You would think, when the new S/W FI numbers come out, and they're as bad as this, that the mainstream media would hold someone responsible. But, so far, nothing.
Maybe it's because the average person doesn't understand the S/W FI. Or doesn't think it effects them. But whose fault is that?
Whenever gas prices hit what sounds like a new record -- this week it was $3.05 -- journalists seem to be contractually obligated to point out that it isn't really as bad as you think. They can cite some time or other when it was worse, either in the 70s, by adjusting the number for inflation, or the 1700s, because internal combustion hadn't been invented yet, and the only way to travel using gasoline was to set fire to your horse.
(I'm not clear on how that's supposed to make you feel better about being gouged. Maybe gas cost more one weekend in 1973, but Mary Tyler Moore was on TV. That was a funny show. You could stay home and watch that.)
(Also, it's kind of a cheat to factor in inflation when comparing gas prices, since gas prices are one of the factors that drive inflation. When the price of gas goes up, the price of everything goes up, which means, comparatively, gas stays the same. It just costs more.)
(It's a little like saying my pants fit me just as well as they did when I was eight, because every time I gained weight I bought bigger pants.)
This is why economists calculate the true cost of gasoline using S/W FI. By this measure, gas prices are more than twice what they were in the early 70s, and almost three times higher than they were in the late 60s. In fact, they're at their highest levels since the Federal government started collecting the relevant data.
The S/W FI is generated by measuring the consumer-cost of a gallon of gasoline against the hourly minimum wage, multiplying that by the fuel efficiency of the average car (expressed as a constant) and expressing the result in miles.
For example, in 1956, when the minimum wage was a dollar, gas cost thirty cents a gallon, which made the S/W FI 66.6 miles. A worker making minimum wage for an hour could relax by driving in circles for sixty-six miles. Which was what you did in 1956.
In 1968, the minimum wage was $1.60 and gas cost thirty-four cents. Which meant an hour's work purchased 94 miles of tooling around.
When Bush took office, the minimum wage was $5.15 and gas cost $1.56. So the S/W FI was 66 miles. Roughly the same as in 1956, which was also where he promised to return America culturally, intellectually, and in terms of race relations.
This week, gas costs $3.05 and the minimum wage is $5.15. The S/W FI is 33.6 miles. Half of what it was at the end of the Clinton years. A third of what it was thirty years ago.
Here's why it feels like you don't have any money, even though talk radio says you do: Because you don't.
Why don't more people report on the S/W FI? Because I just made it up this morning.
But it's still at least as valid as that newspaper ad from the Petroleum Institute with the cut-up dollar, showing that they don't make much money, after the money they pay themselves.
And it's at least as relevant as when Rush Limbaugh says liberals ignore the great news about the economy, like when Standard & Poor's is up.
I think the S/W FI -- or Springsteen/Wilson Freedom Index -- is a pretty good measure of quality of life. Which is why I named it after Bruce Springsteen and Brian Wilson. In America, your freedom can be measured by how much leisure (driving around) you earn from how much labor (working a crappy job).
If you don't believe me, ask every rock song ever written.
The Springsteen/Wilson IndexMinimum Wage (in miles)
2007 33.6 miles2004 53.6 miles2000 66 miles1996 69.2 miles1992 71.4 miles1988 69.6 miles1984 51.6 miles1980 50.8 miles1976 77.8 miles1972 88.8 miles1968 94 miles1964 83.2 miles1960 64.4 miles1956 66.6 miles
Sources: Energy Information Administration / US Department of Labor
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.