This election we have seen a lot of charades. In Maine, the national GOP party has bankrolled nearly $1 million in ads allegedly supporting me. And its candidate believes man-made climate change is a myth and says that nuclear energy is the best source for our future power and electricity needs.
But wait, there's more: On the 50th anniversary of Rachel Carson's 'Silent Spring,' a coveted environmental group has endorsed the unenrolled candidate, who thinks hydrofracking is probably safe and who won't make a firm decision on the destructive Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. He also won't support the feasibility study of a 'gift' of a national park land in northern Maine at a time when preserved common space can support a green economy and jobs.
It's not Godzilla hitting Maine. But we are surely down the rabbit hole.
I am very disheartened by the environmental organization's inexplicable decision. Despite its error, and despite the gender bias that so many national special interests have regarding this race, I promise Maine voters to remain true to who I am.
In the final analysis, I don't need environmental endorsements to verify that I am an environmentalist. I always have been.
I don't need D.C. insiders to validate my progressive, Democratic Party beliefs and credentials. I live them every day.
I don't need proof that the GOP national party has declared a war on women. I see the impact of their assaults on women every day.
I don't need to take a poll about the lives of everyday Maine people because I am one of those people. I live that life with my husband and two children. And I see you, my fellow Mainers, in the grocery stores, at the pharmacy, at our children's schools, at the town recycling area, at soccer games.
So trust me when I tell you: In this election I face great odds as a woman representing a new generation of leadership.
A few people in Maine have quietly counseled me to consider dropping out of this race because winning is such a long shot.
I know the odds are great. Just as great as imagining that a supporter of hydrofracking would win an environmental endorsement. Or that a member of the One Percent Club would convince voters he is middle class. Or that a GOP candidate in 2012 would still say that man-made climate change is fiction.
Yes, the odds against me winning are about as great as a front-runner in a U.S. Senate campaign telling voters: 'I don't know where I stand. I'll see when I get to Washington, D.C. Elect me first, then I'll tell you.'
So maybe the odds against my candidacy aren't that high after all.
I will always tell Maine voters where I stand -- before I am rewarded with their trust and with their votes.
I will always tell special interests where I stand -- before their potentially environmentally hazardous projects are built.
I will always be protective of Maine's future and will do the very best job to protect its wilderness areas -- even if that means studying an idea.
And I will always be a values-based, principled Democrat and Progressive, fighting for the Maine voters who supported me in the June primary and who continue to have my back.
Imagine the odds of that in a 2012 U.S. Senate race.
How will Donald Trump’s first 100 days impact YOU? Subscribe, choose the community that you most identify with or want to learn more about and we’ll send you the news that matters most once a week throughout Trump’s first 100 days in office. Learn more