"Prenatal Exposure to Flame Retardant Compounds Affects Neurodevelopment of Young Children"
"ADHD and lead: Poisoning the mind"
Three new studies from just the past week add to the growing laundry list of evidence linking every day toxic exposures and neurodevelopmental impacts in children. Even with mounting evidence, regulators are slow to act and often have their hands tied as outdated laws given them little authority to do much of anything. Meanwhile, our children are suffering.
Nearly 12 million children (17 percent) in the United States under age 18 suffer from one or more learning, developmental, or behavioral disabilities. We've witnessed increases of epidemic proportions in conditions such as ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Whereas illness, disease and disability are undeniably the result of complex interactions among genetic, environmental and social factors, toxic exposures deserve special attention because they are preventable causes of harm. It is estimated that up to 28 percent of neurobehavioral disorders are attributable directly or indirectly to environmental contaminants, not including alcohol, tobacco or drugs of abuse. This means that in addition to those children who have been impacted from alcohol, tobacco and drug abuse, over three million children suffer from neurobehavioral disorders that could have been prevented.
Chemicals known and suspected to be neurotoxic are present in our air, water, food consumer products, homes, and workplaces -- and, according to a new project, in our bodies.
"Mind, Disrupted: How Toxic Chemicals May Change How We Think and Who We Are" is an innovative biomonitoring project that has initiated an examination of the role environmental toxins might play in undermining healthy development of the brain and nervous system, as well as potentially exacerbating the health conditions of those who already have a learning, developmental or behavioral disorder.
For the study, 12 leaders and self-advocates from the learning and developmental disabilities community volunteered to have their bodies tested for 89 chemicals known or suspected of being neurodevelopmental toxicants or endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol A, lead, mercury, organochlorine pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), perchlorate, perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), and triclosan.
A total of 61 chemicals were found in the twelve participants. Each participant was found to harbor at least 26, and as many as 38, of the tested chemicals in their bodies. Sixteen chemicals were detected in every single participant.
Sixteen neurotoxic chemicals co-mingling in the bodies of every person. Sixteen chemicals that have been detected widely across the populace in previous biomonitoring studies. Sixteen chemicals that are commonly found in everyday products - and that much of the population is completely unaware of.
How much evidence do we need before taking the most obvious action - making sure chemicals are safe before flooding the market with them?
We need to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act immediately, our children deserve nothing less. According to Mind, Disrupted, "A reformed Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) would serve as the backbone of a sound and comprehensive chemicals policy that protects public health and the environment, while restoring the luster of safety to U.S. goods in the world market."
The Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families coalition has outlined an effective reform of TSCA, which includes these ten pillars:
1. Immediately Initiate Action on the Worst Chemicals
2. Require Basic Information for All Chemicals
3. Protect the Most Vulnerable
4. Use the Best Science and Methods
5. Hold Industry Responsible for Demonstrating Chemical Safety
6. Ensure Environmental Justice
7. Enhance Government Coordination
8. Promote Safer Alternatives
9. Ensure the Right to Know
10. Require Labeling of Chemical Ingredients in Products
These are the common sense actions we need to take now, in the words of the report's authors, "to reduce exposures that may impair how we think -- and, in the most basic ways, who we are."
As each new study is released, the alarm sounds louder. When will Congress answer this wake-up call?
Follow Christopher Gavigan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/healthy_child
Wendy Gordon: Brain Drain: Could Environmental Chemicals Cause Autism?
Unfortunately, the cat is already out of the bag, and the results are not pretty. While we are waiting for the government to act, what do we do about the toxins that are already in the environment, most of which persist for years? What do we do with the toxins that are already in our bodies, which can also persist for years? Mercury and lead alone are known to persist in the body for decades, wreaking havoc.
In addition to banning continuing pollution activities, technology is sorely needed for the following:
Protocols for removing existing toxins from the environment. Environmental toxin remediation is an area that needs to be heavily funded.
Protocols for removing existing toxins from our body. Detoxification protocols that are themselves not harmful to the body are also sorely needed. Here is a link to an example of such a protocol:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0204187.html
Perhaps the chemical industry polluters should be fined to provide funds for these activities.
Roy Mankovitz, Director
http://www.MontecitoWellness.com
It is scary the amount of chemicals that we legally put into our waterways.
We intake Mississippi river water, use this water in our factory processes, treat this brown waste water, check the PH, and then send it back to the river.
We can't send the waste water into a creek running by our plant anymore. It has be pumped directly into the river. This is simply to dilute it better.
My factory continually hauls in several different chemicals everyday. Most of these chemicals end up in our process water.
And we follow EPA and TSCA guidelines very closely.