iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Christopher Brauchli
 

Arms and Bahrain

Posted: 11/25/11 05:18 PM ET

Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice.
Thomas Paine
, The Rights of Man

The question is why the United States was even thinking of selling arms to Bahrain. The answer can be found in the fact that the United States is the number one arms supplier in the world and to maintain its status it cannot be judgmental about the conduct of its customers. If standards of conduct were the operable criteria, the United States' customer base would be reduced if not eliminated. As it is, sales of arms simply jeopardize the lives of some who live in the customers' countries as well as those with which they may come into armed conflict, conflicts that might not take place were the adversaries not armed by the United States and other weapons supplying countries.

On March 19, 2011 protestors took over Pearl Square in Manama, Bahrain. Two days before the takeover and acting under orders from King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, the army had used live ammunition to crack down on the Shiite dissidents who were demanding changes in how the country was governed. Unlike Egypt or Tunisia, where the revolts against the establishment were quick and successful, in Bahrain the monarchy brutally put down the revolt, assisted by its neighbor, Saudi Arabia. (As reported in the Los Angeles Times, on March 15 "hundreds of troops from Saudi Arabia and police officers from the nearby United Arab Emirates... entered Bahrain at the request of the ruling family....") Thanks to his own quick, if brutal response, and the assistance of Saudi Arabia, King Hamad continues to rule.

In Egypt and Libya and more recently Syria, the Obama administration said the conduct of their respective leaders had resulted in the loss of their right to rule. In Bahrain, home of the U.S. Fifth Fleet, the Obama administration urged the Kahlifa family and the demonstrators to negotiate their differences. The fact that Bahrain is the headquarters for the U.S. 5th Fleet was probably not the reason for the different approach.

Although King Hamad successfully put down the revolt, he was sufficiently concerned about reports of brutality by government forces that four moths after the events took place he appointed a commission to investigate. The commission was headed by Professor Cherif Bassiounim a professor of international criminal law and a former member of U.N. human rights panels. The report was released on November 23, 2011. According to the Associated Press, in the press conference at which the results of the commission's findings were announced, Mr. Bassiouni said when the revolt began, the government undertook midnight raids to create fear and engaged in purges from workplaces and universities. A number of Shiite mosques were destroyed. Those jailed were blindfolded, whipped, kicked, given electric shocks and threatened with rape to extract confessions. The Bahrain Center for Human Rights said more than 40 deaths of protestors occurred.

Although it is likely that someone in the United States government was aware of the appointment of the commission, it did not wait to find out what the commission would discover. Instead, on September 14 the Pentagon told Congress it intended to sell more than 44 armored Humvees and 300 TOW missiles to Bahrain. Some outside the administration who had followed events in Bahrain were alarmed.

Shortly after the notice was sent out Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) wrote the Secretary of State and observed what she might have observed without his prompting. He wrote that: "Proceeding with the announced arms sale to Bahrain without modification under the current circumstances weakens U.S. credibility at a critical time of political transition in the Middle East." In what might be described as an "oops" moment, the administration said it was delaying the arms sale until the Bassiouni commission report was released and it had had a chance to review the report. Some might wonder why it took a letter from a Senator to get the State Department to delay its actions. The answer can be found in more than the zeal of the United States to stay in first place in the arms sale business. It can be found in a government audit that was released on November 19, 2011, The audit found "inadequate monitoring of American weapons sales to Persian Gulf countries with questionable human rights records or recent clashes with protesters." According to the Washington Post, the GAO's report expressed concern about "how the U.S. government ensures the proper use of military equipment" sold to, among other countries, Bahrain. It observed that "[s]uch vetting is especially critical given Bahrain's use of its security forces to quell public demonstrations."

Commenting on the GAO report, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairwoman, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, said: "We need to ensure that the equipment is not being diverted to third parties, and that those groups and units who are the intended recipients are not implicated in human rights violations." Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen got it right. The disturbing thing is that the State Department didn't.


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
11:31 AM on 11/26/2011
As I have said earlier neocons including Lehtinen (unofficial spokesperson of likud) have not shed a single drop of croc tears as they continue to do so regardign Syria and Pre-Gaddafi days...reason is simple Bahrain is Israel compliant so everything is kosher...
01:37 PM on 11/28/2011
The Congresswoman you mention is a Democrat. If YOU do not find what happens to Syrians in Syria deserving of real tears, and horror, there are some stitches missing. Bahrain has a Shiite population and a Suni government. Nothing there is Israeli compliant. They are Muslim. YOUR issue is that Iran has not yet taken over in Bahrain. Why in the world you want Persians to take over territory that belongs to Arabs is mysterious. There is some more Shiite territory inside S. Arabia. But, do not despair, Iran is working on the issue. Thanks for identifying yourself as one who thinks that torture and murder of Muslim children in Sytia by its own regime, including the killing of a 2-yr old, is fine and dandy. May Allah have mercy on you!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
10:31 PM on 11/28/2011
sure Momma keep apologizing for Bibi and company for a change try reading 'actual' news...and in one of those news there was one item last week showing finding of a respected commission which states there was NO involvement of Iran in Bahrain protests it was a REAL grassroots campaign and criticized Bahrain's handling of the events, this finding was accepted by ruling king of Bahrain...now I understand this 'real' news is something which US msm shoves in the lower drawer...
05:22 AM on 11/26/2011
The people of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia should overthrow the US supported dictatorships.
01:39 PM on 11/28/2011
Walnutriver should relocate to Iran, where she will have all sorts of freedoms to express herself in favor of the actions of the Persian Mullahs against other Muslim.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 PM on 11/25/2011
It is time that we stopped pretending that the military-industrial complex is not the dominant force in American politics. When the epitaph of this once-great nation is written it will be: "The USA became the world's largest supplier of weapons in the latter half of the 20th century. In the 21st century, the long-simmering resentments of those whose people were killed by American arms, whose countries were laid waste by American weapons, whose people were forced into servitude and poverty to pay for American "aid", came to a boil and the backlash against the Americans destroyed their nation's pretensions to world domination and their economy."
08:53 PM on 11/25/2011
It's probably part of the US/Israeli effort to surround and neutralize Iran. It also involves neutralizing the Shia majority in Bahrain, which is across the strait from Iran. Providing arms to the repressive government is part of this policy, which is a crime against the Shia majority in Bahrain.
01:48 PM on 11/28/2011
Iran is not a repressive government. Iranians are free to vote for whom they wish, to practice any religion they want. There are no restrictions on those who march to a different drummer, or who are homosexuals. The latter just happen not to exist in Iran. :), :). Bahrain is NOT, however, part of Iran, or even next door. And the fact that there is a majority Shiite population does NOT make it Iranian territory. Thee is also a shiite territory in S. Arabia, and that, too, is not Persian, or Iranian. They are Arabian Muslim. Niether did Iran have any business making treaties with S. American nations. It fancies itself as deserving of interfering in others' internal politics, be it S. Arabia, Syria, Lebanon, or Gaza, S. America, or Bahrain even Saudi Arabia. It sees itself in control of the world's oil supplies and making all the world dance to the tunes of one Ahmadi Nejad. However, the song of said Ahmadi is off key! Jarring!