EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Chris Kelly

Chris Kelly

Posted: November 10, 2009 12:09 PM

2012 Offends Catholics, Dimwits, Ex-Cons

What's Your Reaction:

The huge new disaster movie 2012 opens this Friday. Everyone but HuffPost blogger John Cusack drowns, but not before a statue of Jesus crumbles, a crack opens in the Sistine Chapel roof -- right between the fingers of God and Adam -- and St. Peter's Basilica falls over on a lot of Italians. These images have offended the usual people in the I'm Offended Industry, but not for the reason you'd think.

The offense takers are offended because 2012 forgot to offend any Muslims.

Here's Greg Gutfeld, who used to be a HuffPost blogger and now has a public access TV show:

But there was one thing missing among

He means "amid."

the carnage: an Islamic target...


In an interview, the director (Roland Emmerich) said he hoped to destroy the Kaaba, an Islamic holy site, but his fellow screenwriter Harald Kloser persuaded him not to.

Here's what the hack had to say about crushing the Kaaba:

"Well, I wanted to do that... but my co-writer Harald said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie..."

Hollywood screws with Christians because Christians don't behead people. But tweak Islam, and you could end up like director Theo van Gogh -- dead on a street with a flag impaled on your chest.

Not what "impaled" means. But a frightening image, anyway. A man lying dead, with his chest sticking through a flag.

If there's one thing Greg Gutfeld hates more than anti-Christianity, it's hacks, with their bad writing.

Bill Donohue, a divorced shakedown artist with no professional ties to any church, frequently appears on television as "president and CEO" of the "Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights." He's also available for parties and boycotts. He says:

Emmerich is more than a coward -- he is a liar who has it out for Catholics. Last year, he was quoted saying, "I would like to erase all nations and religions." Not true. He is quite content to live with Islam, even though he readily admits it is a religion of terror...


Every time I say Hollywood hates Christianity, especially Catholicism, my critics cringe. But they never offer evidence that I'm wrong.

I'll bet that's not the only time Bill Donahue gets the cringing thing.

I'm sorry Bill Donahue's having such a bad time on Earth. Wait till he gets to Hell. Simonists are ever less comfortable there.

In a column for The Christian Post, Chuck Colson, an elderly jailbird, says the deeper problem with 2012 is that "Western culture might have lost its faith, but folks have not lost their anxieties." That's why we turn to "new-age versions of these faiths." Like "the environment" and "global warming."

And there you were, thinking the worst thing about 2012 was going to be that Adam Lambert song.

They're missing the point, of course. The reason Roland Emmerich chose Catholic icons to destroy is out of respect for Catholicism. Because even a guy who could ruin the Godzilla franchise knows that Catholicism means real religion, and everything else is sort of silly.

Chesterton asks us to imagine blaspheming Odin. You can't. You'd just sound like a dope.

Or as Lenny Bruce said:

The only "The" religion, actually, is Catholicism. I mean, as far as strength. Paramhansa Yogananda's cute, but The Church, that's it.

Here's the really tasteful hidden imagery in 2012:

2009-11-10-chriskelly.jpg

Oh fun. The plane's about to crash into those twin skyscrapers.

And look over on the right. First there's the Library Tower. (Or as George Bush, America's Greg Gutfeld called it, "The Liberty Tower.") It was destroyed by Ronald Emmerich in Independence Day and was identified by the Kean Commission as the fifth target on 9/11.

Now look at the building to the far right. The earthquake is the least of its problems. See the three explosions blowing out the windows of its lower floors? Oh my God! It's being imploded by a controlled demolition!

 
 
  • Comments
  • 228
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
10:22 AM on 03/05/2010
Great article as usual Chris. One thing that offends me in all these "Armageddo­n" flicks is when the world gets destroyed.­....it's always during a black presidency­. Morgan Freeman was in office when the giant meteor slammed into Earth. Now Danny Glover bites it. However,if aliens decide to take us over...it will be a white republican like Bill Pullman that will save the day. Not saying this is making me nervous...­but we've been getting a lot of "meteors heading to Earth news lately".
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AD sandiego
05:38 PM on 11/24/2009
Thanks for the laugh.
10:02 PM on 11/15/2009
Of course the profession­al offendees are going to be offended. It's a living. The real issue is the lack of a grown pair.

Last time I looked, Salman Rushdie is still alive.

As Donovan once almost said, "First there is a fatwa, then there is no fatwa, then there is..."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:23 PM on 11/15/2009
Haw haw! Nice.

Cheers, Jack
07:06 PM on 11/15/2009
how can people take this so called prophesy seriously?­?? where are the Mayans now? if they knew so much,why didn't they survive???
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Pyfagorus
I'm here, I'm Dear... get used to it!!
09:49 PM on 11/15/2009
This "prophesy" has nothing whatsoever to do with the Maya. It is 100% the creation of recent New Agers and Doomsdayer­s.
03:03 PM on 11/15/2009
ROFLMAO!
photo
ArborialBiped
There is no spoon. But there's a spork.
01:42 PM on 11/15/2009
Where to begin....

1. Hard to imagine that a being powerful enough to create the universe could be harmed by some cheesy CGI scenes or even some rude words.

2. The Church is not God; it's an ancient, patriarcha­l political institutio­n of vast earthly wealth and power that *claims* (like many others) to have the unique correct understand­ing of God.

3. Of course Hollywood and media types are cowards and opportunis­ts, cringing in fear of the wildly irrational­, violent responses of Muslims to any hint of offense to their belief systems.

4. Islam started about 600 years after Christiani­ty. 600 years ago Christians were still slaughteri­ng "heretics"­, "pagans", Muslims and Jews. Perhaps in 600 years the Islamic world will tolerate dissent, science, literature and human rights.
12:47 PM on 11/15/2009
not offended but not interested­. i dont understand how something like this qualifies as entertainm­ent.

The end of the Mayan calendar is simply the end of an Age and the signs of that are everywhere­. I am quite sure the changes will be positive.
05:15 PM on 11/15/2009
What are the signs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosewelsh
Panentheist Feline Devotee
12:18 PM on 11/15/2009
As a non-Christ­ian I enjoyed not having to endure religious fearmonger­ing in 2012 like I did in the moving Knowing. I went fully expecting it, but wanting to see one of my favorite small budget film actors make it to the big time. I'm sure that Knowing was meaningful to open-minde­d Christians who aren't offended by the assumption that avenging angels are aliens. I however, was revolted by the personaliz­ed carnage and horror and completely unmoved by the Christian apocalypti­c overtones. In 2012 the Mayan prediction­s are there alongside the Christians proclaimin­g End of Days. But it's not dwelt upon; none of the religious content is force fed to us, but just allowed to be part of the plot; for instance the notion of the great Biblical flood and Noah's ark. I for one loved the images of our corrupted government­al, religious and secular institutio­ns crumbling; even though it would have been nice to see a lot more diversity. But I guess you only have so many millions of bucks to devote to special effects so you go for the ones that will affect the majority of the audience.

My absolute favorite image from 2012 was the pull back shot of Earth at the end showing where humanity would start over: Africa. The place we came from originally will be where we get to start over again.
11:45 AM on 11/15/2009
How about being offensive because it was a crappy movie?
11:40 AM on 11/15/2009
Disaster flicks are, by their very nature, intended to evoke the horror of... well, disasters, then give their everyman heroes the chance to survive and maybe save the day so that all is back on its way to normal by the end.

I'm not Catholic, but I would instantly recognize the Sistine Chapel being destroyed, and feel a bit of a thump in the pit of my stomach at the thought of it being gone. Be flattered, Christian complainer­s, that these landmarks are so beloved and well-known that it's horrifying to see them smashed time and time again.

I'm not so sure an image of an Islamic holy landmark would produce the same effect for me, because I'm much less likely to recognize it, much less have an establishe­d concept of its longterm existence. That is likely true of many people, at least in Western nations of primarily Judeo-Chri­stian culture.

If producers are spending $20 million on a protracted CGI sequence of mass destructio­n, every second of screen time should probably produce some strong effect on the viewer.

Maybe it's just a practical matter to destroy icons most familiar to Western audiences. Or maybe Islamic leaders should look into better PR and marketing of its landmarks to the Westerners­, eh?
11:10 AM on 11/15/2009
Here's something the Easily Offended are forgetting about the advent of CGI: it's sole purpose, lo, these last years, is to provide Hollywood directors the ability to destroy, repeatedly in movie after movie after movie after movie, famous landmarks. I mean, honestly, how many times have we seen Manhattan flooded and frozen? How many times have we seen Washington­, the Colosseum and Paris obliterate­d by meteors and whatnot?

Also, the reason they choose those landmarks is because they are landmarks. We all know about St Peter's, the Library Tower, and the Great Jesus Statue of Brazil because we see them in books, magazines and tv shows that showcase them to remind us of how poor we are because we can't go see them in person. How many people in America even know what a mosque really looks like let alone a "famous" one? Ten? Twenty? They could have just as easily blown up La Sagrada Família and Americans would have cheered "Take that islamofasc­ist religion of hatred!!"

Sheesh. These folks need a hobby. Maybe they could occupy themselves planning another crusade.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billhodges
Self Reliant Yet Charitable
10:00 AM on 11/15/2009
The Muslims have accomplish­ed exactly what they wanted by sowing fear into the minds of the non Muslims ion the world. It is Politicall­y incorrect to not say anything demeaning or negative even if it is true about Muslims, WHY?

It is OK to demean other religions but not the Islamic religion. Something is very wrong when people begin to act out of fear rather than logic. I guess if the Christians or Jews were willing to take to the street and threaten people over a cartoon the people would stop criticizin­g them as well.

It is pathetic the way people protect the most violent religion in the world which allows them do as they wish with impunity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billhodges
Self Reliant Yet Charitable
10:08 AM on 11/15/2009
I mean to say, It is Politicall­y incorrect to say anything demeaning or negative even if it is true about Muslims, WHY?
10:47 AM on 11/15/2009
And they know it will always be easy to influence spineless wimps in Hollywood.
08:46 AM on 11/15/2009
what DOESN'T offend Catholics?

and I bet you if Emmerich offered $1.000,000 of the film's profits to the Church they would shut up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vim876
12:15 PM on 11/15/2009
Not sure about that. The Church has more money than God.
02:20 AM on 11/15/2009
The occupation of PaIestine is an act of daily terror either, and I don't see too many Hollywood films portraying it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
06:19 PM on 11/15/2009
That's a weak argument. Using that logic, why not throw in a few scenes about the extinction of the Chinese river dolphin?

Choose your battles, and targets, more carefully, friend...