What's the deal with wondering what can be done about corporate excess? Occupy Wall Street protesters are getting slammed for supposedly having no solutions, but there are plenty.
Tax computer-generated trades. Abolish subprime mortgages. De-regulate shareholder lawsuits. End corporate tax loopholes. Encourage employee ownership. Punish exporting jobs. And how about nominating a Supreme Court that doesn't equate corporate dollars with free speech for the purpose of legalizing bribery?
Decades of politicians giving corporations every imaginable thing they wanted provides a litany of particulars for reform. Just because protesters are focused on identifying the problem doesn't mean that there aren't solutions to talk about.
Craig blogs daily at Trail Mix on craigcrawford.com
Follow Craig Crawford on Twitter: www.twitter.com/craig_crawford
BTW, while we're at it, can someone go to the nearest bar and explain to John Boehner that the "Buffett Rule" is named for Warren, not Jimmy?
In the U.S., shareholder control was ebbing even before the movie "Solid Gold Cadillac" was filmed and released. Since the 80s exec-friendly & crony capitalism/interlocking boards have become ubiquitous, if not the rule.
Who holds the most subprime mortgages? Try the Fannies - Mac & Mae - owned in reality by the federal government.
End corporate tax loopholes - absolutely. AND end private citizen loopholes ala the mortgage interest deduction.
Encourage employee ownership - absolutely. AND hold employee owners responsible ala the Enron fiasco where employees "believed" that their investment would double every year.
Gary brumback
www.uschamberofdemocracy.com
Gary Brumback
www.democracypowernow.blogspott.com