More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Coleen Rowley

Coleen Rowley

Posted: December 6, 2010 09:20 AM

Do we have to laugh so as to not cry?

Unfortunately, the US corporate PR machine is again triumphing. The naked emperor shoots the little boy trying to yell the truth. About 70% of Americans, misled by their politicians, now declare that ignorance is bliss and they want to see Assange assassinated and WikiLeaks taken out. Only a tiny fraction of critical-thinker-Americans recognize that what they don't know can hurt them.

The last time an administration got 70% of the country to believe a false proposition (that Iraq was behind 9-11), we launched an unending war that has already killed over a million and, in so doing, we shot ourselves in the foot. So unless Americans are willing to take their heads out of the sand, that's about to happen again. We find ourselves in such an Orwellian tragedy, that if we don't laugh, we'll cry.

Note: I agree with the realists that neither those in the White House nor in the Congress are listening. The elected in Washington DC operate in a kind of sound-proof SKIF that encloses those inside the DC Beltway like Maxwell Smart's old "cone of silence". (So the politicians are truly unable to hear anyone outside that bubble and they are deaf to all except their own corporate and special interest funders, which include the powerful Military Industrial Complex war profiteers and also includes the neo-con aligned Likud branch of Israeli warhawks.)

Although a segment of the peace community continues to try, try, try, so as to not be complicit with the war crimes and in order to keep hope alive during the playing out of this tragedy -- and I will be part of a new Veterans for Peace group doing so in Washington DC on December 16, some of whom are going to commit non-violent civil disobedience in front of the White House -- there is a seeming futility of protest, no matter what form it takes. (For more info on the December 16th event, click: StopTheseWars.org/ .)

Our repeated attempts to convince Congress to stop funding have failed over and over in these last 9 years despite all the polls showing a high percentage of Americans want the wars to end. Obviously Congress is well aware of the trillions of dollars going onto the national (now deeply in the red) credit card, bankrupting the U.S. to the point where there is near unanimity in both Congress and the Obama administration to try to "balance the budget" by cutting social security, other social programs including education, and everything else (except wars). Still there are only a small number of congresspersons in the House willing to vote against war/military funding that is consuming half of every tax dollar or make the corporations or "the wealthy" or any American taxpayers pay for it. The anti-war vote in the House has ranged between 30 and 100 and an even lower relative number in the Senate, depending upon the party in power in the White House, not the party in power in Congress. The largest number of anti-war votes came (ironically) when Bush was in power.

Obama made campaign pledges that we would not keep the war funding on a credit card but he quickly reneged on that promise too.

Here's the underlying problem with the suggestion about getting Congress to finally vote to make corporations or the wealthy or just regular US citizens to pay for the wars -- and I've heard that the war debt comes to over $50,000 per each US family at this point. It would require Americans to recognize that their Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other government services (even education, transportation, public safety services, etc.) are now being cut and sacrificed on the altar of war. If the people recognized that their leaders' decisions to continue to fund war was bankrupting the U.S. and making it impossible to fund their "entitlements" and services, then there might arise more pressure on Congress to vote to end the war funding, but right now there doesn't seem to be a way to make people understand the horrible situation they are in. The mainstream media merely transcribes the Pentagon and Obama press releases and fails to investigate as old Woodward and Bernstein once did and tell the harsh truth to the American public.

For the most part, the media seems to view a WikiLeaks truth-telling mechanism and government whistleblowers as trying to upset their easy job of transcribing leaders' press releases. Not surprisingly, much of the press helps shoot the little boy calling the emperor naked. The corporate media is funded by the corporations and wealthy Americans who don't want to pay higher taxes or even pay any taxes and who are largely profiting off the continuing wars.

No one remembers that in the summer of 2001, Richard Clarke was unable to get anyone to pay attention to his plan to stem Al Qaeda terrorism. It seems incomprehensible as we bankrupt ourselves (which, by the way, is and always was Osama Bin Laden's stated goal) that Richard Clarke and others were repeatedly put off during that summer of 2001 when "all their hair was on fire", being told that there was "not one dollar available" for anti-terrorism efforts.

So that's the current horrible situation we find ourselves in at the present moment. The current quagmire devoid of truth on every level is a vortex sucking us all down. A truly independent media mechanism like WikiLeaks and more government whistleblowers would be a huge part of a root solution and that is why those in power are in the process of somehow (whether through assassination or prosecution), taking them out. WikiLeaks had given me a flicker of hope of perhaps getting a sufficient number of Americans to take their heads out of the sand at least long enough to see the danger all around them, their children and grand children; but sadly the Propaganda Machine already has 70% of Americans in agreement that they would prefer not to know the Sorrows of Empire that will befall them (as Chalmers Johnson termed it).

Americans continue like the lemmings in that Apple ad that flopped during the 1985 Superbowl. They are being led blindfolded up to the edge of an abyss and then are, one by one, falling off.

The ad was so stark that it flopped. But if no one takes their blindfold off and stops this insanity, we will all simply fall over the cliff.

(Originally posted on Op-Ed News.)


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:46 PM on 12/07/2010
We are falling off the cliff but we're too numb to recognize it. Thank you for all you've done to help the lemmings see ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Law101
My micro-bio is now full.
02:17 PM on 12/07/2010
Asking Americans to think critically goes against everything they were taught. Unfortunately there are a minority of people able to see past blind faith that the US is always the good guy to seeing things for what they really are.

That is why they are pursuing wikileaks so vigorously. Its not so much that the information itself is damaging, it's that the truths revealed destroy the myth that American foreign policy has anything to do with promoting freedom and democracy. They show that American foreign policy is and always was about expanding our empire and world dominance.
02:05 PM on 12/07/2010
Outstanding article. All good points. I really wish people would pull their heads out of the sand and pay attention to what is going on around them, instead of acting like lemmings.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:59 AM on 12/07/2010
With Respect,
1) No intel officials in any country in the world believes the Islamic radicals want peace, so we just need to adjust and be more efficient dealing with them. This a fact of life. 2) Tax revenues are decreasing as technology increases the availability of cheap labor around the world our wars could be easily paid with increased output by capturing the cheap labor in our hemisphere, creating an daily "Labor wage" of $4-6 hour for immigrants and capturing the tax revenue on 5 million plus workers and it gives American businesses the chance to finance new businesses in this hemisphere. 3) Radicals like Bin laden underestimates the fact that Americans build slowly into a war fighting country, in some circles it's even considered an "export" and the raw materials and labor are readily available in volunteer mode. As for radicals, when their communication functions are completely degraded they are gonna run out of guys. They can't recruit without communications. Whereas a draft mode (which is really what we need to do next) the capabilities of our armed forces are more than capable of managing radicals in any part of the world in six months. The other option: withdraw (as you suggest) until we are throwing tactical nukes at each other.
Take your pick lady.
Denvergoat
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:50 PM on 12/07/2010
We're making enemies with our actions (and our words). Bin Laden had a rag-tag group in 2000. Not any more.
09:45 AM on 12/07/2010
Great article . . thank you for posting . . Americans are going to have to mobilize big time and march on DC . . . that is the only way . . . but sadly for the moment most seem content to sit in front of the boob tube and be told what to think . . . it is a sick and tragic situation . . meanwhile the war machine is eating up their future and their grandchildren's futures . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
signgrrl
typeface geek
11:56 AM on 12/07/2010
yes, we owe trillions (and counting) to China, for iraq & afghanistan, they are not in the budget at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oldbull 56
06:59 AM on 12/07/2010
An excellent article that tells it like it is. I hope your demonstration is a success but I don't see it getting much press, they're too busy doing just what you suggest, keeping our blindfolds on. It's a shame that a Rally to restore Sanity and a Rally for whatever purpose Beck's rally was for, garners thousands of attendees, when an anti-war demonstration struggles to find participants. I hope that I am wrong and thanks again for trying to lift the blindfolds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheRock Barkat
04:06 AM on 12/07/2010
I am for a war on Iran Colleen, not for America to go to war but the country making all the accusations and trying to push us into a war. Let them sacrifice their kids. My kids stay here.

Let the country with the biggest nukes in the ME do its own dirty work if they want to be the only ones with the big guns. My sympathies end there.
02:06 PM on 12/07/2010
Right - because war in the ME has gone SO well so far. Uh huh.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Coleen Rowley
retired FBI agent/legal counsel
01:04 AM on 12/07/2010
And now the U.S. Library of Congress is blindfolding its own congressional research service analysts! CRS analysts are not allowed to access the information contained in the WikiLeaks. Here's the article about blocking access to our own analysts (who have clearances, by the way): http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/12/crs_block.html

"In fact, if CRS is “Congress’s brain,” then the new access restrictions could mean a partial lobotomy."

This knee-jerk government reaction is simply so self-defeating or as Steven Aftergood said, "it's insane".
09:46 AM on 12/07/2010
fanned and fav'd Coleen . . it is totally insane and counterproductive . . . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linda Williams
12:57 PM on 12/07/2010
F&F Keep writing.
photo
leftLibertarian
reefer+java=groovy
10:36 PM on 12/06/2010
Thank you.
05:15 PM on 12/06/2010
Nothing changes until enough Americans are hungry....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
signgrrl
typeface geek
11:57 AM on 12/07/2010
and homeless . . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheIndependenceParty
Cranky yankee and a rehabilitated ex-Republican
05:08 PM on 12/06/2010
Thank you Agent Rowley. It is frightening the the level to which this vendetta against Assange has escalated. I wrote facetiously that the US would probably declare him an "enemy combatant" so as to render him to Gitmo, ... and within hours Newt Gingrich had suggested that very thing on a Sunday talk show. Foggy Bottom has gone berserk on this one and is spending an incredible amount of diplomatic capital with such non-committal allies as Sweden and Switzerland. Keep Roman Polanski, a convicted pedophile, but catch Julian Assange at all cost for unprotected consensual sex with two women, one of the 30 year olds reported to be a paid CIA informant, the other a gender affairs officer in a University. Most Wanted criminal my eye!

There are ways to encrypt files that precludes them being opened without a security key code or smart card, ... leaving them gibberish to all but the intended target. I use it every day in my work and I suggest Secretary Clinton go to an office supply store and buy it for Christmas for her staff around the world.

Or perhaps our government would rather keep this tantrum up a while longer, bloviating about Assange being a traitor when he is not even an American, ... all the while gauging how incredibly compliant we Americans have become at allowing the government to pull the wool over our eyes about everything.

The blind allegiance of the rabid, to protecting our government
09:47 AM on 12/07/2010
10 xs fanned The Independence Party . . . . ditto
04:44 PM on 12/06/2010
Great article! While Wikileaks is embarrassing - it is not lethal, and the American public should think critically about the information put in front of them. Diane Vacca comments on it here:
http://womensvoicesforchange.org/wikileaks-embarrassing-yes-lethal-no-video.htm

Concluding that "Washington, however, will have to accommodate the new reality of the modern information age: leaks are unavoidable, and they can’t be efficiently plugged. Nor should they be by a society that values its freedom."
03:43 PM on 12/06/2010
This article is dead on! The American media is pathetic and stopped informing the public many many years ago. They are basically secretaries for whatever government department that wants to use them so naturally they are reacting with fear and hate against Wikileaks which exposes their corruption and uselessness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hiqutipie
Independent... Don't talk just Kiss ...
02:22 PM on 12/06/2010
Nice Work Coleen!!!

"A Head in the Sand is Better then 2 Hands on the Truth"

The propaganda machine of the government has done such a great job of keeping the focus on the messenger and how terrible he is that the message "Truth" fades into the facade. The irony lies in the perception. The government has known this for 7 months and did nothing to Assange. If Assange had done something criminal they would have charged him. The government instead waited to get public opinion on their side to launch an all out illegal personal & cyber assault on an innocent man. Like him or not it's a "Free Speech" issue.

Welcome to Cyberwars & Battle for the Truth. Governments have suppressed the truth about banks, capitalism & political corruption to protect each other that the only way to get to the truth is through Hackers. So now you have Hackers on the right trying to expose the truth battling government hackers (old friends) fighting to hide the truth while the media chases Sarah Palin & DWTS around for crumbs.

This is what Iceland had 2 do to uncover bank corruption that was being protected by government & law: http://tiny.cc/29ola

"Hack the Planet"

Hackers 2 the left of me hackers to the right & here I am suck in the middle with you...
01:57 PM on 12/06/2010
Coleen you succinctly express our current national dilemma. As the Pentagon Papers helped reveal truths about the Vietnam War, the Wiki Leaks revelations are a potential eye opener for the current era. While you report 70% of the people are against Wiki Leaks, I hope people will gradually realize that the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and now Pakistan and Yemen are parts of an imperialist geopolitical chess game over resources and corporate access to them. While our military is used to benefit corporations and move towards a New World Order with the elite in control around the planet a recent poll of US citizens shows that most want the Bush tax cuts extended only for those making less than $250,000. In addition voters in many Minnesota School Districts rejected new levies that were proposed to make up for reduced state aid for schools. At the end of the local District 196 survey call I responded that the District was not facing the reality that the school's funding had been drained away by the Wars. In my economics class some years ago the phrase used was “Guns or butter.” In fact the pressures on entitlements and other social services are a result of the Wars. That people are saying that the elite should not be given another tax cut extension gives me hope. Thank you for being so articulate in expressing how we are letting our country, the great experiment in democratic ways, go bankrupt both financially and morally.