More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Clay Farris Naff

Clay Farris Naff

GET UPDATES FROM Clay Farris Naff

How the Very Rich Use Old-Time Religion to Restore Feudalism

Posted: 04/22/11 10:02 AM ET

The ultrarich have a problem. They are few and we are many. Throughout much of history, this was not much of a problem -- they just told us what to do, and, on pain of whipping or worse, we did it.

But now we live in a democracy that features universal adult suffrage. They are few and we are many. This presents a challenge -- and they have a solution: It's called religion.

The ultrarich are using religion as a political weapon in ways not seen since Pope Urban II launched the first Crusade back in 1095. From the ludicrous ballot measure in Oklahoma to "protect" that state from sharia law to legislation in Tennessee meant to reinfiltrate creationism into science classes to gay marriage hysteria to attacks on funding for family planning in the name of saving "babies" (even "babies" who consist of just one cell), these efforts all have one thing in common: they exploit religious fears to elect officials who serve the interests of the superwealthy.

That the American political system now exists primarily to serve the ultrarich seems incontestable: The minimum wage, which once lifted people out of poverty, now mires them in it. Even while the Tea Party screams itself blue in the face about taxes, the proportion paid by ultrarich and the corporations they own has dwindled -- to zero, for many. At the same time, the ultrarich have taken an ever-growing share of the nation's wealth, while the middle class has shrunk. Don't take my word for it.Look at the graphs, read the stats, listen to Warren Buffett or watch the clip of these wonderful guys, who call themselves Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Responsibility.

It's not just that the ultrarich -- the top 1 percent who now hoard nearly half the wealth of the nation -- are intent on ducking taxes. Aforementioned exceptions aside, billionaires like the Koch brothers, the Scaifes and other seem intent on destroying the middle class. But they can only do it with help. They are few and we are many. Their salvation comes from the religious right, who in turn can only get elected by ordinary working stiffs -- Joes and Janes who have doubled their productivity while taking a pay cut, lengthening their workdays and, in many cases, losing their homes.

Yet, these working folk who so admire Sarah Palin and think the Donald is a hoot continue to elect far-right Republicans who are out to screw them -- indeed, whose goal is to strip them of the little remaining power they have by crushing their few surviving unions and to reduce them to sullen servitude. Why? It all goes back to the first Crusade.

As with the 9/11 attacks, Pope Urban had a handy provocation: Muslims had been attacking cities in Anatolia, now part of Turkey, and the Eastern Orthodox Church's Emperor appealed for help. In a weird parallel to George W. Bush's two-war response to 9/11, the Pope declared that the West would not only invade Anatolia but would march on to liberate Jerusalem, a city that had been under Muslim control for more than 400 years.

"The West must march to the defense of the East. All should go, rich and poor alike. The [Christians] must stop their internal wars and squabbles. Let them go instead against the infidel and fight a righteous war. God himself will lead them, for they will be doing His work. Here they are poor and miserable sinners; there they will be rich and happy."

And there you have it. The classic solution of the ruling class to discontent among the masses: Launch them on a holy war. Then as now, the invasion was initially a success and eventually a disaster. Then as now, it led to unholy slaughter and deadly stalemate. When it was all over, the surviving crusaders returned to a feudal drudgery whose only innovation was the various plagues the soldiers brought back with them from the East. Within a few centuries, a third of all Europeans lay dead from one disease or another.

Things are not that bad today -- at least not yet. But the superwealthy have a clear strategy and goal: to distract the masses with endless "holy" wars here and abroad while they go about restoring feudalism (which they, with a fine sense of irony, call "freedom"). The question is: are we the many going to let religion be the anvil on which we forge our chains?

 
 
 

Follow Clay Farris Naff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/claynaff

 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:23 AM on 04/25/2011
If Americans ever wake up and smell the coffee about what the politicians and uber rich are doing using under the name of "democracy and capitalism" and believe they'll just have a revolution like people have done for centuries, they're kidding themselves. Their government have stripped them of their freedoms (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427989/) and invested heavily in military power. The excuse is to fight the war on terrorism, well if they think it will only be used to control outsiders they have much to learn. They have a situation of control similar to Nazi Germany and the masses now lack the wealth, education, health and freedom to express their rights or protest. I stopped vacationing there when they elected Bush into power, it'll be an interesting to witness America's downhill plight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelley Smith
Mother, Veteran, IT Geek
09:23 AM on 04/25/2011
Religion is not used for feudalism. Religion is feudalism. This is why religion exists. The non-rich must understand this.
08:58 AM on 04/25/2011
-You- liberals don't give up with the never ending guilt trip and class warfare? All of the above is not going to matter because the population time bomb is now upon on us and it will be -Hell- on earth for all of us no matter how much money -You- have???
05:12 PM on 04/24/2011
The problem is that the "middle class" is the "middle" - not wealthy, not poor, honest, hard working, average, and expects everyone to be the same. The middle does not look for ways to get money from the rich nor do they assume the rich are scheming to get the middle to pay more for the support of the government. Many of the poor may be looking at how to get more from the government but the middle assume that anyone receiving government support wants off of this support as soon as possible. Thus the middle get squeezed from both sides and assumes this is a mistake because honest leaders would see the injustice and correct it.
Cantinflas
My micro-bio is not empty.
12:03 PM on 04/24/2011
Mr. Naff might also have added that anyone promoting unions or social programs or criticizing the big cortporations are labeled "socialists" or "communists," to be cast out as unrepentent sinners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
09:17 PM on 04/23/2011
Can't argue with that. I would say a ltitle worse in the sense Privatization of Profit and Nationalizing Debt is well intrenched as is rewarding Stock Traders for Trading Stock Ownership at 60% of corporate AFTER tax profit in Business and third give Unsolicided sole contractors. Even if they electrify ouf GI 's taking a shower.

We need the "establish justice" of the constitution
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KawaiiNoire
Needs to edit her mircro-bio
03:29 PM on 04/23/2011
Capitalism is their religion, Money is their god, and 'The Fountainhead" is their Bible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
09:24 PM on 04/23/2011
Capitalism is great if you have laws and enforce them. Like taxing Corporations to lower their profits and dividends to the rich. Since paying taxes is losing value in you Asset base ot the corporation stock trader won't pay tax even if lossing return. 2 ways to lower tax, HIRE and Purchase Equipment or Land

Money use to be for exchange of commodities only. Now it is traded on the Money and the appreciation is Tax?
03:16 PM on 04/23/2011
amen! (irony intentional)
12:51 PM on 04/23/2011
I recognize that your use of the term "feudalism" is not meant to be taken literally (as least I hope you don't mean to have it taken literally). But really, you can make your points without linking present conditions to social institutions that are a thousand years old. The idea that anything happening today could approximate a return to "feudalism" is silly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:25 PM on 04/23/2011
Feudalism was a set of political and military customs in medieval Europe that flourished between the ninth and fifteenth centuries, which, broadly defined, was a system for ordering society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

With the international vampire banks intent on turning millions of us off our land today, the notion of a modified feudal state where the Lords--Banks--and the Vassals, those who rent from them does not seem so far off the mark. And as we continue to expand our military empire and the need for more "knights" or soldiers grows, we can expect to see a return of a conscription system as well.
10:33 AM on 04/23/2011
You have articulated what I have thought for a long time. The only piece of the puzzle you didn't address way is why religious people seem so eager to follow what is a clear strategy of the superwealthy. But I guess that's a story for another day.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:24 PM on 04/23/2011
O'll take a run at that.

Religious people, for the most part--and primarily those in the lower castes of society--are looking for a father figure. Someone to explain the world to them, tell them what to do, to think, how to behave, and what is right and wrong. They are like those in countries that still have Royalty where large parts of a population are more than willing to 'bend a knee' to their betters. Call it self hatred, weakness, or in the animal world, being submissive. These are folks who have an almost genetic need to look up to someone or something else. It gives their lives order in what they see as threatening chaos all around them. And the church and the Wealthy have always known this, and used it
04:35 PM on 04/23/2011
Your explaination also clears up other questions. For instance, why Europeans are so much more less religious, why the royalty that is left are mainly figureheads, and why they are against the rise of new symbols of religion in their countries. Having been through the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church, which led to the Reformation; and the opulence and greed of the nobility, those memories are probably imbedded deep in their psyche!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyosaku
Nothis non carborundum
10:16 AM on 04/23/2011
"That the American political system now exists primarily to serve the ultrarich seems incontestable." This has always been so...that the interests of the wealthiest Americans have been promoted, and the rest maintained as an inexpensive labor force to serve them.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Clay Farris Naff
Blogger, science journalist, & author
03:50 PM on 04/23/2011
I must disagree. FDR and the congressional Democrats made genuine advances for working people, as did Lyndon Johnson and the Democrats. Even Richard Nixon and the Democrats made some advances -- including the Title X funds for family planning that the Right is gunning for now. Political history has not been uniform. Distribution of wealth was far more egalitarian prior to Reagan. The uber-rich are now at a high point in their influence unseen since the days of the late 19th century robber barons, and (with some welcome exceptions), they seem to be aiming for complete dominance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyosaku
Nothis non carborundum
12:55 AM on 04/24/2011
"Political history has not been uniform." I guess I did paint with a pretty broad brush. However, the 19th century robber barons were not an anomaly, the 3rd quarter of the 20th century, that you describe, was the exception.
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
06:37 AM on 04/23/2011
I don't see a necessary connection between Pope Urban's crusades and Obama's Lybia even though the implications are tempting. This West vs East pattern is a staple of Eurasian history for many reasons ranging from simple greed to expansionism to tribal rivalries. The Persians wanted to conquer Athens, Alexander wanted to occupy India, the Romans wanted Egyptian grain, the Visigoths wanted Roman land, the Feudal Lords wanted spices, the Pashas wanted Vienna, and now the US wants oil. It's a push-and-shove contest that's thousands of years old, no Cruasaders needed to fuel that fire.

As to the inherent feudalism that the Koch borthers and their enablers would foist upon us, oh, yes! That's definitely going on and best explained by leaving Pope Urban in his tomb and looking at the financial games without drawing analogies to the Great Game on the Eurasian Frontier.
05:22 AM on 04/23/2011
You stopped one line too soon. "Men (We) will never be free until the last king (politician) is strangled on the entrails of the last priest." (Attributed to Diderot)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneFish
Various and assorted mutualistic microbial buddies
03:33 AM on 04/23/2011
The truth is seldom a welcome guest.
researcher
researcher
02:08 AM on 04/23/2011
this is capitalism doing its thing to near perfection and reaganhood helped that cause a great deal.

reaganhood is robin hood in reverse as it robs from the middle class and gives to the 2%ers. ie remember wall street bail outs. :-)

americans love capitalism and now they are paying the price for their unawareness of the very agenda of capitalism. to create a society of a few haves and a lot of have nots.

the capitalists are very smart as they take the advantage of religion to further their cause. if you can get the gun ho military supporters and religious fundamentalists promoting your cause you have a win win agenda.

more and more americans are feeling the sting of capitalism but it will have to get to about 60% before laws will be passed to put the brakes on capitalism and it will be difficult as the corp capitalists now own the supreme court. that is a huge feather in the cap of the capitalists 2%ers.