Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page:  « First  ‹ Previous  2 3 4 5 6  Next ›  Last »  (56 total)
01:25 PM on 09/30/2012
Does a naked duchess look essentially different than a naked commoner?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:04 PM on 09/30/2012
I suspect not.

Although I wager that the existence of pre-duchess naked photos would tend to delay or cancel the duchessing process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurt Mundt
Interesting world we live in, eh?
08:39 PM on 09/30/2012
Ah, that Royal Flesh. And no, not really, especially if that commoner is better looking or more pert.
01:21 PM on 09/30/2012
Topless - while at a private residence with her husband? How scandalous...NOT ! If you cant be naked with your husband, when can you be naked? On the other hand, you know you're being watched every second of every day with long range telephoto lenses. you should be more careful what you do and where you do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ursomonie
Republicans have lost their minds.
01:17 PM on 09/30/2012
I will not pay attention to any of these pictures. I have already seen the Family Jewels. They are in the tower. Those are the only royal goodies that are worth gawking at. Although Harry was quite hunky. I'd like to see more of those.
viciousvirago
Veritatum Dilexi
12:56 PM on 09/30/2012
No, the Duchess was not exactly Ms. Goodie Two Shoes before she married the Prince, but they both knew that and his Princeness had been known to party hearty.

There is a limit as to the invasion of privacy photographers should be allowed to break and I feel sorry for her that millions will see what should not be seen except by her husband and her doctor.

Privacy doesn't exist anymore. I found that out sunbathing nude at my pool when a police helicopter swooped so low the rotor wind was like a hurricane. I had a headset on and didn't hear the approach and found out too late. I'm sure they got a good view. It bothered me enough to call the state police (which is what the guys were) and complained and was told that it wouldn't happen again. But it did, repeatedly. After that, I thought if they wanna get a look at a 50 year old woman naked lying near her pool, that's fine with me.

But some things are meant to be private and that includes intimate moments between husband and wife.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:29 PM on 09/30/2012
Being a nobody (in comparison to Kate Middleton) sunbathing nude by your pool where it takes a helicopter to invade your privacy is one thing.

Being a young, beloved, and good looking public figure who knows people love to take pictures of you and going naked where obviously somebody could see you, private estate or not, is another.

There is a limit to reasonable expectations of privacy. Naked in your bedroom with the blinds closed is reasonable. Being naked outside where somebody not on your property can see you is not. If you don't want people to take pictures of you naked, don't go outside in the buff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Common Sense Conservativ
Neither 1% nor 99% - just 100% American
05:26 PM on 09/30/2012
You do realize that the photos were taken from a mile away with a super telophoto lens right? Princess or not, even celebrities should have the right to do as they please on private property when they have gone to great lengths to ensure seclusion and privacy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CabCurious
let's be honest
06:43 PM on 09/30/2012
And this wasn't their property.

It was FRANCE. :)
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:01 PM on 09/30/2012
Oh wow nudity! That's a first. I'll only be interested if she was caught having sex in public
03:50 PM on 09/30/2012
especially if it was sex with someone other than her prince, now that would be a story.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sallyslide
retired, female
11:33 AM on 09/30/2012
There will always be slugs in the world who like to make money any way they can off of this family or any public person. I think the princess will have to be cautious in every way possible to have any kind of normalcy in her life. Maybe this is a lesson learned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rker321
11:13 AM on 09/30/2012
I don't agree with any of that type of picture taking,but, These Royals will have to realize that anything that they do, will be seen and critcizedby everyone, They live in the public eye, so that is a consequence that they have to deal with.
They should have realized that they would be seen by someone being naked. and those are things that you no longer are allowed to do. no matter how much you think your privacy should be respected. because there will be always someone that will not do so..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Namechange
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
12:13 PM on 09/30/2012
Exactly what I have been saying all along. They should know better. I bet the Queen is not amused.
12:14 PM on 09/30/2012
While the royals live in the public eye, and expect to be photographed and scrutinized while in public, these photographs are an invasion of privacy. The royal couple were at secluded private residence on vacation. The photos were taken from some 15 blocks away with a telephoto lens. Royals, public figures and celebrities are entitled to privacy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rker321
04:43 PM on 10/01/2012
The paparazi doesn't respect those terms or limits, and because the public is always there to see whatever the pictures that they take, they will always take the risk no matter what. therefore their expectancy of privacy for them is more of an illusion.than a reality
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SnapShots
Look me in the eyes and say that.
10:58 AM on 09/30/2012
Being chases around by paparazzi all the time would really suckazz.
12:10 PM on 09/30/2012
It's the life she chose.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SnapShots
Look me in the eyes and say that.
01:11 PM on 09/30/2012
No, people don't choose that. She chose the life, but she didn't choose that.
03:51 PM on 09/30/2012
I would take it in stride if i didn't have a thing in the world to worry about like the rent or insurance or food.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chattabox
Moringa plant and seed supplier, Web design, Video
10:40 AM on 09/30/2012
Se og Hør had been promising to print the Kate photos since earlier in the month: "It's a set of unique photos from an A-class celebrity," Se og Hør Editor Kim Henningsen told the Belfast Telegraph. "We are a leading gossip magazine in Denmark, and it is my job to publish them. If the British royal family want to sue us, then it will happen then and we'll deal with it."

Way to go...if they truly needed privacy knowing they were in the Public eye then find some, they live off other people's hard work so they should be able to afford a more private area, or did the do like Kim K ? hmmmm Publicity stunt....just stating.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chattabox
Moringa plant and seed supplier, Web design, Video
10:38 AM on 09/30/2012
The Duchess should be a pinup for Playboy.

BTW the Royal Family, don't really care much.
photo
Randomizer
Living my life like a schnook.
10:36 AM on 09/30/2012
When do we get the MRI or the ultrasound when she gets pregnant? Nudity is so passe!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jacey Smythe
10:32 AM on 09/30/2012
Kate MIddleton is an elegant classy young lady. These rags are pathetic, it seems more interested to attempt to tarnish her clean and pristine image than anything else. But the excitment has worn off, and it is not Kate that is exposed, but these rag mags for the garbage they are...those that would like to see such worthless media vanish just opt out from any future purchase or consideration.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaBUU
Macro-bio won't fit...
12:50 PM on 09/30/2012
Sunbathing in the nude just screams elegant and classy. Classy means not going outside naked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LindaK9975
Life is an experience
12:58 AM on 10/01/2012
Really? I equate classy with how one treats others. There is nothing wrong with being naked outdoors on a private estate. She wasn't running down the street naked. Kate is still learning just how far the papparazzi is willing to go to sell pictures of her. I seriously doubt she will do it again out of fear. What a shame, not being able to relax for even a few minutes or hours while on vacation. I'm sorry this happened to her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
10:24 AM on 09/30/2012
First. its topless photos
Then its bottomless photos.
I'm begining to think that underneath all them cloths, that lady is completely naked!!
The Queen will not be amused
10:22 AM on 09/30/2012
Who is Kate Middleton, and why is she important?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaBUU
Macro-bio won't fit...
12:51 PM on 09/30/2012
I think she's a female soccer player.
photo
GetonBoard
Riding an electron in someones' Atom!
02:42 PM on 09/30/2012
Royal familys' nude pin-up girl. And to top it off, the English people foot all the expenses for her photo shoots.