Deep within the jungle of Papua New Guinea I gripped a milk-white larvae as its black pinchers pulsed back and forth -- it was dinner. My host Samuel assured me, "take a bite, tastes like chicken!" I was completing the final phase of "Last One Standing," a BBC series that followed six Westerners on a journey to live and eat with 12 tribes around the world. The meal of grubs interested me a bit more than the others -- this journey was my mission to get to the bottom of nutrition.
The traditional peoples of every habitable continent taught me a lot about subsistence -- we threw grenades to catch fish, castrated baby goats, spear-hunted wild boar with rebar poles, even dined on blood and bones. I bore witness to food as a tool for survival.
I returned determined to study more closely how nutrition affected the body at peak performance. I committed to the training regimens of bodybuilders, lifting six days a week, four hours a day, while constantly monitoring the results of changes in my diet.
Protein seemed to be the key ingredient, but I wanted to know why. Through laboratory research, I pursued an objective conclusion on the biochemistry of soy and other protein sources -- only to find myself incredibly frustrated with overly simplistic and inconclusive nutritional lab science.
To discover how it was that science seemed to know so little, but products claimed so much, I earned a living bagging groceries to study the inner workings of our modern food supply system.
What I discovered surprised me: The "secrets" to nutrition I was looking for did not exist -- not hidden in the Amazon, not in carefully calculated protein and vitamin supplements and not in choosing certain packaged foods over others. The nutrition truths that unfolded were simple and profound. Most we've known all along.
Science Can't Tell Us Much About What We Should Eat
The petri dishes, burn calorimeters and lab rats of nutritional science reveal very little about the complex workings of the human body.
One thing we do know: diet matters. Half of worldwide deaths and painful diseases are from causes where diet is a significant risk factor. There are thousands of startling associations between dietary factors and disease.
Pinpointing which of these factors are most useful for improving human health is a different issue. Numerous studies claim that certain foods and behaviors are healthy. Unfortunately, nutrition chemistry is just too complicated to make these claims. Studies are nearly always exaggerated, contradicted or overlook serious confounding factors.
To get accurate data, we would need to directly study humans in a controlled fashion over lifetimes. The barriers are obvious: ethics, willing subjects and a lot of time.
Using this as the standard, I focused my research on the next best things. 1) I observed and shared a hunter-gatherer subsistence diet with 12 tribes around the world. 2) I practiced the athletic training diets developed by elite athletes to manage performance. 3) I studied the conclusions of human nutrition surveys that used the largest sample sizes. 4) I researched the known dietary patterns of our closest relatives, chimpanzees.
The Most Important And Consistent Nutrition Principle
Eat mainly raw fruits and vegetables! We've heard this message our entire lives, but few of us follow it. In fact, we ignore it to our own detriment. This principle has more power to defend our bodies against disease, provide us with stable energy and develop fitness than anything else does. Other diets do some of those things, but only this one does them all, because we have been built for it.
We share 99.7 percent of our DNA with chimpanzees(2). They eat 66 percent fruit, 27 percent vegetables, 3 percent seeds, 4 percent prey -- all of it raw. Our dental formula is exactly the same(3), but our digestive system is about 1/3 smaller(4) because we've developed tools like cooking to make our food denser. Our bodies are engineered for eating mainly fruits and vegetables: about 2/3 raw and 1/3 cooked(5).
It's no fluke that our diet has converged on fruits and veggies. For 100 million years, flowering plants have been perfecting their ovaries to become the most tempting and nutritional food for animals. The better food the plants produce, the more we survive to spread their seeds(6), and the more they survive(7).
And survive they have -- by weight alone, our crops outnumber us by over 20 to 1. Flowering plants have used us to dominate the globe. The champions at this -- tomatoes, apples, carrots, cabbage, citrus, avocados, lettuce, etc. -- have survived because they are our healthiest foods. Healthiest only when they are eaten fresh and raw -- not when canned, juiced, extracted or processed.
We've tried to reproduce the healthy components in the lab, but plants have just been in the game too long. They have developed unique phytonutrients and techniques for high vitamin solubility that we will still be puzzling over for at least the next century. Despite attempts to extract these compounds for supplements, plant nutrients remain much more effective when consumed raw and whole(8).
As a result, raw fruits and vegetables are heroes at fighting disease. People who eat five or more servings daily have half the cancer risk of those who eat only two(9).
Plants Know More Than We Do About What We Should Eat
We humans are organisms at the end of a several-billion-year-long history of evolution. Our window of existence is so very small, and our experience even less. We have a lot of new ideas about nutrition, but most changes in the natural world are harmful to their hosts and we should be cautious about taking our own advice.
When you make choices about things that will directly affect your survival -- like what to put in and on your body -- you should be highly selective. Stick with the things that are tried and true (and I don't mean choose products that have passed seven years of drug testing). The entire science of chemistry has only been around for the last 3 percent of human history, which is only 0.0002 percent of life's history!
The few things that have stood the test of time should be cherished. We know that all animals consistently rely on raw food, lots of water, regular sleep and exercise. These lessons from natural history are the most powerful tools we know. Don't get fooled by efforts to make them more complicated. Return to these principles every time you consider new food products, supplements, diets and even new scientific studies. Despite their claims, most of these things have hidden interests other than your health.
Two years ago I founded the not-for-profit company CORE Foods to try to create a food system without hidden interests. I targeted nutrition bars, because I see their proliferation as a major threat to human health. In the course of this project, I learned many ways in which our modern food system is not the way it seems and I am compelled to share some of my discoveries. Please stay tuned.
Chimps don't consult diet books -- you don't need to, either. We wouldn't be here today if we weren't already experts at these enduring health lessons. With a little information and self-awareness you can reawaken the powerfully honed sense of what is healthy that lies deep within you. Start by considering whether your typical food and lifestyle choices fall within the few enduring health principles that have stood the test of time.
Footnotes:
(2) Mary-Claire King, Protein polymorphisms in chimpanzee and human evolution, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (1973).
(3) Peter, Bernhard. (1943) The Evolution of Mammalian Molar Teeth. Boulder, University of Colorado.
(4) Wrangham, Richard. (2010) Cooking with Fire. Houghton Mifflin.
(5) That being said, we can expect to see some changes in our dental formula and physiology as a result of our development of agriculture and industrialization, though it takes about 15-20,000 years for this to occur, and we're not there yet. (Gould, S. J. (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard University Press.)
(6) Michael Pollan. (2001) The Botany of Desire. Random House.
(7) Ridley, I.N. (1930) The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. Reeve.
(8) Nestle, Marion. (2006). What to Eat. North Point. Page 477
(9) Nestle, Marion. (2006). What to Eat. North Point. Page 62
Follow Corey Rennell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/COREfoods
Basic Principles of Nutrition and Diet
Nutrition Principles and Recommendations in Diabetes
Principles of Nutrition and Nutrition Facts for Healthy Eating
You make a great point, and many people could benefit greatly from it.
elcerritan,
You are absolutely correct that obesity is not the only factor related to human health, but it is a big one, and at the moment, widespread. Obesity is "a leading preventable cause of death worldwide" (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18000969). 1.1 billion adults are overweight (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16198769). Obesity is most commonly caused by excessive energy food energy intake. Eating mainly raw fruits and vegetables can do a great service to limit this.
You certainly could.
The type of person who'd limit their diet like that in this day and age probably won't.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goat
http://www.lovingfit.com
Weston Price's research was monumental! It was definitely a blueprint for my own journey. While we came to slightly different conclusions about the optimal proportions of food groups, as you say, nutrition passionate folks will debate that forever. The main point is exactly as you outlined, eat real food--it doesn't really matter what you eat as long as it's produce. Growing your own food does a tremendous service to you, the food system, the environment, and our cultural traditions.
The few who choose a Raw, Sprouted & Fermented diet will thrive & survive, if the Toxic ones who "Live to Eat" as opposed to "Eating to Live" don't dominate with their Toxic Thoughts resulting from Toxic Livers.
I had a "Tripping Revelation" that FIRE is associated with Hell/Bad, resulting in the destruction of LIFE. Solar Cookers, below the temperature that destroys Enzymes seems KEY. Just sprout staples first to shorten cooking time.
If I could trust that the steak I'm eating didn't drink contaminated ground water or eat contaminated food I'd eat it raw, or at the most slightly seared 100% of the time.
We've created an environment that forces us to be less healthy.
Humans evolved to digest cow milk within just a handful of generations because being able to do was a hugely advantageous to survival. So it stands to reason that many mode adaptations happened in the hundreds of thousands of generations since our and the chimpanzee's ancestors split. It's well known that Asians digest soy proteins better than Europeans and Africans, just another example.
Thank you for your comments! We are amazingly adaptive organisms and able to survive under a myriad of circumstances and diets. That being said it is estimated that it takes between 12-15,000 years for our digestive physiology to fully respond to changes in diet (Gould, S. J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard University Press.). While you are absolutely correct that dairy products are high energy foods that provide an advantage in food scarce environments, we are not yet fully adapted to process them. (We began consuming dairy products as early as 9000 BC (Bellwood, Peter. 2005. "The Beginnings of Agriculture in Southwest Asia". Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 44–68)
Dairy products have still unclear associations with cancers (Food Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer AICR 1997, Talamini R, Br J Cancer 1986 Jun;53(6):817-21, Chan JM, Semin Cancer Biol 1998, Aug;8(4):263-73) and osteoporosis (American Journal of Epidemiology 1994;139, American Journal of Public Health 1997;87, Calif Tissue Int 1992;50, Science 1986;233(4763)).
The fact that "approximately 75% of the world's population loses the ability to completely digest a physiological dose of lactose after infancy" (Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2000. PMID 10812376) is a clear indicator that human lactase enzyme production has a long ways to go before we are fully adapted to dairy products. In the US alone at least 50 million people experience discomfort after ingestion (Postgraduate Medicine, 1994;95)
"This just in from the world of intelligence called “common sense”: what you eat really, really matters for how healthy and happy you will be. We make such a mystery of eating well and we dis-empower ourselves by thinking it complicated – leaving it to “experts” with degrees in excess-information. When, really, it’s a pretty simple affair."
continued: http://www.energyofmindtherapy.com/body-mind-connection/common-sense-eating-for-health-and-happiness/
-Yogi
Energy of Mind: A Sauhu Therapy.
www.energyofmindtherapy.com
Natural Wisdom for Optimal Health and Happiness:
We can do more than just talk about it!
Also a good general rule for those of us who deal in research - "studies" that are not peer-reviewed are in fact not reliable scientific works at all. The China Study is not a study at all. It's a book published by a vanity press because it never would have stood up to real peer-review.
My agenda is simple. Truth and health. The China Study is missing both those key components.
For a couple of succinct critiques of the book, see the following (and there are even more detailed and devastating critiques out there):
http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/cancer/the-china-study-vs-the-china-study/#more-4213
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/385/
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/the-china-study-revisited/
Thanks so much for your comments! The China Study is definitely a controversial work. It is undisputed, however, that there are associations between dietary factors and disease--Campbell's book has a good collection of them in the footnotes, there are thousands more. That being said, many of them are contradictory and as a result I choose not to reference anything more than their existence. In my research, meat plays an important role in the human diet, but not the dominant one.
If I walk into a room and see that most of the people in it are sick, and then I look and see that most of them are also drinking green tea, have I just shown that green tea made them sick?
The answer is of course not. Yet that's how valid 99% of the claims in the China Study are. And the reality is that most of the claims are made in the book by the same name, not the study itself. A book, which makes limited reference to a very poor study, and then goes on to give opinions as though they are facts.
I think the benefits of a primarily plant based diet are quite obvious, though I don't know that we can meet all of our nutritional needs solely through plants. I think this is especially true when we consider the continuation of our species...I work in maternity care and through everything I have learned, it's very difficult, if not impossible for women to really meet their own and a growing baby's nutritional needs through a vegan diet, though lacto-ovo vegetarianism seems possible, though still difficult.
I do fully agree that our species has lost our way when it comes to food, and that most of what we are eating at least in the United States, doesn't really resemble food anymore. We need real food, mostly plants.
Eating only plants is great for a time, and for people who aren't pregnant. I think that childbearing is just one time in life where it is especially important to get good animal sources. From my own looking into anthropology, most traditional cultures have special foods given to pregnant women and almost all of them are animal products. Plus, most pregnant women crave meat, or more of it than they normally do! I still think there is a reason for that :)
Thanks for your comments and thank you for all the work you do for new moms! Eating mainly raw fruits and vegetables was the most consistent and important principle that I encountered. 'Mainly' is more than 50%. As to what the other proportion of the diet should be, humans across the world thrive with all different constituents. In my experience with traditional people, they all consumed some meat (and chimpanzees eat 4% prey).
wondering that Eskimos in Artic and Reinder herders in northern Europe include in the 12 Tribrs?
I was unfortunately not able to live with traditional people in the Arctic, though I grew up on Kodiak Island in Alaska and am very familiar with their history and foods. Their diets are a great representation of the adaptive abilities of the human organism to utilize diverse sources of energy and
Developing CORE Foods has definitely been an important part of my journey and I look forward to sharing more about it. While I currently work full time for CORE, it is a not-for-profit and I do not personally benefit from sales.