iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Christina Patterson

GET UPDATES FROM Christina Patterson
 

God Save the Queen (But Not the Monarchy)

Posted: 05/01/2012 7:52 pm

On Thursday, an 86-year-old woman met the Welsh rugby team. After that, she went to a community festival, where she saw displays by the local mountain rescue team, the Forestry Commission and Merthyr Tydfil scouts.

It's possible, of course, that Queen Elizabeth II started this week thinking she could stay at home, and curl up on the sofa with a nice G&T, and rest her feet, which were getting a little bit painful, but that actually what she'd rather do was shake an awful lot of hands in the rain. It's possible that every day she wakes up and thinks she could have a little bit of a lie-in, since she isn't getting any younger, and is actually rather knackered, and could then have a spot of lunch with someone she knows, and likes. But that actually what she'd rather do is chat to the volunteers at the Cyfarthfa Castle museum, or the St. John ambulance service at Ebbw Vale.

It's possible that when she rides, in a special uniform, side-saddle on a horse, and when she parades up and down in a feathered hat and a velvet cloak, and when she gives a long speech that somebody else has written, about the policies of a government she may not even like, she's doing exactly what she felt like doing when she woke up. But it's also quite possible that she isn't.

Most of us have bits of our job we're not all that keen on. Most of us have to do them anyway because of that clause in our job description that basically says "do whatever the hell your boss tells you". If you were the boss, and particularly if you were the Head of State of the United Kingdom, and of 15 other Commonwealth realms, you'd think you might keep the interesting bits of your job like, say, meeting Barack Obama, and leave the boring bits out. But Queen Elizabeth II, head of the Commonwealth of Nations, seems to have more boring bits in her job than anyone else.

For 60 years, she has shaken the hands of strangers, and smiled politely at people she'll never meet again. For 60 years, she has stuck to the promise she made, in a Brief Encounter voice, when she was 21, that her "whole life" would be devoted to the "service" of her subjects. For 60 years, she has spent a big chunk of her waking hours cheering people up. She has done this knowing that a boring moment for her is an exciting one for someone else.

Many of us would think that a promise we made when we were 21, and repeated when we were 25, would be very much like the promises we make to improve our French, or lose half a stone. The Queen, clearly, doesn't. The Queen clearly thinks that a promise is something you make and, even when you're tired, and fed up, and even when your children's marriages are breaking up, and your 1,000-year-old castle has pretty much burnt down, stick to.

The Queen thinks that when you have meetings, you shouldn't wing it. She thinks, for example, that if you have meetings with prime ministers, as part of your job, then you should read newspapers, and listen to the news, and wade through boxes and boxes of papers. She even seems to think that these meetings should be useful. And quite a lot of the prime ministers seem to have thought they were. They seem to have thought, as one official said, that they're like "meetings with a therapist".

People think that meeting the Queen is like meeting a therapist because what she mostly does when people talk is listen. She manages, even though she's nearly always the most important person in a room, to give the impression that she isn't. She seems to think that the most important thing isn't how you feel, but how you behave.

If you meet the Queen, you don't forget it. I've met her, briefly, twice. The first time, at a school in Bethnal Green, she was business-like and polite. The second time, at the awards ceremony for a poetry competition to celebrate her Golden Jubilee, she smiled, and looked happy. She looked, in a way she doesn't always, which is one of the things I like about her, as if she was having a lovely time.

I hope she has a lovely time at her Diamond Jubilee, too. I hope that what she feels if she does isn't the loyalty of "subjects" to an institution, but the respect of people who can recognise dignity, and modesty, and self-discipline, and grace. I hope she'll understand that you can look at an old lady, in big specs and a bright coat, and hope that she's the last in a ridiculous line, but also agree with Barack Obama, and say that she makes us "very proud".

 

Follow Christina Patterson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/queenchristina_

FOLLOW WORLD
On Thursday, an 86-year-old woman met the Welsh rugby team. After that, she went to a community festival, where she saw displays by the local mountain rescue team, the Forestry Commission and Merthyr ...
On Thursday, an 86-year-old woman met the Welsh rugby team. After that, she went to a community festival, where she saw displays by the local mountain rescue team, the Forestry Commission and Merthyr ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
accelerando
my micro-bio is empty
11:56 AM on 05/02/2012
It's a long time since citizens were "subjects". I think having a head of state who is above politics is a great thing and like the link to history, good and bad. Granted griping about the cost is a British national sport (at least among the middle middle classes who write journalism), but, honey, you ain't seen nothin' 'til you try to support a president--who nobody will ever see up close for under $1000 a ticket (and then only maybe).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:30 AM on 05/24/2012
Well said.
10:45 AM on 05/02/2012
Draw my bath, and I'll shake as many hands as needed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
disgusted.
10:06 AM on 05/02/2012
Why use the antiquated but loaded word "subjects" when it clearly states on our passports that we are "citizens"?, nobody seriously considers themselves "subject" to the whims of the monarchy, please report accurately whilst commenting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zevonia
12:13 PM on 05/02/2012
If you don't know why she used the "antiquated but loaded word" then you must be a little on the slow side deluk. Just think about it for a minute and I'm sure it will come to you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:32 PM on 05/02/2012
An American insulting supporters of the monarchy won't make the monarchy go away. All that is accomplished is that you embarrass yourself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
10:04 AM on 05/02/2012
I have spent a considerable amount of time in London in my life, and I have developed an interest in the monarchy and its relationship with the people. I was skeptical at first of all the ceremonial aspects, and especially skeptical of the cost to taxpayers to maintain the trappings, residences, coaches, etc. But, over time, I have concluded that it is worth the cost (the royals have cut back a bit, too) and that it serves a useful purpose for all the citizens. During that same period, I have watched our political discourse grow more venomous every year and competition between our parties descend into something like a blood sport. As a result, every new President is greeted by half the population as a savior and by the other half as criminally insane. It is not just the Presidency. We now hold almost all our professions and institutions in contempt -- we do not have even one capable of earning the respect of all our citizens and serving as a rallying point in difficult times. But, in the UK, the royal family serves as that common uniting element. Just think of the jubilation throughout the country a year ago over the wedding of Prince William and his bride. The streets were filled, politics faded into the background, and everyone in the country had a shared moment of pride. I wish we still had those moments, and that causes me to conclude that the Queen is worth her weight in
07:20 AM on 05/02/2012
Nice article up until the last paragraph which is very disrespectful to the monarchy and world history and heritage.
07:17 AM on 05/02/2012
I admire the sentiment of this article, all except the last paragraph. I for one do respect the lady AND the institution She represents. The monarchy is the bedrock of our constitution and culture and I would rather be the loyal subject of the Sovereign than simply an elector to yet another elected party politician in a grey suit. God save the Queen!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:23 AM on 05/02/2012
What an extraordinary and nonsensical last paragraph from which your sub-editor customed the headline. Why shouldn't my hope this reporter is the last in her nonsensical line be equally valid?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zevonia
12:16 PM on 05/02/2012
Why shouldn't she hope the queen is the last in her line? Does everyone in your country have to want the monarchy to go on forever? Is she not allowed to have an opinion? Wow, I have visited England many times but didn't realise it was a dictatorship.
04:00 PM on 05/02/2012
And what would you call someone who wished that your president was the last president? I'm pretty sure in republics they would call that 'treason' but republicans seem to think that, in monarchies, republicanism should somehow be regarded differently.
08:52 PM on 05/01/2012
The whole jubilee event feels surreal and slightly disingenuous.Does the monarchy really transcend to anything meaningful? No not really, it is romantic soft headed thinking for romantic soft headed fools.
That for a brief moment commoners can feel special, like meeting a celebrity and by this association their life has been enhanced somehow, the fool kidding the fool!! Are people so shallow and think so little of themselves?
The whole monarchy has now become an anachronism, a bizarre satire to watch, a little old lady with white gloves???
What use is this institution, did the Queen stop T. Blair govt. going to War, does the queen stop laws snooping into people’s emails, does the queen stand up for equal rights?
No, what nonsense this is, in an age where the self-entitlement culture has got so many people into trouble in these difficult times, is it not hypocrisy that the monarchy through the same process of entitlement live a privileged life…..but with one BIG difference…………..they haven’t had to risk anything…they were given it!!!!
What is this jubilee about??? Seriously that some German/Greco relationship has enhanced the well-being of the populous??
Kate & Will……………the new face of the royals??? Really???? What rubbish…………medals and titles given to themselves, false accolades for just being average people given false privilege, how must they feel, cutting ribbons to open motorways, hospitals, lauching ships with champagne………….what a false expectation and delivery!!!
‘Serve my subjects’………..what twaddle!!!
07:13 AM on 05/02/2012
Would a president have stopped the Blair Gov't going to war? Would a president have refused to sign a law snooping into people's e-mails? No, probably not. In which case, give me the Queen over yet another useless elected politician any day.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zevonia
12:19 PM on 05/02/2012
But the queen costs you guys a heck of a lot more money than a president. And we can always throw our presidents out after four years. Your stuck with your monarchy for not only their life but the life of their children and grandchildren and great grandchildren and.. well you get the idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sf1000000
Screw being nice its highly overrated
12:26 PM on 05/02/2012
in fact it was an elected President Bush that did snoop and still is snooping on us..not only went into 1 war but then started another..and a GOP contender that says he would consider any means necessary of stopping Iran from going Nuclear..

Yes Obama is right, you nay sayers out there get a your hands on the PBS special a YEAR in the Life of the Queen....

I have seen here twice in my life time..never met just saw her close up..grace, dignity, style and charm..I doubt many of us could have done her job day in and day out for 60 yrs no retirement in sight, listened to the BS and put up with the stupidity she has had to suffer through..to bad we don't have someone like her here...so a President has someone that has seen 60 yrs of history and go and talk things out before they go off invading countries and ending social programs...perhaps we might all be better off..

Let us not forget too..that tiny island Truely did as the saying went : THE SUN NEVER SETS ON THE BRITISH EMPIRE...how many of the citizens of the globe speak English..? Look at the very laws we live under...they came from England..and every time she comes to visit we flock to see her...good to know she is still there..