More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Christine Ahn

GET UPDATES FROM Christine Ahn
 

South Korea Cracks Down on Dissent

Posted: 02/17/2012 10:55 am

On February 8, the South Korean National Intelligence Service (NIS) raided the Seoul and Incheon offices of the South Korean NGO Solidarity for Peace and Reunification in Korea (SPARK) for violating the National Security Law (NSL). The NIS also searched the homes of two of SPARK's leadership, confiscated their notebooks and cell phones, and shut down the server of its website, Jinbo.net.

The NIS, famously known as the Korean CIA, alleges that SPARK members violated the NSL because the organization sent a condolence letter to North Korea following Kim Jong Il's death and that a member was part of a North Korean spy ring. SPARK members counter that they went through the legal and proper channels in sending the letter and that charges of its affiliation with a spy ring is a fabrication. "SPARK always conducts its activities legally and openly," says Regina Pyon, chairwoman of the Seoul branch. "All the day's activities are reported on our website, including the most trivial information."

The South Korean government's targeting of SPARK, however, is clearly politically motivated given the organization's vital role in supporting the Gangjeong villagers' resistance to the naval base on Jeju Island. While the raid on SPARK is just one in a long string of arrests by South Korean President Lee Myung Bak using the NSL, it has particular historic significance given that the Cold War law was created to suppress the uprising on Jeju Island in 1948.

Cracking Down on Dissent

The SPARK raid follows on the heels of the arrest of Park Jung-geun, a 24-year-old photographer, blogger and member of the South Korean Socialist Party who re-tweeted messages from the North Korean government's Twitter account. Park now sits in jail for violating the NSL for "praising and supporting an enemy of the state."

"The NSL has a chilling effect on freedom of expression in South Korea," says Sam Zarifi, the Asia director at Amnesty International, in a February 1, 2012 statement. "It is used not to address threats to national security, but instead to intimidate people and limit their rights to free speech." The application of this law increased dramatically under Lee Myung Bak. In 2007, there were 39 cases of individuals violating the NSL; by 2010, there were 151. In 2008, five individuals were prosecuted for activities considered to be pro-North, compared with 82 in 2010. In 2011, the South Korean government deleted 67,300 web postings considered pro-north.

While the Park Jung-geun case has received international media attention, less is known about how the South Korean government has used the NSL to crackdown on leftists from trade unionists to peace and reunification activists, particularly those who have visited North Korea. Not only has the Lee administration made it more difficult for South Korean humanitarian aid groups to travel to North Korea, it has also used the NSL to investigate those who have traveled as far back as 2007. It has been used by successive South Korean regimes to use the North Korean threat to torture and arrest political dissidents, such as former president Kim Dae Jung. In 1980, when General Chun Doo-Hwan took power through a coup d'etat, he used the NSL to repress pro-democracy activists during the Gwangju uprising. And during the 1997 financial crisis, the NSL was used to arrest more than 400 students and workers challenging IMF-imposed austerity policies and high rates of unemployment. The United Nations and leading human rights organizations have called on the South Korean government to abolish the NSL. Presidents Kim Dae Jung and Roh Moo Hyun both tried and failed.

The Origins of the NSL

The NSL was enacted on December 1, 1948 to prevent anti-state acts that threaten the national security of South Korea. The law defines "anti-state acts" as "domestic or foreign organizations or groups whose intentions are to conduct or assist infiltration of the Government or to cause national disturbances." Under the NSL, the punishment for those who sympathize, voluntarily aid, or cooperate with an anti-state group ranges from several years to life in prison or death. It was initially used to suppress popular uprisings in Jeju and Yosu.

Following Korea's liberation from Japanese rule, Jeju was largely a self-governing province inhabited by islanders used to rugged self-determination, in part due to its geographic distance from the mainland. According to secret U.S. documents, Jeju was "a truly communal area that is peacefully controlled by the peoples' committee without Comintern influence." Two-thirds of islanders were considered leftists, so when an extreme rightist was appointed governor by the mainland, tensions started to mount.

On March 1, 1948, two years before the Korean War, Jeju islanders protested against the separate elections in North and South Korea. To quell the protests, the police arrested 2,500 islanders, including a young man whose tortured body was later found dead in the river. This sparked the April 3rd rebellion throughout Jeju where islanders attacked police stations, destroyed bridges, and cut phone lines. By month's end, a 4,000-peasant strong Peoples' Democratic Army had formed bearing swords, spears, and farm implements. Only 10 percent had firearms.

As the uprising progressed on Jeju Island, a second rebellion erupted in the southeastern port city of Yosu. "The Yosu-Sunch'on rebellion was also about Jeju," Korea historian Bruce Cumings wrote me in an email. "Troops not wanting to go and suppress the island rebels are the ones who caused the uproar."

Because Jeju was labeled a "Red" island, the South Korean government and police unleashed an indiscriminate, state-sponsored killing spree in the name of "national defense." The entire interior of the island was declared an enemy zone, the target of "scorched earth" bombing raids. Civilians, including women, children, and elderly who were left behind were tortured for information and massacred. By 1949, more than 70 percent of the island's villages were burned down, an estimated 80,000 people of the island's 300,000 inhabitants were killed, and over 65,000 left homeless without food. An estimated 1,000 civilians were killed in the course of the military's suppression in Yosu.

Not only did the U.S. military oversee the massacres in Jeju, it helped train counterinsurgent forces, interrogate prisoners, and allowed the use of American spotter planes to ferret out guerillas. In The Korean War: A History, Cumings writes that in Yosu, "The commanders who actually subdued the rebels were Americans, assisted by several young Korean colonels."

To counter the insurgencies spreading throughout southern Korea, the Republic of Korea National Assembly introduced the NSL. As soon as the law was enacted, then President Syngman Rhee immediately arrested 30,000 people accused as communists. Sixty-four years later, the NSL still haunts South Koreans as a form of McCarthyism.

Jeju Full Circle

The South Korean government has targeted SPARK in part because of its critical support of the Gangjeong village resistance, which has been fighting the South Korean naval base that will stage Aegis destroyers as part of the U.S.-missile defense system. It has organized dozens of solidarity visits from throughout the mainland. Since 1999, SPARK has held monthly demonstrations outside of the U.S. Embassy in Seoul to protest its ongoing military occupation in South Korea.

By redbaiting SPARK as a communist, pro-North organization, the South Korean government is trying to taint the Jeju naval base resistance and send a message to others that if they are or become involved, they too will be branded and targeted.

A SPARK video uploaded on Facebook references a Korean Broadcasting Service (KBS) 60-minute program that disclosed a secret deal made among the NIS, police and Jeju Island government in January 2009 to quash the opposition movement against the naval base by labeling SPARK as pro-North. In the video, the NIS is caught saying that the anti-base groups will be dealt with, and Jeju government officials say that the Navy should just push ahead. (When I tried to hyperlink to the video, I got this automatic response, "This video contains content from KBS Media, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.")

The raid on SPARK is part of this state plan just as the round-ups of Jeju residents 64 years ago were used to suppress people's movements fighting for representational democracy and social justice. Sadly the NSL is still at work in Jeju Island.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:59 PM on 04/13/2012
In short, There can be no one to replace her mom especially in the case of the child showing multiple disorders. The court should immediately bring her back to her daughter. This is my firm belief that this is not such a thing humans can do before discussing legal principles!!
11:57 PM on 04/13/2012
To whom it may concern
I am writing this mail to inform you of the recent outrageous court decision in Korea against a single mom with a 12-year-old daughter with multiple mental disorders. The court forced her by law to be separated from her ailing daughter with no reasonable grounds.
Detailed information about her case and other references can be available below.
I sincerely hope that you will patiently read it through and any contact can be a great encouragement for our desperate move to bring her back to her only loving and poor child.
Yours Sincerely
Hwang Seongho
Mobile : 010-3493-4862
E-mail : loveualldude@gmail.com
10:13 PM on 03/10/2012
Thank you for reporting on this. I wish more international media was covering this important story. No matter one's analysis of the relationship between North and South Korea, what is clear is that the Lee Myung Bak administration and the Ministry of Defense does not show genuine concern for the locals on Jeju Island. It seriously makes one question: for whom/by whom is this base being built? Is it really to protect the Korean people? I don't think so.
02:08 AM on 03/07/2012
The issue here isn't whether North Korea is evil or not, or whether a deterrent is needed--one is.
But beyond that we must examine the arms race? Where is it going? When will it end? What will be the final cost in nature and lives (not simply human) lost?

The Lee Myung bak administration, egged on by the Obama administration, is launching a new phase of militarism that threatens to launch us into a Brave New World, from which there will be no turning back.
03:23 PM on 02/19/2012
Christine Ahn would have the uninformed layperson on North Korea believe that the Pyongyang regime is just another regular country — a misunderst­ood country at that — and not one that deliberately starves, tortures, and/or murders millions of its citizens and regularly threatens military attack on its neighbors. She conveniently leaves out North Korea’s recent killing of dozens of South Korean sailors or its shelling of South Korean visitors.
Her parroting of Pyongyang propaganda relies on you having forgotten that, so that this just seems like a mere free speech issue (conveniently told from one side, with inflammatory language to boot). She gives this away when she describes the US military presence as an “ongoing military occupation” (when in fact South Korean administrations on both the right and the left have repeatedly asked for US forces to remain in order to maintain South Korea security against North Korean provocations and Chinese encroachment; it is completely voluntary and the Seoul government, à la the Philippines in the early 1990s, can ask the US to leave anytime).

However, at heart, this is no mere free speech issue, but one that comes from a context of a real enemy trying to do real harm. Christine Ahn, whose writing elsewhere seems to indicate that she simply does not believe Pyongyang really is killing all those people, would rather you not think about that.
10:58 PM on 02/17/2012
I don't think this story speaks out that S Korea needs closer relationship with N Korea while rejecting the US. S Korea shouldn't do that. Why? Every country can't always choose the best option to continue its being safe and growing. But it can take the second best or the third. Someone would say S Korea is being manipulated by the US. Seemingly, it looks like that. Practically the US forces S Korea to follow their policy in unreasonable way. But that's not all about what S Korea has done with the US. Simply saying, S Korea survives and makes practical decisions amid complicated relations with China, Japan and N Korea as well as the US. From historical and geological resources in the past, Korea has protected itself in this way. Showing more favor to the north families without the american friends, S Korea would easily collapse all safety and growth. Of course, I feel sorry about the recent suppression in Jeju as well as the massacre in Yosu-Sunch'on.
07:56 PM on 02/17/2012
when will Korean begin to realize therye being manipulated by the US imperialists that have interests in the Pacific region? Look at israel. they dont need anyone to tell them what they can and cant do. If US is such a great ally, shouldnt they cough up some nukes and help arm SKorea so they can leave? No, they dont want to leave and any breath of chance Korea has to unite or attempt to unite even in spirit, they do this. The Korean people need to speak,not be afraid to go against their confucionism styles and speak against this. Korea needs to unite the eight provinces. How can SKorea unite with the North unless they start to at least share some of the same ideologies? Namely the main problem NKorea has is foreign influence? So how about toning that down? SKorea should be telling US to back off, arm them with nukes like israel, and to stay out of Korean affairs more. Maybe then Nkorea would respect SKorea enough to listen and deal with them together. Otherwise, to NKoreans , SKorea just looks like an American colony, like the phillipines were and kinda are as well as Japan being powerless to control their own military. All those american presidents that spoke of their plans for miltary expansion, forced (coerced free trade) have all come to Korea. Korea wake up!!
12:58 PM on 02/17/2012
excellent underreported story! thanks to christine ahn for getting the word out--and in so doing shedding light--on the dark recesses of south korea's "democracy" under neoconservative president lee myung-bak.