A recent article in People magazine asked the following questions "What's happening at Fort Bragg?" and "Is the Army doing enough to protect its women?" Three female soldiers from the nation's largest army base have been murdered in the past six months allegedly by spouses or boyfriends that have served time in Iraq. These homicides echo the Fort Bragg murders of 2002 in which four Army wives were killed by their soldier husbands-three having just returned from Afghanistan. I could focus on how the military fails by not taking domestic violence seriously enough. That's clearly the case. However, in each of these cases there were warning signs which look eerily similar to symptoms of PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder). I believe many of these domestic violence cases are a direct consequence of untreated PTSD.
Violence is inherent in the military culture. If we couldn't train soldiers to kill, we wouldn't be in the position to defend ourselves as a nation very effectively. I get that. The problem becomes how do we, as a country, address the issues these brave men and women face upon their return from war, where violence was considered necessary, to home where violence is inappropriate yet still just as lethal? Here are a few examples to illustrate the vast differences between combat life and home life, and why it can be so difficult to adjust to civilian life:
In Combat: Maintaining control of weapons and gear.
At Home: Too controlling. Becoming angry when someone messes with your stuff. Nobody cares about doing things right. Back home, the small details are no longer important. Family decisions are best shared.
In Combat: No one understands your experiences except your buddies who were there (cohesion). Bonds with fellow soldiers that will last a lifetime.
At Home: Withdrawal. Avoiding friends and family. Friends and family changed while you were away; re-establishing these bonds takes time.
In Combat: Targeted aggression involves making split second decisions that are lethal. The enemy is the target.
At Home: Inappropriate aggression e.g. snapping at your kids, buddies, or your NCO; assault or spouse abuse. Back home, there are no enemies.
In Combat: Armed at all times. It's dangerous to be unarmed.
At Home: Urge to be armed continues. It's dangerous to be armed.
In Combat: Controlling your emotions is critical for mission success. Controlling emotions is necessary.
At Home: Failing to display emotions (detaching), or only showing anger, hurts relationships. Limiting your emotions lead to relationship failures.
In Combat: Talk about mission only with those who need to know (OPSEC).
At Home: Soldiers may avoid sharing their deployment experiences with loved ones. The need to know now includes friends and family. It is important to share your story with loved ones.
In Combat: Your responsibility in combat is to survive and do your best to keep your buddies alive. Life and death decisions...in the heat of battle.
At Home: Guilt. Feel you have failed your buddies if they were killed or seriously injured. Bothered by memories. Learn from what happened..without second guessing.
In Combat: Unpredictable fast driving to avoid IEDs. Driving fast avoids danger.
At Home: Aggressive driving leads to speeding, accident, fatalities back home, driving fast "feels right" but is dangerous.
In Combat: Survival depends on discipline and obeying orders. Giving and following orders involves a clear chain of command which does not exist in families.
At Home: Too rigid. Trying to order around family and friends causes conflict.
In Combat: Alcohol use was limited.
At Home: Alcohol is now plentiful. Many soldiers use alcohol as a way to cope with deployment experiences, but this is not healthy. Learn to relax without using alcohol. 1
After reviewing this information it was obvious to me why it is inherently difficult for combat vets to return home, not just for some, but for most. They have seen the horrors of war- images most of us cannot even imagine. Add to that exposure to IED's (improvised explosive device) wherein the soldier is exposed to an explosive device that, if they survive, can leave permanent brain injury.
Then add to that, the suspension of "right and wrong" and the loosening of moral codes. The example I'm thinking of is the systematic torture by US soldiers and other government agents of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Make no mistake, these were not crimes perpetrated by a handful of rogue soldiers. These torture crimes were being committed by and condoned by the highest level of military intelligence. At first glance, I was disgusted by the pictures thinking that these men and women lacked any kind of conscience and morality. But when I heard the conditions of the prison were such that they were being bombed and targeted by enemy shells almost daily inside the prison, my PTSD alarm bells started ringing!
These soldiers will not just miraculously recover once they are returned to "normalcy". I heard one soldier say that "When we go over there, we consider ourselves already dead. If we return home, then we are lucky, but otherwise, we couldn't do what we need to do unless we are already gone."
The way I see it not only do we need more programs to evaluate and treat their PTSD, but in doing so, we need to help them acculturate to what has become a distant and foreign concept- home.
"Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind....War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today." John F. Kennedy
1 Walter Reed Institute of Research Land Combat Study Team, U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, Update 13 September 06 (www.battlemind.com)
These are not just the philosophical musings of a new...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
The Obamas dropped by the Vatican on Friday, with daughters...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I never actually heard the words made famous by a certain man on a certain TV show. Instead I got a lot...
Jim Hansen is director of the NASA Goddard Institute for...
Don't write off Saint Sarah all you political pundits,...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
Think Progress flags David Brooks telling...
While we of course do not claim to know anyone's thoughts, we nominate these...
The Daily Show's John Oliver is unhappy with mainstream journalism, and even drearier...
For this week's installment of their "Lunch with the FT" feature the...
Al Franken's been anointed as Minnesota's junior senator, but how did the...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
"What's for dinner?" A lot of us ask that question right...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Everyone is ignoring the REAL issue- THERE ARE TOO FEW CARRYING THE BURDEN OF THIS WAR!Military service in this country should be mandatory- minimum 3 years service - NO DEFERMENTS for ANY reason- those not physically fit for combat to be required to serve in support capacities. I guarantee- if EVERYONES child was in the military our veterans would receive the best care (not to mention we would be much more careful about going to war in the first place) It makes me sick- we've known since ww11 that after one deployment in a combat zone, 30% suffer PTSD's, after the second deployment, 98% suffer PTSD's-third tour it's 100%- yet we are sending these poor troops 4 or more times into combat and then fail to offer immediate & effective treatment for an injury we know every single one of them is suffering with. Most Americans don't worry about this-they are completely unaware & unconcerned- it's not their kid. Hell, most Americans forget there's a war going on! Most nights it's not even on the prime time news.
Fascinating, yet saddening article. Thanks for the info!
Thank you for your article Colleen, because after reading it, I'm wondering who is responsible for the mental health of our vets? We've seen what happens when the military is responsible, and if we wait for the military or our government to step up to the plate to establish a vets coming home program, we will be entering a new century. So, who are the "we?" Here are some of my thoughts: I believe the "we" include anyone in the mental health profession including the American Red Cross and others involved in the well being of others. Why isn't the mental health field offering (affordable) PTSD training to the mental health workers or, making it a mandatory requirement of our training? As a MFT and art therapist, I would welcome training in this area. I would like to see the APA, CAMFT, AAMFT put into place training programs for those interested in working with veterans. How can we get a program like this going?
Iraq War veteran and Illinois Veterans Affairs Director Tammy Duckworth is at the forefront of this epidemic condition of rehabilitating our service men and women both physically and mentally. Whether she becomes the next senator from Illinois or remains in her current position, she will continue to dedicate herself to this cause with irrefutable authenticity. On Veteran's Day last, President-elect Obama said: "Let us rededicate ourselves to keep a sacred trust with all who have worn the uniform of the United States of America: that America will serve you as well as you have served your country." He said this while standing beside Major Duckworth.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or