More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Christine Pelosi

GET UPDATES FROM Christine Pelosi

It Is Time to Heal America's Civilian-Military Divide

Posted: 11/14/10 05:02 PM ET

Though millions of Americans paused to remember those who served our country and honor those who still wear the uniform on Veterans Day, our civilian-military divide persists and must be healed. As a proud family member of three generations who wore the uniform, I'm convinced that we can do more to help.

For years now, we have had raging debates over how to separate the war from the warrior -- how to recruit, support, and fund a strong military while debating the policies for which those in uniform will risk their lives. Now more than ever anti-war activists play a strong role in promoting warriors' benefits. Yet recent surveys of military families reveal an ongoing civilian-military divide. For example, a Blue Star Families release reported over 90 percent of military families believe that the civilian communities do not understand their needs nor support the values and dignity that come with a military career. That is an astounding, depressing number. This is not for lack of information -- we have TV, blogs, papers, and magazines devoted to war coverage -- but lack of experience. When less than three percent of Americans are serving, there is a cultural divide. Short of returning to a draft, what is to be done?

First, build on the historic support for military families. Among the Democratic Congress' sterling achievements are bipartisan successes at delivering unprecedented resources to support America's spouses, sons and daughters, mothers and fathers, siblings, aunts, uncles, grandparents, friends and neighbors who have answered the call to service. Highlights of the massive increase in veterans and military families support for which all Americans should be proud include the Post-9/11 GI Bill as well as legislation addressing caregivers, women veterans, rural veterans, homeless veterans, and their families. In addition, the Obama-Biden Veterans Administration launched an historic effort to combat post traumatic stress syndrome and invest in suicide prevention to help veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) get easier access to the treatment and benefits they need -- a critical step forward for the health and well-being of those who have served in Iraq, Afghanistan, and all of our nation's wars.

Second, improve access to work and college for returning veterans. Fully funding the HIRE Act credits and Post-9/11 GI Bill of Rights will bring more veterans into workplaces and classroom across America where peer-to-peer interaction will broaden the horizons of civilians who don't know what it's like to engage in modern warfare.

Third, lift up more veterans voices in public policy debates. No war debate should be complete without its veterans weighing in on strategy and policy. In addition, policy discussions like Don't Ask, Don't Tell are enhanced with the vocal experience-based advocacy by veterans gay (Lt. Dan Choi) and straight (Rep. Patrick Murphy/Sen. John McCain). Active Gold Star and Blue Star Families combined with veterans service organizations bring needed perspective to policy choices. We need decisions with veterans not just for them.

Fourth, destigmatize the mental costs of war. At the 2010 Memorial Day Concert, I sat on the Capitol Mall and experienced the crowd's positive reaction to Joint Chiefs chairman Adm. Mike Mullen discussing PTSD to the national audience -- a historic cultural and military breakthrough. More of this open discussion will reduce stigma and heal mental wounds of war. We must continue to eliminate combat stress stigma, and support better health care for female veterans including resources to those coping with PTSD and military sexual trauma (MST).

Fifth, pass a veterans budget worthy of their sacrifice. A veterans budget must include proper training and equipment for our troops as they head to battle, health care options to military families, and assistance for veterans and their families when they return home, with an effort to modernize the VA claims processing system. With government spending cuts all the rage among Debt Commissioners and tea party hawks who are occupying ever-more beltway bandwidth, we cannot renege on promises made to military families, nor can we afford to leave any veteran behind.

As the 2010 Veterans Day weekend comes to a close, and hundreds of thousands of military families prepare for next week's Thanksgiving supper with an empty chair at the family table, we should ask ourselves: what will we do to help? Backing up our Veterans Day rhetoric with everyday resources will not only keep our promises but go a long way toward healing our divisions and working together for a safe and free America.

 

Follow Christine Pelosi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sfpelosi

 
 
  • Comments
  • 583
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
11:00 AM on 11/16/2010
i agree, if EVERYONE had to goto war, we'd have less wars...unfortunately, over the past 40 years, war is about money, period...the politicians sending our troops to war are the enemy of state...
08:40 AM on 11/16/2010
"In addition, the Obama-Biden Veterans Administration launched an historic effort to combat post traumatic stress syndrome ..."
I think it's a stretch to credit much of this to the current administration, but over the past 12 years or so, The Military and VA support infastructure has improved by leaps and bounds. I have actually been trying to spread the word about what a shame it is that the government thinks they can just throw money at PTSD sufferers and feel liek they have done their due dilligence. Vets dont need cash, we need an outlet. I have discussed, free trips, hunting/fishing licenses, museum and parks passes for all vets. People don't seem to understand how often adrenaline withdrawal is misdiagnosed as PTSD. Vets don't need 200 bucks a month, they need a white water rafting trip or a hang gliding adventure. Although I am thankful for the GI Bill, it really doesn't set vets up for success. It's barely enough, and forget about getting a degree in a resonable amount of time if you have kids and a family. School should be free for vets. Richard Lariviere makes 400k a year at the University of Oregon... for what? He serves no purpose. I think more schools should worry more about contributing to the Yellow ribbon program instead of making millionares out of their useless figureheads. There is a lot of misinformation out there concerning VA benefits, which are targeted at new recruits rather than veterans.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lodger16x
04:42 AM on 11/16/2010
You can't get rich in the military, except when you can. Former generals retire and get millions by working for "private" defense contactors.
Military officers are 90% Republican, and they tend to be evangelical Christian. Of course they are in position to push these values on their subordinates. I've lived around military bases. The military people tend to watch FoxNews. When the military base provides entertainment at taxpayer expense, it's always country singers wailing about flags and patriotism. The same songs since 9/11/2001.
Don't blame the civilian-military divide on civilians. Most civilians want the military people serving overseas to come home NOW!
The Pentagon has 30 000 public relations people to sell the all war all-the-time propaganda.  Let me know when the Pentagon lets a general debate an anti-war person on TV!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
06:11 AM on 11/16/2010
fanned and faved.
08:46 AM on 11/16/2010
"Military officers are 90% Republican, and they tend to be evangelical Christian."
Where did you find this absolutely fabricated information? As a veteran, I can personally attest to the fact that this is simply not true. It is more near to 60/40 in favor of democrats. You must have gone to the Obama school of "people will gullibly accept everything I say". The fact of the matter is that the VAST majority of soldiers would rather stay and finish the job than be pulled out, and thats a fact. They watch Fox news because all the other media sources demonize and try to discredit what they are doing... just read some file articles posted on this glorious site if you don't believe me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aimleft
01:16 PM on 11/16/2010
And you must have gone to the Republican school of made-up figures and deliberate miscalculations. I have lived and worked in a military town and base for 53+ years. I KNOW who the Republicans around here are, and your trying to state as fact the thoughts of the "VAST majority of soldiers," along with your vapid, cliche, and just plain outdated claim that "all the other media sources demonize and discredit what they are doing" are desperate and sad. And typical.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wesley Holbrook
Retired-Marine
03:42 AM on 11/16/2010
Our military men and women, and their families are the backbone of America. They serve 24/7 wherever. Let's face it, you can't get rich in the military, so you can count out the sons and daughters of the wealthy. You can also count out those "chickenhawks," those that scream the loudest that we should invade Iran, next. The only thing they have in common, is that as long as they can pour their money into war material tech stocks, they're for any war. They are not for ensuring that the needs of military families are met. Military families having to wait in food lines!!!!! Are you kidding...not in America now. Yes, by all means, reinstate the draft. The only exemptions will be physical and mental disabilities.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:50 AM on 11/16/2010
Maybe (and I NEVER thought I would say this), just maybe national conscription is the answer - no excuses. Even the flat-footed rich can serve in some capacity - goodness knows, in our need for more and more cannon-fodder, we are hardly restricting ourselves to enlisting only physically elite supermen (or women).

The elitist desire to send other people's children to die for profit would be curbed as SOMEONE'S silver-spooned darling would be serving at any time. And everyone else would be motivated to keep the powerful in check, as THEIR children would be potentially at risk as well.

The important point is - no excuses, no free passes.

But having written this ... it does not appear to have worked with Israel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Razpootin
02:02 AM on 11/16/2010
So, is it mission accomplished yet?
With nearly 6,000 casualties (could be there by tomorrow) between OIF and OEF are we still a negligible factor?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Razpootin
01:26 AM on 11/16/2010
As a veteran who suffers from PTSD I have seen little interest from the VA to trully help me and the thousands of veterans and active duty members who are in the same situation.
Perhaps with the military being less-than 3% of the population we become a neglegible factor in the minds of this not so grateful nation.
Some will tell us to suck it up but will not walk a mile in my shoes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:47 PM on 11/15/2010
The divide between military and civilians now is not healthy at all. 35 years of a professional military has changed the U.S. and its conscience. The soldiers are good, but they have been used too often by private political interests, and the American populace has been numbed to the killing which is done in their name. And Americans are less bothered by U.S. soldier deaths since "the soldiers are in by choice now."

I believe in national conscription--service and sacrifice for all. I don't believe any conscripts should be forced into the military although a portion of conscripts would choose to do so. But everyone should provide national service and also make some financial sacrifice. When we served in the late 60s, the starting pay in the army was $99/month--about 11 cents an hour...1/10 of the minimum wage ($1.25 an hour then).

Beyond the professional military now, we have a very large mercenary force--Blackwater/Xe. I've heard there are more mercenaries in Afghanistan now than soldiers. This is a whole new American story, and it isn't pretty.

We have to reevaluate the whole concept of the military. National defense means protecting the country itself, not corporate interests abroad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:32 PM on 11/15/2010
Once upon a time the State Department relied on the Marines for security rather than contractors. Between chopping thier forces and requiring lower costs over time, you get the situation we have.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:00 AM on 11/16/2010
I remember, and I saw the Marines in assorted embassies around the world. They were notable and professional, and I wish they were still there. That may be a signpost in our downfall--taking the Marines out of the embassies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Hoogeveen
11:33 PM on 11/15/2010
You are spot on, although in some regards, I would say the US military itself has become something of a "mercenary" entity; rather than being called up to service in times of need, todays soldiers, sailors, and airmen are a de facto permanent, salaried force. In that regard, abolishing the draft has done more harm than good. I also agree 100% that compulsory national service is the way to go.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:00 AM on 11/16/2010
From 1792 to the present we have always had a standing military force, often, especially early on, quite small, but still there. And until the Civil War, conscription was not used at all. (Not Federally--there were some state drafts for state militias during the War for Independence). Madison tried to implement a Federal draft for the War for 1812, but it was voted down. It would not be until 1948 that a peacetime draft would be implemented. Somewhere in here it was decided that a draft was the only way to keep manpower numbers up to required levels. That was disproven with the implementation of the Total Force concept and the end of conscription in 1975.

Interestingly, Total Foce and the All Volunteer military, which go hand in hand, were implemented to prevent the abuses of the military which were illustrated and exacerbated during the Vietnam War. I guess we forget.

Incidentally, actual mercenaries fight for the highet bidder, and have no allegiance to any one. They can also walk off a job if they wish.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:45 PM on 11/16/2010
Or, we could stop our incessant warring.
photo
CalSailor
lex orandi, lex credendi
10:27 PM on 11/15/2010
If you want one thing you can do RIGHT NOW: Call your Representative or Senator and urge him/her to support and pass Concurrent Receipt legislation. Here's what it means:

Military personnel earn retirement through years of service. Veterans who are disabled through their service receive disability payments through the VA.

Those people who are able to serve 20 years, and thus qualify for retirement based on years of service are also eligible for VA to compansate for disabilities incurred in that service. For example: If 20 years in an engine room at sea leaves a Boiler Tech nearly deaf because of exposure to constant high decible noise, he or she will qualify for their retirement through their service, and for the VA disability that their deafness reflects.

HOWEVER, those who are so severely injured that they cannot serve a full tour, such as those disabled in war, or in an accident, do not receive both the retirement earned through service, and their disability. They are forced to choose. It can mean hundreds, even thousands of dollars/month compensation given up. For example; I was forced to retire in 1995 with 19 1/2 years of service. I have been forced to give up about $600/month since. I've paid my share of national debt, the debt of both parents, and I'm now paying back my nieces' liability. ($7k x 15 years = $105k forfeited). My military disability is permanent and debilitating. Please help us.

Pr Chris
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Tucker
Give peace a chance but
10:20 PM on 11/15/2010
Pride of serving might be the problem. All of my brothers and I wore the uniform. My wife only recently retired from a long career that started from E-1 and finished as an O-5. She was the ideal service member but not a big a flag waver or felt she was better, more moral or more honorable than any civilian. She served her country, her people, but the pride issue was never a spoken one. Like all people in uniform she wanted to see her comrades return safe and intact and did her level best to make sure it happened.
As far as civilians are concerned I've never cared for the the bumper stickered, flag waving crowd because , frankly, it's too easy to do. When President Bush allowed the gutting of benefits civilians didn't care. Why? Because they may have bought into the idea that military people made sacrifices but they also were under the impression that the steady paycheck was enough. I heard a congressman tell a TSgt friend of mine that the TSgt had a great life with great restaurants and the life of incredible opportunities and he wished it was tougher for him. I have little doubt this same congressmen was an active shill for "soldiers who sacrifice" when he was campaigning. There's plenty of blame on both sides but all the military member chest beating and utter ignorance of military life by civilians doesn't help a thing. Recruiters are no help.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:57 PM on 11/16/2010
I hadn't heard the benefits were gutted but I'm not surprised. I did hear pathetic stories from a soldier and on the news, that they were not given basic survival and fighting gear and if you were lucky some back home sent a bullet proof vest and a scope for your rifle. That they were raiding dumps for metal to add their own IED protection to their vehicles. Pathetic to hear the Republicans "support" the military/defense, they "support" defense industry.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
09:01 PM on 11/16/2010
They had basic survival and fighting gear. Some had the older PASGT system while others had the newer Interceptor system. The PASGT system was not rated to stop bullets and was being phased out. The HMMWVs were never designed to be armored vehicles, they were supposed to replace the completely unarmored M151 "Jeep" and the unarmored CUCV for basic behind friendly lines transport, so when people started using them like APCs, the HMMWVs got a bad rap.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
10:09 PM on 11/15/2010
As appealing as universal compulsary service might seem, it has a lot of problems and could infact be unconstitutional except in very limited circumstances.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
10:03 PM on 11/15/2010
Six, teach people about the military. Even among some who have served there are so many misperceptions about military service, like that we are expected to be unquestioning, unthinking robots who just obey orders; or that we have no rights such as free speech, assembly, etc.; or that the majority of us come from poor families and are uneducated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MisterCee
The Ruler's back!
09:07 PM on 11/15/2010
There is a military-civilian divide, but that comes with the territory. Americans tend to have an attitude if something doesn't affect them, then they really won't care about it. I'm a navy veteran from the 80's and spent a lot of time in the gulf fighting a secret war against Iran. Came back to the states, and nobody knew, nobody even cared. It's just the way it is. If a person joins the military, realize that it's a thankless job and unless there are television cameras around, your sacrifice will probably go unnoticed and unappreciated.
07:57 PM on 11/15/2010
The solution you mentioned early. Return the Draft. No exceptions except for health, like in WWII. If you are not 4F, you serve. Make it 4 years of service as well, not the 2 years during the last years of Vietnam. When every American has "skin in the game" with their son and/or daughter in uniform, the problems highlited in this article would be taken care of. As it is, the military family will always feel like they are on the deserted island. I'm only glad that so far our troops have not been treated like those who served in the last years of Vietnam. Haven't heard "baby killers". Some have come close though. I'm willing to wager all of those loudmouths never spent a day in uniform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:15 PM on 11/15/2010
Spend a lot more than one day in uniform, and am sick and tired of this military adventurism around the world, meddling in country after country where we have no business.
ZackShorty
Just killing time until time kills me.
10:10 PM on 11/15/2010
You have it right TVolm! I was in Viet Nam 67-68. Didn't realize what I was coming home to until an elderly lady spit on me at the airport in San Francisco. I tried to laugh it off at the time, but forty plus years later, I'm still unable to laugh her spittle off. Bring back the draft! Let everyone have an interest in our country's wars, and there will probably be a few less wars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Razpootin
01:41 AM on 11/16/2010
If everyone had to go to war, we'd have less wars.
Thank you for your service Zack.
I'm a Desert Storm Veteran. I came home to parades and celebrations (Freedom Fests).
But I have been trying for years to get my disability benefits.
The "bumper-sticker" patriots are not sincere in "supporting" the troops.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MossyOak
07:32 PM on 11/15/2010
Colonialism: the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over another country, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.

This is a word never associated with our military or our country because it carries a highly charged connotation which we purposely color over with the term "spreading democracy." Parsed or not, that is what we do and it's starting to dawn on people this is just not what America should be doing at all, ever. We set up huge bases (forts,) we hunt down dissidents (rebels), engage in business contracts to secure whatever natural resources we're actually after. Then we install our candidate (puppet government) and do everything in our might to insure the people vote for him. When they don't, our president says "Democracy doesn't always work the way you think it should." No kidding. Let Americans decide what wars we want to fund and the whole civilian versus military issue goes away.
08:51 PM on 11/15/2010
You are missing the whole point. Its not about our government and what its politics are about its about the soldiers who fight, bleed, live and die for the community not the government. We don't do it for kicks we do it out of loyalty, honor and courage. ITS COMMITMENT we take to uphold the constitution no matter what we have to do. Many of us do this for love of our country and ask nothing in return but a little understanding and a little love from thoses we try to protect in not only Iraq but here in the states (at airports, boarders, floods, hurricans and other natural disasters) we do many other things then fight and protect. We help our fellow man in need.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Razpootin
01:42 AM on 11/16/2010
than you Novak, consider if we didn't have the military.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
06:07 AM on 11/16/2010
As far as the middles east goes, it doesn't take lots of "loyalty, honor and courage", to kill innocent civilians for someones elses' profit. There are many other ways to show love of country and ask nothing in return.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
06:40 AM on 11/16/2010
F&F