandatory Census form in the next week. The U.S. government spent $57 to $85 million (depending upon the statistic you believe) to send us this silly letter. Get this: we are spending $10 billion to conduct the Census this year. For what purpose? We're asking just 10 very simple questions that only relate to demographics, where you live, and who you live with. It seems that the only purpose of the Census today is to figure out how to reapportion congressional districts and rejigger governmental budgets. Did any of our elected representatives ever consider, "If we're going to spend bucket loads of billions, couldn't we ask some more meaningful questions that would help us to understand the hopes and dreams of the American people?"

This ritual of counting the population every decade started in 1790 and there was a time we asked more interesting questions. In the early days, we asked questions that related to how many free white males over the age of 16 were in the household, partly due to America's need to marshal militia quickly as a new nation. The 1850 census started counting slaves, women, and children and asked questions about social statistics like schooling and "pauperism" -- clearly, this foreshadowed the emergence of slaves' and women's' rights. The 1930 census was the last one to ask detailed questions of American citizens as learning the zeitgeist of the American people was important during the Great Depression. Since that time, the number of questions asked in the Census has dwindled to 34 in 1940, 20 questions in 1950, and now down to half that many 60 years later. Is it that we're less interested in what's going on in the hearts and minds of our citizenry today? Or, are we more reliant on Gallup to ask the interesting questions? We certainly have the technology and understanding of how to make consumer inquiries such that we could make the Census a more revealing endeavor every ten years. Heck, even little Bhutan asks its third world citizenry annual questions like "How happy are you?" and "How satisfied are you with how you spend your time each day?" Isn't it about time we asked our citizens more thoughtful questions about what truly counts in life?

What if the U.S. government thought of the U.S. Census as being the ultimate customer satisfaction survey? You know, we all get those surveys after we've stayed at a hotel or bought something online. This exercise gives us the opportunity to be heard and to help the company understand how they can better serve the needs of their customers. If we're going to spend $10 billion on a survey, why not ask questions that can allow our government to both better understand what we're looking for as citizens (and how we're feeling) as well as give us an opportunity to offer suggestions of how the government could serve us better. Americans want a more responsive government and they're certainly used to giving feedback as customers. Nearly one-third of us will not send our Census forms back in the mail in time and, thus, we will be visited (after April 1) by a Census worker at home who will ask these same banal ten questions in person. What a lost opportunity! How many companies make the investment to go and visit their customers in person at home to hear live feedback?

We have a decade to prepare for the next Census so let's start giving feedback to our elected officials that it's time for a real American revolution. It's time for our Census to ask us about what truly counts in our lives. There was a time when the Census was more about understanding who we were than just mechanically counting which box we fit in. It seems all too fitting that the official National Census Day (April 1) is on April Fool's Day. Census or Senseless?

 

Follow Chip Conley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChipConley

One hundred twenty million of us received the same letter last week. It was a simple warning from the U.S. Census that we would be receiving our mandatory Census form in the next week. The U.S. gove...
One hundred twenty million of us received the same letter last week. It was a simple warning from the U.S. Census that we would be receiving our mandatory Census form in the next week. The U.S. gove...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:00 AM on 03/18/2010
"It seems that the only purpose of the Census today is to figure out how to reapportion congressional districts and rejigger governmental budgets." Then why don't we tell them we each live with 27 other people?

I believe the government didn't ask more questions because they a) don't care; and b) know we'd only lie to them. The government is in the best position of anyone to know how unreliable any survey is, after all.

As brief as the census form is, some of us still lied. I'm not naming names, but it could be there are some wookies out there who have done their civic duty by returning their census forms. The postage-paid envelopes could be full of steel washers, too. Heavy ones.
09:14 AM on 03/17/2010
They are always prodding the populace US in some way shape or form and people are sick of it.
11:34 AM on 03/16/2010
Washington consistently chooses to ignore us. Let's return the favor.
11:28 AM on 03/16/2010
Just filled out my census form. Put "American" under "race". ;)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robbcoffee
09:36 AM on 03/16/2010
The Census should not be used for political polling. That would not only be corrupting but useless. Polls are a snapshot in time... They do not take years to change significantly- only months.
If the Census is going to compile more information it should be things that are more or less static.
An every ten-year opinion poll would be a true waste of ink..
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
12:11 PM on 03/16/2010
Agree.
08:17 AM on 03/16/2010
First of all, Democrats killed a bill to allow postal workers to conduct the census. They already, you know, visit every single residence every day....secondly, the idea of responsive government is mirage.

The only responsive government-if you are lucky-is a local one.
01:15 AM on 03/16/2010
$85 million for a useless letter. I'd bet we could have taken care of the sick lady in Ohio that Barry O's so worried about for that. This is how a government that is deeply, deeply in debt but refuses to budget and spend like it goes about it's business.

Medicare - broke.
Medicaid - broke.
Social Security - broke.
Post Office - broke.
Amtrak - $6 billion in subidies and still broke.

"I'm from the government and I'm here to help, and I promise you it'll all be for free!"
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
12:13 PM on 03/16/2010
$85 million? or $57 million? Also, these types of letters have been shown to increase the response rate, which ultimately saves money.

http://www.abcactionnews.com/mostpopular/story/How-much-did-that-census-reminder-letter-cost/MjPnXmm95kOJlV2fwcVA9Q.cspx
photo
Tennys Daughter
A fool and his money shall soon perish
01:17 PM on 03/16/2010
Sorry to break this to you DesertDawgAlpha, all of these entities were broken before the President took office.
photo
NickHP
engineer, human, humane
10:54 PM on 03/15/2010
Any pollster must have access to tens of millions of email addresses. Just send out a blast to everyone on that list asking for their opinions. Sure 10 million opinions might not be scientific, but with a sample size that large it should be able to narrow down the uncertainty, and change the weighting as required to get a really good sample.

How about Facebook asking how it's 400 million people are doing? Just set a 'how are you' question on the home page and collect a sampling of the results. Then publish this as a running result.
10:47 PM on 03/15/2010
You may have heard of these things called elections. They serve the purpose of finding out the hopes and dreams of America. The information was considered too important to only collect once every ten years, that's why they are more frequent than the census.

After reading your article, I am even more disappointed in our educational system. I think an article explaining the dangers of leaving Civics out of the curriculum might be a better read.
10:33 PM on 03/15/2010
A more important question to ask is how much of that $10 billion goes to ACORN for their part in the Census, now that this admin has taken over the responsibility of it?
photo
NickHP
engineer, human, humane
10:55 PM on 03/15/2010
nonsense and nonsensical
12:24 AM on 03/16/2010
Since the assertion is not true, why would that be a more important question?
Unless, of course, you are Glenn Beck.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
10:03 PM on 03/15/2010
It is Constitutionally mandated in order to define congressional districts, and federal funding allocations.

It is not about hopes and dreams, nor taking the pulse of the American people. It is all about counting everyone so federal and state resources can be managed more effectively.

As we have seen this past summer, many Americans are angry at anything and everything. They blame the government for their lack of education, ambition and wealth, they have proven themselves willfully ignorant of issues that affect their lives significantly, and mind bogglingly gullible for the machinations of corporate PR firms and lobbyists. Not to mention the percentage of Americans that actually HATE President Obama and will do anything and say anything to derail his presidency!

It is not the Federal governments prerogative to be a customer service provider.
01:48 PM on 03/23/2010
You're right. It IS about counting everyone. And nothing else. Not names, ages, race, or any other nonsense questions they are asking/demanding people answer on the current census.

I wonder how many more people will or would filled it out and have sent it back if the questions were appropriate for a survey meant to count the number of people in an area. They could always add optional questions to get additional information, but it was a bad decision to REQUIRE people to answer things that have nothing to do with the number of people/area. That just ticked them off.