I don't trust this justice department to give parking tickets without some evil hidden agenda.
Something odd happened in Texas just a few days ago. Tracy Barker, a former Halliburton employee who was sexually assaulted by her co-workers, had her case against Halliburton thrown out by a Bush-appointed federal judge. So why is this odd?
Well, actually, it may seem odd, but it's no longer unusual. The courts--designed to protect the minority from the majority, and often the last resort for people to vindicate their rights--are closing their doors to millions of Americans and sending some of them to secret arbitrations. In about 94% of the arbitrations involving what happened on the job, the employers win, and the employee is forced to pay the arbitrator just to hear their claims, as well the employer's legal expenses. Oh, and I forgot to mention that the arbitrator is chosen by the employer. Sound just?
As first reported by ABC News, Tracy Barker arrived in Baghdad in September 2004 to begin work for KBR, then a subsidiary of Halliburton. Not long after she arrived, Tracy's coworkers and supervisors made sexually abusive comments, berating and belittling her, and threatening her with physical harm. When she reported the abuse to Halliburton, Tracy was retaliated against.
In June of 2005, after intimidating her with stories about women who had been raped and left to die, Ali Mokhtare, a state department employee who worked closely with the Halliburton employees, attempted to rape Tracy. She was able to escape his attack, but not before Mokhtare had sexually assaulted her. Tracy reported the incident to her direct supervisor, who responded by offering to protect her in exchange for sexual favors. He persisted in his advances, and one evening, he entered her living quarters on a false pretense and sexually assaulted her.
Tracy Barker is not alone in having suffered sexual violence at the hands of her coworkers at Halliburton. The story of Jamie Leigh Jones, now widely known, parallels Tracy Barker's story. Before Jones left for Iraq, she was told that she would be living in a trailer with one other woman, but when she arrived in Baghdad, she discovered that she was stationed in a predominantly male barracks, where she reports that she never saw another woman. Like Tracy Barker, she was the object of belittling remarks and sexual advances from the men in her barracks, but when she requested to be moved to the living quarters that were promised her, her request was denied. On her fourth day in Iraq, Jamie Leigh Jones was drugged and gang-raped by five to six men.
Over two and a half years have passed since Tracy Barker and Jamie Leigh Jones were assaulted. Ali Mokhtare, who admitted to having assaulted Tracy Barker, is still working for the state department and has faced no disciplinary action. The men who raped Jamie Leigh Jones have not been brought to justice, and neither has Halliburton.
Because Tracy and Jamie signed an employment contract requiring binding mandatory arbitration, they may never have their rights vindicated in open court. The clause at issue in Halliburton's employment contract has prevented both Barker and Jones from suing for discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in a civil court.
According to Tort Deform, the problem with mandatory arbitration extends far and wide:
"Most Americans do not know it, but, on a regular basis, they inadvertently sign away their right to go to a public court and have a trial by jury. Often found nestled in a small section of a contract for things like a credit card or a form for a patient about to undergo surgery, arbitration agreements have a large impact on a person's ability to exercise his or her legal rights."
Judge Gray Miller, the judge who threw out Tracy's case, recognized, without irony that "sadly, sexual harassment, up to and including sexual assault, is a reality in today's workplace." Yet, he determined that she had agreed to arbitration when she signed her employment contract and, because of recent decisions by the Supreme Court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, that he had to uphold the arbitration clause rather than letting the case go forward in court. He placed the burden on Congress to address the problem, stating "The Supreme Court has held that statutory claims may be arbitrable as long as Congress has expressed no intent to the contrary."
Judge Miller was right about one thing. Congress will need to step in and fix this mess, because the courthouse doors are closing fast. There are some in D.C. who are starting to take notice. Two pieces of legislation, the Arbitration Fairness Act and the Civil Rights Act of 2008 would return many of the protections that Tracy, Jamie and the rest of us never should have lost.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

I don't trust this justice department to give parking tickets without some evil hidden agenda.
I think it should be flat-out illegal to sue the government. I don't know what happened to this lady 'cause I wasn't there, but I do know this: There's a lot of money balled up in all of that stuff, and people will do anything to get a slice of it, including making up stories.
People play headgames on the jobsite, learn how to start little fights, you have to experience it I think to really understand it, but suffice it to say it was no accident with Helen of Troy, women are truly the more lethal and sinister of the species...think Lucrezia Borgia...they should check her story out, see if she's got some kind of psychology background etc. We had a guy come to work at my shop and he angled for the racism claim. I typed up my 2 weeks' notice, and it stopped him cold. Games people play...
With all due respect I think your headline is compleatly mis-leading. The judge's decision had nothing to do with him being appointed by Bush. As you say in the body of your post it was due to the Supreme court cases.
Moreover if you go through the history of Supreme Court cases regarding arbitration, you will see that most of the cases were done way before Bush became presedent. The first change in the interpretation of the law was done in 1991 in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp case. the more recent case was in 2001 in Circuit City Stores v. Adams. Please notice that all these cases were decided before 2 Roberts and Alito was on the court. I am sure the lawyers can do better job than me listing all the cases...
Therefore, while I agree with you that companies abuse the employment contracts to force peole in arbitration, you can not put a blame for that on Bush.
How can it be even legal for any company to require all its employees to waive their legal rights as a term of
employment? Could your employee require an employee to submit a workers comp claim to a company picked arbitrator? Could an employer require an employee to submit to a company picked arbitrator for injuries sustained by a company's safety violation? This is bullshit.
It is indeed a sad commentary, however, she did still have access to some relief; arbitration, etc. for her claim of rape, assault while on the job.
That still remains a much better option than approximately 3.2 million American civilians who if they are similarly raped, assaulted or worse on the job, are directly barred by federal law from any right to review of their claim by any Court or official in the United States. Title 5. USC sec. 8128.
In the past month alone on two separate claims the United States denied injury benefits to two American employees based on medical reports paid for by the US. In the first claim, The government doctor was paid by the United States taxpayer for his examination and for his report. The government doctor, not surprisingly, found that after his one time exam, the claimant's government benefits should be ended. Upon my review of this government doctor I found this government doctor has multiple federal indictments against him by the very same US government who hired him, for:
Mail Fraud
Making False Claims Against the United States
Making False Statements Relating to Health Care Matters
and Health Care Fraud.
This was not disclosed to the employee prior to or even after his examination. Apparently, despite multiple indictments for fraud against the United States, the doctor currently remains fully licensed in Texas and on the government payroll.
In the second claim the US ordered another injured American worker to be examined by a US doctor. Once again the US used their "for hire" doctor to terminate the worker's much injury claim. Once again, no disclosure was made to the claimant by the government or the doctor, that the doctor was actually on five years probation with restricted medical and surgical practice limitations in Florida and Colorado. As far as can be seen this doctor also remains on the government payroll and practicing medicine in Colorado.
By federal law, neither of these claimant nor their families have any right of any Court review of their claims, let alone a right to arbitration.
I have been following this story -- and too many similar -- for a while.
My disgust is only abated by going to Jamie Leigh's foundation's website, and making a donation. They take PayPal.
http://www.jamiesfoundation.org/donate.htm#
The only people who think these ladies are not entitled to their day in court are republicans and morons. Makes you wonder how any woman could belong to a party that treats them as objects and second class citizens..but then again no one said Coulter or Ingram had any brains. Must be the same excuse all gop women use...."I'm too stupid to think for myself, thats why I let these fat overweight white guys tell me what to think".......
Thanks for commenting on these two cases, and the most recent developments in the Barker case.
Even a certain feminist blog conflates the two most prominent cases against Halliburton/KBR.
Jamie Leigh Jones is testifying today before congress in support of "Jamie's Law" which is a law to compel overseas contractors to disclose statistics on sexual assault and rape to incoming employees, in the same way college campuses are required to today (for essentially the same reasons).
Having recently worked for some ex-Halliburton people here in Austin, I can say without qualification that their corporate culture is that of the most filthy disgusting sex-obsessed misogynistic pigs on the face of the planet. They just can't keep their hands to themselves.
I wonder if these women defended themselves by shooting off their attackers' balls - would the men have the same trouble with a lawsuit? I tell you I'd never put my loaded weapon down around those thugs and criminals!
This is the sort of case that promotes contempt for the rule of law and tempts some to create their own justice, not a bright prospect for those who are fans of democracy.
I have long said that impeachment is the only way for us to save the soul of our country.
I hate what we have become!
John Edwards for Attorney General!!
With the Bush administration, the hits against the rule of law just keep coming. Have we ever suffered an administration this lawless?
Allegedly assualted.
"Ali Mokhtare, who admitted to having assaulted Tracy Barker, is still working for the state department and has faced no disciplinary action."
So Mokhtare admitted it. Alleged has nothing to do with it in his case. Also, the gang rape would leave physical evidence, so the question is not "was she raped," but "who were the fucktards who did it and when are they going to be sent to jail for it." The suspects are the alleged attackers. The event is not alleged. It is confirmed.
I hate to be so cynical, but you are naive if you think the courts were "designed to protect the minority from the majority." Smart lawyers can use them for that purpose when the stars are properly aligned, and that does happen sometimes. More often, courts are the province of extreme wealth (whether individuals or corporations).
I am also curious where your data regarding workplace-related ADR (Alternate Dispute Resolution) comes from. I'm not suggesting it is wrong, I am just curious about the source.
God help us all. The private murdering mercenaries of the rethugs Prince, go scott free, while a soldier, probably ordered to kill, gets 10 years.
Is there any way she can bring personal suits against these people in a private case? These people should not get off without punishment. It is not surprising that the Bush Buddies go free. Thats just the way it is. In fact, I am surprised they don't profit in some way from this while they are at it.
This is a private case that is being discussed.
The State Dept and Dept of Justice declined to bring any charges against the individuals who may have sexually assaulted anyone because they claim not to have jurisdiction over occurrances in Iraq. This, of course, is utter (republican) nonsense. The women assaulted have sought help from their congressmen (republicans, actually) who are trying to help but nothing will happen while Bush is in office.
I feel sick to my stomach reading this. Stay strong, sisters, and keep fighting to get your stories out.
The rule of law is no longer applicable in the United States. When a DOJ memo can serve as a springboard for torture and war, justice has been discarded. What we have now in this country is feudalism. The Lords and Ladies have their own personal justice system. We, the people, have none. Until the reveloution happens, there is little we can do but keep our heads down and our powder dry. The day is coming. Sooner than some thought.
This case should be appealed and appealed ... if not only in the court system but also in charges filed against Haliburton.
Yes, you have to fight against a monster no matter how large. And you have to keep fighting and keep fighting.
"Rape is a crime." Got that? No "arbitration agreement" excuses an intentional tort, let alone a Felony. Any judge that claims not to understand this elementary legal principle has been 'bought.'
"I'm sorry, it's not murder. You see, they signed an arbitration agreement. And since the deceased cannot appear in court, the case cannot be arbitrated therefore it also cannot go forward in court." Does that sound reasonable to you? All I did was change one little four-letter word into a little six-letter word...
This is absolutely horrible. Congress must act to fix this as soon as possible, and act to put reasonable legal restraints on corporations who are parties to government contracts in the war theatre.
It is indeed a sad commentary, however, she did have access to some relief for her claim of rape, assault while on the job.
That still remains a much better option than approximately 3.2 million Americans who presently, if they are similarly raped, assaulted or worse on the job, are directly barred by federal law from any right to review of their claims by any Court or official in the United States. Title 5. USC sec. 8128.
For example: in the past month alone the United States denied compensation and review to two injured American employees based on medical reports paid for by the US. In the first claim, The government doctor was paid by the US for his examination and for his report. The government doctor found that after his one time exam, the claimant's injury benefits should be ended. Upon my review of this government doctor this government doctor has multiple federal indictments against him by the very same US government who hired him, for:
Mail Fraud
Making False Claims Against the United States
Making False Statements Relating to Health Care Matters
and Health Care Fraud.
Apparently, despite multiple indictments for fraud against the United States, the doctor currently remains fully licensed in Texas and on the government payroll.
In the second claim the government ordered another injured American civilian to be examined by a government doctors. Once again the government used their "for hire" doctor to terminate the claimant's injury benefits. No disclosure was made to the claimant by the government or the doctor, that the doctor was actually on five years probation with restricted medical and surgical practice limitations in Florida and Colorado. As far as can be seen this doctor also remains on the government payroll and practicing medicine in Colorado.
By federal law, neither of these claimants nor their families have any right of any Court review of the denial of their claims, let alone a minimal right to arbitration.
On Tuesday night's "Colbert Report," Stephen Colbert had fun with...
From the AP: Democrat John Edwards endorsed former rival Barack Obama on Wednesday, a...
*** UPDATED BELOW *** President Bush has said repeatedly that he would not insert himself into the...
Utterly insane goings-on tonight on...
It's a pretty well known fact that most women - attractive women -...
Just off the House floor today, the Crypt overheard House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers tell two...
Tonight, Keith Olbermann unleashed what may well have been his...
The AP reports on Obama's swift and forceful response to Bush and McCain's criticism of...
The Tennessee GOP hasn't yet had their fill of Obama dirty tricks. A few months ago,...
The Democratic Party has finally decided who's going to break it to Hillary that it's time...
Sixteen tips for getting good sleep. There's a lot of advice out there about getting good...
Posted February 12, 2008 | 11:16 AM (EST)