iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Weigant

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Weigant
 

2012 Electoral Math

Posted: 06/25/2012 11:55 pm

It's time once again to begin seriously taking a look at the electoral math for the upcoming election. I know, I know, everyone else is court watching this week, but instead I decided to spend some time poll watching, for those of you who may be getting tired of endless Supreme Court speculation and analysis.

This column series will examine the race between Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama in the only way that is useful for actually predicting its outcome: a state-by-state look at how each candidate is doing. National polling is almost completely useless in election prognostication, because our Constitution simply does not care what the national vote totals turn out to be (see: 2000 election). We actually elect presidents using the Electoral College, which makes such predictions a lot more complicated, because it necessitates examining each state's numbers individually. But "complicated" is our middle name here, so let's dig in and see what the state of the race (pun intended) truly is, at this point in time.

We're going to begin by taking a look backwards, in some ways. This column series ran throughout the 2008 election, which makes this fairly easy (because we saved the charts from back then). Let's start with a comparison of Barack Obama's status as it stands now with what it was back in 2008. Future columns may refer back to the 2008 charts, but to begin 2012 with a side-by-side comparison would be helpful (older charts are from my final 2008 Electoral Math column).

Final 2008 Obama Electoral Math Chart

Obama 2008 Electoral Math

2012 Obama Electoral Math Chart

Obama 2012 Electoral Math

A technical note before we begin: We started our charts this year about a month earlier than we did in 2008 (May 8 vs. June 3), so take that into account when comparing the two. Also, click on any of these charts to see a larger version, with all the details visible.

These charts summarize the states where Barack Obama is leading the polls, broken down by how big a lead he has. The dark blue at the bottom is "Strong" support: a lead of 10 percentage points or more. The lighter blue in the middle is "Weak" support: from 5 to 10 percentage points ahead. And the very light blue at the top consists of states where Obama is "Barely" ahead: by less than 5 percentage points. The red line at 270 represents the total electoral votes (henceforth: "EV") needed to win the presidency.

Barack Obama is doing roughly the same as he was in 2008. His Strong support hovers just under 200 EV, occasionally climbing above it briefly. When you add in his Weak support, the total hits just below 250. Last time around at this point, Obama was doing somewhat better in the Barely category, leaving his overall total comfortably above 300. This time around, his overall total has already slipped below the crucial 270 mark once but has recently recovered. In 2008 this wouldn't happen to Obama until August, a cautionary note that this year's election is likely to be closer than the last time around.

Obama's EV overall total started at 290, rose to a high of 323, then slipped down to a low of 263 before recovering to today's 314. In 2008, on this date, Obama had a one-day spike up to 328, which fell back again to 317 the next day -- which is pretty close indeed to this year's standings.

Comparing Mitt Romney to John McCain is somewhat of an apples/oranges thing to do, but still worth a look.

Final 2008 McCain Electoral Vote Chart

McCain Electoral Math

2012 Romney Electoral Vote Chart

Romney Electoral Math

I should mention that I'm getting my data from the same site I used last time around, Electoral-Vote.com. If you'd like to see a map with state-by-state breakdowns of these totals, you can start with today's map and work your way backwards through their archive to see which states have changed in the past few weeks. Once we get through the charts, I'll provide my own estimation of which categories each state truly belongs in, as well.

Romney is doing slightly better than John McCain, and his numbers seem more stable (which could be a result of not a whole lot of state-by-state polling being conducted this early in the season). Romney's Strong number stands now at 133 EV, essentially unchanged for the past month. By comparison, John McCain's Strong rating had fluctuated more at this point in the 2008 cycle, climbing above 150 EV briefly, but he stood at 105 at this point four years ago, soon to dip to a dismal 71, the lowest point he hit during his entire campaign.

Romney's Weak numbers have also stayed remarkably stable, especially when compared to McCain. When you add in Romney's Barely numbers, the total has stayed in the range between 200 and 250 EV so far, except for one brief dip down to 195. This is better than McCain was doing at this point; he experienced a one-day drop to 183 EV exactly four years ago, before pulling back to a total of 194.

The most critical line in both of these charts is the "Strong plus Weak" number. These represent states that are (for the moment) safely in one candidate's pocket or the other. Mitt Romney's numbers here are, again, remarkably stable when compared with McCain's. So far Romney's Strong plus Weak total has only fluctuated between 170 and 181 EV and today stands at 180. McCain was much more volatile, rising to a high of 221 and hitting a low exactly four years ago (a one-day blip of only 145 EV).

However, Barack Obama's Strong plus Weak has fluctuated between 224 and 260 EV and stands today at 233. This shows the clear lead Obama (so far) enjoys, a lead (today) of 53 electoral votes. To put it another way, of the "Barely" states on both sides, Obama has to gain only 37 electoral votes to win the election, whereas Romney needs 90 to win. That is a pretty hefty advantage, but then again, it is very early in the cycle, so don't read too much into these numbers yet.

With the charts out of the way, let's take our own personal state-by-state look at things.

My Picks

Because we've spent so much time on the charts (and looking backwards), this will be an abbreviated section today. Consider it a jumping-off point, with much more in-depth analysis later on. In our next column, we'll also have some charts and data from other sources included as well.

Full data on my picks (with complete lists of where I'm placing each state in each category) can be found at the bottom of this article, for easy reference.

My picks are much more subjective than just looking at a snapshot of where the polls currently are. I look at the state's performance over time in such polling and take into account my own personal feelings about each state's electorate, so this part of the column is a lot squishier in nature, just to warn everyone. This is actually the second one of these columns, I should also mention, as I ran a ridiculously early "gut feeling" look at the states over a month ago.

I use slightly different categories here, to differentiate my picks from the straight polling data. In the polling charts above, states are broken down into "Strong/Weak/Barely" solely on the lead percentage. Because my picks are a little more nebulous, I break them down into "Likely" states for each candidate (further divided into "Safe" and "Probable" subcategories), and "Tossup" states (broken down into those that "Lean" one way or another, and then "Too Close To Call"). Any questions? OK, then here we go....

Likely States -- Obama

Safe Obama (16 states, 194 EV)
These are states that Barack Obama is all but certain to win, and my list (see data section below) is pretty close to how the states have been performing in the state polling. Some might quibble that there are a few weak states on this list (such as Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, or New Mexico), but at this juncture I'm pretty certain the whole list will wind up in Obama's column in November.

Probable Obama (4 states, 47 EV)
The four states, listed from weakest to strongest for Obama (in my opinion): Michigan, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Oregon. That last one may be the first state to move up into "Safe" territory for Obama, but at the moment it is being dragged down by a poll from back in May that had Obama only up by four points. Pennsylvania will likely go for Obama, although New Hampshire is always tough to call. Michigan has had some weak polling (including one poll that put Romney on top), but I believe the success of the Detroit bailout is going to carry the day for Obama in Mitt's home state (or one of them, at any rate).

Likely States -- Romney

Safe Romney (19 states, 156 EV)
Many of these, as with Obama's Likely states, haven't even been polled yet, because everyone knows which way they're going to vote. See the data section at the end for the full list of poll-less states. The only possible weak spots for Romney here are South Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee, but I'm betting all three will fall Romney's way on election night. One caveat: Nebraska splits its electoral vote, and Obama won one out of their five votes last time around, a feat that could conceivably happen this time around, as well.

Probable Romney (3 states, 24 EV)
Weakest to strongest, for Romney: Indiana, Missouri, Montana. Again, that last one will likely migrate to "Likely" soon, but we had to start Montana off as only "Probable." John McCain won Missouri by the thinnest of margins (3,900 votes out of 2.9 million cast), but Romney will likely do better this time around. Indiana was one of the surprising states that Obama won last time (Virginia and North Carolina were the others), and polling so far seems to put the state into Romney's column. If Obama racked up big wins in Michigan and Ohio, it's possible he could put Indiana into play again, but it's not looking likely at this point.

Tossup States

Lean Obama (3 states, 25 EV)
Which brings us to the most interesting categories: the true "tossup" or "battleground" states in this election cycle. Out of the nine states I've put here to begin with, three are leaning toward Obama: Colorado, Nevada, and Wisconsin. I think Obama has a clear edge in all three states, but this could change very quickly.

Lean Romney (2 states, 26 EV)
Romney has two states that seem to be leaning his way. North Carolina would be a pickup state for him (given that Obama won it last time around), and Romney has a small but persistent edge in polling here so far. The other state is more worrisome for Romney, given that Arizona was won by McCain last time around (as his home state). Recent polling in Arizona puts Obama within striking distance, but Romney continues to show a lead here, for now.

Too Close to Call (4 states, 66 EV)
Finally, the juiciest category of them all: those states that are truly anybody's guess, this far out. We'll have much more to say about these states in the coming weeks. All four of these states have already flipped the lead, or at least evenly tied in the polling. Obama looks stronger in Iowa and Virginia, but neither state is certain for him. Romney is running neck-and-neck with Obama in Florida and Ohio, and he may need both of these states in order to even have any possible path to garnering the 270 votes necessary to win. But, as the category title suggests, any of these states could go either way.

Barack Obama, heading into the summer, is showing a clear but not quite "commanding" lead over Mitt Romney in the electoral math. This is entirely normal; incumbents almost always enjoy such an advantage over their challengers this early on. Whether Obama can hold on to, and build upon, this lead remains to be seen.

For the moment, without counting leaning or tossup states, Obama comfortably has 241 EV on his side, to Romney's 180 -- a lead of over 60 EV. To cross the finish line, Obama needs only 29 more electoral votes from all nine battleground states (winning Florida alone would do it for him, to put it another way), whereas Romney needs to win a whopping 90 EV from the battleground states to claim the White House in November.

* * * * *

[Electoral Vote Data:]
(State electoral votes are in parenthesis following each state's name. Washington D.C. is counted as a state)

Barack Obama Likely Easy Wins -- 20 States -- 241 Electoral Votes:

Safe States -- 16 States -- 194 Electoral Votes
California (55), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), Hawaii (4), Illinois (20), Maine (4), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), Minnesota (10), New Jersey (14), New Mexico (5), New York (29), Rhode Island (4), Vermont (3), Washington D.C. (3), Washington (12)

Probable States -- 4 States -- 47 Electoral Votes
Michigan (16), New Hampshire (4), Oregon (7), Pennsylvania (20)

Mitt Romney Likely Easy Wins -- 22 States -- 180 Electoral Votes:

Safe States -- 19 States -- 156 Electoral Votes
Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arkansas (6), Georgia (16), Idaho (4), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (8), Mississippi (6), Nebraska (5), North Dakota (3), Oklahoma (7), South Carolina (9), South Dakota (3), Tennessee (11), Texas (38), Utah (6), West Virginia (5), Wyoming (3)

Probable States -- 3 States -- 24 Electoral Votes
Indiana (11), Missouri (10), Montana (3)

Tossup States -- 9 States -- 117 Electoral Votes:

Tossup States Leaning Obama -- 3 States -- 25 Electoral Votes
Colorado (9), Nevada (6), Wisconsin (10)

Tossup States Leaning Romney -- 2 States -- 26 Electoral Votes
Arizona (11), North Carolina (15)

Too Close To Call -- 4 States -- 66 Electoral Votes
Florida (29), Iowa (6), Ohio (18), Virginia (13)

No polling data yet: (states which have not been polled so far)

Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Utah, Washington D.C., Wyoming

 

Chris Weigant blogs at:
ChrisWeigant.com

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant
Become a fan of Chris on The Huffington Post

 

 
 
 

Follow Chris Weigant on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChrisWeigant

FOLLOW POLITICS
It's time once again to begin seriously taking a look at the electoral math for the upcoming election. I know, I know, everyone else is court watching this week, but instead I decided to spend some t...
It's time once again to begin seriously taking a look at the electoral math for the upcoming election. I know, I know, everyone else is court watching this week, but instead I decided to spend some t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 266
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:49 PM on 08/01/2012
If, and its a huge if, if Obama wins florida, and I don't count on it because the republicans control all the levers of power and they know how to use the power when they don't have the votes, but, if obama wins florida, then obama wins ohio, and Romney loses in a blow-out, at least electoral college wise.
02:28 AM on 06/30/2012
I just can't can't wait for the Debate!!!! Big O is going to give an ASS whipping !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Raskin
12:21 PM on 06/29/2012
We should perhaps mention the economy which will have a big effect on the swing states. What appears to be interesting is that the national economy will not be as important as the economy in the nine or so swing states. Here in Florida, the economy has been improving generally in the last year. Unemployment has dropped from 10.6 to 8.6 and Housing sales were up about 35% and prices up about 10%. There also seems to be a slight uptick in Obama's poll numbers to about 3% ahead with the latest two Quinnipac polls giving him a 4% lead.
If the economy in the swing states improves or remains the same over the next four months, we should see an easy re-election for President Obama. On the other hand, bad economic news over the next four months could swing the election to Romney.
The price of gasoline is predicted to drop over the summer months, which will further help the economy of a tourist state like Florida.
As the article noted, Florida is a must win state for Romney. For that reason, I believe, Romney will choose Marco Rubio as his vice-presidential candidate. Sarah Palin was a Hail-Mary pass by a desperate McCain in 2008. Rubio, I predict, will be Romney's Hail-Mary pass.
04:26 PM on 07/01/2012
I don't think he'll pick Rubio. Rubio is for a version of the Dream Act, Romney is not. Obama nullified Rubio's chances by not pursuing kids who have been in this country, and giving them the ability to work legally. Romney is against this so Rubio would have to campaign against it. Rubio won't add anything to the ticket.

Birthers of course will take note. Both his parents were not American citizens when he was born, and his mother was several months pregnant when she came to the US, so he was conceived in Cuba.

I of curse think he's a Natural Born citizen (the same as I think Obama is). But by birther logic (calling them logical might be a stretch) he is not qualified to be President.
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
09:02 PM on 06/28/2012
Why isn't Obama 6-10 points ahead of Romney in Michigan???
10:14 AM on 06/28/2012
I think that the vast majority of Catholics in Florida is going to be turned off by Romney's Mormonism.
06:27 PM on 06/29/2012
And turned on by Obama's pro-choice position?!?!
10:01 PM on 06/30/2012
A lot of Catholics are pro-choice. Also, a lot of Catholics are not single-issue voters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestSeattle8
O futuro é agora.
02:24 PM on 06/27/2012
Throw the numbers out the window. Obama wins by more than any president in at least a few decades. Yeah, I know the media wants you to know it's a close race so you buy more newspapers, watch more news programs and candidates spend more money on media advertising. But consider this:

The GOP (Romney) platform is Bush on steroids. If Bush's platform led to the great recession, there's only one place Romney's platform can lead. Would you like to take a guess?

Something big would have to happen to change this. And a VP pick doesn't even come close, especially considering who Romney has to choose from. If I was Obama, I would quietly ask Biden to retire, then promptly pick Clinton as his running mate. That would guarantee the biggest margin ever.

On a side note: the major question is the house and senate. Can the Dems pick up enough seats to take the house? Can they take enough seats to prevent filibusters in the senate? If you really care about the country you and your family live in, you better do everything you can to make sure this happens.
10:29 AM on 06/28/2012
"Can the Dems pick up enough seats to take the house?"

I hope so. US Congress has rarely if ever polled as low in overall satisfaction and job approval as it does today. A huge majority of Americans are absolutely appalled at the dismal record of the Congress since Boener took the lead and since the Senate GOP filibustered virtually every measure introduced by Obama. I predict a major turnover in Congress, with the ousting of many, many incumbents.

When you compare the job approval rates of the Republican Congress and the Republican-leaning Supreme Court with those of Obama, you suddenly realize that the White House's rates are much higher and that the Executive branch enjoys the biggest job approval of all branches of government today. If there was one branch that has the approval of America, it is the White House.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:31 PM on 06/29/2012
and how do you know this?????? did your crystal ball say so???? People have so many opinions but really know nothing to be for sure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestSeattle8
O futuro é agora.
08:43 AM on 06/30/2012
In this life, some things are just so dang obvious.  I don't think many people will want to see just how bad the Great Depression really was.
proudcalib
I never said it was going to be easy
11:28 AM on 06/27/2012
How about abolishing the electoral college altogether so the candidates would actually have to run a national campaign rather than focusing on a handful of "swing states."
10:30 AM on 06/28/2012
That may happen one day, I doubt we'd be still alive though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoSandwiches
08:54 AM on 06/27/2012
McCain plummeted when he picked Sarah and we all realized how scary incompetent she was. Obama is a known. Romney still has a chance to bump up or throw down with his veep choice. Maybe someone who will excite his base? I doubt it. Hey, how about Sarah? Republicans especially hate to be on a losing ticket so I wonder how many will turn him down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vietveter
To the FAR LEFT
07:03 AM on 06/27/2012
"2012 Electoral Math"


I can not count that much money
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestSeattle8
O futuro é agora.
02:25 PM on 06/27/2012
Awesome. I don't think anyone can. Stephen Hawking, maybe on a good day.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
03:27 PM on 06/27/2012
vietveter -

OK, I have to admit, that was freakin' hilarious!

:-)

-CW
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:35 AM on 06/27/2012
When I first started reading this article, I thought it was a Tossup, but by the third paragraph, I had to rate it Extremely Weak for the author.

Seriously? He ranks Indiana and Missouri as probable? Arizona a tossup?

Obama's campaign has not even given a thought of competing in any of those states, therefore his chances of carrying any of them are virtually nil. What a joke of an analysis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestSeattle8
O futuro é agora.
02:33 PM on 06/27/2012
Umm, have you seen the number of hispanic voters in Arizona?

A tossup? That's some fantasy land you live in!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
03:33 PM on 06/27/2012
StatsNo1fan -

First, it's a column series, so the states are guaranteed to move around among the categories in each installment. Stay tuned, next time you may agree more (or not).

As for specifics, IN and MO have been polling 5-10 points up for Romney. AZ's latest poll put Romney up by only 2 points.

I bet Obama's team is at least considering running an ad or two in AZ, at this point.

But I'm curious, if you think I got these states (and others, too, perhaps) wrong, then which categories would you put them?

-CW
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:52 PM on 06/27/2012
Since Obama completely gave up on those three states and no reputable elections expert gives him a chance at winning them, they should be placed in some safe for Romney category. Anything else is wishful thinking at best, dishonesty at worst.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:56 PM on 06/27/2012
Hey, Chris, I just realized you're the author. Sorry if I sounded harsh, but my greater point is that too many of the polls you rely on for categories are done by either incompetent, or downright dishonest, manipulative, narrative pushing pollsters. I do appreciate the work you've put into this. I certainly think you have done an honest job, based on the polling data available to you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
03:00 AM on 06/27/2012
Even Karl Rove agrees that Obama has a significant lead in projected electoral votes.
http://rove.com/election
Rove'sbreakdown:
194 Electoral Votes (EVs) for Obama with 63 "leaning" his way versus 101 for Romney with 71 "leaning" his way. 109 "toss ups". If Obama wins the 194 and all EVs "leaning" his way, he'd only need to win 15 "toss up" EVs to clinch reelection. If Obama won half of his "leaning" EVs and Romney won ALL of his, Obama would still only need to win 46 of the "toss ups" while Romney would need to win 100 "toss ups".

Mr. Romney has a BIG mountain to climb and not much time to do it. In light of how little his numbers have improved this month (Obama's worst month in a long time), where is Romney's "upside" going to come from? Literally pretty much his only hope is that the economy totally goes in the dumps again.....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
03:38 PM on 06/27/2012
Josh Crawford -

I almost hate to admit this, but I respect Karl Rove and his numbers more than just about anyone else in the MSM on TV. This is due to the fact that Karl seems to tell the truth even when he doesn't like that truth. In 2008, KR was just about the only pundit who was honest and admitted three or four weeks before the election that an Obama landslide was about to happen. Almost all other pundits were still pushing the "it's REALLY close -- look at the national polling!" line, at the time.

I don't agree with the man on much, but I have to respect his electoral math. He's honest, I will give him that.

-CW
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
04:05 PM on 06/27/2012
His numbers are generally rock solid, no doubt, and I too always have respect for that (which is why I like your pieces so much and so consistently). So he has that going for him. Which is nice... But the rest of his schtick? Not so much.

But he's no dummy, that's for sure. Just thoroughly unctuous and, IMHO, one of the most dangerous people in America. Right up there with the Koch bros and the "conservative" cabal on the SCOTUS.
01:49 AM on 06/27/2012
Romney's route is much more difficult, kind of like drawing to an inside straight. He HAS to win both Florida and Ohio. The President could lose both of them and still be re-elected. The immigration issue is going to doom Romney in Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico, and forces him to spend money defending Arizona. It also makes Florida (critical) much tougher and probably costs him Virginia too. But he still could pull it off if the economy tanks. Obama's hold on Michigan seems very weak at the moment and that has to be troubling to them. And winning Ohio has to be of the highest priority, because to win Ohio would completely seal Romney out. Romney's has the more difficult hand to play. But the President could still be tripped up by events beyond anyone's control.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
03:40 PM on 06/27/2012
ARonHenry -

I have to agree with everything you said, especially your comments on each state. That's just about exactly how I see things, at this point.

Just had to say that.

-CW
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garganto
01:35 AM on 06/27/2012
Interesting speculation and nicely written. Ultimately, however, there is really only one state to watch and that is Florida. Why do I say that? Florida can go either way. However, if Obama wins Florida that means that something happened to push Florida his way....economic news, major Romney gaffe, poor showing by Romney in the debates, etc..etc.. So if something happened that pushed Florida over to Pres. Obama...well, Florida is such a bellweather state that it means that this same news probably pushes 2 or 3 other states over to Pres. Obama.....Virginia, Michigan, whatever...maybe even Iowa. The point is simply this...if you want to follow the presidential election over the next few months, but really don't want to be bothered checking out the polls in every 'battleground' state every day...just check Florida. If Florida starts leaning to Pres. Obama in a noteworthy way, the election is basically over.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
03:01 AM on 06/27/2012
garganto -

I'm not usually a fan of shortcuts, but yours is likely not too bad of one, for the reasons you cite.

I'd also cite one more -- FL is a BIG state in the EC, with 29 EV. That's twice as big as most other battleground states.

If FL goes for Obama, that may be the whole race right there. If it goes for Romney, it won't guarantee a win in the same way, though.

-CW
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garganto
06:59 PM on 06/27/2012
well, thank you for your kind and thoughtful reply...much appreciated. I do personally think that if Romney does not win Florida then he is toast. Many people think that Rubio may be Romney's 'savior'...and those two idiots who actually get an article in the USA Today once a week both think that Rubio will be Romney's VP candidate because of that 'savior' factor. However, since Pres. Obama simply stepped up to the plate and smacked Rubio, he (Rubio) is not the asset that republicans may think he is. I actually think that Rubio is a detriment to the republican campaign and Rubio being a VP candidate is, in my mind, a long shot. Romney is afraid that picking Rubio, which would be a blatant ploy to buy votes in Florida, might backfire as bad as Palin did for McCain...well, it wouldn't backfire THAT bad...nothing can backfire that bad!
05:49 AM on 07/03/2012
Rick Scott handed it to president Obama today when he refused to go along with the AHCA and will not implement anything..lot of old, poor people in Flordia and he is going to deny them three years of free insurance..good luck with that one..already in trouble with the Latino's in Flordia and this is icing on the cake
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who Honest
11:59 PM on 06/26/2012
Reality based Political Commentary? Was that also true in 2010? On March 27, 2012 you posted on your website this: The individual mandate is the least-liked part of healthcare reform. It really has no natural constituency other than insurance companies. There was no call from the public to include this in the final law (as there was with the "public option," in comparison). The Left wasn't in favor of it, and it causes apoplexy over on the Right. President Obama did not campaign on the individual mandate (although Hillary Clinton did, I should point out), so he obviously didn't think it was all that important (or all that good an idea, take your choice) before he got elected. Since the mandate appeared, very few people have bothered defending it in public. Its appearance in the debate was obviously a direct result of demands from the health insurance industry, who will be the obvious beneficiary of the plan.

-- Chris Weigant 2010

Interesting position on the indvidual mandate, Chris!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Weigant
www.ChrisWeigant.com
02:42 AM on 06/27/2012
Who Honest -

I've never liked the mandate, personally. I believe that article was even called something like "Dump the individual mandate," wasn't it?

But I admit I fail to see what this has to do with the current article...?

-CW
photo
King Arthur
Center Right
11:59 PM on 06/26/2012
Midterm elections were a little more than a glimpse. Exit polls show many votes were more of a vote against Obama then the candidate they voted for.