EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Cynthia Gordy

Cynthia Gordy

Posted: November 30, 2009 01:23 PM

Senator Roland Burris "Not Playing Games" On The Public Option

What's Your Reaction:

As the Senate gears up for floor debate on its health care reform bill, Illinois Senator Roland Burris says he's through making concessions. "I've already compromised because, you see, I was for a single payer system," he says plainly from his Capitol Hill office. Now he insists that he will vote against any final plan without a government-run health insurance program.

The Senate's health care reform bill presently includes the public option touted by President Obama, albeit with an opt-out provision for states, but with zero Republican support for the idea and several Democrats opposed to it...its future in the final version is shaky at best. Yet Burris is holding firm. The Chicago politician, who has been shrouded in suspicion since being appointed last December by disgraced Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich -- and recently cleared of legal wrongdoing by the Senate Ethics Committee -- may have some leverage, as Democrats need every vote they can get. I talked with Burris recently about why his vote can't be taken for granted.

ESSENCE.com: What are your thoughts on the Senate health care bill?
ROLAND BURRIS: It's not a perfect bill, but it has a lot of good parts to it. It certainly carries a public option, but I'm not happy with the opt-out provision. When it's debated on the floor, I certainly would like to improve it. If we can't improve that, since the bill has so many other favorable parts to it, then we'll go along with that. But if for some reason, the public option is amended out then it would not get my vote.

Since you're not running for re-election next year, you're seen as having nothing to lose. Without election considerations, your stand could be viewed as political posturing.
This is about my commitment to being a senator; I'm not playing games. I'm not trying to be an obstructionist. I'm doing this because of what my constituents have put forth to me and what I've heard, not only in Illinois, but from across the country. I get phone calls, or I'll be on an airplane, and people say to me, "Senator Burris, stay strong on your position on the public option."

So, the Democrats have this 60-vote majority in the Senate...
It's a curse and a pleasure. Meaning, if you don't come together you can't do anything with it. But you've got it, so you're supposed to make it work.

Are you frustrated that you haven't been able to come together and push through the bill that you want?
I'm not frustrated. I'm sure my colleagues and I will work out a compromise that is in the interest of the people of America. And that's what we're going to work on.

 

Follow Cynthia Gordy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/essenceonline

 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:36 PM on 12/09/2009
Roland Burris is so tainted that even lobbyists won't buy him. Ironically that makes him one of the best senators. There has to be a lesson in there somewhwere­.
photo
metogamekun
What's all this nonsense then?
04:01 PM on 01/11/2010
You took the words right out of my fingertips­. Very perceptive­.
photo
metogamekun
What's all this nonsense then?
04:02 PM on 01/11/2010
It also helps that he isn't trying to get re-elected­. Something to be said for that, too.
05:52 PM on 12/06/2009
Its truly ironic how Reid wont allow Burris, the only democrat willing to stand up for the public option, to run aggain, while doing nothing about joe liberman, blanche lincoln, landreau, and nelson, the four senators who pledged to filibuster if it still has a public option. The problem with the democrats is not their ideas, ITS THEIR LEADERS. Obama and Reid have done a great job of ruining the party, and unless we start supporting other candidates for president in 2012 and 2010, the democrats will lose all power soon. We are taking responsibi­lity for bad bill due to their compromise­s. Imagine the GOP screaming about what a failure heathcare reform was, after premiums continue to rise due to the lack of a public option. Imagine after we just spent a trillion dollars with an already 11 trillian dollar debt, and didnt get anything out of it. Government will be viewed as the problem, and thus result in another generation lost to the GOP. Support Another candidate now for 2012, and support a different majority leader for senate. We Have very little margin of error now. These are really serious times, and i mean serious. Technology is growing at a rate we cant control, global warming is threatenin­g to end the world in 60 years, our economy is threatenin­g to colllapse our country, and great wars cant happen in an age of nuclear weapons. Lets finally stand up and fight back.
02:51 AM on 12/01/2009
Obama ,Harry , and Nancy, has destroyed the Democratic Party!
12:44 AM on 12/01/2009
If states are allowed to opt-out of a public option, then the federal government should provide relocation subsidies to individual­s who want to be in the public option but find themselves living in a state which has opted out. If a state opts out and then experience­s a mass exodus of citizens, it would serve them right.

Alternativ­ely, why not move the opt-out option from the state level to the individual level. Then an individual who does not want to be in the public option could opt-out of it. After all, that is why it is called an OPTION!!!

Finally, this whole idea of fining and possibly jailing someone for not having health insurance is just plain stupid. Instead, take anyone who doesn't have health insurance and automatica­lly enroll them in the public option and send them a bill for the premiums. Fining them without enrolling them just ensures that they will have less money and still not be insured.
11:43 AM on 12/03/2009
I absolutely agree. Individual­s are perfectly free NEVER to enroll in the public option if it is so horrifying to them. It is just one OPTIONAL plan from among the many private plans which will be available on the exchange. So why does any state feel the need to step in and grab that choice away from anyone? Red states ought to by definition have just about zero enrollment­, right? But no, let's be a good "Red State" and make sure we PROHIBIT people from enrolling. WTF.
12:09 AM on 12/01/2009
Before they indict him for lying under oath...Bla­go's guy !
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ECBA88
11:11 PM on 11/30/2009
This is the argument for term limits in the Senate... Burris hasn't had time to be bought off and doesn't have anyone but himself and his constituen­ts to satisfy with his position, and it's giving him the balls to do what people really want.
10:40 PM on 11/30/2009
I agree we compromise­d to the hilt. No strong public option no bill ... try again next year Obama this time do it right. Senator Sanders will surely join you Senator Burris. You have my respect
11:11 AM on 11/30/2009
Stay strong Sen. Burris! The American people do not want to be forced to buy the private insurance product. They do not want a new 40% tax on employer benefits. If there is no public option there should be no bill.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mltmama
10:38 PM on 11/30/2009
I absolutely agree!