Chris Goldberg

Chris Goldberg

Posted December 14, 2008 | 08:29 PM (EST)

Milk Robbed of Globes

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

When my friend at Focus Features told me I'd love Milk a few months before it came out, I was pretty skeptical. I figured he was just drinking the company, um... milk.

Sure I'm a diehard liberal and all (pro gay rights, a former political organizer, etc.) but I cringed at the idea of what I thought would be another heavy-handed, preaching-to-the-choir, eat-your-vegetables, Oscar-bait message movie. We'd all have to sit through it and applaud because we love and support our gay friends -- not because it's actually a good movie.

Plus, it was Sean Penn of all people. Love the guy, but he's kind of a blowhard, isn't he? And the last movie that he played a politician in didn't exactly turn out so great, did it?

To top it off, I was blown away by The Wrestler and already rooting for Mickey Roarke to win the Best Actor Oscar. Did we really need to give it to Sean Penn again?

Well, I was wrong. Very wrong. Sean Penn nails it (even Milk's Queens accent, which I can personally attest to as a Sunnyside resident). But beyond that, the movie is nearly flawless. It puts most biopics to shame. And it really socked me in the gut while (sorry Harvey Weinstein!) The Reader left me emotionally cold.

I'm not sure what the 80-some-odd members of the Hollywood Foreign Press are sniffing, but they definitely snubbed Milk.

Penn was recognized, but no Best Picture nomination? No Best Director for Gus Van Sant? Tom Cruise gets a Best Supporting Actor nom for his lame white boy rap routine in a fat suit in Tropic Thunder and Josh Brolin gets nothing? Not even a Best Screenplay nomination for Dustin Lance Black who spent years valiantly trying to get his version of Harvey Milk's life on screen?

WTF?

My first thought was maybe the Hollywood Foreign Press has an anti-gay slant, but I looked it up and they gave the Golden Globe for Best Picture to Brokeback Mountain in 2006 while Oscar voters -- to everyone's shock and many people's dismay -- pulled the lever for Crash.

I'm not sure the real reason Milk got Globe-shafted, but here's hoping Oscar voters will redeem themselves this year. As Milk would say, "I'm here to recruit you!"

[BTW, I'm taking an educated guess that a movie with Sean Penn featuring graphic gay sex scenes is near the very bottom of his list, but if there's one movie I wish I could force my Republican uncle in Missouri to watch -- Clockwork Orange style - this year its Milk. Not because agree with the message, but since (to my surprise) it's probably the most moving film of the year and he's too decent of a human being (despite the fact that he voted for Palin) not to be moved.]

 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

It's hard to take the Golden Globes too seriously. Look at how much recognition they gave to "Mamma Mia". And ignored "The Dark Knight". Don't get me wrong, I love Streep and I even bought the DVD, but is it a good, well-made movie? God no. It's a feel-good piece of fluff.

And besides, they'll always have that albatross Pia Zadora hanging around their necks!
(If you can get a DVD of "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians", either the MST3K or Cinematic Titanic version, do it!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 12/16/2008

I will admit, I have yet to see this movie.

However, I vividly remember a television movie, about Milk, that was one many years ago. I didn't see the need to watch another movie about the very same story, that is promoted in the theaters simply because it has a more famous actor. Why remake a story over and over? With each remake, the characters become larger-than-life, and more iconic, rather than human.

Also didn't see the need for Monster to be remade for the big screen, since there was a very good television movie about it many years ago as well. Don't get me wrong, I prefer the theater to TV, but why constantly remake things? But sometimes, TV can capture a situation better than film, which is often overglamourized.

Why not be original?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 12/15/2008

For whatever reason, the HFPA has never been kind to MILK director Gus Van Sant. They gave GOOD WILL HUNTING no nominations, and also took a pass on the screenplays for MY OWN PRIVATE IDAHO and DRUGSTORE COWBOY (both of which for ex. won Spirit Awards).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 12/15/2008

Sorry, meant to say ELEPHANT above (not GOODWILL HUNTING ), which got Palme d'Or and Best Director at Cannes, 2003. Basically, Van Sant's edger stuff strikes out with HFPA-ers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 12/15/2008

Saying a film was robbed by the Golden Globes is like complaining about the lack of valet parking at McDonald's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 12/15/2008

I completely agree with you. But don't get too down, we all know that the HFP, which at times can build up Oscar momentum, is not indicative of the Academy at all. I mean, we need only look to the past two GG Drama winners, which were Atonement and Babel respectively. Your uncle sounds like Clint Eastwood's character in Gran Torino.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 12/14/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect