More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Clay Farris Naff

Clay Farris Naff

Posted: May 19, 2010 01:11 PM

The Vatican's Deeds Don't Yet Match the Pope's Words

What's Your Reaction:

Imagine the worst. Suppose that you discovered that a member of your family was actually a criminal. Not a petty criminal, mind you, but one whose crimes were truly awful, morally repugnant in every sense. What would you do?

When David Kaczynski realized that his brother Ted was the Unabomber, he made the hard choice and called the FBI. Thanks to David's moral courage, the man responsible for murdering and maiming dozens of people with homemade bombs sent through the mail was stopped before he could carry out his grander schemes of putting bombs on airliners and detonating them over cities. When Kaczynski received a million-dollar reward from the FBI, he donated most of the money to his brother's victims.

Kaczynski had no special moral training to prepare him to turn in his brother or make other wrenching decisions. Until then, his life's work had been helping his father run a foam rubber business. It is therefore instructive to contrast his actions with those of the Pope, a man supposedly chosen by God to lead the world in the path of righteousness, and of his ring of cardinals and bishops.

Faced with overwhelming evidence that the church has been harboring and actively shielding child molesters and rapists, the Vatican went into a defensive mode that would have done the Nixon White House proud. Speaking to the faithful in his Palm Sunday address, Pope Benedict said he would not be intimidated by "petty gossip."

Bear in mind that gossip means unsubstantiated rumors. Imagine how that made the thousands of victims of priest-attacks feel -- including the hundreds of deaf boys who were molested by the man in charge of their care, the Reverend Lawrence Murphy. Their stories are documented. You can read them for yourself. It's just that no one would pay much attention, because their abuser was a priest.

In fairness, I suppose the Pope may have meant that only the published reports, based on documents, implicating him in Rev. Murphy's escape from justice were "petty gossip." But less than a week later, the Pope's personal preacher stood before a mic and made the outlandish comparison of media "attacks" on the Pope to the "collective violence" suffered by Jews. Yes, criticizing the Pope's failure to bring child-molesters in his house to justice is a lot like murdering six million Jews. Anyone can see that.

Six weeks later -- and centuries too late -- the Pope has made a very different speech. He blamed sin within the church for the crisis. That turnabout is commendable. So are his efforts to convey apologies to victims.

Yet the church has not entirely changed its longstanding policy of refusing full cooperation with law enforcement and is mounting the most vigorous defense possible against the claims of victims. Now you can't -- and I don't -- blame the church for defending itself. But in its pattern of using bankruptcy and arcane canonical legalisms to dodge settlements, it has shown all the compassion of a particularly nasty coal mine company toward its victims. And there's no sign yet of a change in that. Maybe it will come. Maybe not. But until the church does what any other legal institution harboring criminals and their abettors would do, such speeches amount to empty gestures of piety.

href="http://www.statcounter.com/vbulletin/"
target="_blank"> src="http://c.statcounter.com/5887655/0/f77439f5/1/"
alt="vBulletin statistic"
border="0">

 
 
 

Follow Clay Farris Naff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/claynaff

Imagine the worst. Suppose that you discovered that a member of your family was actually a criminal. Not a petty criminal, mind you, but one whose crimes were truly awful, morally repugnant in every s...
Imagine the worst. Suppose that you discovered that a member of your family was actually a criminal. Not a petty criminal, mind you, but one whose crimes were truly awful, morally repugnant in every s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:47 PM on 06/09/2010
The Catholic Church has been morally bankrupt before the scandals. Unless there is serious change in leadership (doubtful) and acknowledgement of all their problems, the church will either fail or face a new Reformation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
06:04 PM on 05/20/2010
Miguel Servet was a Unitarian and was burned at the stake by the papists. He would not be considered a protestant any more than a Mormon is considered a protestant.

You can't be "sort of Protestant" . Any more than you can be sort of pregnant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:27 PM on 05/20/2010
The Church prelacy has been luxuriating in the myth that the evil public media are simply dragging up stories from the distant past to highlight over and over again. WRONG again. Will the blunders in Rome and the stupidity of bishops and cardinals never cease?

In Germany and Ireland fresh reports have been coming in. In Ireland as many as 200 additional cases have reported just since April of 2009!!!! In Germany, Pope Benedict's older brother, Canon Georg Ratzinger, has even volunteered to be a star witness in the German prosecutions now continuing full blast.

This illustrates the point that abused case victims and families must not lose heart, and should press their legal action against Church authorities with renewed vigor. Don't give the Vatican reason to think these crimes against humanity are going to subside and drift away into the mists of history. Precisely, what Pope Benedict's advisors undoubtedly are telling the old boy.

HANG TOUGH! Your flock loves you Benny!! A miracle will occur and then it will be back to business as usual.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
02:36 PM on 05/20/2010
Ratzinger surely knows what he needs to do - wind up his criminal conspiracy and donate the proceeds to good causes.
02:35 PM on 05/20/2010
And how about if those who have some faith left and burried under the theological / historical
train wreck of the Church would simply convert from the RCC (or any church) to Jesus / God?
Instead of tackling an insurmountable mountain of "faith truths", an incredible compilation of
theology, philosophy and history, not to mention an institution that is based on the
ancient emprical roman law and administration. Time and again such attempts have turned
to a total waste of time.
While on the other hand lapsing by changing over to God can be done with the victory sign
along with visiting the next public library for all the lot of history books etc..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:34 PM on 05/20/2010
"In Hoc Signo Vinces", the new motto for the Catholic laity. Get rid of the Imperial Church with it's Caesarian pretensions, golden hats and golden thrones, and get back to the basics and to the early Church Fathers.

Only the laity can save the Church now.

The old men in Rome and their stooges in the diocesan chanceries are drowning in the excrement of corruption, arrogance, and irrelevancy. Weighed down by their ermine covered cappa magnas, jewelled hats, and lace dresses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:51 PM on 05/20/2010
Back to basics and to the simple core teachings of any faith are the indispensable ingredients to any successful religious reform movement--Christian and non-Christian alike. Always has been and always will be.

Let the dying RCC organizational structure, heir to Neronian, Caesarian , and imperial authoritarianism die and those who labor to prop it up as the central core of the faith.

These old geezers have never been trained to think beyond the 16th century and continue to fight the last wars. They are totally clueless as to the depth of what is happening to the RCC. Therefore, they have no modern weapons to combat it.

As in the 16th century Catholic Counter-Reformation following the Protestant Revolt, they will rely upon frightening the faithful and trying to reverse the defections by calling for a renaissance in PAST art and architecture. Like all good reactionaries and crypto- fascists, the authoritarian hierarchy's return to the past failed to win back the heretics and it will fail again fail in trying to keep Peter's Barque afloat today.

The CHURCH OF THE FUTURE must be built by the laity. It will have little help from the lower clergy. The entire hierarchy from the pope on down must be abolished and reconstituted by direct elections to fixed terms of office. With all Church wealth and it's finances firmly in the hands of the people.
12:17 PM on 05/20/2010
The Church needs to go. Period. Anyone who's read the Gospel of St. Thomas knows that Jesus didn't want a monolithic institution. Just you and God are all that's necessary, you don't need a giant Church. "Split a piece of wood, and I am there. Lift a stone, and you will find me."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:37 PM on 05/20/2010
The Gospel of Thomas is a forgery and a fraud, even it it's own day. All religions become complex and are institutionalized eventually. That is completely unavoidable. Even the simplest examples become organizational behemouths.
10:08 AM on 05/20/2010
I don't see how any morally decent person can be a member of the Catholic Church. I'm an atheist. If I find out any atheist organization I belong to is systematically covering up the rape and torture of children I will immediately renounce my membership. I couldn't live with myself being part of a cult that cares more about its reputation than the welfare of children being tortured in its care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
06:06 PM on 05/20/2010
" If I find out any atheist organization I belong to is systematically covering up the rape and torture of children I will immediately renounce my membership" AND BECOME A BELIEVING CHRISTIAN RIGHT? LOL LOL LOL
photo
Soulmentor
"To thine own self be true...."
01:10 AM on 05/20/2010
The dam is breaking. This continuing RCC scandal reminds me of a book by Episcopal Bishop John Shelby Spong titled WHY CHRISTIANITY MUST CHANGE OR DIE. A past article in HP by a Jesuit Priest made the point that some aspects of the RCC must die before it can change: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rev-james-martin-sj/the-churchs-easter-what-n_b_524349.html
Perhaps one of the most significant things about the RCC that must die is its ubiquitous use of power words. Self aggrandizing titles of Father, Mother, Lord, Excellency, Holiness (god, what a joke), Papa, sheep, flock, have the effect, perhaps the design of making the average catholic feel "less than" while making the leadership feel "more than". The development of hubris and arrogance among the "more than" is self-fulfilling in such a power structured system. Words mean things and those words are clearly power mechanisms, designed to make the average members of the church feel like children who must be instructed and condescended to while making the Priests, Nuns and hierarchy feel like well, Fathers and Mothers and Masters. The hubris leads to blind self-righteousness, and the law-unto-themselves the hierarchy has become. The "simple, humble and poor....like Jesus" church that Rev Martin hopes to see cannot happen until the words are changed.

Of course, then it would no longer be the RCC. The Roman hierarchy is caught in a trap of it's own making.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeeingIs
10:34 AM on 05/20/2010
Thank you for the cogent analysis. I hope you are right and the dam(n) is breaking. I often joke that the RCC doesn't give me what I need, but ruined me for anyone else... Maybe sad, but true.
photo
Soulmentor
"To thine own self be true...."
02:40 PM on 05/20/2010
If you can think that, then your mind is already much recovered and your spirit not far behind. The church teaches us to not believe in ourselves and it is from THAT that we need to recover. We know we must be skeptical of ourselves too, but to totally distrust ourselves to the point where we give up our intellects to another, be it science or religion or humanism, is to deny the God given gift our our intellect and, for me, THAT is the greatest "sin". Indeed, we cannot evolve without it. By this rapidly growing worldwide religious/spiritual dialogue I am reminded almost daily of the words of Galileo before the Inquisition: “ I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forego their use.”

Be at peace with belief in your heart and mind knowing at the same time, that they are not perfect, but that they are your spirit.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
05:54 PM on 05/19/2010
As far as I'm concerned, the Catholic Church has stripped itself of all credibility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidGW
03:48 PM on 05/19/2010
The Catholic church is a man made international political orgasnization. The pope is a politician. If a politician can talk about mom and apple pie (forgiveness and redemption in this case) and do NOTHING he'll do that EVERY time. The last thing a politician wants to do ... is to do something! Ne will never do anything. Nothing will change. (Change is an implied admission that what has been done up to that point is wrong. The pope is NEVER WRONG!!!) And Catholic children will continue to be beat, sodomized, and raped by Catholic priests for the next two millenia. On the "bright side" it's limited to only Catholic children.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
05:54 PM on 05/19/2010
More accurately, the CC is a corporation. The world's oldest corporation, to be precise. If this corporation wanted to be true to Jesus's sermons, it wouldn't force impoverished families to pay tithes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeeingIs
10:36 AM on 05/20/2010
I bet there aren't 3 Catholic famlies worldwide that "tithe". That's for American evangelicals and Mormons.
12:07 PM on 05/20/2010
I studied at a Scholapian school in Spain, and I wasn't sodomized, raped, or beaten by the fathers. As far as I know, none of my mates was, too. I received, in general terms, a very good education, and i'm proud of having studied there. And what about religion? Well, nowadays I'm still a christian, although probably not a Roman Catholic anymore. So, let's say I'm a sort of Protestant. But that's not a problem for me:--there have been many other Protestants in Spain, like Miguel Servet, or Casiodoro de Reina, of Cipriano de Valera... I try to obey the Commandments, and God will judge me. It's as simple as this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
06:01 PM on 05/20/2010
Miguel Servet was a Unitarian. He would not be considered a protestant any more than a Mormon is considered a protestant.

You can't be "sort of Protestant" . Any more than you can be sort of pregnant.
02:18 PM on 05/19/2010
I suppose it's not unusual for a criminal to consider himself a victim.
01:46 PM on 05/19/2010
In the early 1950s, at the School of Art Institute of Chicago we had this saying: He gcould talk a good painting.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Clay Farris Naff
Blogger, science journalist, & author
07:01 AM on 05/20/2010
How wonderfully enigmatic. Or icon, I suppose? Best, CFN
11:18 AM on 05/20/2010
Your comment was most welcomed and appreciated. I was taught: that if someone had the time to share their thoughts on what I said, then I have the time to say thank you.

Enigmatic, iconic, archetypical all share in transcending the consciousness.

May Good gladden your heart, lift your spirits, and nourish you soul. Have a good life.