"I believe America is turning the page to a new dawn." ~ Doug Hoffman, Concession Speech
Doug Hoffman lost his election last night. He was supported by a plurality of talk radio entertainers, and a majority of former half-term governors of Alaska, but it wasn't enough. An obscure quirk of constitutional law says you also need votes from voters. This is the same cruel hurdle that tripped up three of his other biggest supporters, Gary Bauer, Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani, all of whom ran for President of the United States, but failed the "getting votes" test, because everyone hates their guts.
With their help, and a million dollars from the Club for Growth, Doug Hoffman lost a part of New York State that had voted Republican since the best way to get from Albany to Buffalo was by canal.
Not bad for a first try.
Doug Hoffman didn't just have money to burn and the staunch support of Facebooking frost bunnies, Fox News and the Ghosts of Vanity Campaigns Past. He also had coots on the ground; an army of volunteers from the tea bag movement, the 9/12 Project and the fanatic anti-choice fringe. The problem was, they could shout at the polling places as loud as they wanted, and they did, but they didn't live there, so they weren't allowed to vote.
There's probably a lesson to that. Something about politics being local.
And beyond that, about the people who do live there resenting being told what to do.
Rush Limbaugh predicted that Hoffman would win. In fact, Hoffman's victory was such a foregone conclusion yesterday that Rush had already moved on to mocking Democrats spinning their loss.
Rush:
If Hoffman wins -- and polls suggest that he will -- the race there will be dismissed as an outlier...
Folks, I want you to print these words out. I want you to get the transcript off my website. I want you to print these out, I want you to distribute them, I want you to carry them with you, and we'll just see how close I am to being right. (When Hoffman wins) the State-Run Media will say, "New York-23, the race is more about the demise of the Republican Party and anger on the right than Obama or his policies."
Print it out. Distribute it. And carry it with you, just to see how close he was to being right: Not within a zillion light years.
Rush couldn't be right, (and he can never be wrong) because he's debating a straw man from the future. His point is that X would say Y. And that's always his point: If the thing he imagines happening happens, liberals will react in a way he imagines, and it'll be just like them, too. Except they never do, because it doesn't, so they can't, not that they would have. But I wouldn't put it past them, since they do it every time.
But not today. Imaginary liberals won't be saying New York-23 doesn't matter. Rush will.
NY 23 Election Results: Bill Owens Beats Doug Hoffman
Doug Hoffman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newt Gingrich: Doug Hoffman support a 'mistake' - Andy Barr ...
Is Doug Hoffman's Loss A Chink In Glenn Beck's Armor?
NY 23 election results - Bill Owens beats Doug Hoffman, Glenn Beck and Rush ...
Make No Mistake, Tuesday's GOP Surge Was About Obama
Sarah Palin Lines Up An Impressive Array Of Cupcake Media Appearances
Nice try changing the subject.
Kelly also seems sympathetic to my space/time rift theory: The ruby slippered neo fascists are clicking their heels together chanting 'there's no time like the roaring 20's' forgetting how the end of that decade would feel just like a time warp forward to our present circumstance.
Even more moderate Republicans are desperate to turn back to the clock at least as far as the Reagan era, when consequences of voodoo economics were just a twinkle in Casandra's eye.
Did they just sleep through the Shrub years? If they're still asleep, can we get them to stop talking voting and governing in their sleep? There must be a pill for that.
They'd better plan on losing for quite a while given the Republican Party's shift to just right of Mussolini.
Kind of like a halftime pep talk given to a football team that is losing 21-6.
That's a big deal. There is no spin about that. And it is true, republicans do have democrats right where they want them, and I guarantee in 2010 that republicans will take back majorities in both houses of congress. It is guaranteed.
The win in NY 23 though...do you understand? That district has been Republican for as long as there has been a Republican party. That says far more than what happened in NJ, or VA for that matter. There is also the little matter of 2 seats in Congress, which rather outweigh the governerships of VA and NJ.
Historic vote, electing a Democrat. Suck it up.
Rethuglican should be reserved for those who earn the title.
Doug did do pretty well, though, especially for a non-resident with no knowledge of, or interest in the affairs of the district.
Except Palin. I'm surprised that woman hasn't forgot how to breathe and suffocated by now.
Governors pretty much have nothing to do with the Federal Gov't. except for asking for $$.
So the GOP can crow all they want about winning a pair of state capital seats.
They're just trying desperately to get the focus off the fact that they lost another pair of seats in Congress.
Rush, Beck, Palin, tea-baggers and Faux News endorsements = losing the election.
Even in Republican districts!
Democrats won one meaningful victory against a guy who ran for literally 30 days and had his other Republican opponent endorse the Democrat the night before the election.
Yes, it's noteworthy a democrat won that seat, but it's guaranteed to go back to a republican in 2010, so I wouldn't be too excited.
How's that for spin?